A driver will have more time and space to explore their options by looking 20 to 30 seconds in advance, locating objects that might necessitate a shift in speed or direction 12 to 15 seconds in advance, and considering alternative routes 8 to 12 seconds in advance.
Why is it necessary for a driver to quickly process visual information?The driver has more time to spot potential issues if they look as close as possible and speed up to the visual field.
How much space do you see in front of you as you drive?In all environments, it is recommended to scan ahead 12-15 seconds, 1-112 blocks in urban environments, and 14 mile in highway environments. Before and after changing lanes, check mirrors and blind spots every three to five seconds.
Learn more about speed & direction here:
https://brainly.com/question/137081
#SPJ4
Discuss the consequences of court organization in approximately
The consequences of court organization in approximately clear terms are fair hearings and fair judgements. The court organization provides room for an individual to get his voice or case heard at different court for example appeal court or appellate court if not satisfied with the previous judgement.
What are the court organization?There are different court organizations and there are different perspectives for classifying courts. Basically, differences must be established between criminal and civil courts, courts of general jurisdiction and that of limited jurisdiction, and so also appellate and trial courts. There are also constitutional, federal, and transnational courts.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about court organization: https://brainly.com/question/25682397
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Discuss the consequences of court organization in approximately clear terms.
In this lesson, you learned about the possibility of confidential informants receiving authorization from the law enforcement agencies they are working with to continue engaging in criminal activities while serving as informants. On one hand, they are committing crimes, which is against the law. On the other hand, they are providing invaluable information law enforcement agencies would not be able to obtain otherwise. Discuss the ethics of allowing confidential informants to commit crimes. Should they be allowed to do so? Why or why not? Make sure to address what would happen if confidential informants were not allowed to commit crimes. A good suggestion is to think about everything you've learned so far in this lesson, then decide which side you would support: should informants be allowed to commit crimes or not? Write a brief post with your reasoning as to why you believe so. Then, read the posts of your peers and see if you can contribute to the discussion by responding to their posts with points they might not have considered or questions to help understand their points.
The ethics of allowing confidential informants to commit crimes is that
Confidential informants, who are insiders in the drug trade and have the ability to visit locations and communicate with persons that the police are unable to, are frequently used in narcotics investigations to direct investigators to their primary targets. Informants are typically involved in illicit operations since they work inside a system of unlawful enterprises.
I believe that should informants be allowed to commit some crimes because if they do not, they may be found as informant and be killed.
What is the issue of confidential informants about?Many law enforcement investigations depend on confidential informants, but they are especially important for drug investigations. Informants have access to detailed information that is indispensable from other sources.
But since informants frequently have criminal backgrounds, if they are not handled carefully, they can undermine the effectiveness of a law enforcement investigation, damage the reputation of the agency, and even put officers' lives in danger. Agencies must create formal and reliable procedures in order to successfully use confidential informants.
The courts effectively have no control over the way that the police use informants. Three Supreme Court rulings from the 1960s—Hoffa v. United States, Lewis v. United States, and Osborn v. United States—made it obvious that police might utilize informants quite freely. The top court said that using informant testimony does not violate either the Fifth Amendment's ban on self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on excessive searches and seizures.
Therefore, law enforcement frequently makes use of confidential informant, or CI, testimony. The approach does, however, pose a significant danger that the CI will provide false testimony. CIs are frequently enticed to volunteer information that authorities deem valuable (by the prospect of a plea bargain or no arrest for their own alleged offenses).
Learn more about informants from
https://brainly.com/question/14244373
#SPJ1
when the news organization disagrees with the journalist's decision to withhold confidential information when served with a subpoena, it is in the interest of the journalist to hire his own attorney.
Writers depend on source security to assemble and uncover data in the public interest from private sources. In order to avoid physical, financial, or professional retaliation in response to their revelations, such sources may require anonymity.
What kind of conduct is against journalistic ethics in terms of accuracy?
moral codes consistently restrict separation of various types and in all structures: "People should not be treated differently by journalists because of their race, gender, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, physical disability, appearance, or social status.
Is a journalist subject to a subpoena?
The Supreme Court decided in 1972 that a journalist could not refuse to testify when they had witnessed criminal activity. The Court likewise since held that a columnist who neglects to consent to a summon can be censured of court and fined or even shipped off prison.
Learn more about journalist here:
https://brainly.com/question/25945566
#SPJ4
Creditors hold judgments on overdue debts against Expert Auto Repair when the debtor receives a discharge in bankruptcy. The discharge will
When a person files for bankruptcy and gets a discharge, creditors still have judgments against them for past-due bills against Expert Auto Repair. Any creditor's judgment on a discharged debt will be void after discharge.
Write a brief note on debts.A debt is an agreement to compensate the creditor with money or another agreed-upon value. Payments for debt are delayed or made in installments, unlike those for an immediate purchase. The debt may be owed by a local government, a business, an individual, or a sovereign state or country. Commercial debt frequently is governed by contractual clauses that specify the amount and timing of principal and interest payments. Mortgages, bonds, notes, and loans are all examples of debt. In financial accounting, debt is a type of financial transaction as opposed to equity.
The phrase can also be interpreted metaphorically to allude to moral obligations and other interactions that don't include a financial exchange.
To know more about, debts, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/19593003
#SPJ4
One of the main ways interest groups participate in supreme court cases is by ________.
what limits the presidentâs power to make treaties with other countries?
The President's ability to negotiate treaties is constrained since a treaty cannot become enforceable without the approval of two-thirds of the Senate. Treaties are legally binding agreements that are incorporated into international law.
What are the President's foreign policy powers?The Senate's advise and consent are required for all appointments made by the president, who also serves as commander in chief and has the authority to name ambassadors. The President's Foreign Policy is formulated and carried out by the State Department.
The President has the authority to negotiate and sign treaties, which are then ratified by the Senate. The Executive Branch also engages in diplomacy with other countries. Executive orders are documents that the president can issue to direct executive offices or to explain and advance current laws. He has the authority to sign treaties and executive agreements, designate ambassadors, and welcome them.
To learn more about treaties, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11107584
#SPJ4
8. Which of the following best characterizes contemporary parties in America ?
9. What is the most common challenges that people face in allocating public goods?
Answer:
8. is the 3rd one
9. is monopoly
Explanation:
Identify at least two advantages and disadvantages of using reverse sting to deter crime
Reverse string can be used as a crime detection tool to help identify what is being presented. Depending on the object, the reverse string can also help convey an object's features.
Reverse string is the process of changing the order of a given string so that the final character becomes the first character, and so on. Additionally, by flipping the original string upside down, we may check the given string's palindrome.
Let's utilize the reverse technique to, for instance, input the string "APPLE". The string "ELPPA," which is an exact mirror of the original string, is the result of the reverse string.
The different approaches to reverse string in the C programming language are as follows:
The strrev() method can be used to reverse string.
Unuse the library method to reverse string instead
Recursion function used to reverse string
Utilize a for loop to reverse string.
while loop to reverse string
Using pointers, reverse string
To check for a palindrome, reverse a string.
The drawbacks of utilizing reverse string for crime detection include the potential for deception and the requirement that reverse string function well with other senses in order to provide 100% accuracy.
To learn more about reverse string from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/23684565
#SPJ1