A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here is a false statement.
What is a business ?A business can be defined as an organization that carries out transactions like sending a commodity or rendering service and for that they are being paid some money.
A defendant who has few encounters with both the state is one who does not violate the principles of substantial fairness as well as fair play.
The minimum connections test is a careful balance that aims to strike a balance between the reasonableness of requiring a criminal to go to the territory of a country to argue against one complaint there and the sum of the accused's connections only with the host state.
Learn more about business , here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ1
You are assisting an attorney in the closing of a real estate sale transaction. You have in your possession a copy of the contract for the purchase and sale of the property.The contract contains the names of both the purchaser and the seller and a complete legal description of the property being bought and sold, and it has attached as an exhibit a survey of the property. You have been asked to order a title examination on behalf of your client. What information do you need to give to the title examiner?
The information that you would have to give to the title examiner would be the following:
The name of the present owner of this particular property.The description of this property is being sold.The surveys and deeds as well as all of the policies that affect this deed.What is a real estate transaction?This is the term that is used to refer to the type of transaction that would occur where the rights and the deeds of a house are transferred between two parties. The real estate agent is the one that stands as the middle man in this type of transaction and what is usually being transferred here is the ownership of the house from the seller to the buyer.
Before this is done, several things and checks have to be done on the property. This would include the name of the person that is interested in selling this particular unit to the buyer. The description of the property that is being sold has to be made as well. Also there has to be checks on all of the deeds of the house.
Read more on real estate here: https://brainly.com/question/1534216
#SPJ1
Mark is a famous syndicated radio personality for talkradio. He has a distinctive voice and manner of speaking. Moretalk hires gordon, who sounds nearly identical to mark, to host a competing show. Moretalk encourages gordon to imitate mark as closely as possible while on the air. Moretalk is most likely to be liable for.
Answer:
Moretalk is liable for voice phishing
Explain how debt is actually a product that is bought and sold.
Debt is bought and sold because you produce the debt and so different offers are available in and say if you be part of their company they're going to pay off your debt, however you only get yourself into a lot of and a lot of debt with the a lot of businesses you move into with.
Debt is something owed by one person to a different person. Debt will involve real estate, money, services, or different thought. In finance, debt is a lot of narrowly outlined as cash raised through the provision of bonds. And a loan may be a kind of debt however, a lot of specifically, is an agreement during which one party lends cash to a different party.
To learn more about Debt here
brainly.com/question/11033370
#SPJ1
Discuss organ of states and examples
Answer:
The term “organs of state” is used to refer to a range of institutions, including national and provincial government departments, municipalities and their business agencies. “That would be a time-consuming and an almost impossible task, even for an office as well-resourced as mine”, he said.
the federal court system has exclusive jurisdiction only over claims arising out of federal statutes. group startstrue or falsetrue, unselectedfalse, unselected
False. Admiralty proceedings, bankruptcy-cases, federal criminal prosecutions, lawsuits in which one state-sues another state, claims against the United States, and cases involving patents, trademarks, and copyright fall under the exclusive authority of the federal court-system.
Briefing:-Additionally, issues arising under federal acts that designate exclusive federal-jurisdiction are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts.
What matters are under the exclusive purview of federal courts?International trade, government contracts, patents, trademarks, some financial-claims against the United States government, federal employees, and veterans' benefits are just a few of the many diverse subject-areas that fall under the exclusive national jurisdiction of the United-States Court of Appeals for the Federal-Circuit.
What sectors are under the sole jurisdiction of the federal government?When a state transfers or cedes to the federal government all of its authority to create and enforce its civil and criminal-laws over and on federal territory, the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction.
To Know more about bankruptcy-cases,
https://brainly.com/question/10424841
#SPJ13
b.
trauma
6. dysfunction
d. dependency
When children become separated from the mainstream of society or from their
peer group, this is MOST specifically termed
Alienation is the process by which children become separated from the mainstream of society or from their peer group.
The correct option is C.
Describe a peer group:The people you know that are the same age as you or who belong to the same socioeconomic class as you make up your peer group. A manager must be able to rely on his peer group's support.
Why are peer groups important?Children can develop a variety of important social emotional skills, such as empathy, collaboration, and problem-solving techniques, in the context of peer interactions. Bullying, rejection, and deviant peer behaviours are just a few examples of how peer connections have a negative impact on a child's social and emotional development.
To know more about Peer groups visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13164490
#SPJ13
The complete question is -
____ is the process by which children become separated from the mainstream of society or from their peer group
A. Dependency
B. Maladjustment
C. Aggression
D. Alienation
leadership in the house of representatives introduction: drag the responsibility to the correct job title.
The responsibility and the job title that is done in the house of representative are listed below:
Speaker of the House: controls the agenda, leads the caucusFloor Leader: helps the party agree, speaks for the partyWhip : organizes votes, assists the floor leaderWhat is the house of representative?This is the name of the second and the lower house of the legislative in the democratic type of bicameral governments.
They help to carry out several functions in the house. There are several ways that the house is organized with the people that have to take care of the proceedings.
There is the speaker, the whip and the floor leader
Read more on the house of representative here:
https://brainly.com/question/13288238
#SPJ1
Complete question
Drag the responsibility to the correct job title.
assists the floor leader
Speaker of the House
Floor Leader
Whip
organizes votes
speaks for the party
helps the party agree
leads the caucus
controls the agenda
Done
Emilia is attending a forensic science conference. She is looking for a session that discusses taphonomy. Which session title MOST likely covers this topic?
OA. The Victim's Remains: From Death to Discovery
B. Forensic Autopsy. The Newest Technology
C. Determining Time of Death: Beyond Rigor Mortis
D. Skeletal Clues: Baby Teeth and Pelvic Bones
The original right to confront witnesses was established by
which landmark case?
Answer:
Brookhart v. Janis 384 U.S. 1 (1966)
Explanation:
As someone who works with classified information, what should you do if you are contacted by a foreign national seeking information on a research project?.
All non-professional or irregular connections with foreign nationals, including communication through social media, must be reported to the Security POC if you are a person who works with classified information and a foreign national contacts you for information on a research project. linking to websites is just one example.
It would be reasonable to anticipate that the unauthorized revelation of confidential information would jeopardize national security. It would be reasonable to anticipate that the unauthorized release of confidential information would seriously compromise national security.
A person may only be given access to classified information if the information's owner can prove that the individual has a legitimate "need to know" and that having access is necessary for carrying out official government tasks.
Sending confidential information to or from DHS. Keep sensitive PII in a separate report, password-protect it, or encrypt it before emailing it outside of DHS. Send the encrypted document to the recipient as an email attachment and provide the password through phone or separate email.
Learn more about confidential information
https://brainly.com/question/15869788
#SPJ4
Question 5
5. Which of the following was established by Article I of the United States
Constitution?
O It established that Congress should consist of the Senate and the House of Representatives
O It established that Congress has full and exclusive legislative capacity.
All of the choices are correct.
20 pts
Oit established Congress,
Answer:
O all the choices are correct.
Explanation:
The supremacy of the people through their elected representatives is recognized in Article I, which creates a Congress consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives. The positioning of Congress at the beginning of the Constitution affirms its status as the “First Branch” of the federal government.
_________________Connor filled his 63 gallon pool with water in 6 hours how many gallons per hour did he fill
Answer:
Your answer will be 10.5 gallons an hour.
Explanation:
I find it odd how this is a law-related question but oh well lol.
Anyways,
the pool is 63 gallons, right? and you filled it up for a total of 6 hours.
All you need to do is divide 63/6 and you would get your answer: 10.5.
max and jones are neighbors who are not on speaking terms. max owns a couple of apple trees that are near the fence he shares with jones. max accesses jones' garden to collect the apples from the branches on the other side of the fence without jones' permission. in this scenario, max can be sued for committing the tort of . multiple choice question. assaulting negligence battery trespassing
In this scenario, max can be sued for committing the tort of trespassing
What is meant by trespassing?Trespassing is the intentional invasion of another person's privacy or property interests by entering their land or property without their consent. Trespass, which falls under the umbrella of tort law, can be broadly categorized into three categories: trespass to person, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. Threats, assault, battery, injury, mayhem, and false imprisonment were the six independent offenses that previously made up trespass to the person. Trespassing is described as entering someone else's property or crossing a social line. Trespassing is anything like crossing private property lines to go hunting. Give a hug to someone who doesn't like other people touching them, for instance, and that is trespassing. the breaking of a moral or social rule, code, or obligation.
Hence, in this scenario, max can be sued for committing the tort of trespassing,
To learn more about trespassing refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/16735389
#SPJ4
There are nine goals that a perpetrator may seek in a courthouse security breach. which is the most serious or impactful? Which is the least serious and impactful?
Abusing power and control.
Explanation:
Explain the significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case in regards to its’ impact on current law enforcement protocol.
The significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case with the impact on law enforcement protocol is that it helped to establish the protocol that would be used in securing a crime scene so as not to have it contaminated by other people.
What was the Jon Bennet Ramsey case?This was the homicide case of the lady named JonBennet that had been killed in what the law enforcement agents ruled as homicide. The cause of death that she had was from the fact that she was strangled and suffered from asphyxiation due to the act.
The issue that resulted was that her father contaminated the scene of the crime when he went to get hold of the victims body thereby making it difficult to get the suspect that committed the murder.
The major lesson that was learnt from this was the need to always secure the crime scene first and block people from having the entrance to such areas.
Read more on law enforcement protocol here: https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ1
Why do third parties usually not last very long in
the American two-party system?
is it possible for a plaintiff who has not filed a libel suit within the statute of limitations in their home state to file an action in another state that has a longer statute of limitations? quizlet
Yes, it is conceivable for a plaintiff to file a lawsuit in a jurisdiction with a lengthier statute of limitations if they have not yet filed a libel suit inside the limitations period in their home state.
In contrast to the defendant, who is the subject of a lawsuit, the plaintiff is the party who initiates or is named in one. In civil and equity law, as well as admiralty, the term is equivalent lengthier statute to petitioner and libelant, respectively. The equity petitioner is typically included as well, especially in places where law and equity are combined.
The legal fiction of adoption was used in ancient Rome to make up for the plaintiff absence of male heirs, which lengthier statute was a need for every household. In England, the Court of Queen's (or King's) Bench, a criminal court, might help ease the load when civil courts were overloaded by feigning that the defendant in a straightforward civil dispute had been detained and was in custody.
Learn more about plaintiff here
https://brainly.com/question/6708758
#SPJ4
According to Captain Cochran, what is the ultimate goal of the investigation?
O To find physical evidence
O To make an arrest
O To get a conviction
O To arrive at the truth
The ultimate objective of the investigation, according to Captain Cochran, is to locate tangible evidence.
What is the main purpose of investigation?
Establishing pertinent facts to support or refute allegations of fraud and corruption is the goal of an investigation. It is a legally mandated fact-finding process that is carried out in an objective, impartial manner with the goal of establishing the pertinent facts and making recommendations in this regard.
In the context of law enforcement, an interrogation is when a representative of the organization questions suspects, victims, or witnesses in order to learn more about a crime. The resolution of the crime is the ultimate goal of an interrogation. A suspect may be questioned for a short while or for several hours.
According to Captain Cochran, finding physical evidence exists the highest purpose of the investigation.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) To find physical evidence.
To learn more about investigation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/25578076
#SPJ4
if the appellate court believes the lower court committed an error but does not know how that error affected the outcome of the case, it the case to the lower court for a new trial.
Answer:
Appellate courts that grant an appeal often remand the case back to the trial court. A case remand overrules the trial court's decision or a part of its ruling and provides instructions on how to correct the errors that it made. The lower court then has to reconsider the case in light of the appellate court's ruling
Explanation:
Felicia lives in a city where it is legal to turn right on a red light. She is visiting in a city where this is illegal, and she gets a ticket for turning right on a red light. Felicia has no defense to the ticket due to her ________.
Answer: Ignorance of the law is not an excuse
Explanation: Ignorance of the law is not an excuse, is a legal priciple holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because they were unaware.
Which of the following is NOT seen in the Preamble?
create a unified nation
create just and fair laws
protect the country
maintain peace among the citizens
grant life, liberty, and property
There is no mention of life, liberty, or property in the Preamble. Therefore, option E is correct.
The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States is a succinct introduction declaration of the essential aims and guiding principles of the US Constitution that starts with the words "We the People."
It has been acknowledged by courts as trustworthy proof of the Founding Fathers' intentions regarding the meaning of the Constitution and their goals for it.
The preamble to the Constitution was written with the intent of establishing the Constitution's enactment, separating it from the Articles of Confederation, and summarizing its main points.
A Pennsylvania delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which convened at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, the preamble was mostly drafted by founding father Gouverneur Morris.
Learn more about the preamble here:
https://brainly.com/question/30287427
#SPJ2
Who did Jeremy Bentham think deserved special consideration?
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Who was Jeremy Bentham What did he believe in?Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.
To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1085669
#SPJ4
In this chapter, we quoted a legal expert as saying, “In the adversary system the goal of the advocate is not to determine the truth but to win . . ..” Does this mean that prosecutors and defense attorneys should behave unethically in court? Why or why not? Give an example of rules that are in place to ensure that prosecutors and defense attorneys act ethically in court proceedings.
Give your thoughts on the politics and challenges of prison locations. More specifically, give your thoughts on state prisons being built in rural communities where they often times are run and operated by citizens of the rural community unfamiliar with the social challenges of inner city struggles, biases of the criminal justice system, and individuals living in the inner city. On the other hand, inner city communities welcome employment opportunities but staff hired from within the communities often struggle with supervising offenders with whom they have social bonds, blood relations, and commonalities (education system, housing, employment opportunities). Each mix of populations brings challenges to prison operations. Explain why.
My thoughts on the politics and challenges of prison locations is that the prison system is highly political and in regards to the challenges, it includes cases transportation issues of prisoners, security risk and lack of funding.
The mix of populations listed above brings challenges to prison operations because there are different kinds of personality and mindset involved and one cannot be able to change them at once.
What are the major issues facing prisons as well as jails today?Depression, anxiety disorders, as well as bipolar disorder are a few frequent diseases. According to recent data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than half of all inmates struggle with mental health difficulties.
Some biggest challenges facing prisons are:
Prison overcrowding. Lack of Funding.Staff safety/inmate violence.Lack of Advancements in technology use.Issue of Staff retention.If all this issues, are properly handled, the location will not be a problem
Learn more about prison from
https://brainly.com/question/28346529
#SPJ1
ILL GIVE YOU 10 POINTSS
Answer:
you take from me
ghdhdhdufufuufuf
Make a list of any four manpower related to the medical field.
Manpower in medical field includes geographic distributions, age and gender division. It also covers the need for and hiring of both professional and allied health staff, as well as their current and foreseeable supply, distribution, and assignment and use.
What is mean by Manpower?The strength or force of a human being, or the combined strength of a group of people, is what is meant by the term "manpower." The combined strength of five individuals on a work team is an illustration of manpower. the totality of all employees; the labor force.There are two different kinds of personnel: administrative manpower and technical manpower. By enhancing employees' knowledge, abilities, and capacities, manpower development is the process of modernizing the workforce to execute future tasks in a changing environment. The requirement for labor arises from the fact that organizations need human resources to complete specific task loads.Learn more about Manpower here:
https://brainly.com/question/23960324
#SPJ9
What we can conceive of in our minds as possible is __________ possibility.
Group of answer choices
logical
necessary
causal
sufficient
Answer: The correct answer is logical
Explanation: Logical possibility refers to a logical proposition that cannot be disproved, using the axioms and rules of a given system of our own logic.
. grant a full pardon to a person convicted of a felony. b. commute a death sentence to life imprisonment at hard labor. c. remit a fine to a person who has been assessed one. d. grant one 30-day stay of execution of a death sentence.
The correct option is c. The governor of Texas may grant 30 days stay of the execution in case of a death sentence.
The death penalty, sometimes known as the capital punishment, is a state-sanctioned procedure that involves killing a person as retribution for a crime. A death sentence is a judgment ordering that a criminal be punished in this way, and the act of carrying out that judgment is known as an execution. The phrase "on death row" refers to a prisoner who has recently been given a death sentence and is currently awaiting execution. The use of the death penalty is debatable in many nations and states, and opinions might differ even within one political philosophy or one cultural area. According to Amnesty International, the death sentence is against human rights.
In the case of a person facing a death sentence, the governor of Texas may independently
a. grant a full pardon to a person convicted of a felony.
b. remit a fine to a person who has been assessed one.
c. grant one 30-day stay of execution of a death sentence.
d. commute a death sentence to life imprisonment at hard labor.
Learn more about death sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/25182125
#SPJ4
can video be used to document a crime scene?
Answer:Video tapes of crime scenes are not often used in court, but they are valuable illustrations for explaining the scene to other investigators and are often used to refresh the memory of those who were involved in processing the crime scene. Video tapes are considered evidence.
Explanation:There are several methods of documentation: Notes, photography, sketches, and video are all important. Note taking is one of the most important parts of processing the crime scene.
Brian was steering his 18 wheeler down a steep hill in the outside lane of westbound 1-80. Gradually his speed built up to over 85 mph. On the right angled curve at the bottom of the hill, the truck’s speed carried it into the inside lane where it side swiped JJ’s car and forced it into a guard rail. JJ lost control and his car veered across both eastbound lanes and into a concrete barrier. Thanks to a seat belt, an airbag, JJ’s injuries were minor, but his car was demolished. Did brian violate civil law or criminal or both?
Both
Explanation:
It's both because I said so