Answer this math question for 15 points

The relative abundance of the (M+2) peak to the M peak for C10H6Br2 is approximately 0.0266%.

To calculate the relative abundance of the (M+2) peak to the M peak for C10H6Br2, we need to consider the natural abundance of carbon and bromine isotopes.

The formula for C10H6Br2 suggests that we have a total of 10 carbon atoms, 6 hydrogen atoms, and 2 bromine atoms. We'll consider the isotopic composition for carbon and bromine.

For carbon isotopes, the natural abundance of 12C is approximately 98.93%, and the natural abundance of 13C is approximately 1.07%.

For bromine isotopes, the natural abundance of 79Br is approximately 50.69%, and the natural abundance of 81Br is approximately 49.31%.

To calculate the relative abundance of the (M+2) peak to the M peak, we need to consider the isotopic contributions of each atom.

For carbon, we have 10 carbon atoms, so the probability of having a (M+2) peak due to one carbon atom is (1.07%)(98.93%)^9(1.07%) = 0.00106432.

For bromine, we have 2 bromine atoms, so the probability of having a (M+2) peak due to one bromine atom is (49.31%)(50.69%) = 0.25006439.

The overall relative abundance of the (M+2) peak to the M peak is the product of the individual probabilities:

Relative abundance = (0.00106432)(0.25006439) ≈ 0.0002662 or approximately 0.0266%.

Therefore, the relative abundance of the (M+2) peak to the M peak for C10H6Br2 is approximately 0.0266%.

Learn more about relative abundance here:

https://brainly.com/question/29989166

#SPJ11

Answer:

--------------------------

According to the Angles of Intersecting Chords Theorem, the angle between two chords is half the sum of the intercepted arc measures :

Substitute and solve for x:

The key elements of the graph are completed as below

                                                      a                                       b

Direction of Opening             Down                                      up

Vertex (x, y)                            (-3, 4)                                       (2, 1)

Is there a max or min?           max                                         min

What is the max or min?         4                                              1

Axis of symmetry                    x = -3                                     x = 2

X-intercepts                        (-4, 0) and (-1, 0)                       imaginary

Y-intercept                           (0, -5)                                         (0, 3)

The x-intercept of a parabola is the point(s) where the parabola intersects the x-axis. Geometrically  the x-intercepts are the points where the y coordinate of the parabola is equal to zero, this is also called the roots

In the case of b, the roots are imaginary and hence are not shown on the graph

Learn more about parabola at:  

https://brainly.com/question/29635857

#SPJ1

The percent change between the maximum population and the current population for this herd of caribou is -60%. This means that the current population is 60% lower than the maximum population due to habitat loss.

To determine the percent change between the maximum population and the current population for this herd of caribou, we need to use the formula for percent change, which is:
Percent Change = (New Value - Old Value) / Old Value x 100%

In this case, the old value is the maximum population size of 500,000, and the new value is the current population size of 198,000. So, we can plug these values into the formula:

Percent Change = (198,000 - 500,000) / 500,000 x 100%
When we simplify this equation, we get:
Percent Change = -302,000 / 500,000 x 100%

The negative sign indicates a decrease in population, which makes sense given that the current population is lower than the maximum population due to habitat loss. To find the actual percent change, we can divide -302,000 by 500,000 and then multiply by 100:

Percent Change = -0.604 x 100%
Rounding to the nearest whole number, we get:
Percent Change = -60%

To know more about herd of caribou visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17271808

#SPJ11

Answer: I would expect them to win 80 games!

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Multiply 0.4 by 200.

       200 · 0.4 = 80

The 90% confidence interval for the mean weekly time spent on homework for the population is (11.6, 12.6).

(a) Find the sample mean and sample standard deviation: The sample mean is calculated by summing up all the values and dividing by the sample size. In this case, the sum of the values is 201.9, so the sample mean is 201.9/16 = 12.61875 hours. The sample standard deviation can be found using the sample computational formula, which calculates the square root of the sum of squared differences between each value and the sample mean, divided by (n-1). After calculations, the sample standard deviation is approximately 1.9784. (b) Find the critical value using the t-distribution: Since the sample size is small (n = 16), we use the t-distribution to find the critical value. With a 90% confidence level, the alpha value is (1-0.90) / 2 = 0.05. Using the t-distribution table or calculator with 15 degrees of freedom (n-1), the critical value is approximately 1.7531. (c) Estimate the sample mean: The sample mean calculated in step (a) represents an estimate of the population mean. Using the formula for the confidence interval: sample mean ± (critical value * (sample standard deviation / sqrt(n))), we can substitute the values into the formula to calculate the confidence interval. In summary, the 90% confidence interval for the mean weekly time spent on homework for the population is calculated using the sample mean, sample standard deviation, critical value from the t-distribution, and the sample size.

To learn more about confidence interval here : brainly.com/question/13067956

#SPJ11

The equation that can be used is the exponential growth equation p = p0 * e^(kt), where p0 is the initial population, e is Euler's number, k is the growth rate constant, and t is the number of years after.

In this case, we need to solve for t when p = 3p0. The given formula for modeling population growth, p = p0 * e^(kt), is an exponential growth equation. In this equation, p0 represents the initial population, e is Euler's number (approximately 2.71828), k is the growth rate constant, and t is the number of years after.

To find the number of years after which the population triples, we need to solve for t when p = 3p0. Substituting 3p0 for p in the equation, we get 3p0 = p0 * e^(kt). By canceling out p0 on both sides, we have 3 = e^(kt). To solve for t, we take the natural logarithm of both sides to eliminate the exponential term. Applying the natural logarithm to both sides gives us ln(3) = ln(e^(kt)). Since the natural logarithm and exponential functions are inverse operations, the exponential term simplifies to kt. Therefore, t = ln(3) / k.

By substituting the specific growth rate constant value, we can determine the exact number of years after which the population will triple.

To learn more about population click here:

brainly.com/question/28390579

#SPJ11

If the taxi operated every day, the annual profit per taxicab license would be $8,030. The market price of a taxicab license, assuming a 10% interest rate and constant conditions, would be $220. The number of additional licenses needed to reduce the taxicab price per ride to $5 would depend on the demand and supply conditions.

(1) The competitive equilibrium price per ride is determined by setting the price equal to the marginal cost. Thus, the competitive equilibrium price is $5. The equilibrium number of rides per day can be calculated by substituting the price into the demand function D(P) = 1200 - 20p, giving 1,000 rides.

(2) In 1995, the demand curve changed to D(n) = 1220 - 20p. By setting the demand equal to the supply, the equilibrium price of a ride in 1995 can be determined, which is $6.10.

(3) The profit per ride in 1995, can be calculated by subtracting the marginal cost ($5) from the equilibrium price ($6.10), resulting in a profit of $1.10 per ride. The profit per taxicab license per day is obtained by multiplying the profit per ride by the taxi capacity, resulting in $22. If the taxi operates every day, the annual profit per taxicab license will be $8,030.

(4) The market price of a taxicab license can be determined by discounting the annual profit per taxicab license, resulting in $220.

(5) The exact number of additional licenses needed would depend on the specific demand and supply conditions.

(6) The value of a taxicab license at the new fare of $5 would depend on the expected profits generated at that price.

(7) It depends on the perceived impact on their profits and on their individual valuations and expectations.

To learn more about demand and supply , click here: brainly.com/question/1342403

#SPJ11

False.

The statement is not necessarily true. The number of levels of observed x-values does not have to be equal to the order of the polynomial in x that you want to fit.

In polynomial regression, the order of the polynomial refers to the highest power of x in the polynomial equation. For example, a polynomial of order 2 would have terms like x^2, x^1, and a constant term.

The number of levels of observed x-values refers to the distinct values of x that you have in your dataset. It represents the range or diversity of x-values observed.

In polynomial regression, you can fit a polynomial of a higher order (with more terms) to a dataset with a limited number of distinct x-values.

However, it is important to note that as the order of the polynomial increases relative to the number of distinct x-values, the model can become increasingly complex and may lead to overfitting or instability.

Therefore, the number of levels of observed x-values does not need to be equal to the order of the polynomial in x that you want to fit. It depends on the specific data, the relationship you want to capture, and the trade-offs between complexity and model performance.

To know more about polynomial regression refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28490882#

#SPJ11

Answer:

12.9 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

area of full circle = 2 X 65.8 = 131.6cm².

131.6 = π r² = (3.14r²)

r² = 131.6/3.14 = 41.9108....

r = 6.47.

diameter = 2r = 12.94 = 12.9 cm to nearest tenth

Based on the behavior of the terms, the series ∑n=1∞ (−1)nsin(9n) diverges.

To determine whether the series ∑n=1∞ (−1)nsin(9n) converges or diverges, we can analyze its behavior.

The series involves alternating signs with the term (−1)n and the function sin(9n).

For a series to converge, it must satisfy two conditions:

1.   The individual terms of the series must approach zero as n approaches infinity.

2.   The series must exhibit an overall pattern or behavior that allows the sum to converge.

Let's analyze the behavior of the terms in the series:

As n increases, the term (−1)n alternates between positive and negative values. The function sin(9n) oscillates between -1 and 1 as n increases.

Since sin(9n) oscillates indefinitely between -1 and 1 without approaching zero, the terms of the series do not converge to zero as n approaches infinity.

Therefore, based on the behavior of the terms, the series ∑n=1∞ (−1)nsin(9n) diverges.

learn more about "diverges":- https://brainly.com/question/28169281

#SPJ11

The given method is convergent with a global order of accuracy 2. It involves the computation of the next value in the sequence using a combination of the current and previous values.

The given method is a linear multistep method for solving ordinary differential equations of the form yn+2 - yn = h (-γfn+2 + 2(1+γ)fn+1 - γfn), where yn represents the approximate solution at time tn, h is the step size, and γ is a parameter.

To determine the convergence and global order of accuracy, we need to analyze how the method approximates the exact solution of the differential equation. By substituting the exact solution into the method's formula, we can examine the error term.

Upon analysis, it can be shown that the method is convergent, meaning that as the step size approaches zero, the numerical solution approaches the exact solution. Furthermore, the method has a global order of accuracy 2. This implies that the error between the numerical and exact solutions is proportional to the square of the step size. In other words, if we halve the step size, the error will be reduced by a factor of four.

The convergence and order of accuracy are crucial indicators of the method's reliability and efficiency. Convergence ensures that the numerical solution is approaching the correct solution, while a higher order of accuracy indicates that the method provides more accurate results with smaller step sizes.

Learn more about convergent here:

https://brainly.com/question/28202684

#SPJ11

It is not possible to determine the global order of accuracy based solely on the given method

To analyze the convergence and determine the global order of accuracy of the given method, we will perform a local truncation error analysis.

Let's assume that the exact solution at time tn is given by [tex]y(tn)[/tex], and the numerical solution at tn is denoted by yn. We can expand the terms in the given method using Taylor series expansions around tn:

[tex]yn+2 = y(tn+2) = y(tn) + y'(tn)h + \frac{y''(tn)h^2}{2!} + O(h^3)\\yn+1 = y(tn+1) = y(tn) + y'(tn)h + \frac{y''(tn)h^2}{2!} + O(h^3)\\yn = y(tn)[/tex]

Now, substitute these expansions into the given method:

[tex]yn+2 - yn = h (-γfn+2 + 2(1+γ)fn+1 - γfn)[/tex]

[tex](y(tn) + y'(tn)h + \frac{y''(tn)h^2}{2!} + O(h^3)) - y(tn) = h (-γ(y(tn+2) + O(h^3)) + 2(1+γ)(y(tn+1) + O(h^3)) - γy(tn) + O(h^3))[/tex]

Simplifying and rearranging the terms, we get:

[tex]y'(tn)h + \frac{y''(tn)h^2}{2!} = h (-γy(tn+2) + 2(1+γ)y(tn+1) - γy(tn)) + O(h^3)[/tex]

Dividing both sides by h and neglecting higher-order terms, we obtain:

[tex]y'(tn) + \frac{y''(tn)h}{2!} = -γy(tn+2) + 2(1+γ)y(tn+1) - γy(tn)[/tex]

Now, compare this equation with the Taylor series expansion of the exact solution y(tn) and its derivatives:

[tex]y'(tn) + \frac{y''(tn)h}{2!} = y'(tn) + y''(tn)\frac{h}{2!} + O(h^2)[/tex]

By comparing the corresponding terms, we can see that the local truncation error is O([tex]h^2)[/tex].

Since the local truncation error is O[tex](h^2)[/tex], the method is consistent of order 2. To determine the global order of accuracy, we need to investigate whether the method is also stable and convergent. Without further information or analysis, it is not possible to determine the global order of accuracy based solely on the given method. Additional information, such as stability analysis or convergence proofs, would be needed to establish the global order of accuracy.

Learn more about global order here :-

https://brainly.com/question/8052979

#SPJ11

To determine whether a and b are orthogonal in the resulting inner product space defined by 〈u, v〉= [tex]tr(u^t * v)[/tex], we need to compute 〈a, b〉 and check if it equals zero.

In the given inner product space, orthogonality between two vectors a and b is determined by checking if their inner product, denoted as 〈a, b〉, equals zero.

To find this inner product, we calculate the trace of the matrix product of the transpose of a [tex](a^t)[/tex] and b, and then compare the resulting value to zero. If 〈a, b〉 is zero, it implies that a and b are orthogonal in the inner product space. If the inner product is nonzero, a and b are not orthogonal.

Learn more about Orthogonal

brainly.com/question/31051370

#SPJ11

True.

The method of least squares is used in regression analysis to determine the best-fitting line or curve that minimizes the sum of squared errors (SSE). The SSE is calculated by summing the squared differences between the observed values and the corresponding predicted values.

The goal of the least squares method is to find the line that minimizes this sum, indicating the line that has the smallest overall error.

Additionally, the least squares method ensures that the regression line has an average error of zero by taking into account the overall deviation from the line. This means that, on average, the predicted values from the regression line will be equal to the observed values.

So, it is true that the method of least squares specifies that the regression line has an average error of 0 and an SSE that is minimized.

To know more about regression refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28178214#

#SPJ11

The equation of the parabola in standard form is f(x) = -(x - 3)² + 25

Here, we have,

the vertex of the parabola is given as (3, 25), we know that the equation of the parabola can be written in vertex form as:

f(x) = a(x - 3)² + 25

where a is a constant that determines the shape of the parabola.

The point (6, 16) lies on the parabola

so we can substitute x = 6 and y = 16 into the equation above to find 'a'.

16 = a(6 - 3)² + 25

-9 = 9a

Dividing both sides by 9, we get:

a = -1

Now we know that the equation of the parabola is:

f(x) = -(x - 3)² + 25

Hence, the equation of the parabola in standard form is

f(x) = -(x - 3)² + 25

To learn more on Equation:

brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

The equation of the plane passing through the points (0, 6, 6), (6, 0, 6), and (6, 6, 0) is: 1296x + 1296y + 1296z - 15552 = 0.

To locate an equation of the aircraft passing thru three given points, we can use the point-normal structure of the equation of a plane.

The ordinary vector of the aircraft can be determined through taking the move product of two vectors in the plane.

Find two vectors in the airplane the usage of the given points:

Vector u = (6, 0, 6) - (0, 6, 6) = (6, -6, 0)

Vector v = (6, 6, 0) - (0, 6, 6) = (6, 0, -6)

Calculate the move product of vectors u and v to locate the ordinary vector of the plane:

Normal vector n = u x v

= (6, -6, 0) x (6, 0, -6)

= (-36, 36, 36)

Step 3: Use one of the given factors (0, 6, 6) and the regular vector (-36, 36, 36) in the point-normal structure of the equation of a plane:

(x - x₁, y - y₁, z - z₁) · (A, B, C) = 0, the place (x₁, y₁, z₁) is the factor and (A, B, C) is the regular vector.

(x - 0, y - 6, z - 6) · (-36, 36, 36) = 0

(-36x, 36y - 216, 36z - 216) · (-36, 36, 36) = 0

Simplifying the equation, we get:

(-36x)(-36) + (36y - 216)(36) + (36z - 216)(36) = 0

1296x + 1296y - 7776 + 1296z - 7776 = 0

1296x + 1296y + 1296z - 15552 = 0

Therefore, an equation of the airplane passing thru the factors (0, 6, 6), (6, 0, 6), and (6, 6, 0) is:

1296x + 1296y + 1296z - 15552 =

For similar question on plane passing:

https://brainly.com/question/30336283

#SPJ11

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, there are 4 "s" blocks that make up one "20" units block. So all you have to do is to divide 20/4 to get 5.

The probability that they are in middle school is 0.067.

We are given that;

The table of middle school, high school and total.

Now,

The probability that a student selected at random is a middle school student who was present is calculated by dividing the number of middle school students present by the total number of students present.

1,276​/8,632≈0.148

The probability that a high school student selected at random was absent on that day is calculated by dividing the number of high school students absent by the total number of high school students.

12,118​/12,68≈0.167

The probability that a student who was present that day is in middle school is calculated by dividing the number of middle school students present by the total number of students present.

1,276/19,195​≈0.067

Therefore, by probability the answer will be 0.067

Learn more about probability here;

https://brainly.com/question/9326835

#SPJ1

Answer:

writing in english is easier

Step-by-step explanation:

To find f(g(x)), we have to substitute the formula for g(x) as the input for f(x).

   f( g(x) ) = f( x+7 )

               = 2 (x+7) - 3

               = 2x + 14 - 3

               = 2x + 11

The key is to substitute the entire formula for g(x) in as the input for f.

To amortize a loan of $256,400 with an interest rate of 7.2% over 30 years, the monthly house payment can be calculated using the amortization formula. The payment size is $1,758.70 (rounded to the nearest cent).

To find the monthly house payment necessary to amortize the loan, we can use the formula for calculating the monthly payment amount for an amortizing loan. The formula is given by:

Payment = (Loan Amount * Monthly Interest Rate) / (1 - (1 + Monthly Interest Rate)^(-Number of Payments))

First, we need to convert the annual interest rate to a monthly interest rate. The monthly interest rate can be calculated by dividing the annual interest rate by 12 and converting it to a decimal. In this case, the monthly interest rate is 7.2% / 12 = 0.006.

Next, we substitute the values into the formula. The loan amount is $256,400, the monthly interest rate is 0.006, and the number of payments is 30 years * 12 months = 360 months.

Plugging in these values into the formula, we have:

Payment = (256,400 * 0.006) / (1 - (1 + 0.006)^(-360))

Calculating this expression, we find that the monthly house payment necessary to amortize the loan is approximately $1,758.70 when rounded to the nearest cent.

Learn more about amortization formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/16554334

#SPJ11

The relativistic mass formula, m = m₀√(1 - v²/c²), can be derived from the principles of special relativity. The formula relates the relativistic mass (m) of an object to its rest mass (m₀), velocity (v), and the speed of light (c).

What is relativistic mass?

Relativistic mass is a concept in physics that refers to the mass of an object as observed from a moving frame of reference, taking into account relativistic effects. It is a term associated with Einstein's theory of relativity and is dependent on the velocity of the object.

To derive the formula, we start with the concept of relativistic energy, which is given by E = mc², where E is the total energy of the object. In special relativity, energy and mass are interconnected.

Next, we consider the relativistic kinetic energy, which is given by K = (γ - 1)m₀c², where γ is the Lorentz factor and is defined as γ = 1/√(1 - v²/c²). The Lorentz factor takes into account the time dilation and length contraction effects at high velocities.

We equate the relativistic energy (E) to the sum of rest energy (m₀c²) and relativistic kinetic energy (K), yielding E = m₀c² + (γ - 1)m₀c².

Simplifying the equation, we have E = γm₀c².

Since E = mc², we can equate the two expressions and obtain mc² = γm₀c².

Dividing both sides by c², we get m = γm₀.

Substituting the value of γ, we have m = m₀/√(1 - v²/c²).

This is the relativistic mass formula, which shows how the mass of an object changes with velocity, taking into account the effects of special relativity.

To know more about relativistic mass, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28217622
#SPJ4

The limit of the expression as (x, y) approaches (1, 2) is 8.

To find the limit of the given expression as (x, y) approaches (1, 2), we can use algebraic manipulation and factorization.

First, let's simplify the expression:

[tex](x^2 - 1)(y^2 - 4) / ((x - 1)(y - 2))[/tex]

Next, we can factorize the numerator and denominator:

[tex](x^2 - 1) = (x - 1)(x + 1)\\(y^2 - 4) = (y - 2)(y + 2)[/tex]

Substituting these factorizations into the expression, we have:

((x - 1)(x + 1)(y - 2)(y + 2)) / ((x - 1)(y - 2))

Now, we can cancel out the common factors of (x - 1) and (y - 2):

(x + 1)(y + 2)

At this point, we can directly substitute the values x = 1 and y = 2 into the expression:

(1 + 1)(2 + 2)

= 2 × 4

= 8

Therefore, the limit of the expression as (x, y) approaches (1, 2) is 8.

for such more question on limit

https://brainly.com/question/12017456

#SPJ11

Answer:

my answer is 20

Step-by-step explanation:

tan 45=opposite/adjacent

1 =opposite*20.

opposite=20cm

[tex]\textit{Law of Cosines}\\\\ \cfrac{a^2+b^2-c^2}{2ab}=\cos(C)\implies \cos^{-1}\left(\cfrac{a^2+b^2-c^2}{2ab}\right)=\measuredangle C \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \cos^{-1}\left(\cfrac{302^2+344^2-289^2}{2(302)(344)}\right)=\measuredangle A \implies \cos^{-1}\left(\cfrac{ 126019 }{ 207776 }\right)=\measuredangle A \\\\\\ \cos^{-1}(0.6065137) \approx \measuredangle A \implies 52.66^o \approx \measuredangle A[/tex]

Make sure your calculator is in Degree mode.

Answer:

x≈4.63902101

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.7 is the probability they would allow it

Step-by-step explanation:

0.3 is the probability out of 1

so 1-0.3 is the probability they would allow it

1-0.3=0.7

The z-coordinate of this point of intersection is 10/3.

As given,

The line that is normal (perpendicular) to the surface 3x² − y² − 2z² = 3 at the point (3, 4, 2) intersects the yz-plane.

Suppose that,

f = 3x² − y² − 2z² - 3

Differentiate function,

fx = 6x

fy = -2y

fz = -4z

So, (fx, fy, fz) = (6x, -2y, -4z)

At the point (3, 4, 2) such as (x = 3, y = 4, and z = 2)

(f₃, f₄, f₂) = (18, -8, -8)

So, vector r = (3, 4, 2) + λ (18, -8, -8)

At yz plane (x = 0)

So, 3 + 18λ = 0

Solve the value for λ respectively,

3 + 18λ = 0

     18λ = -3

         λ = -1/6

So, z = 2 - 8 λ

Substitute value of  λ respectively,

z = 2 - 8 (-1/6)

z = 2 + 8/6

z = 2 + 4/3

z = 10/3

Hence, the option D is correct.

Hence, the z-coordinate of this point of intersection is 10/3.

To learn more about normal and intersect the plane from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/30655803

#SPJ4

The given linear transformation dx maps a function f(x) to its derivative, dx(f) = 4x^2. To find the preimage, we need to determine the original function f(x) that satisfies this derivative.

By integrating the derivative with respect to x, we can find the antiderivative F(x) of 4x^2. The antiderivative is obtained by reversing the process of differentiation.

The antiderivative of 4x^2 is (4/3)x^3, where (4/3) is the coefficient of the term and x^3 is the term raised to the power one higher than the exponent in the derivative. The constant of integration C is added to account for the family of functions that have the same derivative.

Therefore, the preimage of the function dx(f) = 4x^2 is F(x) = (4/3)x^3 + C, where C represents any constant value.

True. The loan-to-value ratio is a calculation that compares the amount of the loan being taken out for a real estate investment project to the value of the property being purchased. This ratio is often used to determine the amount of leverage being used in the investment, with higher ratios indicating more leverage and potentially higher risk.

The LTV ratio indicates the percentage of the property's value that is financed through debt. Higher LTV ratios indicate a higher level of leverage, meaning that a larger portion of the property's value is funded through borrowed money. LTV ratios are commonly used by lenders to assess the risk associated with a real estate investment and determine the terms of the loan.

To know more about real estate, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30169502

#SPJ11