Answer:
A to speak freely hope it hopes beb
Answer:
D. run for feder office
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the pretrial motions with their correct descriptions.
motion for a bill of particulars
motion for discovery
motion for suppression
motion for continuance
states that the prosecution may not use unconstitutionally
obtained evidence in the trial
>
requests the judge to postpone the trial
requests the judge to make the prosecutor's evidence,
witnesses, and other details available to the defense
before the trial starts
>
helps the defense obtain a list of items that the prosecution
plans to present as illegal
The prosecution may not include evidence that was collected in violation of the law during the trial, according to a motion for suppression. A motion for continuation asks the judge to adjourn the case. Motion for discovery: asks the judge to provide the defense.
Which of the following motions filed prior to trial asks that one side give the other side evidence?Every party needs time to plan, and that time should include time to plan a response to what the opposing side has said. A motion to discover is an application to the court for a ruling ordering the other side to turn over evidence. An interview with a potential witness is requested in a motion to depose.
What circumstances allow for the filing of pretrial motions and what exactly are those motions?Pre-trial motions frequently used include: An attempt to have a charge or the case dismissed by the judge is known as a motion to dismiss. This is possible if there is insufficient proof or if the alleged facts do not constitute a crime. An effort to prevent specific statements or evidence from being presented as evidence is known as a motion to suppress.
To know more about prosecution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30348962
#SPJ1
The Great Compromise proposed by the committee headed by Roger Sherman called for
a two-house Congress.
backing the New Jersey Plan.
keeping the Articles government.
creating the Supreme Court.
please help
What are the four characteristics of a nation state
Answer:
sovereignty, land, population, and government.
Answer:
The nation state is a system of organization defined by geography, politics, and culture. The nation is cultural identity that is shared by the people, and the state is the governing administration. A nation state must have a shared national identity, physical borders, and a single government.
Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up
What is it called when the president refuses to sign a bill into law?
-veto
-rejection
-refusal
-disagreement
I will give 20 points! Thx for helping me :)
Answer:
rejection im pretty sure! and ofc
Explanation:
Answer:
veto
Explanation:
What percentage of bills are made into laws each year?
Answer:
Legislation .
Explanation:
This table breaks down the bills and resolutions introduced in each two-year ... Therefore, the generally decreasing number of bills enacted into law does not reflect ... Congress, Enacted Laws, Passed Resolutions, Got A Vote, Failed Legislation ... cumulative percent of bills enacted for December in the first year of a session
2. What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at
work? Explain and analyze why this story speaks to her point.
3. Were there other jurors that experienced similar feelings of regret and remorse like
Lou? What potential solution was mentioned that would allow the jurors to better cope
with their duty? Discuss your thoughts on this,
4. What sentence could Lou's granddaughter not answer? Explain the context and discuss
whether you could answer this question or not. What coping mechanism has Lou
employed to deal with the residual feelings of her juror experience? Discuss.
5. What are your thoughts on the death penalty? Do you believe that people are less likely
to commit murder or violent crimes in states that have the death penalty? Evaluate and
explain
Answer:
Were there other jurors that experienced similar feelings of regret and remorse like Lou? What potential solution was mentioned that would allow the jurors to better cope with their duty? Discuss your thoughts on this.
Yes, there were jurors out there that felt the same feelings of sadness like Lou was
feeling. She sat down with most of the jurors that worked the same case of Billy,
and they all felt regret and broke down after the day was over.
Explanation:
Write 2 paragraphs stating if you believe the Insite Drug Facility is a good or bad thing. Please explain why you believe it or not!
Its due tomorrow please help me out!!
A common misconception surrounding drug addiction is that it solely affects the life of the user. However, the idea that they aren’t hurting anyone except for themselves is an excuse that many individuals who abuse drugs use in order to justify their addiction. Drug addiction is not a one-person phenomenon, and it creates a domino effect on the lives of those around them. It is a social problem that normalizes drug use and affects individuals and their families.
Effects of Drug Addiction
At first glance, a drug addiction may appear to only affect the person who is using. However, because addiction is a destructive issue that can have an adverse effect on the community, family, and individual, it’s very rare that other people aren’t affected. An individual neglecting their responsibilities as a result of drugs can negatively affect their career, children’s education, or family’s financial security. Their impact can also extend outside of the immediate family. Friends or community members who rely on their presence or companionship can suffer from their absence.
There are a variety of short-term and long-term health effects associated with addiction. Although the specific effects vary between drugs, prolonged abuse of any substance can lead to chronic disease or alter an individual’s productivity. The most permanent effect of drug addiction is death, which becomes more likely through addiction because of increased tolerance leading to overdose.
The Connection Between Addiction and Crime
There is a definitive link between crime and drug addictions that is mainly contributed to the illegal status of commonly abused drugs. Not only is it illegal to carry many of these drugs but an individual’s lowered inhibitions when under the influence can encourage them to commit other crimes. The types of crime that an individual may commit when on drugs is extensive and dependent on a variety of sub-factors, but regardless, drug users are more likely than nonusers to commit crime. Petty theft in order to obtain drugs and satiate their cravings when desperate is another way in which drugs influence individuals to commit crimes.
How Drug Rehabilitation Can Better Society
There are two types of people: those who believe that drug addiction treatment should be given to everyone, and those who think that drug addiction shouldn’t be treated as a criminal issue. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter who suffers from addiction, criminal or not. With the proper help and treatment, you will be able to overcome your addiction and fit into society once again. Due to the process of drug rehabilitation, there is almost a countless number of people who took the necessary steps to beat their crippling addiction and even become pillars of various communities. Some individuals have managed to procure fantastic jobs and live healthy, drug-free jobs.
Unfortunately, drug addiction is still in society. Once an addiction starts, it can become very difficult for you to come back from it. With that said, you don’t have to fight it alone. Don’t be ashamed to tell people of your addiction. Many people are going through or have gone through the same thing. You will need the support of your family, friends and even the professionals treating you. If you or someone you know is suffering from an addiction, asking for help is the first step to regaining control of your life.
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
In what way did Sir William Garrow have a huge effect on the American legal system?
a. He made sure that the American system had all the innovations of the English system.
b. He created the adversarial court system.
c. He insisted on the right of the accused to have a defense lawyer.
d. He was the first to show an aggressive style in the court.
Answer:
C. He insisted on the right of the accused to have a defense lawyer.
Explanation:
Answer: c.
Explanation:
Who were the earliest settlers to create a modern correctional institutions?
O Virginians
people from the Mayflower
the people of New Amsterdam
the Puritans of Pennsylvania
Answer:
people from the Mayflower
Explanation:
The Mayflower people were the first settlers to create modern correctional institutions, in addition to being the first colony to establish a type of government that most closely resembles what we have today. This made the Mayflower colony a major advance in world democracy, laying the foundations for the entire political and judicial system that the United States currently has.
nice guys always finish last?
Answer:
yeah...
Explanation:
its the hard truth. I should have known that gave you my heart but you messed around and broke that.
Officers respond to the following call ( Black male with a firearm ) suspect runs trips and fall the firearm falls from waistband suspect picks firearm back up. Is the officer right to open fire why or why not.
what is the police power reserved to the states?
Answer:
In the United States, state police power comes from the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which gives states the rights and powers "not delegated to the United States." States are thus granted the power to establish and enforce laws protecting the welfare, safety, and health of the public.
Explanation:
I will be on for 30 more mins if u need help ask now.
Answer:
I need help with this,
Explanation:
How has the American model of democracy affected the cause of civil rights around the world? (I need a CONCLUSION for this question)
Speculation, hearsay, relevance are examples
of valid objections.
True or false
Answer:
false
Explanation:
because a statement is not hearsay if the word spoken are relevant not what the words mean
Hi extras who ever want to cosplay with me they can but i am bakugo
Answer:
who should i be??? idek
Explanation:
Amendments that involve the executive branch
Answer: The Twentieth Amendment is your answer.
Explanation: Hope my answer helped you! Plz, mark my answer helped you and Thank you!
Which criminal justice concept directly relates to evidence?
discovery
summons
settlement
damages
Answer: I would say Damage
Explanation: cause if the suspect or murder damage somethin with their own hands their would be fingerprints on them
How are electoral districts configured?
1. By the Federal Govt.
2. By a Specially Elected Tribunal
3. By State or Local Laws
4. By an International Council
Answer:
2 by a specially elected tribunal
Which of the following is NOT considered trace evidence?
Bullets
O Gun-shot residue
O Chemicals
O Paint residue
Chemicals aren't counted as traces of evidence.
Traces of evidence:
Hairs, threads, paints, glass, and dirt are the most typical materials investigated in the microscope lab, despite the fact that the sorts of materials that may be utilized as trace evidence are practically endless.
Hair, fibers, paint, and glass are the most typically examined trace evidence items. Soil, cosmetics, and fire debris are some of the less commonly listed materials.Find out more information about 'trace evidence'
https://brainly.com/question/6764645?referrer=searchResults
will mark brainlist
What is the wings of fire?
Is it the best?
Describe it without looking it up.
Answer:
Wings of fire is a series of (soon) 14 books, (soon) four graphic novels, 4 ebooks and two legends books.
The author of this amazing series is Tui. T. Sutherland
Each book has a different POV (point of view) of a different dragon ( i'll describe each later in my answer) There are 10 tribes in this series as well: MudWing, SeaWing, IceWing, RainWing, SandWing, NightWing, SkyWing, LeafWing/PoisonWing, HiveWing and SilkWing
There are three prophecies in the series. One is called "The Dragonet Prophecy where 5 dragons (Clay, Tsunami, Glory, Sunny and Starflight) try to save the world from war that has lasted about 20 years. The other is about a mountain (Jade Mountain) is going to fall under thunder and ice.
(I should go more into detail about Darkstalker but not in here because it will take forever)
The Character's POV's for each book and the title of each book are of the following:
1. The Dragonet Prophecy- Clay- MudWing
2. The Lost Heir- Tsunami- SeaWing
3. The Hidden Kingdom- Glory- RainWing
4. The Dark Secret- Starflight- NightWing
5. The Brightest Night- Sunny- SandWing/NightWing hybrid
6. Moon Rising- Moonwatcher- NightWing
7. Winter Turning- Winter- IceWing
8. Escaping Peril- Peril- SkyWing
9. Talons of Power- Turtle- SeaWing
10. Darkness of Dragons- Qibli- SandWing
11. The Lost Continent- Blue- SilkWing
12. The Hive Queen- Cricket- HiveWing
13. The Poison Jungle- Sundew- LeafWing
14. The Dangerous Gift- Snowfall- IceWing
Explanation:
What are the four characteristics of a nation state
Answer: The four characteristics of a nation-state are sovereignty, Currency, population, and system of laws.
The law making process is similar in the House and Senate with slight
differences, but what thing has to be identical in both locations?
Answer:
Both houses must accept the bill
Explanation:
Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.
what document charges the defendent with a crime
Answer:
Indictment
Explanation:
Indictment – An indictment is a formal document issued by a Grand Jury, charging the Defendant of committing a crime(s). The U.S. Attorney or an Assistant U.S. Attorney appears before a Grand Jury and presents evidence to show a person has committed a crime and that they should be formally charged for it.
a woman gives birth to a color-blind but otherwise normal daughter. The husband sues for a divorce on the grounds of adultery. Will his case stand up in court?
What do you think of the current state of the US and the pandemic?
Answer:
the country is divided!!!
Explanation:
some shops want to open up and others are closing down. the government is making it look like a bigger issue than it really is. all this is hurting little business and all the people people are afraid of going outside you have to wear a mask when you meet people all this is unnecessary.
Only the plaintiff can have a cross examination.
O True
O False
BRAINLIEST!! In at least 4-5 sentences, Explain how has the american model of democracy influenced other countries
Answer:
The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.
Answer:
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."
Introduction
In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6
This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.
I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.
Explanation:
Which of these is an example of the exchange principle?
A.Making casts of footprints at the crime scene
B.Taking photographs of the scene to be used later
C.Leaving markers to show the location of evidence
D.Leaving a strand of hair on a murder victim
Answer:
a
Explanation:
I mean I'm not sure answer at your own risk
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Locard’s exchange principle says that, in the physical world, whenever perpetrators enter or leave a crime scene, they will leave something behind and take something with them.
if professor fletcher is right, was Goetz justified in shooting?
Answer:
no nobody should take anybody's life leave that to the lord
Explanation:
What political idea does this quote express?