Find all eigenvalues of the given matrix. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list.) 7 - 8 8 -9 6 6 A = 0 0 - 1 a =

Answer:

234

Step-by-step explanation:

x=2+3

The answers are =

1) The board is now 1.26 meters long.

2) Olivia's recipe calls for approximately 113 grams of rice and a baking temperature of approximately 176.67 degrees Celsius.

3) The cost of a piece measuring 3.70 meters is 3.70 × $12.99 = $48.03. Rounded to the nearest cent, the cost is $48.03.

4) Jalo's weight in pounds is approximately 80.9 × 2.20462 ≈ 178.6 pounds.

5) Approximately 13.5 liters of punch are needed for 75 people.

Peggy's cutting board initially measured 2 meters 4 centimeters, which is equivalent to 204 centimeters.

After cutting off 78 centimeters, the board's new length is 204 - 78 = 126 centimeters.

To convert this to meters, divide by 100: 126 cm ÷ 100 = 1.26 meters. Therefore, the board is now 1.26 meters long.

2) To convert 4 ounces of rice to grams, we need to know the conversion factor.

1 ounce is approximately equal to 28.35 grams.

Therefore, 4 ounces of rice is approximately equal to 4 × 28.35 = 113.4 grams.

To convert 350 degrees Fahrenheit to Celsius, we use the formula: Celsius = (Fahrenheit - 32) × 5/9.

Celsius = (350 - 32) × 5/9 = 318 × 5/9 ≈ 176.67 degrees Celsius.

Therefore, Olivia's recipe calls for approximately 113 grams of rice and a baking temperature of approximately 176.67 degrees Celsius.

3) The length of the fabric is 3 meters 70 centimeters, which is equivalent to 3.70 meters.

The cost of the fabric per meter is $12.99.

Therefore, the cost of a piece measuring 3.70 meters is 3.70 × $12.99 = $48.03. Rounded to the nearest cent, the cost is $48.03.

4) Jalo's weight is given as 80.9 kilograms.

To convert this to pounds, we need to know the conversion factor. 1 kilogram is approximately equal to 2.20462 pounds.

Therefore, Jalo's weight in pounds is approximately 80.9 × 2.20462 ≈ 178.6 pounds.

Jalo's height is given as 1.83 meters.

To convert this to feet, we need to know the conversion factor. 1 meter is approximately equal to 3.28084 feet.

Therefore, Jalo's height in feet is approximately 1.83 × 3.28084 ≈ 6.003 feet, which can be rounded to 6 feet.

Therefore, Jalo weighs approximately 178.6 pounds and is approximately 6 feet tall.

5) Each serving of punch is 180 mL.

To find the total amount of punch needed for 75 people, we multiply the serving size by the number of people: 180 mL × 75 = 13,500 mL.

Since 1 liter is equal to 1,000 mL, we can convert the amount of punch to liters by dividing by 1,000: 13,500 mL ÷ 1,000 = 13.5 liters.

Therefore, approximately 13.5 liters of punch are needed for 75 people.

Learn more about conversion factor click;

https://brainly.com/question/32020768

#SPJ4

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

I believe this is the explanation of this problem. If not, anyone else is free to correct me on this.

Look at the line segment passes through the center and is divided into 8 and 4. Since this line segment passes through the center of the circle, this is the diameter and is equal to 12 simply by adding 8 and 4..

Let's look at the next segment. It passes through the center as well, so it must have the same diameter. After all, the circle has the same diameter no matter what as long as the segment passes through the center.

You have the length of one part of that segment, which is 2. Subtract it from 12, the diameter you got from the other segment, and the answer is 10.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Angle B: 26 degrees

Angle C: 26 degrees

Angle BSD: 97 degrees

Angle CSE: 97 degrees

Angle E: 57 degrees

Arc BC: 114 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Good luck boi

Answer:

Answer

5.0/5

1

sana112704

Answer:

i think the answer is 10,296

Step-by-step explanation:

The first one is still 13C6

Review the definition of combina

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

what is the answer to part one ?

and the answer too part 2 ?

the answers down below wereńt clear enough .

Step-by-step explanation

Answer:

$1.50

25% of 6 is 1.5

Answer: $1.50

Step-by-step explanation:

0.25x5.99= 1.4975 which would round to 1.5

Answer:b

Step-by-step explanation:

The function f(t) = 5sin(3t) + 4 represents the oscillations of the spring it had an amplitude of 5, a frequency of 3/(2pi), and a midline of 4 option second is correct.

It is defined as the number of waves that crosses a fixed point in one second known as frequency. The unit of frequency is per second.

We have amplitude A = 5

Frequency f = 3/(2π)

Midline m = 4

The equation for the simple periodic motion is given by:

f(t) = Asin(wt+∅) + m

Here phase angle ∅ = 0

We know:

w = 2πf

w = 2π(3/2π)

w = 3

Put all the values in the equation:

f(t) = 5sin(3t) + 4

Thus, the function f(t) = 5sin(3t) + 4 represents the oscillations of the spring it had an amplitude of 5, a frequency of 3/(2pi), and a midline of 4

Learn more about the frequency here:

brainly.com/question/27063800

#SPJ2

Answer:

(a) His speed when he runs from C to A is [tex]4.\overline {285714}[/tex] m/s

(i) The bearing of B from A is approximately 127.18°

(ii) The bearing of A from B is approximately 307.18°

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) The given parameters are;

The distance from A to B = 120 m

The speed with which Olay runs from A to B, v₁ = 4 m/s

The distance from B to C = 180 m

The speed with which Olay runs from B to C, v₂ = 3 m/s

The distance from C to A = 150 m

His average speed for the whole journey = 3.6 m/s

We find

The total distance of running from A back to A, d = 120 m + 180 m + 150 m = 450 m

The time it takes to run from A to B, t₁ = 120 m/(4m/s) = 30 seconds

The time it takes to run from B to C, t₂ = 180 m/(3m/s) = 60 seconds

Let t₃ represent the time it takes Olay to run from C to A

We have;

The total time it takes to run from A back to A = t₁ + t₂ + t₃

Therefore;

[tex]Average \ velocity = \dfrac{Total \ distance }{Total \ time} = \dfrac{d}{t_1 + t_2 + t_3}[/tex]

Substituting the known values for the average velocity, 'd', 't₁' and 't₂'  gives;

[tex]Average \ velocity = 3.6 \, m/s = \dfrac{450 \, m}{30 \, s + 60 \, s + t_3}[/tex]

3.6 m/s × (30 s + 60 s + t₃) = 450 m

3.6 m/s × 30 s + 3.6 m/s × 60 s + 3.6 m/s × t₃ = 450 m

108 m + 216 m + 3.6 m/s × t₃ = 450 m

∴ 3.6 m/s × t₃ = 450 m - (108 m + 216 m) = 126 m

t₃ = 126 m/(3.6 m/s) = 35 s

The speed with which Olay runs from C to A, v₃ = Distance from C to A/t₃

The speed with which he runs from C to A = 150 m/(35 s) = 30/7 m/s =[tex]4.\overline {285714}[/tex] m/s

(i) The given bearing of C from A = 210°

By cosine rule, we have;

a² = b² + c² - 2·b·c·cos(A)

∴ cos(A) = (b² + c² - a²)/(2·b·c)

Where;

a = The distance from B to C = 180 m

b = The distance from C to A = 150 m

c = The distance from A to B = 120 m

We find;

cos(A) = (150² + 120² - 180²)/(2 × 150 × 120) = 0.125

A = arccos(0.125) ≈ 82.82°

The bearing of B from A ≈ 210° - 82.82° ≈ 127.18°

The bearing of B from A ≈ 127.18°

(ii) The angle, θ, formed by the path of the bearing of A from B is an alternate to the supplementary angle of the bearing of B from A

Therefore, we have;

θ ≈ 180°- 127.18° ≈ 52.82°

The bearing of A from B = The sum of angle at a point less θ

∴ The bearing of A from B = 360° - 52.82° ≈ 307.18°

The bearing of A from B ≈ 307.18°.

Answer:

A. They will pay more with the new price plan.

B. The new price plan would be cheaper.

Step-by-step explanation:

A. They will pay more with the new price plan.

For the current price plan, you would add the $3 rent to the two games (which are $4 each). This basically means:

$3 + $4 + $4 = $11

For the new price plan, you would add the $11 rent to the two games (which are $2 each). This basically means:

$11 + $2 + $2 = $15

Therefore, you pay more for the new price plan.

B. Using similar logic as part A, the current price plan 7 games would cost:

$3 + [7 x ($4)] = $31    (multiply by 7 since they play 7 games)

For the newprice plan, 7 games would cost:

$11 +  [7 x ($2)] = $25    (multiply by 7 since they play 7 games)

Therefore, the new price plan would be cheaper.

Hope this helps :)

To calculate the minimum, score a person must have to qualify for the society catering to highly intelligent individuals, given that test scores are normally distributed with a mean of 140 and a standard deviation of 5, you may need to use the appropriate appendix table to answer this question.

The Z-score formula is useful for calculating the minimum score a person must have to qualify for the society catering to highly intelligent individuals. The formula for Z-score is given below: Z = (X - μ) / σwhere, X is the minimum scoreμ is the mean σ is the standard deviation Z is the z-score

From the given data, we can find the Z-score as follows: Z = (X - μ) / σZ = (X - 140) / 5

Given that the person must score in the upper 2% of the population, the area under the normal curve is 0.02.

Since the curve is symmetric, the area under the curve to the right of the mean will be 0.5 - 0.02/2 = 0.49. Since we need to find the minimum score, we can use the inverse normal distribution table or appendix table. From the inverse normal distribution table, the Z-score for 0.49 is 2.06. Now we can substitute the Z-score in the above formula and find the minimum score: X = Zσ + μX = (2.06) (5) + 140X = 151.3The minimum score a person must have to qualify for the society catering to highly intelligent individuals are 151 (rounded to the nearest integer).

Therefore, the correct answer is 151.

To know more about standard deviation refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

The given statement, "Logistic regression works well for perfectly separable data, that is, a hyperplane in the feature space can separate the two classes in the training set" is FALSE.

This statement is incorrect because the logistic regression model does not work well with perfectly separable data as logistic regression is not designed to handle perfectly separable data.

Explanation:Logistic regression is a statistical method used for modeling the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.

It is widely used for classification problems that involve predicting a categorical outcome.For instance, logistic regression is used to predict the probability of a particular outcome (such as a person's gender, a customer's behavior, or a patient's diagnosis) based on one or more independent variables (such as age, income, education, etc.).However, logistic regression assumes that the data are not perfectly separable.

That is, it assumes that there is some overlap between the two classes in the feature space, and the logistic regression model tries to find a hyperplane that separates the two classes with maximum margin.

This means that logistic regression works best when the data is not perfectly separable. If the data is perfectly separable, then the logistic regression model will not work well because it will fail to find a decision boundary that separates the two classes.

To know more about classification problems, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29740070

#SPJ11

The statement "Logistic regression works well for perfectly separable data, that is, a hyperplane in the feature space can separate the two classes in the training set" is false.

Logistic Regression is a statistical technique for examining a dataset in which there are one or more independent variables that determine an outcome.

The outcome is determined by a binary variable, which means that there are just two possible results.

In other words, it determines the likelihood of a dependent variable occurring for a given set of independent variables. It is widely used for prediction and classification purposes.

Logistic regression makes no assumptions about the distribution of the independent variables and, unlike linear regression, can use binary, categorical, and continuous independent variables. It also estimates the probabilities of an event occurring.

Linear regression is for continuous data and logistic regression is for categorical data.

So, the statement "Logistic regression works well for perfectly separable data, that is, a hyperplane in the feature space can separate the two classes in the training set" is false because logistic regression works best when data is inseparable.

To know more about Linear regression, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13328200

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

125+75= 200

75:200= 3/8

3/8 is  the ratio of the number of geese to the total number of birds in the simplest form.

At α = 0.10, 0.05,0.01, and   0.001, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportion is not equal to 0.3.

Given

H₀: p = 0.3 (null hypothesis)

Hₐ: p ≠ 0.3 (alternative hypothesis)

Sample size (n) = 100

Sample   proportion (p)= 0.2

To calculate the p-value, we can follow these steps  -

Calculate the test statistic z -

z = (pa   - p₀) /√(p₀ * (1 -  p₀) / n)

where pa is the sample proportion,   p₀ is the hypothesized population proportion,and n is the sample size.

Calculate the p-value -

For a two-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:

p-value =2 * P(Z ≤ -|z  |), where Z is the standard normal distribution.

Now let's calculate the test statistic and p-value for each level of significance α

For α = 0.10:

p₀ = 0.3

The test statistic is

z =(0.2 - 0.3) / √(0.3   * (1 - 0.3) / 100)

z ≈ -4.714

The p-value for a two-tailed test is calculated like this

p-value = 2 * P(Z ≤ -|z|)

≈ 2 * P(Z ≤ -4.714)

Using a standard   normal distribution table or calculator,the p-value is approximately < 0.001

At α = 0.10  - We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportion is not equal to 0.3.

At α = 0.05  - We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportion is not equal to 0.3.

At α = 0.01  - We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportion is not equal to 0.3.

At α = 0.001  - We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportion is not equal to 0.3.

Learn more abut null hypothesis:
https://brainly.com/question/4436370
#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In this scenario, You've asked about the Chutney (Sauce/Raita).

Ok, So let's suppose you are making a "Chutney"

The amount of milliliters (Weight measurement) depends upon the amount of usage/intake that one is taking.

It could be a few hundred (gms. or some Kg's).

That totally depends up on your choice

Answer:

4.8

Step-by-step explanation:

Radius is 1/2 of the diameter so just do 2.4 and multiply it by 2

hope this helps :)

To maintain the same exposure of 100mR with a new technique of 20 mAs, the new kV value should be increased to approximately 120 kV.
The exposure received by a patient during an X-ray examination is determined by the product of milliamperes-seconds (mAs) and kilovolts (kV).

In this case, the initial technique of 40 mAs with 60 kV resulted in an exposure of 100mR.

To calculate the new kV value, we can use the mAs reciprocity law, which states that if the mAs is halved, the kV should be doubled to maintain the same exposure. In other words, the product of mAs and kV should remain constant.

In the initial technique, the product of mAs (40) and kV (60) is 2400. When the mAs value is reduced to 20, we need to find the new kV value that, when multiplied by 20, gives the same product of 2400.

By rearranging the equation, we find that the new kV value should be approximately 120, obtained by dividing the constant (2400) by the new mAs value (20).

To maintain the same exposure of 100mR with a reduced mAs value of 20, the new kV value should be increased to approximately 120 kV. This adjustment ensures that the product of mAs and kV remains constant, as dictated by the mAs reciprocity law.

To know more about kilovolts ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31458235
#SPJ11

[tex]z=xe^y,\ x=u^2-v^2,\ y=u^2 v^2[/tex]. Using partial differentiation, ∂z/∂u = [tex]2ue^y + 2uv^2xe^y[/tex] and ∂z/∂v = [tex]-2ve^y + 2u^2\ vxe^y[/tex].

How to apply partial differentiation?

To find the partial derivatives ∂z/∂u and ∂z/∂v, we will differentiate the function [tex]z = xe^y[/tex] with respect to u and v while keeping other variables constant.

Given:

[tex]z = xe^y,\\x = u^2 - v^2,\\y = u^2v^2.[/tex]

First, let's express z in terms of u and v by substituting the expressions for x and y into z:

[tex]z = (u^2 - v^2)e^{u^2v^2}[/tex]

Now, we can find the partial derivatives.

Partial derivative ∂z/∂u:

To find ∂z/∂u, we differentiate z with respect to u while treating v as a constant. Applying the chain rule, we have:

∂z/∂u = (∂z/∂x)(∂x/∂u) + (∂z/∂y)(∂y/∂u).

∂z/∂x = [tex]e^y[/tex],

∂x/∂u = 2u,

∂z/∂y =[tex]x * e^y[/tex],

∂y/∂u = [tex]2uv^2[/tex].

Substituting these values, we get:

∂z/∂u = [tex](e^y)(2u) + (x * e^y)(2uv^2)[/tex].

∂z/∂u = [tex]2ue^y + 2uv^2xe^y[/tex].

Partial derivative ∂z/∂v:

To find ∂z/∂v, we differentiate z with respect to v while treating u as a constant. Applying the chain rule, we have:

∂z/∂v = (∂z/∂x)(∂x/∂v) + (∂z/∂y)(∂y/∂v).

∂z/∂x = [tex]e^y[/tex],

∂x/∂v = -2v,

∂z/∂y = [tex]x * e^y[/tex],

∂y/∂v = [tex]2u^2v[/tex].

Substituting these values, we get:

∂z/∂v = [tex](e^y)(-2v) + (x * e^y)(2u^2v)[/tex].

∂z/∂v = [tex]-2ve^y + 2u^2vxe^y[/tex].

Therefore, the partial derivatives are:

∂z/∂u = [tex]2ue^y + 2uv^2xe^y[/tex],

∂z/∂v =[tex]-2ve^y + 2u^2\ vxe^y.[/tex]

To know more about partial differentiation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31495179

#SPJ4  

The statement that is used to prove that quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram is opposite sides are congruent. In a parallelogram, opposite sides are parallel, and their opposite angles are congruent. A quadrilateral is a polygon with four sides. A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of opposite and parallel sides, which means that the opposite sides in the parallelogram are congruent.

So, a statement that is used to prove that quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram is that opposite sides are congruent. It is one of the necessary and sufficient conditions to prove a quadrilateral as a parallelogram. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.Apart from this, the other statements that could have been options are:Option (a) - Opposite angles are congruent. It is a property of a parallelogram but is not sufficient to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram. If only opposite angles are congruent, then it is not necessary that opposite sides are parallel.Option (c) - Diagonals bisect each other. This property is only applicable to a parallelogram, and not to any other quadrilateral. However, it is not sufficient to prove a quadrilateral as a parallelogram because this property is only one of the properties of a parallelogram.Option (d) - Consecutive angles are supplementary. This property is common to all quadrilaterals, not just parallelograms. Therefore, it is not sufficient to prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram.

To know more about parallelogram, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28854514

#SPJ11

The statement that is used to prove that quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram is "Opposite sides are congruent".

A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides.

There are some properties of parallelograms which include:

Opposite sides are parallel

Opposite sides are congruent

Opposite angles are congruent

Consecutive angles are supplementary

Diagonals bisect each other

Now let's look at the answer options available:

a) Opposite angles are congruent: This statement is used to prove that a quadrilateral is not necessarily a parallelogram, but it is a kite.

b) Opposite sides are congruent: This statement is used to prove that quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram.

c) Diagonals bisect each other: This statement is used to prove that quadrilateral is a parallelogram or rectangle. But it cannot prove that ABCD is a parallelogram.

d) Consecutive angles are supplementary: This statement is used to prove that quadrilateral is a parallelogram or rectangle. But it cannot prove that ABCD is a parallelogram.

To know more about quadrilaterals, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29934291

#SPJ11

Answer:

B) 6 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

(24 - 6)/3 = 6 miles

Answer:

Based on the calculations, the store with the better buy is The Eyewear Shoppe

Step-by-step explanation:

Jake wants to buy two pairs of a particular style of sunglasses. The sunglasses are sold at two different stores.

For The Eyewear Shoppe:

The Eyewear Shoppe sells the sunglasses for $60 but is having a “Buy 1 Pair, Get 1 Pair Free” promotion.

Based on this promotion, you can get 2 sunglasses for $60

For Sunglass House

Sunglass House sells the sunglasses go 20% off the $40 retail price.

A Sunglass = $40 - ( 20%× $40)

= $40 - $8

= $32

Two sunglasses will cost = $32 × 2

= $64

Therefore, based on the above calculations, the store with the better buy is The Eyewear Shoppe

If Jake buys 2 sunglasses from Sunglass House the total price would be $64. The Eyewear Shoppe would get you two sunglasses for $60. This means that the The Eyewear Shoppe is a better buy.

don't use rope, us duck tape it always works

this is a haha funny joke by the way

Answer:

The polynomial expression for the profit from making and selling 'n' paper goods, is;

n × (n - 18)

Step-by-step explanation:

The revenue, 'R', and the cost, 'C', from the company's Scranton, PA factory are as follows;

R = 2·n² - 15·n + 23

C = n² + 3·n + 23

The profit, 'P', is the revenue, 'R', in excess of the cost, 'C', therefore;

The profit, P = R - C

By substituting the polynomials representing 'R', and 'C', we have;

P = 2·n² - 15·n + 23 - (n² + 3·n + 23)

∴ P = 2·n² - n² - 15·n - 3·n + 23 - 23

P = n² - 18·n = n·(n - 18)

P = n·(n - 18)

The polynomial expression for the profit from making and selling 'n' paper goods, is P = n·(n - 18).

Answer:

[9.99744 (10m)] for q#1 and [18688.006kg (18,688kg] for q#2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

First blank is 10m

Second blank is 18688kg

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the conversion calculator