Answer: Machiavelli is saying that no prince stay true to his word or accomplishes much, he's basically saying their corrupt. I agree.
Machiavelli suggests that successful leaders prioritize cunning over honesty, contrasting it with the idealistic notion of integrity. Agreeing or disagreeing depends on one's perspective on ethics in politics.
Machiavelli compares the realistic behavior of successful princes who value dishonesty over honesty with the idealistic notion of a prince who keeps his word and lives honorably. He claims that many great leaders in history have succeeded by employing cunning tactics and disobeying moral obligations.
Machiavelli's observation had moral limitations which emphasize the importance of pragmatism and strategic thinking in political leadership. If someone agrees or disagrees with Machiavelli's perspective, it will depend on how they feel about how important ethics are in politics. Others may view Machiavelli's observations as a sobering account of the complexities of political power while others may argue that morality and ethics should always be upheld.
learn more about Machiavelli here
brainly.com/question/33841919
#SPJ2
Please hurry and don't put a link for the answer whoever answers first will get brainliest and 30 points
What percentage of Americans believes that humans are causing global warming?
The Radical Republicans were a group in _______
Answer: They were in Republican Party
Explanation:
wwi is also called the 'War to End All Wars" because at the time no one thought another war that was that deadly could happen again? True or false?
30. Which event took place after the Civil War and before World War II?
Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. June 28, 1914. ...
The Armenian Genocide. April 24, 1915. ...
Battle of the Somme. ...
Treaty of Versailles Presented to German Delegation. ...
Adolf Hitler Issues Comment on the “Jewish Question” ...
Nazi Party Platform. ...
Beer Hall Putsch. ...
Adolf Hitler Becomes Leader of the Reestablished Nazi Party.
HAPPY PRIDE MONTH!!!!!️️⚧️
Answer: HAPPY PRIDE MONTH BESTIES
REMEMBER YOU'RE VALID AND IT MIGHT BE HARD TO GO THROUGH THESE BAD TIMES BUT JUST REMEMBER YOU'LL GET THROUGH IT <333
February revolution
Masking rules: ar they “reckless" or
"overreaching"?
Answer:
Overreaching
Explanation:
Masking isn't necessarily reckless, in act its actually quite the opposite.
Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct..????.
Answer:
The answer would have to be D.
Explanation:
received cash from Rajesh rs 30000 was ommited to post in cash account rectify after preparation trial balance
Answer:
Date Account title Debit Credit
XX-XX-XX Cash Rs 30,000
Account Receivable - Rajesh Rs 30,000
Rajesh is a Receivable so when they pay, reduce the amount they owe by the amount they paid. Doing so would mean crediting their account.
The Cash account will be debited to show that Cash was received because assets like cash are debited when they increase.
Question: How did a dynasty lose or gain the Mandate of Heaven?
A> - If the ruling dynasty was wealthy, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.
B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.
C> - If the ruling dynasty was weak, it would lose the Mandate of Heaven.
D> - If the ruling dynasty was not spiritual, it would lose the Mandate of Heaven.
Answer:
B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.
Explanation:
The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.
The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.
So, if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
what role does bread have in the formenting revolution?
Answer:
"Bread was considered a public service necessary to keep the people from rioting," Civitello writes. "Bakers, therefore, were public servants, so the police controlled all aspects of bread production."
Explanation:
maybe this helps you
Tenement housing usually consisted of small apartments that offered tenants clean, cheap housing. True. False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Why did Prudence Crandall open the Canterbury School?
A
to educate immigrant children
B
to educate girls
С
to educate African American girls
D
to provide religious education
Minority groups signed up for segregated units like the Tuskegee Airmen and Navajo Code Talkers for which of the following reasons?
Answer: B. To show their equality to the nation during WWII.
Explanation:
Minority groups have been fighting for recognition in American history for a long time and this is not without merit because time and time again they have contributed to American history like European descendants.
One such time was during the second world war where African Americans formed the Tuskegee Airmen who flew many successful missions in the war and the Navajo Code Talkers who came up with a code so complex that the Japanese could not break it. Both of these groups did this to show that they were just as American as other groups.
How did the location of the German Concentration Camps fit into Hitler's "Final Solution"
The correct answer is C. They were designed to eliminate all people of Jewish descent from Europe.
Explanation
The Nazi concentration camps were places to which minority communities such as political opponents, Jews, Gypsies and people with mental or physical disabilities were taken. There were several types of concentration camps among which were those of prison, concentration, work and extermination. These places were part of Hitler's "Final Solution" political plan in which he proposed the extermination of the population of Jewish descentdants. So the correct answer is C. They were designed to eliminate all people of Jewish descent from Europe.
Who was responsible for creating the Great Compromise?
Roger Sherman
William Paterson
George Washington
James Williams
Answer:
Roger Sherman
Explanation:
Not really much to explain but Roger Sherman was responsible for the Great Compromise
The person that was responsible for creating the Great Compromise is Roger Sherman.
Roger Sherman can be regarded as an icon in colonies' struggle for independence. By all cost he wanted people to be free from British rule.
He was the Continental Congress and was part of the Declaration of Independence and how it was achieved.
We can conclude that the person that was responsible for creating the Great Compromise is Roger Sherman.
Learn more about Great Compromise at:
https://brainly.com/question/21235714
The colonists especially hated the Stamp Act because it was seen as placing limitations on
The colonists especially hated the Stamp Act because it was seen as placing limitations on
=
The Stamp Act was very unpopular among colonists. A majority considered it a violation of their rights as Englishmen to be taxed without their consent—consent that only the colonial legislatures could grant. Their slogan was "No taxation without representation"Arguing that only their own representative assemblies could tax them, the colonists insisted that the act was unconstitutional, and they resorted to mob violence to intimidate stamp collectors into resigningAnswer:
Foreign trade
The two main ways to become a knight are to:
pay the right people, and work your way up.
win a bunch of competitions, inherit from your father.
Inherit from your father or work your way up.
fredrick douglas was not only known for supporting the freeing of slaves but also for
Answer:
he was also known for wanting
equality of all people
Which statement would Sanford B. Dole most likely agree with?
A. It is a dangerous gamble to make American business dependent
on Hawaiian trade.
B. It is in the best economic and social interests of Hawaii to join the
United States.
C. It is imperative that we secure a friendly alliance with the political
rulers of Hawaii.
O D. It is an ethical obligation to gain the consent of the Hawaiian
monarch before annexation.
The correct answer is B. It is in the best economic and social interests of Hawaii to join the United States.
Explanation
Sanford Ballard Dole (1844-1926) was a Hawaiian politician. As a politician, he stood out for allowing the annexation of Hawaii to the United States of America in the year 1900. This occurred because Sanford considered that it was the best for the future of the island. After all, the United States was in economic growth and was becoming a world power. So the correct answer is B. It is in the best economic and social interests of Hawaii to join the United States.
What laws did the Nazis create against Jewish people?
The application of racial and eugenic laws and policies in Nazi Germany
Targeted groups
the application of reca and engineers laws and policies in Nazi Germany
The term D-Day refers to which major offensive ?
Answer:
The answer is a, the allied invasion of the coast of Normandy
Explanation:
Based on your answer to the first question, what were the specific causes of China's economic turn around?
HELP MEE i need a timeline of five events that happened in the 19th century.
What does ancestral meaning
Answer:
belonging or inherited from an ancestors or ancestor.
stay safe healthy and happy....Explanation:
Answer:
belonging or inherited from an ancestors or ancestor.
hope it is helpful to you
How was long distance trade easier for muslims
Answer:
helpful in trade, 10 days without water, long distance across Sahara, camel saddle made it easier to bring things
Explanation:
Why are implied powers of Congress, why are they important, but why do they make limits on Congress’ powers an urgency?
Answer:
Because they set limits to branches
Explanation:
PLS HELP 30 POINTS
In the nineteenth century, political leaders Victor Emmanuel and Prime Minister Count
Camillo Cavour fought for national unity of Italy. What type of nationalism is this an example of?
bipartisan nationalism
economic nationalism
civic nationalism
popular nationalism
Answer:
economic nationalism
Explanation:
Hope I helped! Ask me anything if you have any questions! Brainiest plz! Hope you make a 100% and have a nice day! -Amelia♥
Answer:
The correct awnser is civic nationalism
Explanation:
Hope this helps :]
Supporters of the Union looked to Article VI of the Constitution for support for their argument. Read the excerpt from Article VI and then choose and defend a point of view regarding whether the Constitution corroborates (supports) a view that the Union is permanent.
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
The Supremacy Clause of Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
Answer:
The Supporters of the Union had a point in this argument, 'the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land...' this excerpt states that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. This would contradict the Democrats' opinion that a state shall decide for itself's view on slavery, because any federal treaties or laws take priority over any state laws. If the government further decides to abolish slavery, all sectional interests would be ignored as the federal laws take priority over state laws. If popular sovereignty was made permanent, and the government decided for itself the view on slavery, popular sovereignty wouldn't exist.
Explanation:
Because popular sovereignty was very popular in the South, but the Constitution clearly states that federal laws take priority over state laws, so If a state law decides for itself that the state will accept slavery, but the government passes a law abolishing slavery, popular sovereignty no longer exists because the federal law abolishing slavery takes priority over any state wishing to accept slavery. This should show us that popular sovereignty or any sectional interest is proven to be invalid because the federal government will always have priority over the state government
Some historians consider the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century to have been crucial decades in the development of Western thought. What evidence supports that contention?
Hi. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
A textual evidence is a justification that the author uses to prove an argument presented in the text. This evidence seeks to present elements that prove that the author's argument about something must be considered correct and true. In this case, to answer your question, you should read the entire text and identify the sentences the author uses to prove that the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were crucial decades in the development of Western thought. In this case, the author can present the scientific discoveries made during this period that were essential to explain and solve several problems that humanity did not know how to solve.