It enabled the federal government to collect taxes. The Articles of Confederation lacked a provision for the federal government to levy taxes, which hindered its ability to fund its operations.So, the option D. is the right choice.
The U.S. Constitution resolved this problem by granting the federal government the power to collect taxes, ensuring a stable source of revenue for governance.
The U.S. Constitution addressed a problem created by the Articles of Confederation by enabling the federal government to collect taxes. Under the Articles, the federal government had limited authority and lacked the power to levy taxes on its own. This created significant financial challenges and hindered the government's ability to operate effectively.
The Constitution resolved this issue by granting the federal government the power to collect taxes. This provision, outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, allowed the government to raise revenue to fund its operations, maintain a standing military, and fulfill its responsibilities. It provided a stable and consistent source of income for the federal government, enhancing its ability to function and address the needs of the nation.
By empowering the federal government to collect taxes, the Constitution helped alleviate the financial strains that plagued the Confederation government. This change played a crucial role in strengthening the central authority, promoting stability, and supporting the development of a more effective and functional system of governance in the United States.
The right answer is D. It enabled the federal government to collect taxes
For more such question on Articles of Confederation
https://brainly.com/question/28386696
#SPJ11
Do you think American policies (HUAC, blacklisting, McCarthy’s senate hearings) were effective in containing communism at home?
French prime ministry said a speech, how did he convince the audience that France needed colonial expansion ?
French Prime Minister Jules Ferry convinced the French for colonial expansion by relating to economic, moral and strategic arguments.
What did Jules Ferry say ?Ferry argued that colonies were essential to the economic well-being of France. He claimed that colonies provided France with raw materials, markets for French goods, and opportunities for investment.
Ferry also argued that France had a moral obligation to colonize. He claimed that France was bringing civilization to the colonies and that it was helping to uplift the native peoples. Finally, Ferry argued that colonies were essential to the security of France. He claimed that colonies provided France with strategic resources and that they helped to protect France from its enemies.
Find out more on Jules Ferry at https://brainly.com/question/19377572
#SPJ1
32*
This political cartoon from 1933 depicts efforts made by President Roosevelt to end the Great Depression with his New Deal. President Roosevelt tries to “prime” the economic pump using taxpayer dollars to get the economy going again.
How does this artist illustrate their objection to the New Deal policies?
What symbols are used to convey the message?
The artist illustrates their objection to President Roosevelt's New Deal policies by depicting him as a plumber attempting to fix the economic pump with a wrench labeled "New Deal." The use of symbols such as the wrench and the pipe in the cartoon highlights the artist's disapproval of government intervention and implies that a more effective solution may exist.
The political cartoon from 1933 depicts President Roosevelt's New Deal policies to end the Great Depression. The artist illustrates their objection to these policies by depicting Roosevelt as a plumber attempting to fix the economy using a wrench labeled "New Deal." The use of a wrench implies that the New Deal policies are not the appropriate tool for fixing the economy. Additionally, the use of the phrase "taxpayer dollars" suggests that the artist is opposed to government spending and views it as an unnecessary burden on taxpayers.
The use of symbols in the cartoon reinforces the artist's message. The wrench symbolizes the New Deal policies as a tool that is not effective in fixing the economy. The plumber's tools, including the wrench and the pipe, represent the government's attempts to fix the economy. The artist's use of taxpayer dollars to prime the economic pump implies that government spending is an unjustified expense.
Overall, the cartoon suggests that the artist opposes the New Deal policies and believes that government intervention is not the solution to the Great Depression. The cartoonist's use of symbolism is a powerful tool in conveying this message to the public. It highlights the artist's disapproval of government spending and implies that a more effective solution may exist.
Know more about Political cartoon here :
https://brainly.com/question/26489031
#SPJ11
1. Rwanda-What did you learn? What did you like?
2. Guatemalean-What did you learn? What did you like?
3. Bosnian-What did you learn? What did you like?
4. What are 3 causes/3 effects of World Genocides?
5. What did Nelson Mandela do to heal and progress in South Africa? (Explain 3 examples)
6. Why was Nelson Mandela elected president in 1994 in South Africa?
Many of today's ethnic conflicts were caused, at least to some degree, by artificial boundaries, identities, and role relationships and the effects of genocide are the psychological as well as demographic effects of genocide on youth affect the transition into adulthood. Mandela tried to focus on the racial problem of South Africa that had come to an end.
In fact, Mandela meant to say that the very hour to bridge the gap between the white people and the black people had arrived.
Nelson Mandela was a South African anti-apartheid activist and politician who served as the first president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999. One of the 20th century's most important civil-rights change-makers, Nelson Mandela devoted his life including 27 years in prison to bringing an end to the cruelly segregationist policies of South Africa's apartheid system.
Learn more about South Africa, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31900946
#SPJ1
TION: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISH NATION BY THE NAZI GERMANY DURING THE PERIOD 1933 TO 19467
The impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946-7 was devastating. The Nazis believed that the Jews were an inferior race and that they were a threat to the German people. They used these pseudoscientific ideas to justify the persecution and murder of millions of Jews.
The Nazis began their persecution of the Jews shortly after they came to power in 1933. They passed laws that discriminated against Jews in all aspects of life, including employment, education, and housing. They also began to physically attack Jews, and there were numerous pogroms, or organized attacks on Jews, throughout the 1930s.
In 1938, the Nazis launched a series of coordinated attacks on Jewish businesses and synagogues, known as Kristallnacht. This event marked a turning point in the Nazi persecution of the Jews. After Kristallnacht, the Nazis began to systematically round up Jews and send them to concentration camps.
The Nazis believed that the Jews were a threat to the German people because they were supposedly responsible for Germany's economic problems and its defeat in World War I. They also believed that the Jews were a threat to the German race because they were supposedly trying to take over the world.
Which country was not a member of the Axis Powers during World War II?
a) Germany
b) Italy
c) Japan
d) Soviet Union
Answer:
D, Soviet Union
Explanation:
The Soviet Union were allies not part of the Axis Powers
Answer: d) Soviet Union
Explanation:
The Soviet Union was not a member of the Axis Powers. It was part of the Allied Powers, but it did sign a non-aggression pact with Germany before the war.
Who was the leader of Nazi Germany during World War II?
a) Adolf Hitler
b) Benito Mussolini
c) Joseph Stalin
d) Winston Churchill
Answer:
a) Adolf Hitler
Explanation:
Beneficiaries of Racism in both Germany and South Africa.
In both Germany and South Africa, racism has resulted in various groups benefiting from discriminatory systems and policies. However, historically, certain groups have enjoyed privileges and advantages based on their racial or ethnic identity.
In Germany, during the Nazi era, the Aryan population was elevated and granted preferential treatment, while non-Aryan groups, particularly Jewish people, faced persecution and marginalization. The Nazi regime implemented policies that aimed to purify the German race and consolidate power in the hands of the so-called superior Aryan race.
In South Africa, during the period of apartheid, the white minority government enacted policies that institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination. This system privileged white South Africans, granting them access to better education, healthcare, housing, and employment opportunities, while the majority Black population faced systemic oppression and limited rights.
It is crucial to recognize that racism perpetuates social and economic inequalities, perpetuating a cycle of privilege and disadvantage. Overcoming these historical legacies requires ongoing efforts to dismantle racist structures and ensure equitable opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their racial or ethnic background.
For more questions on Racism
https://brainly.com/question/23754542
#SPJ11
Which three statements describe some of the results of Hurricane Katrina?
All levels of government were criticized for their slow response.
Thousands of people had to relocate to different states.
The population of New Orleans grew much larger.
Thousands of people were forced to shelter at churches in Texas.
Many people could not find affordable housing after the flooding.
Hurricane Katrina, which struck the Gulf Coast of the United States in 2005, had profound and far-reaching consequences. Three statements that describe some of the results of Hurricane Katrina are:
All levels of government were criticized for their slow response: The response to Hurricane Katrina by the local, state, and federal governments faced widespread criticism for being slow and inadequate. The delayed evacuation efforts, insufficient coordination, and ineffective response led to a heightened sense of frustration and anger among the affected population and the general public.
Thousands of people had to relocate to different states: The storm's impact on New Orleans was particularly devastating, as the city experienced catastrophic flooding when the levees failed. As a result, thousands of residents were displaced and had to seek refuge in other states. The forced relocation of individuals and families caused significant disruptions to their lives and resulted in long-term social, economic, and emotional challenges.
Many people could not find affordable housing after the flooding: The widespread destruction caused by Hurricane Katrina left many residents without homes. The limited availability of affordable housing options exacerbated the difficulties faced by displaced individuals and families. The lack of accessible and affordable housing options became a major challenge for those trying to rebuild their lives and communities in the aftermath of the hurricane.
It is important to note that while the population of New Orleans did experience significant fluctuations following Hurricane Katrina, the statement "The population of New Orleans grew much larger" is not accurate. The city's population initially declined due to the displacement caused by the hurricane, and it took several years for the population to recover to pre-Katrina levels.
for more questions on Hurricane Katrina
https://brainly.com/question/29928816
#SPJ11
What occurred as a result of the XYZ affair ?
In the latter half of the 18th century, there was a diplomatic crisis known as the "XYZ affair" between France and the United States. John Adams was president when it happened, and it had a big impact on both nations.
Here's what happened as a result of the XYZ affair:
1. Tensions have increased as a result of the XYZ scandal between France and the United States. It all started in 1797 when American officials were dispatched to France to discuss resolving unresolved problems.
Instead of negotiating diplomatically, three French operatives identified as X, Y, and Z contacted them and requested a bribe and a loan for France in exchange for talks.
2. The US was outraged upon hearing of the French demands and attempted bribes. It caused a surge of anti-French feelings among Americans.
3. The Quasi-War was reignited as a result of the XYZ scandal, which also had a role in the deterioration of Franco-American relations.
4. The Federalist-controlled Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 in response to the XYZ crisis and worries about national security.
5. After some time, diplomatic talks between the United States and France resumed, which resulted in the Convention of 1800 (also known as the Treaty of Mortefontaine), which was signed.
Overall, the XYZ scandal had a big impact on American politics at the time, helping to strengthen the Federalist Party and the ties between the two countries.
To learn more about XYZ affair:
brainly.com/question/298649
A government based on the peaceful principles of Confucianism and Daoism, plus the defeat of the Xiongnu invaders from the north allowed ancient
China, under the Han Dynasty, to experience a period of time known as
the Spring and Autumn Period
Pax Sinica
the Golden Age of Pericles
the Warring States Period
A government based on the peaceful principles of Confucianism and Daoism, plus the defeat of the Xiongnu invaders from the north allowed ancient China, under the Han Dynasty, to experience a period of time known as The correct answer is "Pax Sinica."
The Pax Sinica refers to a period of relative peace and stability in ancient China under the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE). During this time, the principles of Confucianism and Daoism played a significant role in shaping the government and society. Confucianism emphasized social harmony, respect for authority, and moral virtue, while Daoism focused on living in harmony with the Dao, or the natural way of the universe.
The Han Dynasty successfully defeated the Xiongnu, a nomadic group from the north, which further solidified their control over the region and allowed for a more peaceful and stable rule. This period is often considered a golden age in Chinese history, marked by advancements in governance, agriculture, trade, arts, and sciences.
The Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, on the other hand, preceded the Han Dynasty and were characterized by political turmoil, warfare, and fragmentation among various states in ancient China. The Golden Age of Pericles, meanwhile, refers to a period of cultural and political flourishing in ancient Greece, specifically during the leadership of Pericles in the 5th century BCE.
For more questions on China,
https://brainly.com/question/28824638
#SPJ11
Who was the leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) during the Rwandan Genocide?
a) Paul Kagame
b) Juvenal Habyarimana
c) François Mitterrand
d) Juvénal Mugabe
Answer: a) Paul Kagame
Explanation:
Paul Kagame was the leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a rebel group that fought against the government responsible for the genocide, and he later became the President of Rwanda.
Answer: a) Paul Kagame
Explanation:
The leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) during the Rwandan Genocide was Paul Kagame and he was the main rebel against the government at the time. He then defeated the government, established a government and ended the genocide.
Saturday, Nov. 12. We were [frightened] almost to death
last night. Some mean soldiers set several houses on fire
in different parts of the town. I could not go to sleep for
fear that they would set our house on fire. We all [dread]
the next few days to come for they said that they would
set the last house on fire if they had to leave this place.
Sun. Nov. 13. The federal soldiers have been coming
today and burning houses and I have been looking at
them come in nearly all day.
-Carrie Berry, 1864
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers
O destroyed mills and other factories.
O burned buildings as they left the city.
O sent women and children to the North.
O used a total war strategy to win the war.
Done
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers burned buildings as they left the city.
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers burned buildings as they left the city. The author, Carrie Berry, expresses her fear and distress as she witnesses Union soldiers setting houses on fire in different parts of the town. The act of burning buildings indicates a destructive and retaliatory action taken by the Union soldiers.
Carrie Berry and the residents of the town are filled with fear and dread, anticipating further destruction as the soldiers threaten to set the last house on fire before leaving. The author's inability to sleep due to the fear of her own house being targeted highlights the intense psychological impact of such actions.
While the passage focuses on the burning of buildings, it does not provide evidence of other specific activities such as destroying mills or factories, sending women and children to the North, or implementing a total war strategy. The primary emphasis is on the destructive acts of burning houses carried out by Union soldiers as they leave the city.
For more such question on Union soldiers
https://brainly.com/question/28418223
#SPJ11
What was one goal of the U.S. invasion of Iraq?
Hi :)
Answer:
to overthrow a dictator
Explanation:
The 2003 invasion of Iraq had many different goals. One of them was the removal from power of Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi dictator and tyrant, who was accused of being connected to al-Qaeda and of developing weapons of mass destruction.
The invasion started with a 21-day major combat operation with joint forces from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland.
The end of Hussein's dictatorship brought about the first Iraqi parliamentary election in January 2005. USA forces stayed in Iraq until the withdrawal in 2011.
hope this helps :) !!!
A Jacksonian Democrat- he related with the common man. Had total disregard for "corrupt" aristocracy of Northeast.
Lincoln
Calhoun
Johnson
Clay
If a Jacksonian Democrat- he related with the common man. Had total disregard for "corrupt" aristocracy of Northeast is: c. Johnson.
Who is Andrew Johnson?
The 17th President of the United States, Andrew Johnson (1865–1869), was a Jacksonian Democrat who connected with the average person.
He had nothing but contempt for the "corrupt" Northeastern elite. Johnson a Southern Democrat from Tennessee, supported the concerns of the working class and ordinary people and linked himself with Andrew Jackson's beliefs.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about Andrew Johnson here:https://brainly.com/question/23458622
#SPJ1
what is the view of the first author regarding the notion of the industrial revolution
Answer:
Arnold Toynbee
Explanation:
This process began in Britain in the 18th century and from there spread to other parts of the world. Although used earlier by French writers, the term Industrial Revolution was first popularized by the English economic historian Arnold Toynbee (1852–83) to describe Britain’s economic development from 1760 to 1840.
Explain whether you agree or disagree with the right to know campaign
Whether one should agree or disagree with the right-to-know campaign depends on their values, beliefs, and the specific context in which the campaign is being advocated. I think I agree with this concept.
The right-to-know campaign is a movement advocating for transparency and access to information held by governments, corporations, and other entities. It aims to empower individuals with the knowledge necessary to make informed decisions, hold authorities accountable, and participate actively in public affairs. Supporters argue that the right to know is fundamental to a democratic society. They believe that citizens have a legitimate interest in understanding how decisions are made, how public resources are allocated, and how policies affect their lives. By having access to information, individuals can better engage in public discourse, contribute to policy debates, and exercise their democratic rights.
Moreover, proponents contend that transparency helps combat corruption, promotes good governance, and strengthens trust between citizens and institutions. When information is readily available, it becomes more difficult for authorities to hide wrongdoing or manipulate public opinion. The right to know can serve as a powerful tool for fostering accountability and promoting ethical behavior.
However, critics of the right-to-know campaign argue that certain information should be kept confidential for national security, privacy, or commercial reasons. They contend that unrestricted access to information could potentially harm individuals, and organizations, or even undermine the functioning of society. Balancing the right to know with other legitimate concerns is an ongoing challenge.
Ultimately, whether one agrees or disagrees with the right-to-know campaign often depends on their assessment of the benefits and potential drawbacks associated with transparency and access to information.
For more questions on campaign
https://brainly.com/question/28341453
#SPJ11
Which event marked the beginning of World War II in Europe?
a) Invasion of Poland
b) Attack on Pearl Harbor
c) Battle of Stalingrad
d) D-Day Normandy Landings
Answer: a) Invasion of Poland
Explanation:
The invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany in 1939 marked the beginning of World War II in Europe as the nations of Britain and France declared war on Germany shortly after.
Answer: a) Invasion of Poland
Explanation:
When Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939, this proved to be the last straw for the Allies and they proceeded to declare war on Germany which led to the Second World War.
LANDMARKS OF BAHRAIN introduction
Answer:
Explanation:
Bahrain, a small island nation located in the Arabian Gulf, is rich in history and culture. Over the centuries, it has been home to various civilizations and has witnessed the rise and fall of empires. As a result, Bahrain boasts a plethora of fascinating landmarks that showcase its diverse heritage. From ancient archaeological sites to modern architectural marvels, these landmarks provide a glimpse into the country's past and present.
One of the most iconic landmarks in Bahrain is the Bahrain Fort, also known as Qal'at al-Bahrain. This archaeological site dates back to the Dilmun civilization, which flourished over 4,000 years ago. The fort's strategic location and historical significance make it a UNESCO World Heritage Site, attracting visitors from around the world.
Another notable landmark is the Bahrain National Museum, located in the capital city of Manama. The museum showcases Bahrain's rich history, culture, and heritage through its extensive collection of artifacts, artworks, and exhibitions. It offers visitors a comprehensive understanding of the country's traditions, customs, and archaeological discoveries.
The Al-Fateh Grand Mosque is a prominent religious landmark in Bahrain. Known for its stunning architecture and impressive size, it is one of the largest mosques in the world. The mosque is open to non-Muslim visitors, allowing them to admire its intricate design and experience the tranquility of the place.
In recent years, Bahrain has also witnessed the development of modern architectural landmarks. The Bahrain World Trade Center, with its distinctive twin towers topped by wind turbines, is a prime example of sustainable and innovative design. The building serves as a symbol of Bahrain's progress and economic growth.
Additionally, the Bahrain International Circuit stands out as a landmark for motorsport enthusiasts. It hosts the annual Formula 1 Bahrain Grand Prix and has become a hub for various motorsport events and activities.
These landmarks, among others, reflect Bahrain's rich tapestry of history, culture, and progress. They provide a glimpse into the past while embracing the present, making Bahrain a captivating destination for visitors seeking a blend of tradition and modernity.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
How did the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party change after the death of Mao Zedong? • A. It held China's first national elections but failed to rebuild the devastated Chinese economy. • B. It fiercely condemned Mao and his supporters but kept many of their policies in place • C. It began introducing free market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms. • D. It closed off relations with the Soviet Union but remained an influential communist state.
Answer C. It began introducing free-market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms.
Explanation: After Mao Zedong's death, the Chinese Communist Party had a leadership turnover as it started implementing free-market reforms but kept restricting individual freedom
Answer:
C. It began introducing free-market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms.
Explanation:
apex
Sonnet 73 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 That time of year thou mayst in me behold When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang Upon those boughs which shake against cold, Bare ruined choirs where late the sweet birds sang. In me thou seest the twilight of such day As after sunset fadeth in the west, Middle (2) Which by and by black night doth take away, Death's second self, that seals up all in rest. In me thou seest the glowing of such fire That on the ashes of his youth doth lie, As deathbed whereon it must expire, Consumed with that which it was nourished by. This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong, To love that well which thou must leave ere long. 2.1 Describe the structure of this poem fully. (3) 2.2 What happens in each section of the poem? Beginning (2) End (2) 2.3 Refer to line 7 (Which by and...doth take away"). 2.3.1 Identify the literal device used in this line. (1) 2.3.2Explain how this literal device enhances the message of this poem. (2) 2.4 Discuss the theme of death as it is evident in this poem. (3) TOTAL SECTION B: 15 marks
The poem is structured as a Shakespearean sonnet, consisting of three quatrains and a final couplet. The rhyme scheme is ABAB CDCD EFEF GG, and the meter is iambic pentameter.
In the beginning of the poem, the speaker describes the season of autumn and compares it to the twilight of his own life. In the middle section, he further describes the process of aging and compares it to the approach of death. In the final quatrain, he reflects on the fire of his youth that is now fading away, and how this realization makes his love stronger. The poem ends with the couplet, which emphasizes the theme of mortality and the inevitability of death.
The literal device used in line 7 is personification.
The use of personification in this line enhances the message of the poem by emphasizing the inevitability of death. The image of black night taking away the twilight of the day is a metaphor for death taking away the speaker's life. By personifying the night as an active force that "takes away" the light of day, the poem suggests that death is an unstoppable and inevitable force that will eventually claim us all.
The theme of death is central to this poem. The speaker uses the metaphor of autumn to describe the twilight of his own life, and he compares himself to a dying fire that is slowly fading away. The image of the "bare ruined choirs" where the birds no longer sing is a symbol of the emptiness and loneliness that the speaker feels as he contemplates his own mortality.
for more such questions on rhyme scheme
https://brainly.com/question/16888144
#SPJ11
The works of Emile Durkheim focus on how social order is possible and how society can remain stable despite the many influences that can destabilise social order.
With the above in mind, briefly explain Durkheim’s point of view regarding the role of educational institutions to uphold the equilibrium between individual rights and the interest of society.
According to Durkheim, educational institution and education serves as a mechanism to instill shared values, norms, and moral principles in individuals, thereby promoting social integration and cohesion.
Emile Durkheim, a renowned sociologist, believed that educational institutions play a vital role in maintaining social equilibrium between individual rights and the interests of society.
Durkheim argued that through the educational process, individuals acquire a collective consciousness, which encompasses a shared understanding of societal expectations and norms. This collective consciousness helps to regulate individual behavior, ensuring that members of society adhere to common norms and values. By internalizing these norms, individuals develop a sense of solidarity and commitment to the collective good.
Moreover, Durkheim believed that education helps individuals develop social skills and abilities necessary for active participation in society. By imparting knowledge and skills, educational institutions prepare individuals to assume their roles and responsibilities as productive members of society. This contributes to the overall stability and functioning of the social order.
Durkheim emphasized the importance of educational institutions in shaping individuals' moral development and social integration. By transmitting shared values and promoting social cohesion, education upholds the equilibrium between individual rights and societal interests, fostering a harmonious and stable social order.
For more questions on educational institute
https://brainly.com/question/29789159
#SPJ11
In 50 years what historically significant event/events will students learn about that
have happened in your lifetime?
Answer:
The end SARS protest in Nigeria.
What does Mississippi mean when it says their "position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery"?
When Mississippi stated that its "position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery," it means that the state was firmly aligned with and supportive of the institution of slavery.
On January 9, 1861, Mississippi formally broke away from the US. The state's secession convention members believed it was their obligation to explain why to the world in doing so. Members stated, "Our attitude is wholly associated with the institution of slavery—the largest material interest of the globe.
However, Mississippi's defense of the institution of slavery was the primary reason the state seceded from the Union. State's rights and high tariffs are commonly listed as causes of the war.
Learn more about Mississippi here:
https://brainly.com/question/931281
#SPJ1
What misconceptions did the indigenous people of America seem to have about the Europeans who arrived on Christopher Columbus’s ships? What misconceptions did Columbus and other Europeans have about the indigenous people they encountered?
(a) The indigenous people of America had several misconceptions about the Europeans who arrived on Columbus's ships. The misconception was that they believed the Europeans were supernatural beings or gods because of their advanced technology and weaponry.
(b) Columbus and other Europeans had various misconceptions about the indigenous people they encountered. One of the most common misconceptions was that the indigenous people were primitive and uncivilized.
(a) The indigenous people had never seen such advanced technology before, and they assumed that it was something magical or supernatural. They also believed that the Europeans had come to help them in some way, possibly to protect them from their enemies.
(b)The Europeans believed that they were superior to the indigenous people in every way, including culture, religion, and technology. They also assumed that the indigenous people were savages and lacked basic human qualities such as intelligence and empathy.
Overall, both the indigenous people of America and the Europeans who arrived on Columbus's ships had many misconceptions about each other. These misconceptions were based on cultural differences, language barriers, and the lack of knowledge about each other's customs and traditions. Unfortunately, these misconceptions led to many conflicts, wars, and misunderstandings that continue to affect these two groups' relationships to this day.
know more about Columbus here:
https://brainly.com/question/11068699
#SPJ11
The main principles of the black consciousness movement movement?
Who played a major role in founding the NAACP?
OA. Booker T. Washington
B. A. Philip Randolph
OC. W. E. B. Du Bois
OD. Marcus Garvey
Answer:
Henry Moscowitz
Explanation:
Our founders
Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth.
The role and influence of BCM leaders?
Answer:
One of the leading management challenges in the establishment of a BCMS (Business Continuity Management System) is gaining board-level support. Like any major projects that could influence the way an organization operates, business continuity needs to be perceived as a management activity that adds value to business.
Explanation:
What was the human cost of world war 2 ?
The human suffering of World War II was immeasurable and devastating. An estimated 70 to 85 million people died in the war, making it the deadliest conflict in human history.
About 50 million of the dead were civilians, including millions of Jews who were systematically murdered in Nazi concentration camps and millions who died due to the German invasion of the Soviet Union. Including Soviet citizens.
In addition to losing life, war has resulted in extensive physical and mental trauma, displacement, and economic devastation. After the war, many cities lay in ruins, and countless people were left homeless, starving, and struggling to rebuild their lives. The war also had long-term geopolitical consequences, such as the division of Germany and the rise of the United States and the Soviet Union as global superpowers.
To learn more about the German invasion:
https://brainly.com/question/2995683
https://brainly.com/question/1079147
how did the kansas-nesbraska act represent an attempt at compromise on expansion of slavery in the west
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was indeed an attempt at compromise on the expansion of slavery in the western territories of the United States.
It was introduced by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois and aimed to address the issue of westward expansion and the organization of new territories.
The act proposed that the territories of Kansas and Nebraska would determine the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty, allowing the residents of those territories to decide whether or not to allow slavery within their borders.
The supporters of the Kansas-Nebraska Act argued that it respected the principle of popular sovereignty, giving the people of the territories the right to decide their own fate regarding slavery.
However, the act ultimately led to significant controversy and intensified sectional divisions. It sparked a rush of settlers from both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions to influence the outcome of the popular votes in Kansas. This resulted in violent clashes and political turmoil, known as "Bleeding Kansas," as both sides sought to establish their dominance in the territory.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act's attempt at compromise ultimately failed to ease tensions and instead further heightened sectional divisions and set the stage for the intensification of the slavery debate.
While the Kansas-Nebraska Act was intended as a compromise by allowing popular sovereignty, its consequences led to increased tensions and further entrenched the divide over the expansion of slavery in the western territories.
For more questions on slavery
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ11