=
If f(x) = 3x – 2 and g(x) = x+2,
find f(g(x)).
3
f(g(x)) = [?]
Simplify your answer as much as possible.

Answer:96

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

28%

Step-by-step explanation:

(25%-7%)×4

100%-28%

Answer:Example: evaluate the function f(x) = 2x+4 for x=5

Just replace the variable "x" with "5":

f(5) = 2×5 + 4 = 14

Answer: f(5) = 14

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

55%

Step-by-step explanation:

The percent change formula is written like this:

[tex]|\frac{change - original }{original}|[/tex]. In this scenario, the "change" or new value is 31, because it is this season, and the original is last season. Now, 31-20 = 11, and 11/20 = 55%.

Answer:

answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

I used Desmos to graph the function

Answer:

1200 units 30 times 40 is 1200

1200 sq units

hope this helps

40 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = 8 + 4x

Step-by-step explanation:

y is the total cost of 1 skating experience.

y = 8 + 4x

This can be read as:  the total cost, y, is equal to the admission, $8, plus $4 times the number of hours the skates are rented.  No snacks included.

What do you mean? What’s the question?

Answer:

Unknown

Step-by-step explanation:

Question, not provided.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

sum of ratio=3+7=10

total=120 ml

first part=3/10×120=36 ml

second part=7/10×120=84 ml

Answer:

9 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

270/30=9

Answer:

h,c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

A is locate in the second quadrant

Answer:

12*2=24

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

what do you need help with??

Step-by-step explanation:

i would be happy to help : )

Answer:

third option (-3,3,5,9)

Step-by-step explanation:

domain is the starting point of the set (x coordinate )

Answer:

-12, -6, -4, -1, 9, 20

Step-by-step explanation:

9, -12, -4, 20 -1, -6

putting them in order from least to greatest means that negatives should go to the left (1st), largest should go to the right (last).

The number -9, -12, -4, 20, -6, -1 in the order from least to greatest is -12, -9, -6, -4, -4, -1, 20.

Given data: -9, -12, -4, 20, -6, -1

Starting from the smallest number:

-12 is the smallest number.

Next is -9, which is larger than -12 but smaller than -6.

Then comes -6, larger than -9 but smaller than -4.

After that, we have two occurrences of -4.

Following that is -1, greater than -4.

Finally, the largest number is 20.

So, the numbers in ascending order are: -12, -9, -6, -4, -4, -1, 20.

Learn more about ascending order here:

https://brainly.com/question/31946606

#SPJ12

Answer:

The answer is $20.75

A dog: 40$

2: $37.25

3: $34.50

4: $31.75

5: $29

6: $26.25

7: $23.50

8: $ 20.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Minus $2.75 is the pattern

Answer:

$ 59.25

Step-by-step explanation:

The given rates form an AP (Arithmetic Progression).

Let the cost of walking 1 dog be taken as the first term

and,

cost of walking 2 dogs as second term,

we notice that the price per dog is decreasing by 2.75 $ each time the number of dogs is increasing by 1.

So, it's safe to say that

In the AP:

First term is $ 40

Common difference is $ 2.75

Finding the charge to walk each of the eight dogs is like finding the 8th term of the given Series.

Formula for n-th term of a depreciating AP in terms of common difference(d) and first term(a):

[tex] \boxed{ \mathsf{a _{n} = a - (n - 1)d}}[/tex]

[tex] \implies \mathsf{a _{8} = 40 - (8 - 1) \times 2.75}[/tex]

[tex] \implies \mathsf{a _{8} = 40 - 7 \times 2.75}[/tex]

[tex] \implies \mathsf{a _{8} = 40 - 19.25}[/tex]

[tex] \implies \mathsf{a _{8} = \underline{20.75}}[/tex]

Hence, the charge to walk each of the eight dogs is $ 20.75

It helps to set up a two way table as shown below. Such tables compare 2 different variables. In this case, we're comparing the variables "working status" and "age".

Specifically, the working status separates the men into "working vs non-working". The age variable splits the men into groups of "35 or younger" and "over 35". Usually, but not always, each variable will take on two values.

Let's say this town had 1000 married men. 80% of this is 0.80*1000 = 800 to indicate there are 800 married working men. So we write this in the "total" column for the "working" row. This leaves 1000-800 = 200 nonworking married men, which will go right under the 800.

We're told that 75% of the married men are over 35, so 0.75*1000 = 750 married men are over 35. This goes in the "total" row for the "over 35" column. There are 1000-750 = 250 married men who are 35 and under.

As you can see, the stuff in the total column and the total row must add back to the grand total of 1000 married men overall.

--------------------------------

Another bit of info given is that "Among the working married men, 70% are over 35". We'll only focus on the "working" row. We have 800 total and 70% of this is 0.70*800 = 560 which is the number of working married men over 35. This leaves 800-560 = 240 married men who are not over 35.

At this point, we have 2 spots left in the table. Through guess and check, or using algebra, you should find that there are 190 non-working men over 35 and 10 non-working men who aren't over 35. Make sure that each row and column total checks out.

--------------------------------

By now, the table is fully filled out. See below.

Your teacher now asks "what proportion of non-working married men are over 35 years old?" which means we'll only focus on the "non-working" row. There are 200 men total here, and of this total, 190 are over 35.

So, 190/200 = 0.95 = 95% of the non-working married men are over 35.

[tex]\left \{ {{2x + 3y = 9} \atop {3x - y = 8}} \right. <=>\left \{ {{2x + 3y = 9} \atop {9x-3x=24}} \right. <=>\left \{ {{2x+9x+3x-3x=9+24} \atop {9x-3x=24}} \right. \\<=>\left \{ {{11x=33} \atop {9x-3x=24}} \right. <=>\left \{ {{x=3} \atop {y=1}} \right.[/tex]

ok done. Thank to me :>

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the cofunction identity

sec(90 - x) = cosecx , then

sec(90 - 58)° = cosec32° , so

[tex]\frac{cosec32}{sec58}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{cosec32}{cosec32}[/tex]

= 1

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Find the factors of 3 and 33.

Step 2: Find the largest common factor they share.

Therefore, the GCF of 3 and 33 is 3.

Answer: choose the one that is addition... trust me

Step-by-step explanation:

Frank paid a total of $304 ($55+249). You multiply $304 by 0.07 to get $21.28 (To convert a number to a percentage, multiply it by 100. So, 0.07 as a percent is equal to 7%). You add this to $304 to get to your answer: $325.28.

The total would be $325.28 if the sunglasses were $249. Hope it helped!

Answer:

no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

7x + 15 = 9x + 15 - 2x + 1

Combine like terms

7x+15 = 7x+16

Subtract 7x from each side

7x+15-7x = 7x+16-7x

15 =16

This is not a true statement so there are no solutions

Answer:

32°

Step-by-step explanation:

Its pretty strait forward.

2x + 60° + 3x - 40° = 180°

5x + 20° = 180°

5x = 160°

x = 160°/5

x = 32°

Actually I am from India, Please Mark me as brainliest.....

Step-by-step explanation:

(-a)⁴ / (-a)³ = -a

since both terms have the same exponent base (-a), we can simply do the regular exponent arithmetic (multiplication = +, division = -)

4 - 3 = 1

so, the exponent 1 remains.

it works also, if we process the exponents first

(-a)⁴ = a⁴

(-a)³ = -(a³)

a⁴/-(a³) = a/-1 = -a