What is the solution to this problem

Answer:

  24

Step-by-step explanation:

Let d represent the number of dimes. Then (57-d) is the number of quarters, and the total value (in cents) is ...

  10d +25(57 -d) = 1065

  -15d +1425 = 1065 . . . . . . simplify

  -15d = -360 . . . . . . . . . . subtract 1425

  d = -360/-15 = 24 . . . divide by the coefficient of d

There are 24 dimes in the jar.

Answer:

x^7-7x^6+21x^5-13x^3+33x^2-35x

Step-by-step explanation:

there you go!

= 60

( i dont know how to explain it , to many steps lol :3)

Answer: 1 in 51

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

23/26

Step-by-step explanation:

A standard deck of cards has 52 cards.

The cards are divided into 13 cards of each of 4 suits.

2 suits are black and 2 suits are red.

Each suit has 3 face cards. Since there are 2 black suits, there are 6 black face cards.

The total number of cards in a deck is 52.

52 - 6 = 46

There are 46 cards that are not black suit cards out of 52 total cards.

p(not black face card) = 46/52 = 23/26

1. First, he will be climbing 10,000 feet from where he is right now. 10,000 / 1,000 = 10.

-3.6 x 10 = 36 degree decrease.

25 - 36 = -11

At 12,000 feet, the temperature will be -11.

2.  First, we need to do 8.80 x 7 = 61.6

61.6 / 4 = 15.4

61.6 - 15.4 = 46.2

He has $26.20 left.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the picture.

(x, y)

left 1 unit: (5 - 1 = 4)

up 1 unit: (0 + 1 = 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

p+4<-24

collect like terms

p<-28

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow p+4<-24[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow p<-24-4[/tex]

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow p<-28[/tex]

So

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow p\in (-\infty,-28)[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A + B = 90

A/6(15.25) = 3B/4

61A/18 = B

18A/18 + 61A/18 = 90

A = 90(18)/79

A = 20 40/79°

B = 90 -A = 69 39/79°

Answer:

ray

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$319

Step-by-step explanation:

Usually, sales tax is proportional to the amount of the sale, so if the sales tax is a factor of 22/16 times the original tax, then the sale amount must be 22/16 times the original item cost:

 (22/16)·$232 = $319

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem with this kind of question is that the author tells you what you should see in that sentence. The dogs experienced fear. Any other answer you suggest is not what the author means. So you are guessing. It is adding to the notion that the arctic is not a friendly place and you cannot go sunbathing in and be comfortable in the middle of winter.

A is as good an answer as you are likely to get, but I don't think it's right.

Answer:

no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps! :D

have a miraculous day!! <3

Answer:

g = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

4 = 2(3g + 2) ← divide both sides by 2

2 = 3g + 2 ( subtract 2 from both sides )

0 = 3g , then

g = 0

Answer:

Geometric

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratios of the terms are constant

Answer:

B,C,D

Step-by-step explanation:

24ft =288 in A IS FALSE

2 miles = 10560 ft B IS TRUE

1/2 miles = 2640 ft C IS TRUE

0.5 miles = 880 Yds D IS TRUE

0.5 ft = 6 in E IS FALSE

Answer:

x =|y| x right = negative x left=+ y up = + y down = -

[tex]a)\frac{-3^4}{3^4} = -3^{4-4} = -1[/tex]

[tex]b)\frac{(-9)^{10}}{(-9)^5} = (-9)^{10-5}= (-9)^5[/tex]

[tex]c)\frac{11^9}{11^6} = 11^{9-6} =11^3[/tex]

ok done. Thank to me :>

Answer:

Here is my answer I have solved hope this helps

Answer: the answer would be C

Yes, the television is approximately 8 inches shorter than the space.

Step-by-step explanation: My name is Ebenezer Haile

Based on the number of tapes used on those days and the number of tapes in the rack, the fraction on the average used was 2/5

The average tapes used in those 3 days was:

= (35 + 60 + 25) / 3

= 120 / 3

= 40 tapes

The total number of tapes that can be used are:

= 50 + 50 per rack

= 100 tapes

The fraction of the average is:

= 40 / 100

In the lowest term this is:

= 2 / 5

In conclusion, the fraction is 2/5

Find out more about fractions at https://brainly.com/question/233783.

Question 1

-----------------

Explanation:

To compute f(g(2)), we'll first need to find g(2).

Locate 2 in the x row. Then read straight down until you get to the g(x) row. You should find that g(2) = 4

This means f(g(2)) becomes f(4). We then repeat the same process as before. Locate 4 in the x row, read straight down til you get to the f(x) row to find that f(4) =  -9

Overall, we can say f(g(2)) = -9

We do the same set of steps to compute g(f(-1)). You should find that f(-1) = -1 and g(f(-1)) = g(-1) = -2

Lastly, we subtract the results we got:  

f(g(2)) - g(f(-1)) = -9 - (-2) = -9+2 = -7

==============================================

Question 2

-----------------

Explanation:

If you were to graph each equation, you should get what you see below.

The red and blue curves do not intersect in any way. We need an intersection point to have a solution. Because there are no intersections, we don't have any solutions. The system is considered inconsistent.

==============================================

Question 3

-----------------

Explanation:

x = number of scooters made and sold

Each scooter costs $150 to make. If you made x of them, then it costs 150x dollars. Then tack on the fixed cost of $2000 to get the expression [tex]150x+2000[/tex]

The cost function is [tex]C(x) = 150x+2000[/tex]. We'll subtract this from the revenue function R(x) to get the profit P(x)

[tex]\text{Profit} = \text{Revenue} - \text{Cost}\\\\P(x) = R(x) - C(x)\\\\P(x) = (400x-2x^2) - (150x+2000)\\\\P(x) = 400x-2x^2-150x-2000\\\\P(x) = -2x^2+250x-2000\\\\[/tex]

==============================================

Question 4

[tex]\left\{x\in \mathbb{R} \big| \ x \ne -2, x \ne 1\right\}[/tex]

-----------------

Explanation:

[tex]g(x) = \frac{1}{x+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{f(x)+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{x^2+x-3+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{x^2+x-2}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\(g\circ f)(x) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\[/tex]

I started with the outer function g(x) and replaced each x with f(x) in the second step. Then I plugged in f(x) = x^2+x-3 and simplified. Factoring the denominator is helpful to determine where the denominator becomes zero. Specifically, it happens when x = -2 and x = 1. These x values must be kicked out of the domain to avoid a division by zero error.

So we start off with the real number line, and poke holes at x = -2 and x = 1.

The notation [tex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/tex] means x is a real number. Then we tack on [tex]x \ne -2, x \ne 1[/tex]

Overall, the domain is [tex]\left\{x\in \mathbb{R} \big| \ x \ne -2, x \ne 1\right\}[/tex]

Let's see what happens if we tried plugging x = -1 into this composite function:

[tex](g \circ f)(x) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{(-1+2)(-1-1)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{(1)(-2)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{-2}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = -0.5\\\\[/tex]

We don't get a division by zero error, so x = -1 is allowed. The same can be said about any other x value as long as it's not -2 and not 1 either.

Answer:

what are your options ??

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: this is 4

Step-by-step explanation: A+b=2+2=4

Answer:

A probability cannot be more than 100%

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{t=\sqrt{\dfrac{2d}{a}}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]d=\dfrac{1}{2}at^2\\\\\dfrac{1}{2}at^2=d\qquad|\text{multiply both sides by 2}\\\\2\!\!\!\!\diagup\cdot\dfrac{1}{2\!\!\!\!\diagup}at^2=2\cdot d\\\\at^2=2d\qquad|\text{divide both sides by}\ a\neq0\\\\\dfrac{a\!\!\!\!\diagup t^2}{a\!\!\!\!\diagup}=\dfrac{2d}{a}\\\\t^2=\dfrac{2d}{a}\to t=\sqrt{\dfrac{2d}{a}}[/tex]

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Relative Maxima means "a point that is higher than the points directly beside it on both sides", or when looking at derivatives, when the derivative of a function changes from above zero to below zero. If you're looking at a graph, all you have to do is find those points that seem to be poking out of the graph, aka c, when x=2.

Also look at the interval - (1,3), so... really, just by that, c would be your answer

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The income elasticity is +2.5 and income increases by 20%. Sales were 5000 units, what will they be now? If the income elasticity is +2.5, income increases by 20% and sales were 5000 units, then the sales will increase by 20%*2.5 = 50% to 7500 units.