can someone please help me on this all u have to do is search up on the internet and then put down 4 facts that are mentioned in the web site and give the main idea to but make sure I know were the main idea is

web site: The de-extinction of the woolly mammoth would be an evolutionary mistake ​

1:As of recently, the essential contention for species de-termination was that it offered humankind an opportunity to make up for itself for the wrongs submitted north of millennia. People, one could really guarantee, have been messing up the planet since days of yore. Thus, a large number of the species that have been the objectives of de-termination endeavors have been picked on the grounds that they appear to have some essential thing right to make due. Frequently, they look similar as species that have made due until the present time. Assuming it hadn't been for people meddling with their normal natural surroundings and sensitive environments, the contention goes, they would have been prospering today.:2To get around this contention, however, a few researchers are beginning to put forth the defense that it wasn't Mother Nature who did in the wooly mammoth — it was people. When the planet began to defrost, people came into contact with the wooly mammoth in more prominent numbers, and started to chase them savagely after their meat, bones and even skin. It's basically the traveler pigeon proposal, stretched out to the wooly mammoth. De-eradication fans will most likely let you know that people bear a sort of transformative responsibility for having cleared out the wooly mammoth, quit worrying about environmental change.:3creating a highly-controlled environment (i.e. a theme park) where the wooly mammoth could conceivably flourish – it doesn’t reason that you can simply hit the “rewind” button on evolution. As some conservationists are already warning, bringing back a species like the wooly mammoth could lead to the disappearance of other species who share similar habitats. Once you bring back a new species, you have to start thinking about ecosystem effects — and about Butterfly Effects. Bringing back the wooly mammoth would require massive changes to existing ecosystems.:4Yet, that equivalent contention – an opportunity to reclaim human bad behaviors over an improper annihilation – doesn't hold on account of the wooly mammoth. The wooly mammoth, with its monstrous hair coat to save warmth, had no way for endurance once the Ice Age finished. As Darwin originally guessed, advancement resembles a calculation followed commonly. In the event that a variation assists an animal varieties with getting by and thrive, the transformation will stick. Assuming it doesn't, it will ultimately vanish from the genetic stock. For better or for more regrettable, certain species will go terminated when they can presently don't adjust to their current circumstance. It wasn't only that wooly mammoths had substantial hair coats – they had a wide range of different variations that assisted them with flourishing during the Ice Age, as enormous tusks to clean up snow and ice. Bringing back the wooly mammoth would be commensurate to bringing back an animal types that had the right to go terminated. : main idea Accepting totally effective cloning to make sound creatures, the cloned wooly mammoths would in all likelihood have hopeless existences and couldn't have ever evident freedomWhat's more not just the productive restoration of the wooly mammoth, but it's full rewilding into the Arctic." Bringing species like the wooly mammoth back into the frosty might perhaps help deferred down non-renewable energy source side-effects in the area and help with restoring lost organic frameworks, Lamm said.But think about how conceivable it is that they somehow made due. Our Arctic regions would look an incredible arrangement changed, and not because there would be huge assessed, shaggy animals meandering around. There would be less elk, moose, and caribou considering the way that the wooly mammoth would out battle them for food.Assuming absolutely viable cloning to make sound animals, the cloned wooly mammoths would probably have miserable presences and couldn't have ever clear freedomLamm said expecting the association is productive, research has shown bringing back ended species could reshape the Siberian tundra and in other Arctic regions to be more specialist of the normal game plan of the Arctic glades when it was an unrivaled carbon-sequestering areaLamm said assuming the organization is effective, research has shown bringing back wiped out species could reshape the Siberian tundra and in other Arctic districts to be more agent of the biological arrangement of the Arctic fields when it was a superior carbon-sequestering location.But imagine a scenario in which they some way or another made due. Our Arctic locales would look a ton changed, and not on the grounds that there would be enormous measured, shaggy creatures meandering around. There would be less elk, moose, and caribou in light of the fact that the wooly mammoth would out contend them for food.

PLEASE HELP I LITERALLY BEG!!!!!!
What’s the difference between transformed and untransformed bacteria

If you gently bend your ear, and then let go, the shape of your ear will return because the cartilage of your ear contains_____.

Marie Curie was a famous French-Polish scientist known for her pioneering research on radioactivity. Her work not only brought her fame but her death as well; she developed aplastic anemia due to radiation exposure. She experienced recurrent and prolonged infections (viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal). Explain why she suffered from recurrent infections. Be sure to mention the different types of WBC and the relation to the various infections, and the reasons why she lacked the cell-mediated and the humeral response.

PLEASE HELP MEEEEEEEEE
Which option distinguishes the outcome if the Farm Bill were to end subsidies to private growers, but continue to provide food stamp funding?


Wholesale commodities prices would increase and create a devaluing of food stamps.

Food stamp recipients would replace subsidies by spending more money on agriculture.

Farm prices would drop due to a higher supply of unsold goods but no demand change.


Aid would shift and all farmers receiving subsidies would receive food stamps instead

Sofia, a scientist, wants to change the DNA of a sexually reproducing organism and have the
new DNA present in every cell of the organism. In order to do this after fertilization, she would
change the DNA in which of the following?

A. Zygote

B. Placenta

C. Testes of the father

D. Overuse of the mother

Describe an experiment that would allow you to determine if it is warmer inside or outside the playhouse by using two similar cups filled with equal amounts of ice

Match these items .

1 .
scales
pistil and stamen
2 .
egg
cone parts
3 .
mitosis
fungi parts
4 .
hyphae
leaf and spore case
5 .
mold
vegetative reproduction
6 .
flower parts
cell division
7 .
cherry tree
male cell
8 .
sperm
female cell
9 .
without seeds
flowering plant
10 .
fern parts
fungi

9. When a scientist makes a proposal of a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables, this
statement is called a
a. Conclusion.
O b. Fair test
C. Theory
O d. Hypothesis

what is Nuclear Fusion. ​