how did the kansas-nesbraska act represent an attempt at compromise on expansion of slavery in the west
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was indeed an attempt at compromise on the expansion of slavery in the western territories of the United States.
It was introduced by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois and aimed to address the issue of westward expansion and the organization of new territories.
The act proposed that the territories of Kansas and Nebraska would determine the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty, allowing the residents of those territories to decide whether or not to allow slavery within their borders.
The supporters of the Kansas-Nebraska Act argued that it respected the principle of popular sovereignty, giving the people of the territories the right to decide their own fate regarding slavery.
However, the act ultimately led to significant controversy and intensified sectional divisions. It sparked a rush of settlers from both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions to influence the outcome of the popular votes in Kansas. This resulted in violent clashes and political turmoil, known as "Bleeding Kansas," as both sides sought to establish their dominance in the territory.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act's attempt at compromise ultimately failed to ease tensions and instead further heightened sectional divisions and set the stage for the intensification of the slavery debate.
While the Kansas-Nebraska Act was intended as a compromise by allowing popular sovereignty, its consequences led to increased tensions and further entrenched the divide over the expansion of slavery in the western territories.
For more questions on slavery
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ11
Saturday, Nov. 12. We were [frightened] almost to death
last night. Some mean soldiers set several houses on fire
in different parts of the town. I could not go to sleep for
fear that they would set our house on fire. We all [dread]
the next few days to come for they said that they would
set the last house on fire if they had to leave this place.
Sun. Nov. 13. The federal soldiers have been coming
today and burning houses and I have been looking at
them come in nearly all day.
-Carrie Berry, 1864
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers
O destroyed mills and other factories.
O burned buildings as they left the city.
O sent women and children to the North.
O used a total war strategy to win the war.
Done
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers burned buildings as they left the city.
This passage mainly describes how Union soldiers burned buildings as they left the city. The author, Carrie Berry, expresses her fear and distress as she witnesses Union soldiers setting houses on fire in different parts of the town. The act of burning buildings indicates a destructive and retaliatory action taken by the Union soldiers.
Carrie Berry and the residents of the town are filled with fear and dread, anticipating further destruction as the soldiers threaten to set the last house on fire before leaving. The author's inability to sleep due to the fear of her own house being targeted highlights the intense psychological impact of such actions.
While the passage focuses on the burning of buildings, it does not provide evidence of other specific activities such as destroying mills or factories, sending women and children to the North, or implementing a total war strategy. The primary emphasis is on the destructive acts of burning houses carried out by Union soldiers as they leave the city.
For more such question on Union soldiers
https://brainly.com/question/28418223
#SPJ11
TION: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISH NATION BY THE NAZI GERMANY DURING THE PERIOD 1933 TO 19467
The impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946-7 was devastating. The Nazis believed that the Jews were an inferior race and that they were a threat to the German people. They used these pseudoscientific ideas to justify the persecution and murder of millions of Jews.
The Nazis began their persecution of the Jews shortly after they came to power in 1933. They passed laws that discriminated against Jews in all aspects of life, including employment, education, and housing. They also began to physically attack Jews, and there were numerous pogroms, or organized attacks on Jews, throughout the 1930s.
In 1938, the Nazis launched a series of coordinated attacks on Jewish businesses and synagogues, known as Kristallnacht. This event marked a turning point in the Nazi persecution of the Jews. After Kristallnacht, the Nazis began to systematically round up Jews and send them to concentration camps.
The Nazis believed that the Jews were a threat to the German people because they were supposedly responsible for Germany's economic problems and its defeat in World War I. They also believed that the Jews were a threat to the German race because they were supposedly trying to take over the world.
Explain whether you agree or disagree with the right to know campaign
Whether one should agree or disagree with the right-to-know campaign depends on their values, beliefs, and the specific context in which the campaign is being advocated. I think I agree with this concept.
The right-to-know campaign is a movement advocating for transparency and access to information held by governments, corporations, and other entities. It aims to empower individuals with the knowledge necessary to make informed decisions, hold authorities accountable, and participate actively in public affairs. Supporters argue that the right to know is fundamental to a democratic society. They believe that citizens have a legitimate interest in understanding how decisions are made, how public resources are allocated, and how policies affect their lives. By having access to information, individuals can better engage in public discourse, contribute to policy debates, and exercise their democratic rights.
Moreover, proponents contend that transparency helps combat corruption, promotes good governance, and strengthens trust between citizens and institutions. When information is readily available, it becomes more difficult for authorities to hide wrongdoing or manipulate public opinion. The right to know can serve as a powerful tool for fostering accountability and promoting ethical behavior.
However, critics of the right-to-know campaign argue that certain information should be kept confidential for national security, privacy, or commercial reasons. They contend that unrestricted access to information could potentially harm individuals, and organizations, or even undermine the functioning of society. Balancing the right to know with other legitimate concerns is an ongoing challenge.
Ultimately, whether one agrees or disagrees with the right-to-know campaign often depends on their assessment of the benefits and potential drawbacks associated with transparency and access to information.
For more questions on campaign
https://brainly.com/question/28341453
#SPJ11
Who was the leader of Nazi Germany during World War II?
a) Adolf Hitler
b) Benito Mussolini
c) Joseph Stalin
d) Winston Churchill
Answer:
a) Adolf Hitler
Explanation:
The role of women in Soweto Uprising in 1976
Economic insecurity and____
paved the way for Hitler's rise to power.
Answer: The Versailles Treaty
Explanation: After WWI, The Entente Set A Very Harsh and Impossible Set Of rules for germany. Etc. 100,000 Soldiers, no armoured cars, tanks, or gas.
Economic insecurity and political instability paved the way for Hitler's rise to power.
After World War I, Germany's government, the Weimar Republic, had to deal with several difficulties, including political unpredictability, hyperinflation, and a severe socioeconomic catastrophe. In many respects, this unpredictability contributed to the emergence of fascism and communism and the Nazi government.
Germany was particularly severely affected by the Great Depression of the 1930s. When the economy tanked and unemployment shot through the roof, many Germans believed that their government was powerless to help them. The Nazi Party, which vowed to bring Germany back to its former glory, found fertile roots in this economic unrest.
Thus, Economic insecurity and political instability were the main factors that paved the way for Hitler's rise to power.
Learn more about Hitler's rise, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14823680
#SPJ4
Sonnet 73 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 That time of year thou mayst in me behold When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang Upon those boughs which shake against cold, Bare ruined choirs where late the sweet birds sang. In me thou seest the twilight of such day As after sunset fadeth in the west, Middle (2) Which by and by black night doth take away, Death's second self, that seals up all in rest. In me thou seest the glowing of such fire That on the ashes of his youth doth lie, As deathbed whereon it must expire, Consumed with that which it was nourished by. This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong, To love that well which thou must leave ere long. 2.1 Describe the structure of this poem fully. (3) 2.2 What happens in each section of the poem? Beginning (2) End (2) 2.3 Refer to line 7 (Which by and...doth take away"). 2.3.1 Identify the literal device used in this line. (1) 2.3.2Explain how this literal device enhances the message of this poem. (2) 2.4 Discuss the theme of death as it is evident in this poem. (3) TOTAL SECTION B: 15 marks
The poem is structured as a Shakespearean sonnet, consisting of three quatrains and a final couplet. The rhyme scheme is ABAB CDCD EFEF GG, and the meter is iambic pentameter.
In the beginning of the poem, the speaker describes the season of autumn and compares it to the twilight of his own life. In the middle section, he further describes the process of aging and compares it to the approach of death. In the final quatrain, he reflects on the fire of his youth that is now fading away, and how this realization makes his love stronger. The poem ends with the couplet, which emphasizes the theme of mortality and the inevitability of death.
The literal device used in line 7 is personification.
The use of personification in this line enhances the message of the poem by emphasizing the inevitability of death. The image of black night taking away the twilight of the day is a metaphor for death taking away the speaker's life. By personifying the night as an active force that "takes away" the light of day, the poem suggests that death is an unstoppable and inevitable force that will eventually claim us all.
The theme of death is central to this poem. The speaker uses the metaphor of autumn to describe the twilight of his own life, and he compares himself to a dying fire that is slowly fading away. The image of the "bare ruined choirs" where the birds no longer sing is a symbol of the emptiness and loneliness that the speaker feels as he contemplates his own mortality.
for more such questions on rhyme scheme
https://brainly.com/question/16888144
#SPJ11
1. Rwanda-What did you learn? What did you like?
2. Guatemalean-What did you learn? What did you like?
3. Bosnian-What did you learn? What did you like?
4. What are 3 causes/3 effects of World Genocides?
5. What did Nelson Mandela do to heal and progress in South Africa? (Explain 3 examples)
6. Why was Nelson Mandela elected president in 1994 in South Africa?
Many of today's ethnic conflicts were caused, at least to some degree, by artificial boundaries, identities, and role relationships and the effects of genocide are the psychological as well as demographic effects of genocide on youth affect the transition into adulthood. Mandela tried to focus on the racial problem of South Africa that had come to an end.
In fact, Mandela meant to say that the very hour to bridge the gap between the white people and the black people had arrived.
Nelson Mandela was a South African anti-apartheid activist and politician who served as the first president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999. One of the 20th century's most important civil-rights change-makers, Nelson Mandela devoted his life including 27 years in prison to bringing an end to the cruelly segregationist policies of South Africa's apartheid system.
Learn more about South Africa, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31900946
#SPJ1
32*
This political cartoon from 1933 depicts efforts made by President Roosevelt to end the Great Depression with his New Deal. President Roosevelt tries to “prime” the economic pump using taxpayer dollars to get the economy going again.
How does this artist illustrate their objection to the New Deal policies?
What symbols are used to convey the message?
The artist illustrates their objection to President Roosevelt's New Deal policies by depicting him as a plumber attempting to fix the economic pump with a wrench labeled "New Deal." The use of symbols such as the wrench and the pipe in the cartoon highlights the artist's disapproval of government intervention and implies that a more effective solution may exist.
The political cartoon from 1933 depicts President Roosevelt's New Deal policies to end the Great Depression. The artist illustrates their objection to these policies by depicting Roosevelt as a plumber attempting to fix the economy using a wrench labeled "New Deal." The use of a wrench implies that the New Deal policies are not the appropriate tool for fixing the economy. Additionally, the use of the phrase "taxpayer dollars" suggests that the artist is opposed to government spending and views it as an unnecessary burden on taxpayers.
The use of symbols in the cartoon reinforces the artist's message. The wrench symbolizes the New Deal policies as a tool that is not effective in fixing the economy. The plumber's tools, including the wrench and the pipe, represent the government's attempts to fix the economy. The artist's use of taxpayer dollars to prime the economic pump implies that government spending is an unjustified expense.
Overall, the cartoon suggests that the artist opposes the New Deal policies and believes that government intervention is not the solution to the Great Depression. The cartoonist's use of symbolism is a powerful tool in conveying this message to the public. It highlights the artist's disapproval of government spending and implies that a more effective solution may exist.
Know more about Political cartoon here :
https://brainly.com/question/26489031
#SPJ11
What was Moscow's reaction to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
Well, according to my secret sources, Moscow's initial reaction to the collapse of the Soviet Union was to hold a massive yard sale to get rid of all the excess communist memorabilia. They even tried to sell Lenin's embalmed body on eBay, but unfortunately, they couldn't find any buyers willing to meet the reserve price. In the end, they settled for just donating it to a local museum. As for the rest of the Soviet Union, they all just shrugged and went back to drinking vodka and eating blini like they always do.
Russian - I drink vodka
American - I drink gunpowder to blow up my toilet
Mexico - I drink liquid wood to build ladders to hop over the border.
Beneficiaries of Racism in both Germany and South Africa.
In both Germany and South Africa, racism has resulted in various groups benefiting from discriminatory systems and policies. However, historically, certain groups have enjoyed privileges and advantages based on their racial or ethnic identity.
In Germany, during the Nazi era, the Aryan population was elevated and granted preferential treatment, while non-Aryan groups, particularly Jewish people, faced persecution and marginalization. The Nazi regime implemented policies that aimed to purify the German race and consolidate power in the hands of the so-called superior Aryan race.
In South Africa, during the period of apartheid, the white minority government enacted policies that institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination. This system privileged white South Africans, granting them access to better education, healthcare, housing, and employment opportunities, while the majority Black population faced systemic oppression and limited rights.
It is crucial to recognize that racism perpetuates social and economic inequalities, perpetuating a cycle of privilege and disadvantage. Overcoming these historical legacies requires ongoing efforts to dismantle racist structures and ensure equitable opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their racial or ethnic background.
For more questions on Racism
https://brainly.com/question/23754542
#SPJ11
Northern Republicans began to lose heart , began toHad less effect with each election. Republicans now moved toward a consensus that the federal government had accomplished its Civil War objective and should end Reconstruction.
Republicans in the North gradually lost their enthusiasm and effectiveness. They started to come to an understanding that the federal government should put an end to the Reconstruction era since it had completed its goals for the Civil War.
The American Civil War (1861–1865) was followed by a time period known as the Reconstruction era, during which the federal government worked to rebuild and reintegrate the Southern states that had seceded into the Union. It attempted to deal with concerns including the rights of recently freed African Americans and the political and social unification of the Southern states.
Learn more about the Reconstruction era here:
https://brainly.com/question/15744199
#SPJ1
A Jacksonian Democrat- he related with the common man. Had total disregard for "corrupt" aristocracy of Northeast.
Lincoln
Calhoun
Johnson
Clay
If a Jacksonian Democrat- he related with the common man. Had total disregard for "corrupt" aristocracy of Northeast is: c. Johnson.
Who is Andrew Johnson?
The 17th President of the United States, Andrew Johnson (1865–1869), was a Jacksonian Democrat who connected with the average person.
He had nothing but contempt for the "corrupt" Northeastern elite. Johnson a Southern Democrat from Tennessee, supported the concerns of the working class and ordinary people and linked himself with Andrew Jackson's beliefs.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about Andrew Johnson here:https://brainly.com/question/23458622
#SPJ1
The main principles of the black consciousness movement movement?
how much members are in the sepreme court
Answer: There are nine members
Explanation:
why was peral harbor not as bad as it could have been
The attack on pearl harbor was not as bad because of the fact that Japan failed to destroy American repair shops and fuel oil tanks.
However, there are a few reasons why it was not as bad as it could have been:
1. Absence of aircraft carriers: The US aircraft carriers, the primary targets, were not present at the time of the attack, limiting the long-term impact.
2. Key infrastructure spared: Fuel depots and repair facilities were largely untouched, allowing for quick repair and refueling of the remaining fleet.
3. Limited destruction of critical facilities: While battleships and aircraft were damaged, key infrastructure like shipyards and maintenance shops remained intact.
4. US resolve and industrial capacity: The attack united the nation and spurred a strong war effort, aided by the US's robust industrial capacity to rebuild and replace losses.
Read more about pearl harbor:
brainly.com/question/28606279
The correct question is:
Why was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor not as bad as it could have been?
Who was the leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) during the Rwandan Genocide?
a) Paul Kagame
b) Juvenal Habyarimana
c) François Mitterrand
d) Juvénal Mugabe
Answer: a) Paul Kagame
Explanation:
Paul Kagame was the leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a rebel group that fought against the government responsible for the genocide, and he later became the President of Rwanda.
Answer: a) Paul Kagame
Explanation:
The leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) during the Rwandan Genocide was Paul Kagame and he was the main rebel against the government at the time. He then defeated the government, established a government and ended the genocide.
Which religious figure is considered a prophet in Christianity and Islam, but
not in Judaism?
The religious figure who is considered a prophet in both Christianity and Islam but not in Judaism is Jesus. Both monotheistic Abrahamic religions with Middle Eastern roots are regarded as Abrahamic.
Christians consider Jesus to be the Messiah and Son of God who came to carry out the Old Testament prophecy. Although not divine, Jesus, also known as Isa, is regarded as one of God's greatest prophets and messengers in Islam. Jesus, however, is not regarded as a prophet or the Messiah in Judaism. Jews do not believe that Jesus fulfilled the messianic prophecies contained in their scriptures.
Learn more about Judaism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29548118
#SPJ1
The photo shows a Nazi officer posting a sign on a store run by a Jewish business owner.
A photo of a German Nazi in uniform taping up a sign on the shop window of a business. Translated, the sign reads, "Germans! Defend yourself! Buy nothing from Jews!"
The sign reads "Germans! Defend yourself! Buy nothing from Jews!” to support the Nazi belief that Jewish business owners were
purposefully destroying the economy.
planning to attack German citizens.
selling useless products to Germans.
planning to harm other minority groups.
This sign, which reads "Germans! Defend yourself! Buy nothing from Jews!", was used to support the Nazi belief that Jewish business owners were Option A. purposefully destroying the economy.
The Nazis used propaganda like this to promote their anti-Semitic ideology and turn public opinion against the Jewish population.
The main aim of the Nazi regime was to establish an ethnically pure German state and eliminate any groups they considered undesirable. The Nazis believed that Jews, as well as other minority groups, were a threat to the economic well-being and stability of the nation. By accusing Jewish business owners of intentionally damaging the economy, the Nazi regime justified their discriminatory and violent actions against Jewish people.
This propaganda campaign also played a role in isolating Jews from the rest of society, encouraging German citizens to avoid patronizing Jewish businesses. This economic boycott led to the further impoverishment and marginalization of the Jewish community. Such propaganda served as a precursor to more extreme actions taken against Jews, such as the Nuremberg Laws and eventually the Holocaust.
In conclusion, the sign posted by the Nazi officer in the photo reflects the regime's false accusation that Jewish business owners were purposely destroying the German economy, which served to justify their discriminatory and violent actions against Jews. Therefore, the correct option is A.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
The photo shows a Nazi officer posting a sign on a store run by a Jewish business owner.
A photo of a German Nazi in uniform taping up a sign on the shop window of a business. Translated, the sign reads, "Germans! Defend yourself! Buy nothing from Jews!"
The sign reads "Germans! Defend yourself! Buy nothing from Jews!” to support the Nazi belief that Jewish business owners were
A. purposefully destroying the economy.
B. planning to attack German citizens.
C. selling useless products to Germans.
D. planning to harm other minority groups.
Know more about Business owners here:
https://brainly.com/question/27968241
#SPJ11
Answer:
purposefully destroying the economy.
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
Who was the leader of the Soviet Union during most of World War II?
a) Joseph Stalin
b) Vladimir Lenin
c) Mikhail Gorbachev
d) Leonid Brezhnev
Answer:
Your answer is A) Joseph Stalin.
Explanation:
World War II started in September 1939 and ended in September 1945. Stalin took office in May 1941 and his term ended in March 1946.
Answer: a) Joseph Stalin
Explanation:
Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union during most of World War II, from 1924 until his death in 1953. He was known for his violent dictatorship which saw tens of millions of Russians die.
How did the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party change after the death of Mao Zedong? • A. It held China's first national elections but failed to rebuild the devastated Chinese economy. • B. It fiercely condemned Mao and his supporters but kept many of their policies in place • C. It began introducing free market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms. • D. It closed off relations with the Soviet Union but remained an influential communist state.
Answer C. It began introducing free-market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms.
Explanation: After Mao Zedong's death, the Chinese Communist Party had a leadership turnover as it started implementing free-market reforms but kept restricting individual freedom
Answer:
C. It began introducing free-market reforms but continued limiting personal freedoms.
Explanation:
apex
Who played a major role in founding the NAACP?
OA. Booker T. Washington
B. A. Philip Randolph
OC. W. E. B. Du Bois
OD. Marcus Garvey
Answer:
Henry Moscowitz
Explanation:
Our founders
Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth.
Should we open the existing conserved lands to economic development?
Current conserved lands are typically kept for their ecological, cultural, or recreational value and are not meant for intensive economic development.
Since economic development affects people's standards of living, it frequently takes precedence over environmental sustainability. However, if individuals reside in a location that is economically developed but has low environmental quality, their quality of life may suffer.
It's crucial to keep in mind that any economic development in protected areas must take into account long-term land conservation of the place, cultural preservation, and environmental sustainability. Maintaining the advantages offered by these priceless natural and cultural resources requires striking a balance between economic development and conservation goals.
Learn more about land conservation here:
https://brainly.com/question/13490970
#SPJ1
what way does the African perspective on human development differ from Erikson’s psychosocial theory?
Answer:
Explanation:
The African perspective on human development differs from Erikson's psychosocial theory in several ways. First, African perspectives emphasize the interdependence between individuals and their community, whereas Erikson's theory places greater emphasis on individual development and autonomy. Additionally, African perspectives view development as a continuous process that occurs throughout one's life and is shaped by various social, cultural, and environmental factors. In contrast, Erikson's theory emphasizes distinct stages of development that are primarily determined by biological and psychological factors. Finally, African perspectives tend to view development as a collective process that involves the entire community, whereas Erikson's theory emphasizes the individual's relationship with the broader social context.
In 50 years what historically significant event/events will students learn about that
have happened in your lifetime?
Answer:
The end SARS protest in Nigeria.
The “___”
was the dividing line that separated Europe following World War II.
Answer:
Explanation:
The dividing line that separated Europe following World War II was the Iron Curtain. The term was popularized by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in a speech he gave in 1946, in which he referred to the boundary that divided Europe into two ideological blocs: the communist Eastern Bloc and the democratic Western Bloc. The Iron Curtain physically consisted of various border fortifications, walls, and fences, along with heavily guarded borders that restricted travel and communication between the two sides. The division was a key feature of the Cold War, which lasted until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
what is bill of rights in the constitution
French prime ministry said a speech, how did he convince the audience that France needed colonial expansion ?
French Prime Minister Jules Ferry convinced the French for colonial expansion by relating to economic, moral and strategic arguments.
What did Jules Ferry say ?Ferry argued that colonies were essential to the economic well-being of France. He claimed that colonies provided France with raw materials, markets for French goods, and opportunities for investment.
Ferry also argued that France had a moral obligation to colonize. He claimed that France was bringing civilization to the colonies and that it was helping to uplift the native peoples. Finally, Ferry argued that colonies were essential to the security of France. He claimed that colonies provided France with strategic resources and that they helped to protect France from its enemies.
Find out more on Jules Ferry at https://brainly.com/question/19377572
#SPJ1
Do you think American policies (HUAC, blacklisting, McCarthy’s senate hearings) were effective in containing communism at home?
How was Germany and the Allied affected by the Victory of the Allied for The Battle of the Atlantic?
Answer:
The outcome of the battle was a strategic victory for the Allies—the German blockade failed—but at great cost: 3,500 merchant ships and 175 warships were sunk in the Atlantic for the loss of 783 U-boats (the majority of them Type VII submarines) and 47 German surface warships, including 4 battleships (Bismarck, Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, and Tirpitz).