Answer: The 1967 Detroit Riots were among the most violent and destructive riots in U.S. history.
Explanation:
What was the main target for the Japanese by invading malaya and Thailand (ASAP)
Answer: The Japanese want to do the tiling because it was strategically important location in Asia to have control of. Japan badly needed to capture Malaya because it had half of the worlds tin and a third of its natural rubber initially the decision to attack was made based on intelligence gathered by Japanese officers Who had been secretly dispatched to Thailand and Malaysia disguised as a commercial travelers.
Explanation:
Why did benjamin Franklin decide to let his family run the printing buisness?
Answer:
What Benjamin really wanted was to go to sea. He was an excellent swimmer, loved the ocean, and dreamed of working on a ship, but an older brother had died at sea so his father would not allow it. When another brother, James, returned from England to set up a printing business, their father knew what to do.
Explanation: Credit to 72770
Answer:
he wanted to do something else
Explanation:
Why are so many Americans against the Persian gulf war?
Answer:
Explanation:
Iraq invaded the country of Kuwait to its southeast in a bid to gain more control over the lucrative oil supply of the Middle East. In response, the United States and the UN Security Council demanded that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein withdraw Iraqi troops from Kuwait, but Hussein refused.
The story of the Covenant begins at
creation...Give examples on how it
continues?
Answer:
are we talking about halo?
Explanation:
which countries can be found in Oceania
will give brainliest
Answer:
Explanation:
Australia, Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.
Hope this helped!!!
How did African Americans try to stop racial injustice?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has thwarted Congressional attempts to shield previously enslaved people in a series of crippling decisions. The Supreme Court gave jurisdiction to the same white Southerners who used fear and intimidation to exclude Black people from voting, enforcing laws and policies that codified ethnic hierarchy and endorsing a modern constitutional order based on "states' rights."
EJI insists that a new age of truth and justice is needed, and that it must begin by tackling our country's legacy of racial inequality.
The mistaken assumption that nonwhite people are less civilised than white people starts American history with the emergence of a fallacy to absolve white settlers of the genocide of Native Americans. This belief in racial hierarchy survived slavery's abolition, sparked lynchings in the name of racial fear, demanded constitutionally codified segregation, and spawned our current mass incarceration epidemic.
Since we don't write about it, the dehumanising idea about ethnic difference persists still.
Help please it is not the one the with the filled in circle
I was a member of a separatist church that fled first to the Netherlands and then to the New World in search of religious freedom. The men and I signed a document aboard our ship, the Mayflower, that outlined the basics of our self-government. I was governor of the Plymouth Colony until my death. I also wrote a book about the history of our colony. Who am I?
Answer:
William Bradford
Explanation:
William Bradford’s article from Britannica ( https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Bradford-Plymouth-colony-governor) has a lot of information on him. If you don’t feel safe clicking the link, you can look up “William Bradford Britannica,” too :) He was a separatist who migrated to Holland, Netherlands for religious freedom, but left for America because he was not satisfied with his economic opportunities in the Netherlands. Here, he signed the Mayflower Compact, which outlined how people would treat each other at their new village. His book, History of Plymouth Plantation, described how the colony grew and thrived over time. He governed the colony until 1956, shortly before his death. Hope this helps!
I need help with the question :what are they disadvantages of democracy?
Answer:
Democracy is ineffective unless voters educate themselves on governing decisions. The structure of democracy depends upon the will of the majority. Democracy can encourage mob rule. The cost of democracy is something that many people don’t realize exists. Democracy requires more time to implement changes. The structure of a democracy is a person-first process. There is still the risk of creating a conflict of interest within the government. Democratic governments follow the “a chicken in every pot” system. Gridlock occurs frequently in democratic structures. It can require individual voters to accept an entire mandate for a single issue.
Hope this helped!
Explanation:
Democracy is ineffective unless voters educate themselves on governing decisions.The structure of democracy depends upon the will of the majority.Democracy can encourage mob rule.The cost of democracy is something that many people don’t realize exists.Democracy requires more time to implement changes.It can require individual voters to accept an entire mandate for a single issue.Hope this helps :)❤
What are some
examples of good things John
Brown did? If possible please provide a website so I can check it as well
Answer:
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/618810/abolitionist-john-brown-facts
website
Explanation:
John Brown (May 9, 1800 – December 2, 1859) was an American abolitionist. Brown advocated the use of armed insurrection to overthrow the institution of slavery in the United States. He first gained national attention when he led small groups of volunteers during the Bleeding Kansas crisis of 1856.
The impact of french revolution on European democracy
Explanation:
The long-term impact on France was profound, shaping politics, society, religion and ideas, and politics for more than a century. The closer other countries were, the greater and deeper was the French impact, bringing liberalism and the end of many feudal or traditional laws and practices.
In which of the following Landmark Supreme Court Cases were the powers of the Judiciary further defined to have authority of review over the practices of either branch?
Answer:
Marbury v. MadisonExplanation:
Marbury v. Madison (1803), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
5. In your opinion, who does this contract seem to favor
most? Provide evidence from the contract to support your
point of view. (Students should provide at least 2 pieces of
evidence to support their point of view)
Answer:
Ideological divisions within Congress that
can lead to gridlock or create the need for
negotiation and compromise
§ Gerrymandering, redistricting, and unequal
representation of constituencies have
been partially addressed by the Supreme
Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962),
which opened the door to equal protection
challenges to redistricting and started
the “one person, one vote” doctrine, and
the no-racial-gerrymandering decision in
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Explanation:
PLEASE HURRY~GIVING OUT BRAINLIEST<3
Please match the word/ name/ term to the correct definition.
Question 7 options:
The principle that the authority of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people. The people of the state have the right and power to chose for themselves.
A place for the collection of weapons and military equipment, where they are made and stored by a country.
Had become friends with several Ohio abolitionists and had heard stories from fugitive slaves and Underground Railroad conductors, and would be inspired to write Uncle Tom’s Cabin, due to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
Was a Congregationalist educator, minister
Written to educate Northerners, most of which had never witnessed slavery firsthand, about the brutalities of the institution
Some of these believers, that were Puritans who initially identified themselves as part of the Church of England. Each congregation had the right and responsibility to determine its own affairs. They emphasized their beliefs on freedom of conscience, a priesthood of all believers, and they have worked for civil and religious liberty.
True believers adhered to a strict code of right and wrong or they believed that they would answer to God. They believed that someone living a moral life shows that that person is probably saved.
Allowed the people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not they would allow slavery within their borders.
A person that is killed because of the personal or religious beliefs, is someone that gains admiration or sympathy for their beliefs or their cause.
Was a radical abolitionist. He grew up with Calvinist beliefs and anti-slavery views.
1.
Lyman Beecher
2.
Congregationalists
3.
Harriet Beecher Stowe
4.
Uncle Tom's Cabin
5.
Calvinist
6.
John Brown
7.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854
8.
Popular Sovereignty
9.
Arsenal
10.
Martyr
Answer:
Logo inverted circle
Constitution and Secularism
Social and Political Life - III
The Need for a Constitution
A constitution helps serve as a set of rules and principles that all persons in a country can agree upon as the basis of the way in which they want the country to be governed. This includes not only the type of government they want but also an agreement on certain ideals that they all believe the country should uphold.
Principles and ideals of a monarchy are quite different from those of a democracy. Therefore, soon after the transition in the government system in Nepal, the government started the process of making a new constitution of Nepal, because the earlier one did not suit their new democratic setup.
Nepal was in need to change all its constitutive rules in order to usher in a new democratic society.
The constitution defines the nature of a country’s political system. In a monarchy, the king or queen is the supreme power, whereas in a democracy, people rule the country and the government is run by the representatives elected by people at large.
The constitution also prescribes rules that guard against misuse of power by the leaders. In the constitution of India, such provisions have been made in the section on Fundamental Rights.
The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to equality to all citizens. It is one of the fundamental rights, and says that no citizen can be discriminated against on grounds of religion, race, caste, gender, or place of birth.
Which of the following philosophers argued that epidemic disease and war are helpful overall?
According to Mark Kurlansky, why did people use salt?
All this trade led to the founding of cities. City governments became necessary, as well as men trained to be put in charge of keeping accounts, of maintaining law and order, of ensuring the safety of citizens.
hope this helped
what form of gov is a king in?
Answer:
monarchy.Explanation:
Answer:
A monarchy
Explanation:
A limited or absolute monarchy is a form of government where a king has partial or complete power.
How did politicians
react to slavery?
They were in 2 different sides. The Abolitionists and the Pro-Slavery politicians. Some were heavily against slavery and started a movement to abolish it, some even tried freeing slaves. Pro-slavery politicians were in heavy support of it and did everything in their power to keep it alive in the South. It got to the point where all the Southern States threatened to secede from the United States in the late 1850s, and even caused Virginia to split into 2 states, Virginia and West Virginia.
A confederate is someone that wanted to stay in the union and work out differences over slavery . True or False?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The Confederates were the ones who wanted to keep slavery, but the north did not want that, so the south tried to back off of the united states to become its on country, naturally the north did not want that so they went to war
n your knowledge of social studies
A
RY
9. What is the main idea of this
cartoon?
(1) Nuclear proliferation continues
to threaten the world.
(2) Different people have varying
perspectives on artistic values.
(3) Most nations have forgotten the
impact of Hiroshima.
(4) Members of the International
Atomic Energy Agency support a
strategic defense initiative.
Answer: it’s 4
Explanation:
How were the wealthy landowners treated by the peasants denunciation meetings under Mao
why does andrew jackson justify the native American policy
Answer:
US President Andrew Jackson oversaw the policy of "Indian removal," which was formalized when he signed the Indian Removal Act in May 1830
Explanation:
I have a Question who is the most Handsome guy in the world
Which of the following is a check on the power of the judicial branch?
a
The president overturns a Supreme Court ruling.
b
The House of Representatives impeaches a justice.
c
The Senate nominates judges for the Supreme Court.
d
The Congress rejects a ruling by the Supreme Court.
Answer:
B - The House of Representatives impeaches a justice.
Explanation:
Search up "checks and balances" and see images to confirm this if you want.
please help ill give brainly <333 and don't put any link up or else ill report you !!!
the quote below by Lincoln is discussing which topic?
'That on the first day of January. All person held as slaves within any state or designated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free and the Executive Government of the United States, Including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons.
A ) Session
B ) Cession
C ) Emancipation
D ) Reconstruction
Answer:
C) Emancipation
hope this helps :)
Explanation:
How did President Clinton respond to the terrorist attack in Oklahoma City?
❌He closed all federal buildings in Oklahoma.
✅He signed a new antiterrorism law.
❌He outlawed groups that opposed the federal government.
Answer:
the second one is the correct answer
Explanation:
Answer:
B :)
Explanation:
Edge2022
In August 1936 [Adolf Hitler] had appointed Ribbentrop as German ambassador in London in an effort to explore the possibility of a settlement with England—on his own terms. Incompetent and lazy, vain as a peacock, arrogant and without humor, Ribbentrop was the worst possible choice for such a post... .facts or opinions
Answer:
Fact
Explanation:
Brainliest Please
How did Jackson die and why do you think this was a great loss to the confederacy?
Answer: Andrew Jackson died at his home, the Hermitage, of congestive heart failure on June 8, 1845.
Explanation:
I dont know the answer to the second one sorry :|
Study the chart on the left and consider what you learned about the Homestead Act.
Which of the following statements is accurate?
Between 1860 and 1900, most of the people who left the East moved to the South.
Between 1860 and 1900, the percentage of people living in the West and Midwest increased.
Between 1860 and 1900, the percentage of people living in the South and West decreased.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
because
Answer:
bb
Explanation:
Did President Truman make the correct decision in using the atomic bomb? What would the consequences have been if he had chosen not to drop the bomb?
Answer:
Explanation:
YES, HE DID MAKE A RIGHT CHOICE
=================================================================
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF TRUMAN DID NOT DROP THE ATOMIC BOMBS
If he did not drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, this would mean he would have to do a ground invasion of Japan. That is the first problem. The Japanese terrain is filled with mountains where the Japanese have the home field advantage meaning they can take advantage of what they have and pummel the Americans.
Another problem. Japanese soldiers are not the type of people to give up. They follow the standard that if you die in war, you die in war honouring your country but if you do not die for your country, you will live, knowing that you have shamed your family for the rest of your life.
=================================================================
IN A NUTSHELL...
It was to minimize the loss of life even if it meant that civilians were going to die. If a war were to continue, American lives would be lost left, right and centre. This would also bring a more rapid victory, ending the war completely, stopping any more casualties from the war. But clearly, the USA did not think about the moral side of using an atomic bomb but yes they were completely justified.
=================================================================
! HOPE I HELPED !