does anyone know how to do this?

Answer:

the answer is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$5026

Step-by-step explanation:

if you divide 70 by 15 you get 4.66666667

then multiply 4.6666667 by 1077 and you get 5026

Answer an essay on nothing

Step-by-step explanation:

In philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

Answer:

[tex]x_1=\frac{-2+\sqrt{14}}{2}\approx 0.871,x_2=\frac{-2-\sqrt{14}}{2}\approx-2.871[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2x^2+4x-5=0[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-4\pm\sqrt{4^2-4(2)(-5)}}{2(2)}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-4\pm\sqrt{16+40}}{4}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-4\pm\sqrt{56}}{4}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-4\pm2\sqrt{14}}{4}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{-2\pm\sqrt{14}}{2}[/tex]

[tex]x_1=\frac{-2+\sqrt{14}}{2}\approx 0.871,x_2=\frac{-2-\sqrt{14}}{2}\approx-2.871[/tex]

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

3 + x = 7 ( isolate x by subtracting 3 from both sides )

x = 7 - 3 = 4

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

3+x=7

Subtract 3 from both sides as Subtraction is the opposite of Addition.

So 7-3 = 4

X=4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if my answer helps plz give me brainliest :)

Answer:

I hope this helps. I'm sorry in advance if it isn't.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) SSS

2) The first bullet point

3) SAS

4) They are congruent by SAS, ASA

5) Segment AO is congruent to segment CO because:

The diagonals AC and BD both have O as the intersection point. AC = BD since the geometric means of the legs is equal. Thus AO is congruent to CO

Answer:

is it 60$

Step-by-step explanation:

because if its 100% than it would be 40+40+40

due to 50% = 120 ÷50%

= 60

Answer: 0.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Mark me branliest please

The following statements are true:

The given diagram is a triangular prism. From the diagram, some of the sides are parallel to each other (that is facing each other directly)

Some of the lines are also parallel to each other. From the given diagram, the sides that are parallel to each other are;

For the lines, the lines that are parallel to each other are:

For skew lines, they are straight lines that do not intersect and are not in the same plane. Hence the line that is skewed to DE is BC

Learn more about parallel and skew lines here: https://brainly.com/question/18013592

Answer:

Step 1: 10 group(s) of 23=230

Step 2: 6 group(s) of 23=138

Step 3: Add the partial quotients: 10 + 6 = 16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y-2 = -11 (x-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

2 is the y value of the point, 5 is the x value and -11 is the m value.

Slope point form: y-y1 = m(x-x1)

Hope that helps

Answer:

1. SSS

2. SAS

3. SAS

4. 1?

5. SSS

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: (x,y) → (x - 2, y - 8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Two units to the left would mean decreasing value on the x-axis, making it -2.

Eight units down would, again, mean decreasing value on the y-axis, making it -8.

Therefore, (x,y) → (x - 2, y - 8) is the correct translation rule.

I hope this helps :)

I get it, Geometry can be pretty difficult sometimes... I'm in it right now lol

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

When x=-1, y=5(-1)+3=-5+3=-2

When x=0, y=5(0)+3=0+3=3

When x=1, y=5(1)+3=5+3=8

When x=2, y=5(2)+3=10+3=13

When x=3, y=5(3)+3=13+3=16

Therefore, this is the correct table:

x -1 0 1 2 3

y -2 3 8 3 16

1,662,209 is the answer. You just have to add them all up

Answer:

It's 1662209.

Step-by-step explanation:

just add them

Given monomials are 3x⁷ , 4x² and -5x³

On multiplying them then

⇛ (3x⁷)×(4x²)×(-5x³)

⇛(3×4×-5) × (x⁷×x²×x³)

⇛ -60×x^(7+2+3)

Since , a^m × a^n = a^(m+n)

⇛-60 × x¹²

⇛ -60x¹² Ans.

also read similar questions: Multiplying Polynomials by Monomials: 2x (5x-2) = 10x-4x...

https://brainly.com/question/21877934?referrer

Find the product of the monomial and the polynomial: 4x^3y^3*(3x^3-7xy^2+2xy-y)..

https://brainly.com/question/20695867?referrer

[tex]3x^7 .4x^2.(-5)x^3=3.4.(-5).x^{7+2+3}=-60x^{12}[/tex]

ok done. Thank to me :>

Answer:

If her garden is 70m long, and it's a square type, wouldn't that suggest that her garden is 280m long?(70m X 4) And if this is the case, her garden would be 280 X 3=840 since there are 3 rounds?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 840m

Answer:

u= 6, -6

Step-by-step explanation:

simplify the equation. Isolate the variable.

Hey there!

(u + 6)(u − 6) = 0

DISTRIBUTE “u” WITHIN the PARENTHESES

u(u) + (-6) + 6(u) + 6(-6) = 0

u^2 - 6u + 6u - 36 = 0

COMBINE the LIKE TERMS

u^2 - 36 = 0

ADD 36 to BOTH SIDES

u^2 - 36 + 36 = 0 + 36

CANCEL out: -36 + 36 because it gives you 0

KEEP: 0 + 36 because it helps solve for the u-value

NEW EQUATION: u^2 = 0 + 36

SIMPLIFY IT!

0 + 36 = 36

NEW EQUATION: u^2 = 36

TAKE the SQUARE ROOT

u = ± √36

u = -6 or u = 6

Therefore, your answer is: u = 6 or u = -6

Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!

~Amphitrite1040:)

Answer:

6H

that was soo hard to find

Answer:

Let m represent the number of minutes.

Amount of water in Karla's tank:  100 + 5m

Amount of water in Jake's tank:  50 + 10m

Same amount of water:  100 + 5m  =  50 + 10 m

--->                                         100  =  50 + 5m

--->                                            50  =  5m

--->                                            10 = m

In ten minutes, Karla's tank will have 100 + 5(10)  =  100 + 50  =  150 gallons.

In ten minutes, Jake's tank will have 50 + 10(10)  =  50 + 100  =  150 gallons.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped!

Answer:

There is 11 fish in each fish tank

Step-by-step explanation:

242 total fish

divided into 22 fish tanks

242÷22=11

Draw 11 fish in each of the 22 fish tanks

2 5/12 or 29/12

hope it helps ?

study well:)

Answer:  Deopends.  See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

-5/12 from 2​

The question is poorly worded.  Is it asking us to subtract -5/12 from 2?  Or are we being asked to subtract 5/12 from 2?

Assuming the first:

2 - (-5/12)

2 + 5/12

2 5/12 or 24/12 + 5/12 = 29/12

Assuming the second:

2 -5/12

24/12 - 5/12

19/12

Answer:

  10 in

Step-by-step explanation:

If you draw a line parallel to the side of the cone through the center of the 10-inch (radius) circle, you create a right triangle with one leg 10 inches and a hypotenuse of 20+10 = 30 inches. It is similar to the right triangle shown on the diagram with leg 10 inches. That  means the distance from the center of the 10-inch (radius) ball to the bottom of the cone is 30 inches.

Subtract from that the 10-inch radius and the 10-inch diameter of the two bottom balls shown, and you find the distance from the base of the smallest ball to the bottom of the cone is 30 -10 -10 = 10 inches.

Given two points, the equation of the line may be determined by,

y - y1 = ((y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1))(x - x1)

Substituting the given values,

y - 7 = ((9 - 7) / (6 - 3))(x - 3)

Simplification will yield to an answer of,

y = 2x/3 +5

Therefore, the answer is the second choice.

Answer:

Simplify x+1-2x+1−2 to x-1x−1.

x-1=4

x−1=4

2 Add 11 to both sides.

x=4+1

x=4+1

3 Simplify 4+14+1 to 55.

x=5

x=5

Add 11 to both sides.

x=2+1

x=2+1

2 Simplify 2+12+1 to 33.

x=3

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

(7,9)and (5,8)

x1,y1 x,y

now

x=(x1 + x2)divide by 2

now putting the value

5 = (7+ x2) by 2

2 is in divide then get the 2 in right side with 5 in muntiply form

5×2=7+x2

10=7+x2

10 - 7=x2

x2=3

using the same process do it

y=(y1+y2) by 2

[tex](i)\\\\2A = \begin{pmatrix}3x \times 2 & 1 \times 2 & 5 \times 2\\0\times 2 & 2x \times 2 & -3 \times 2\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}6x & 2 & 10\\0 & 4x & -6\end{pmatrix}\\\\\\(ii)\\\\2A + B = C\\\\\implies \begin{pmatrix}6x & 2 & 10\\0 & 4x & -6\end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}y & 0 & -4\\1 & -3y & 2\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}31& 2 & 6\\1 & 17& -4\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\implies \begin{pmatrix}6x+y & 2+0 & 10-4\\0+1 & 4x-3y & -6+2\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}31 & 2 & 6\\1 & 17& -4 \end{pmatrix}\\\\\\\implies \begin{pmatrix}6x+y & 2 & 6\\1 & 4x-3y & -4\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}31 & 2 & 6\\1 & 17& -4 \end{pmatrix}\\\\\text{System of equations},\\\\6x +y =31,~~ 4x -3y = 17\\\\\\(iii)\\\\6x +y-31 =0 \\\\4x-3y -17=0\\\\\text{Solving by cross multiplication method}\\\\\\\dfrac x{1(-17) - (-31)(-3)} = \dfrac y{4(-31) - 6(-17)} = \dfrac 1{6(-3) - 4(1)}[/tex]

[tex]\implies \dfrac{x}{-17 -93} = \dfrac{y}{-124 +102} = \dfrac 1{-18-4}\\\\\\\implies -\dfrac{x}{110} = -\dfrac{y}{22} = -\dfrac 1{22}\\\\ \implies \dfrac{x}{110} = \dfrac{y}{22} = \dfrac 1{22}\\\ \\\text{Hence,}\\\\\\x=\dfrac{110}{22}=5,~~~~ y= \dfrac{22}{22} =1[/tex]

Answer:

  (i)

  [tex]2A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}6x&2&10\\0&4x&-6\end{array}\right][/tex]

  (ii) 6x+y=31; 4x-3y=17

  (iii) (x, y) = (5, 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

The matrix 2A is written by multiplying each element of A by 2.

  [tex]2A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}6x&2&10\\0&4x&-6\end{array}\right][/tex]

__

Variables are seen in elements (1, 1) and (2, 2) of the matrices A and B, so the simultaneous equations can be chosen from those elements of the equation 2A+B=C.

__

A graphing calculator shows the solution to be (x, y) = (5, 1).

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

*From what I'm getting, many of the blanks have multiple numbers that would work.*

No Solutions:

First Blank: 7

Second Blank: Any number but 5

One Solution:

First Blank: Any number but 7

Second Blank: Any number

Infinitely Many Solutions:

First Blank: 7

Second Blank: 5

Answer: 554

Step-by-step explanation: cause yeah