Find the missing side of each triangle

We can see here that some strategies needed to order and group the factors are:

A factor in mathematics is a number that divides another number by itself without producing a residue. As an illustration, 2 is a factor of 6 since 6 divided by 2 equals 3 with no residue.

We can see here that some reasons needed to reorder some factors:

Factors are an important concept in mathematics and in many other fields. They are used to solve problems, to design things, and to understand the world around us.

Calculating the given factors, we have:

5. 2 × 10 × 5 = 100

6. 2 × 8 × 2 = 32

7. 3 × 9 × 3 = 81

8. 5 × 2 × 6 = 60

9. 4 × 5 × 2 = 40

10. 2 × 9 × 2 = 36

11. 3 × 8 × 3 = 72

12. 4 × 2 × 2 = 16

Learn more about factors on https://brainly.com/question/219464

#SPJ1

To graph the functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 in the viewing rectangles [0, 10] by [0, 1] and [0, 100] by [0, 1], we can use a graphing calculator or an online graphing tool.

For the first viewing rectangle [0, 10] by [0, 1], we can set the x-axis range to [0, 10] and the y-axis range to [0, 1]. Then, we can graph the functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 on the same graph. The graph should show that the function f(x) increases faster than the function g(x) as x increases. This is because the exponent in f(x) is greater than the exponent in g(x). For the second viewing rectangle [0, 100] by [0, 1], we can set the x-axis range to [0, 100] and the y-axis range to [0, 1]. Then, we can graph the same functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 on the same graph.
The graph should show that the difference between the functions f(x) and g(x) is less noticeable than in the first viewing rectangle. This is because the x-axis range is larger, which means that the values of the functions are spread out more over the x-axis.

To know more about graphing calculator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30127177

#SPJ11

The uniform continuous probability for the interval (25 < x < 45) within the uniform distribution U(15, 65) can be found by calculating the proportion of the total range that falls within that interval.

To calculate the probability, we need to determine the length of the interval (45 - 25) and divide it by the length of the entire range (65 - 15).

Length of the interval: 45 - 25 = 20

Length of the entire range: 65 - 15 = 50

Now, we divide the length of the interval by the length of the entire range to obtain the probability:

Probability = (Length of interval) / (Length of entire range) = 20 / 50 = 0.4

Therefore, the uniform continuous probability for p(25 < x < 45) within the uniform distribution U(15, 65) is 0.4, rounded to one decimal place.

To learn more about uniform continuous probability click here brainly.com/question/13257446

#SPJ11

The correct step in the process of calculating successive discounts of 8% and 10% on a $50 item is to take 8% of $46.

Option B is the correct answer.

We have,

Original price:

We start with an item that has an original price of $50.

First discount:

The first discount is 8%. To calculate this discount, we take 8% of the original price.

So, we calculate 8% of $50, which is (8/100) x $50 = $4.

This means that the first discount is $4.

Reduced price:

To find the reduced price after applying the first discount, we subtract the discount amount from the original price.

So,

$50 - $4 = $46.

The reduced price after the first discount is $46.

Second discount:

The second discount is 10%.

However, it is important to note that this discount is applied to the reduced price from the previous step, which is $46.

We do not apply it to the original price of $50.

Calculating the second discount:

To calculate the amount of the second discount, we take 10% of the reduced price.

So, we calculate 10% of $46, which is (10/100) x $46 = $4.60.

This means that the second discount is $4.60.

Thus,

The correct step in the process of calculating successive discounts of 8% and 10% on a $50 item is to take 8% of $46.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

We are comparing the difference in mean commuting distance (in miles) between commuters in Atlanta and commuters in St. Louis. The standard error is calculated using the sample standard deviations as estimates of the population standard deviations.

To find the standard error of the bootstrap distribution, we need to use a statistical software or tool like StatKey. This tool allows us to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample differences in means based on the given data. We input the commuting distances for Atlanta and St. Louis and use the software to perform the bootstrap sampling procedure.

Once we have the bootstrap distribution, we can calculate the standard error by using the sample standard deviations as estimates of the population standard deviations. The standard error represents the variability of the sample means and provides an estimate of the uncertainty in our estimate of the population mean difference.

By comparing the standard error obtained from the bootstrap distribution to the standard error calculated using the Central Limit Theorem, we can assess the agreement between the two methods. The Central Limit Theorem states that as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the mean approaches a normal distribution, and the standard error calculated using the sample standard deviations becomes a good approximation of the standard error of the population mean difference.

By rounding our answers to two decimal places, we obtain the final values for the standard errors, allowing us to evaluate the accuracy and precision of our estimates.

To learn more about Central Limit Theorem, click here: brainly.com/question/898534

#SPJ11

If the level of significance is 0.05 and the p value is 0.06, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

The level of significance (alpha) is the threshold that we use to determine whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It is usually set at 0.05, meaning that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of making a type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true). The p value is the probability of obtaining the observed results (or more extreme results) if the null hypothesis is true. If the p value is less than or equal to the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If the p value is greater than the level of significance, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. In this case, since the p value (0.06) is greater than the level of significance (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30899146

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the equation:

6(sin(x))^2 + 7cos(x) - 3 = 0

We can use the identity:

sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1

Rearranging the equation, we get:

6(1-cos^2(x)) + 7cos(x) - 3 = 0

Expanding and rearranging, we get:

6cos^2(x) + 7cos(x) - 9 = 0

This is now a quadratic equation in terms of cos(x).

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

cos(x) = [-7 ± √(7^2 - 4(6)(-9))]/(2(6))

cos(x) = [-7 ± 13]/12

cos(x) = 1/2 or -3/2

Now we use the inverse cosine function to find x for each solution for cos(x).

When cos(x) = 1/2, we get:

x = π/3 + 2πk or x = 5π/3 + 2πk

When cos(x) = -3/2, we get:

there are no solutions for this case.

Therefore, the general solution to the equation is:

x = π/3 + 2πk or x = 5π/3 + 2πk where k is an integer.

Answer:

ermmm...yeah

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's label the sides of the right triangle. The longest side is the hypotenuse (c) and the other two sides are the adjacent side (a) and the opposite side (b). We know that c = 8 inches and one of the other sides, say a, is 4 inches. We need to find the length of the remaining side, which is b.

We can use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that in a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides:

c² = a² + b²

Substituting the given values, we get:

8² = 4² + b²

Simplifying, we get:

64 = 16 + b²

48 = b²

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

b = √48

We can simplify this by factoring 48 as 16 × 3:

b = √16 × √3

b = 4√3

Therefore, the length of the remaining side is 4√3 inches.

v · (2u - 3~v) equals -18.

What is Distributive Property?

This is the definition of distributive property:

The Distributive Property is an algebra property which is used to multiply a single term and two or more terms inside a set of parentheses.

For example:

3 (2+4)

According to the distributive property, you first have to add these two numbers (2+4 = 6) and then multiply the result 6 by 3 = 18.

To find v · (2u - 3~v), we can use the properties of the dot product and the given information.

Let's break down the expression step by step:

v · (2u - 3~v)

Using the distributive property, we can expand the expression:

= v · 2u - v · 3v

Now, let's calculate each term separately.

v · 2u:

Since ~u · ~v = -3, we can substitute this value:

= v · 2u

= 2(~v · ~u)

= 2(-3) (substituting ~u · ~v = -3)

= -6

Next, we calculate the second term:

v · 3v:

The dot product of a vector with itself gives us the square of its magnitude:

= v · 3v

= 3(|~v|²)

= 3(2²) (substituting |~v| = 2)

= 3(4)

= 12

Now, let's substitute the values back into the original expression:

v · (2u - 3~v)

= -6 - 12 (substituting v · 2u = -6 and v · 3v = 12)

= -18

Therefore, v · (2u - 3~v) equals -18.

To learn more about from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ4

To check the conditions for computing a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of red Skittles (p), we need to verify the following conditions:

1. Random Sample: The Skittles were placed into the bags using machinery at the factory, which can be considered a random process. Therefore, the condition of a random sample is met.

2. Large Sample Size: The total number of Skittles observed is 4084, which is large enough for the Central Limit Theorem to apply. The condition of a large sample size is met.

3. Independence: We assume that the selection of Skittles from the bags is independent. As long as each Skittle is selected without influence from other Skittles, this condition is satisfied.

Based on the provided information, it appears that the conditions for computing a confidence interval for the proportion of red Skittles are met.

Therefore, we can proceed with computing a 95% confidence interval for p using the class data, and the results obtained in Step B should be valid.

To know more about confidence interval refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13481020#

#SPJ11

Answer: A (3,4)   D(4,-3)    B (-4,-2) C(-5,-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

what you want to do is basically do from left to right first the x-axis/line and that's the first number then go up or down on the y axis/line then with both number make the coordinate the x number goes first then the y one

not sure if i explained good but i tried

Answer:

A = (3, 4)

B = (-4, -2)

C = (-5, -3)

D = (4, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

      Coordinate points are written as (x, y). The x-axis is the horizontal axis ad the y-axis is the vertical axis. You can think of finding coordinate points as walking and riding an elevator. First, walk right (positive) or left (negative), then ride the elevator up (positive) or down (negative).

      For point A, we move three units right and four units up to (3, 4).

      For point B, we move four units left and two units down to (-4, -2).

      For Point C, we move five units left and 3 units down to (-5, -3).

      For point D, we move four units right and three units down to (4, -3).

Answer:

please see detailed answers below

Step-by-step explanation:

we can work these out with z scores and use of a z-table.

formula is z = (X - υ) / σ, where X is test statistic, υ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

a)  z = (X - υ) / σ

= (235 - 204) / 55 = 0.5636.

now go to a z-table. find +0.5 along left column. now find 0.06 on top row. look where these two meet on the table. number is 0.71226. this is area to the left of z = 0.5636. since we want to find probability of at least $235, we need area to the right.

*total area under a normal curve always = 1.

so, area to the right is 1 - 0.71226 = 0.2877 = p(at least $235).

b)  z = (X - υ) / σ

= (120 - 204) / 55 = -1.527.

we find just like in part a). area for this z-score is 0.6301, to the left.

p(< $120) = 0.6301.

c) for $300:

z = (X - υ) / σ

= (300 - 204) / 55 = 1.745.

area to left is 0.95950.

for $210:

z = (X - υ) / σ

= (210 - 204) / 55 = 0.109.

area to left = 0.54380.

p($210 < Z < $300) = p($300) - p($210)

= 0.95950 - 0.54380

= 0.4157.

d) top 10% means we need z area of 0.9.

z-score for that is 1.285.

z = (X - υ) / σ

1.285 = (X - 204) / 55

X - 204 = 1.285(55) = 70.675

X = 70.675 + 204

= 274.675

so cost of 10% most expensive is $274.68 (to nearest cent).

The distance from the smaller charge where the electric field intensity will be zero can be calculated using the principle of superposition and the equation for electric field intensity.

By considering the charges, their magnitudes, and the distance between them, we can determine the location where the intensity cancels out.

Let's assume that the two charges are denoted as q1 and q2, with q1 being the smaller charge. The distance between the charges is given as 80 cm. To find the distance from the smaller charge where the electric field intensity is zero, we need to consider the principle of superposition. According to this principle, the electric field at a given point due to multiple charges is the vector sum of the electric fields produced by each charge individually.

If the electric field intensity is zero at a certain point, the electric fields produced by the two charges at that point must cancel each other out. Mathematically, this can be expressed as:

[tex]k * (q1 / r1^2) + k * (q2 / r2^2) = 0[/tex],

where k is the electrostatic constant, r1 is the distance between the smaller charge and the point of interest, and r2 is the distance between the larger charge and the point of interest.

Simplifying the equation, we can solve for r1:

[tex](q1 / r1^2) = - (q2 / r2^2)[/tex],

[tex]r1^2 = - (q2 / q1) * r2^2[/tex],

[tex]r1 = \sqrt{(- (q2 / q1) * r2^2)}[/tex]

By substituting the given values of q1, q2, and r2 into the equation, we can calculate the distance from the smaller charge where the electric field intensity is zero.

Learn more about smaller here: https://brainly.com/question/4241533

#SPJ11

Answer:

Solution is in attached photo.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the dual of the optimization problem, we'll first express it in standard form:

Minimize:

f(x1, x2, x3) =[tex]x1^2[/tex]+ [tex]x2^2[/tex] +[tex]x3^2[/tex] - x1x3 - x1x2

Subject to the constraint:

g(x1, x2) = 0

To find the dual of this problem, we introduce a Lagrange multiplier λ and form the Lagrangian function:

L(x1, x2, x3, λ) =[tex]x1^2[/tex]+  [tex]x2^2[/tex] + x[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - x1x3 - x1x2 + λg(x1, x2)

Since the constraint is g(x1, x2) = 0, we can rewrite the Lagrangian as:

L(x1, x2, x3, λ) =[tex]x1^2[/tex]+ x[tex]2^2[/tex]+ x[tex]3^2[/tex]- x1x3 - x1x2 + λ(0)

Simplifying, we get:

L(x1, x2, x3, λ) = [tex]x1^2[/tex] + x[tex]2^2[/tex] + [tex]x3^2[/tex]- x1x3 - x1x2

To find the dual problem, we need to maximize the Lagrangian over the variables x1, x2, and x3:

Maximize:

D(λ) = max [L(x1, x2, x3, λ)]

The dual problem seeks to find the maximum value of the Lagrangian over the feasible region.

However, since there is no constraint given in the original problem, the Lagrange multiplier λ does not have a corresponding constraint and the dual problem is undefined in this case.

To know more about  optimization refer here

https://brainly.com/question/32281314#

#SPJ11

Fot the two random samples of customers from Internet provider, a) The null and alternative hypothesis are [tex]H_0 : \mu_1 = \mu_2 \\ H_a : \mu_1< \mu_2[/tex].

b) The appropriate test that we will use is Two sample t-test.

We have an independent random sample with sample size from provider A, n₁ = 8

Sample size for provider B, n₂ = 10

Sample mean for sample A, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = 35.2 years

Standard deviations, s₁ = 8.2

Sample mean for sample B, [tex]\bar X_2 [/tex] = 38.4 years

standard deviations, s₂ = 5.8

Level of significance, a = 10% = 0.10

a) Now, we have check the claim that the average age for customers is less for those using Internet provider A than for Internet provider B, is true or not. Consider the null and alternative hypothesis are defined as [tex]H_0 : \mu_1 = \mu_2 \\ H_a : \mu_1< \mu_2[/tex].

b) As we have two samples with all details like mean, standard deviations, etc. So, to check the validity of null hypothesis we will use two sample t test. The test statistic value is written as

[tex]t = \frac{ \bar X_1 - \bar X_2 }{\sqrt{s_p²(\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}})}[/tex], where Pooled standard deviations,[tex]s_p =\frac{( n_1 - 1)s_1² + (n_2 - 1)s_2²}{n_1 + n_2 - 2} [/tex].

For more information about two sample t test, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29677066

#SPJ4

The height of the prism is 7.1m

A prism is a solid shape that is bound on all its sides by plane faces.

Surface area is the amount of space covering the outside of a three-dimensional shape.

The surface area of a prism is expressed as;

SA = 2B +ph

where B is the base area , p is the perimeter of the base and h is the height of the prism

The base of the triangle is calculated as;

√ 10² -8.7²

√100- 75.69

= √24.31

= 4.93m

If half base = 4.93

then the base = 4.93 × 2 = 9.86m

area of the base = 1/2 × 9.86 × 8.7

= 42.9 m²

perimeter of the base = 10+10 + 9.86

= 29.86 m²

Surface area = 297

Therefore ;

297 = 2 × 42.9 + 29.86h

29.86h = 297 - 85.8

29.86h = 211.2

h = 211.2/29.86

h = 7.1 m

Therefore the height of the prism is 7.1 m

learn more about surface area of prism from

https://brainly.com/question/1297098

#SPJ1

Given that p, q, and r are primes other than 3, we can show that 3 divides [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex].

To prove that 3 divides [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex], we need to consider the possible remainders of primes when divided by 3. Since p, q, and r are primes other than 3, they can only leave remainders of 1 or 2 when divided by 3.

Case 1: If any of p, q, or r leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 3, then its square, denoted as [tex]x^2[/tex], will also leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3 (since [tex](1^2) % 3 = 1)[/tex]% 3 = 1). In this case, [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex] will be a sum of three numbers that each leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3. Hence, [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex] will leave a remainder of 3 when divided by 3, and thus, it is divisible by 3.

Case 2: If p, q, and r each leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, then their squares, denoted as [tex]x^2[/tex], will also leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3 (since ([tex]2^2[/tex]) % 3 = 1). Similar to Case 1, [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex] will be a sum of three numbers that each leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3. Hence, [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex] will leave a remainder of 3 when divided by 3, and it is divisible by 3.

In both cases, we see that [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex] is divisible by 3. Therefore, we have shown that if p, q, and r are primes other than 3, then 3 divides [tex]p^2 + q^2 + r^2[/tex].

Learn more about primes here:

https://brainly.com/question/20532807

#SPJ11

Based on the given equation, the population of the country in the year 2000 should be approximately 3,167,277 (option D).

The equation log(population) = -13.5 + 0.01 x (year) represents a logarithmic regression model for the population of a country. The equation relates the logarithm (base 10) of the population to the year.

To find the population in the year 2000, we substitute the year value (2000) into the equation. Plugging in x = 2000, we have:

log(population) = -13.5 + 0.01 x 2000

log(population) = -13.5 + 20

log(population) = 6.5

To find the population, we need to take the antilogarithm of both sides to undo the logarithm:

population = 10^(6.5)

Evaluating this expression, we find that the population of the country in the year 2000 should be approximately 3,167,277 (option D).

Therefore, the correct answer is D) 3,167,277.

Learn more about regression model here:

https://brainly.com/question/28560106

#SPJ11

Answer: A scatterplot with a correlation coefficient closest to r = –1 would have a strong negative linear relationship between the two variables. In other words, as one variable increases, the other variable decreases in a nearly straight line.

Visually, this would appear as a tightly clustered set of points that slope downwards from left to right, with little to no scatter or deviation from the line of best fit.

The scatterplot would show a clear and strong negative correlation, with most if not all of the points falling close to the line of best fit. The further the points are from the line, the weaker the correlation.

So, the scatterplot that has a correlation coefficient closest to r = –1 would be the one that shows a strong negative linear relationship between the two variables with little to no scatter or deviation from the line of best fit.

Step-by-step explanation: :)

From the given statements, the following three options are true:

1.The planes x and y intersect at a right angle.

2.The planes x and y are parallel.

3.The line lies in plane x.

The statement "The planes x and y intersect at a right angle" indicates that the planes x and y meet orthogonally. This implies that their intersection forms a perpendicular intersection.

The statement "The planes x and y are parallel" means that the planes x and y do not intersect each other and are situated at a constant distance from each other. This parallel arrangement suggests that the planes do not converge or diverge.

The statement "The line lies in plane x" implies that the line, which is not specified further, is contained entirely within the plane x.

To learn more about lines click here:

brainly.com/question/2696693

#SPJ11

The three true statements are: (1) Plane y intersects plane x at a right angle, (2) Plane y does not intersect plane x, and (3) Line y lies in plane x.

The given information states that planes x and y intersect at a right angle. This means that the two planes meet perpendicularly. Additionally, it is stated that line y lies in plane x. This implies that all points of line y are contained within plane x. However, it is also mentioned that plane y does not intersect plane x. This means that the two planes do not have any common points or intersections. Therefore, the three true statements are: (1) Plane y intersects plane x at a right angle, indicating a perpendicular intersection, (2) Plane y does not intersect plane x, meaning they have no common points, and (3) Line y lies in plane x, implying that all points of line y are contained within plane x.

to learn more about perpendicular click here:

brainly.com/question/13705160

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2 \\9 \end{array}\right]}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]b=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4\\-18\end{array}\right]\\\\-2a=b[/tex]

Find:

[tex]a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}??\\??\end{array}\right][/tex]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[tex]-2a=b\\\\\Longrightarrow a=-\frac{1}{2}b\\ \\\Longrightarrow a=-\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4\\-18\end{array}\right] \\\\\Longrightarrow a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4(-\frac{1}{2}) \\-18(-\frac{1}{2}) \end{array}\right]\\\\\therefore \boxed{\boxed{a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2 \\9 \end{array}\right]}}[/tex]

Answer:

x≤ -2

Step-by-step explanation:

we want black part, so we know it's going to be to the left of -2.

the black dot at -2 means we include -2. if it was just an unfilled dot (circle) we exclude -2 (ie it would just be ( < -2)

so answer is x≤ -2

To find the probability P(X ≤ 3) for a binomial random variable with parameters n = 14 and p = 0.13 using Excel, you can utilize the BINOM.DIST function. The BINOM.DIST function calculates the probability of a specific number of successes in a binomial distribution.

In this case, you need to calculate the cumulative probability from 0 to 3 successes. Here's how you can use Excel to find the result:

1. Open Excel and enter the formula:

  =BINOM.DIST(3,14,0.13,TRUE)

  This formula calculates the cumulative binomial probability for 3 or fewer successes (X ≤ 3) in a binomial distribution with n = 14 and p = 0.13. The TRUE argument specifies that it calculates the cumulative probability.

2. Press Enter to get the result.

The resulting value will be the probability P(X ≤ 3) rounded to four decimal places.

To know more about BINOM.DIST function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28027510#

#SPJ11

To find the total amount of money donated, we can set up an equation based on the given information.

Let's assume the total amount of money donated is represented by the variable "T".

Since there are 4 charities and each charity received $375, we can multiply $375 by the number of charities to get the total amount of money donated to all charities.

The equation that represents this relationship is:

4 × $375 = T

Therefore, the equation that can be solved to find the total amount of money donated is 4 × $375 = T.

Learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

The value of the integral ∫7 |2x − 7| dx from 0 to 7 is 24.5.

To evaluate the integral ∫7 |2x − 7| dx from 0 to 7, we can interpret it in terms of areas.

First, let's find the points where the absolute value function |2x − 7| changes sign. The expression 2x − 7 equals zero when 2x = 7, which gives us x = 7/2 or 3.5. Therefore, the integrand changes sign at x = 3.5.

Now, let's break down the integral into two parts based on the sign of the integrand:

For 0 ≤ x < 3.5:

In this range, the expression 2x − 7 is negative, so |2x − 7| = -(2x − 7) = 7 - 2x. Therefore, the integral becomes:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = ∫7 (7 - 2x) dx

For 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 7:

In this range, the expression 2x − 7 is positive, so |2x − 7| = 2x − 7. Therefore, the integral becomes:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = ∫7 (2x − 7) dx

Now, let's evaluate each part separately:

For 0 ≤ x < 3.5:

∫7 (7 - 2x) dx = [7x - x^2] evaluated from 0 to 3.5

= [(7 * 3.5 - 3.5^2) - (7 * 0 - 0^2)]

= [(24.5 - 12.25) - 0]

= 12.25

For 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 7:

∫7 (2x − 7) dx = [x^2 - 7x] evaluated from 3.5 to 7

= [(7^2 - 7 * 7) - (3.5^2 - 7 * 3.5)]

= [(49 - 49) - (12.25 - 24.5)]

= [0 - (-12.25)]

= 12.25

Finally, adding the results from both parts:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = 12.25 + 12.25 = 24.5

Learn more about Integral

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

i) Based on the ratio of 3: 1: 4 , the number of bottles of strawberry syrup Vani has to buy is 4.

ii) Using the amount of strawberry syrup bought as calculated in part (i), the additional quantities of lemonade and carbonated water Vani has to buy in order to maintain the ratio of 3: 1: 4 are:

Ratio describes the relative size of one quantity when compared to another.

Ratios are fractional values, determined as the quotients of two values or quantities.

The total quantity of the fruit drink = 6 liters

The ratio of lemonade, strawberry syrup, and carbonated water = 3:1:4

The sum of ratios = 8 (3 + 1 + 4)

1 liter = 1,000 ml

6 liters = 6,000 ml

The quantity of strawberry syrup required = 750 ml (1/8 x 6,000)

The quantity of strawberry syrup in a bottle = 240 ml

i) The number of bottles to buy = 3.125 (750 ÷ 240)

Since Vani cannot buy 3.125 bottles of strawberry syrup, she has to buy more, which 4 bottles.

4 bottles = 960 ml (240 x 4)

Total quantity of liquid = 7,680 ml (960 ÷ 1/8)

ii) To maintain the ratio of lemonade, strawberry syrup, and carbonated water, the additional she has to buy include:

Lemonade:

Old quantity = 2.25 liters (6 x 3/8)

New quantity = 2.88 liters (7.68 x 3/8)

Difference = 0.63 liters or 630 ml

Carbonated Water:

Old quantity = 3 liters (6 x 4/8)

New quantity = 3.84 liters (7.68 x 4/8)

Difference = 0.84 liters or 840 ml

Learn more about ratios at https://brainly.com/question/12024093.

#SPJ1

Question Completion:

(ii) Using the amount of strawberry syrup bought as calculated in part (i), find how much more lemonade and carbonated water Vani has to buy in order to maintain the ratio of 3 : 1:4​

To determine the segment length in a right triangle, you would need to use the Pythagorean theorem which states that the sum of the squares of the lengths of the two shorter sides (legs) of a right triangle is equal to the square of the length of the longest side (hypotenuse).

In this case, if we assume that 14 is the length of the hypotenuse and 7 is one of the legs, we can solve for the other leg using the Pythagorean theorem:
14²= 7² + x²
196 = 49 + x²
x² = 147
x = √147
Therefore, the length of the other leg in the right triangle is √147.
In this case, let's consider the side lengths 14 and 7 as the two legs of the right triangle. To find the hypotenuse, apply the Pythagorean theorem:
Hypotenuse² = Leg₁² + Leg₂²
Hypotenuse² = 14² + 7²
Hypotenuse² = 196 + 49
Hypotenuse² = 245
Hypotenuse = √245
So, drag the tiles "14" and "7" to the boxes representing the legs, and "√245" to the box representing the hypotenuse. This forms the correct pairs for the segment lengths in the right triangle.

Learn more about  Pythagorean theorem here: https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11

The probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female is 0.160. None of the answer choices provided (A, B, C, D) matches the calculated probability of 0.160.

To find the probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female, we can consider the different possible combinations of students.

Let's denote the event of selecting a female student as F and the event of selecting a male student as M.

The probability of selecting at least two female students can be calculated by summing the probabilities of the following mutually exclusive events:

Selecting exactly 2 female students and 1 male student.

Selecting all 3 female students.

The probability of selecting exactly 2 female students and 1 male student can be calculated as follows:

P(2F and 1M) = P(F) * P(F) * P(M)

Since there are 40% female students and 60% male students, we have:

P(F) = 0.4 and P(M) = 0.6

Therefore, P(2F and 1M) = 0.4 * 0.4 * 0.6 = 0.096

The probability of selecting all 3 female students can be calculated as follows:

P(3F) = P(F) * P(F) * P(F) = 0.4 * 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.064

Now, we can find the probability that at least two students are female by summing the probabilities:

P(at least 2F) = P(2F and 1M) + P(3F) = 0.096 + 0.064 = 0.160

Therefore, the probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female is 0.160.

None of the answer choices provided (A, B, C, D) matches the calculated probability of 0.160

Learn more about mutually exclusive events here:

https://brainly.com/question/28565577

#SPJ11

The right-endpoint Riemann sum for the given integral is indeterminate due to the limit (∞ * 0).

To evaluate the integral ∫[2, 0] (3x² + 1) dx using a right-endpoint approximation to generate the Riemann sum, we can divide the interval [2, 0] into subintervals and calculate the sum of the areas of rectangles formed using the right endpoints of these subintervals.

Let's assume we divide the interval into n subintervals, each with a width of Δx. The width of each subinterval is given by Δx = (2-0)/n = 2/n.

Now, we can calculate the right endpoints of these subintervals as follows:

x_i = 2 - iΔx

where i ranges from 1 to n.

Next, we evaluate the function at the right endpoints:

f(x_i) = 3(x_i)² + 1

The Riemann sum is then given by:

R_n = Σ[1 to n] f(x_i)Δx

Substituting the values:

R_n = Σ[1 to n] (3(2-iΔx)² + 1)(2/n)

Simplifying the expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ Σ[1 to n] 3(4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²) + Σ[1 to n] 1 ]

Now, we can evaluate the summations:

Σ[1 to n] 3(4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²) = 3Σ[1 to n] (4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²)

= 3Σ[1 to n] (4Δx - 4iΔx² + i^2Δx²)

Σ[1 to n] 1 = n

Substituting back into the Riemann sum expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3Σ[1 to n] (4Δx - 4iΔx² + i^2Δx²) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 4(Δx²)Σ[1 to n] i + (Δx²)Σ[1 to n] i²) + n ]

The summations Σ[1 to n] i and Σ[1 to n] i^2 can be evaluated using the formulas:Σ[1 to n] i = n(n + 1)/2

Σ[1 to n] i² = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6

Substituting these formulas into the Riemann sum expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 4(Δx²)(n(n + 1)/2) + (Δx²)(n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 2(Δx²)(n^2 + n) + (Δx²)(n² + n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

Now, we can substitute Δx = 2/n and simplify the expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 4(4/n)(n² + n) + (4/n)(n² + n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16(n² + n) + (2n² + 2n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (4n² + 4n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 8n² + 4n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + 8n^3/3 + 12n²/3 + 4n/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (24n - 48n² - 48n + 8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 44n + 24n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 20n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 20n + 3n²)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 33n² - 20n)/3 + n ]

Now, we take the limit of the Riemann sum as n approaches infinity:

lim[ n→∞ ] R_n = lim[ n→∞ ] (2/n) * [ (8n³ - 33n^2 - 20n)/3 + n ]

Taking the limit of each term:

lim[ n→∞ ] (2/n) = 0

lim[ n→∞ ] (8n³ - 33n² - 20n)/3 = ∞

lim[ n→∞ ] n = ∞

Therefore, the limit of the Riemann sum as n approaches infinity is indeterminate (∞ * 0), and we cannot directly evaluate the integral using this method.

In summary, using a right-endpoint approximation to generate the Riemann sum, we have derived the expression for the Riemann sum but cannot evaluate it directly as the limit is indeterminate.

Learn more about integral

brainly.com/question/31433890

#SPJ11