Find x. Do not label. Round to the nearest hundredth.

Hello !

A

= (5k + 7n) - (2k + 3n)

= 5k + 7n - 2k - 3n

= 3k + 4n

B

= (4k + 6n) + (2k + 3n)

= 4k + 6n + 2k + 3n

= 6k + 9n

C

= (6k + 9n) + (5k + 7n)

= 6k + 9n + 5k + 7n

= 11k + 16n

The distance d from the camera to a particular unit in the parade can be represented as a function of the angle x:

d(x) = 20 / cos(x)

To write the distance d from the camera to a particular unit in the parade as a function of the angle x, we can use trigonometry and the concept of a right triangle.

Let's consider the reviewing platform as the point of origin (0, 0) on a coordinate plane. The camera is located 20 meters from the street, which means its coordinates are (20, 0).

Now, let's imagine a unit in the parade at a distance d from the camera and forming an angle x with the positive x-axis. We can draw a line connecting the camera (20, 0) and the unit (d, x) to form a right triangle.

cos(x) = adjacent / hypotenuse

cos(x) = 20 / d

To isolate d, we can rearrange the equation:

d = 20 / cos(x)

To graph this function over the interval −π/2 < x < π/2, you can plot various values of x within this range and calculate the corresponding values of d(x) using the equation. The resulting graph will show how the distance d changes as the angle x varies within the given interval.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/29633660

#SPJ1

Since O is the centroid of ASPT, it divides each median in the ratio 2:1. Therefore, OS = 2/3 * 2.6 = 1.7.

The area of triangle SPT is (1/2) * 2.6 * 2.6 = 3.36.

The area of triangle MPO is (1/2) * 1.7 * 2.6 = 2.22.

The area of triangle OSP is (1/2) * 1.7 * 1.7 = 1.54.

The area of triangle OPT is (3.36 - 2.22 - 1.54) = 0.58.

Therefore, V = 3.36 + 2.22 + 1.54 + 0.58 = 7.6.

The number of asymptotes for a large gain, k value in a unity negative feedback system with an open-loop transfer function is zero.

In a unity negative feedback system, the closed-loop transfer function is given by the equation: T(s) = G/(1+GH). Where G is the open-loop transfer function and H is the feedback transfer function. In this case, since the feedback transfer function is -1 (negative feedback), we have:T(s) = G/(1-G). For a large gain, k value, the open-loop transfer function G approaches infinity. Therefore, the closed-loop transfer function simplifies to: T(s) = infinity/(1-infinity) T(s) = infinity.

This indicates that the system has zero asymptotes, meaning there are no poles or zeros at infinity in the transfer function. The absence of asymptotes implies that the system is stable and able to provide a good response without any oscillations or overshoots. Therefore, a unity negative feedback system with an open-loop transfer function has no asymptotes for a large gain, k value.

To learn more about asymptotes click here: brainly.com/question/32038756

#SPJ11

A thin plastic ring with a radius of 0.31 m is painted with electrically charged paint. One half of the ring has a constant line charge density of 2, while the other half has a constant line charge density of 2 μC/m.

To find the total charge on the ring, we need to calculate the charge contributed by each half of the ring separately and then add them together. For the first half of the ring, which has a constant line charge density of 2, we can calculate the charge by multiplying the line charge density by the length of the arc. The length of the arc is equal to half the circumference of the ring, given by πr. Thus, the charge contributed by the first half is 2 times πr.

For the second half of the ring, which has a constant line charge density of 2 μC/m, we need to convert the line charge density to the charge per unit length by multiplying it by the length of the arc. Therefore, the charge contributed by the second half is 2 μC/m times πr. To find the total charge on the ring, we add the charges contributed by each half: 2πr + (2 μC/m times πr). Factoring out πr, we get (2 + 2 μC/m) times πr.

Substituting the given value of r (0.31 m) into the expression, we have (2 + 2 μC/m) times π times 0.31. In conclusion, the total charge on the thin plastic ring is given by (2 + 2 μC/m) times π times 0.31.

To learn more about charge density click here:

brainly.com/question/30465490

#SPJ11

To record the year-end entries for ore deposit depletion and mining machinery depreciation, the following entries should be made:

Ore Deposit Depletion:

Depletion Expense $2,100,000

Accumulated Depletion $2,100,000

Mining Machinery Depreciation:

Depreciation Expense $130,600

Accumulated Depreciation $130,60

Ore Deposit Depletion:

Depletion is the process of allocating the cost of a natural resource, such as an ore deposit, over its useful life. In this case, the company paid $3,268,550 for the ore deposit containing 1,557,000 tons.

To record the ore deposit depletion, the following entry is made:

Depletion Expense $X

Accumulated Depletion $X

The depletion expense is calculated by dividing the total cost of the ore deposit by the total estimated tons of ore. The accumulated depletion account is a contra-asset account that accumulates the depletion expense over time.

Mining Machinery Depreciation:

Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of a long-term asset, such as machinery, over its useful life. The mining machinery cost $207,600 and is expected to be fully depreciated by the time the ore is completely mined.

To record the mining machinery depreciation, the following entry is made:

Depreciation Expense $Y

Accumulated Depreciation $Y

learn more about Depletion here:

https://brainly.com/question/29694656

#SPJ11

option (d) 40 would be the closest choice for the number of measurements required to detect a difference in the true standard deviation with a probability of at least 0.9, assuming α=0.05

several factors need to be considered, including the desired level of significance (α), the desired power of the test (1-β), and the effect size.

Given that α=0.05 and the desired probability is at least 0.9, we are considering a statistical test with a power of at least 0.9. However, the effect size is not provided in the question, which is necessary to determine the sample size required.

The required sample size can be determined using power analysis, which takes into account the effect size, significance level, desired power, and other statistical parameters.

Learn more about level of significance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766149

#SPJ11

The equation representing the total amount of time to paint the center stripe of a highway as a function of the number of miles to be painted is Total Time = 2.3m + 0.75

The total amount of time it will take to paint the center stripe of a highway can be represented by the equation:

Total Time = Time per Mile × Number of Miles + Setup Time

The time per mile is given as 2.3 hours, the number of miles to be painted is denoted as 'm', and the setup time is 45 minutes, which can be converted to hours by dividing by 60.

Therefore, the equation that best represents the total amount of time is:

Total Time = 2.3m + (45/60)

Total Time = 2.3m + 0.75

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

a. Expected value: -11.5

Standard error: 0.2621

b. Probability that the sample mean is less than -12: 0.2971

c. Probability that the sample mean falls between -12 and -11: 0.1525

The expected value (mean) of the sampling distribution of the sample mean is equal to the population mean, The standard error for the sampling distribution of the sample mean is a measure of how much the sample means are likely to vary from the population mean. It is calculated by dividing the population standard deviation by the square root of the sample size. The population standard deviation in this case is 2, and the sample size is 58. By plugging these values into the formula, we get a standard error of approximately 0.2621 when rounded to 4 decimal places.

b. To calculate the probability that the sample mean is less than -12, we need to convert -12 to a z-score. The z-score measures how many standard deviations an observation is away from the mean. We use the formula z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n), where x is the value of interest (-12), μ is the population mean (-11.5), σ is the population standard deviation (2), and n is the sample size (58). By substituting these values into the formula, we find that the z-score is approximately -0.5303.

To find the probability associated with a z-score of -0.5303, we can refer to Table 1.a or use a standard normal distribution calculator. From the table or calculator, we find that the probability is approximately 0.2971 when rounded to 4 decimal places. This means that there is a 29.71% chance that the sample mean will be less than -12.

c. To calculate the probability that the sample mean falls between -12 and -11, we need to find the z-scores for -12 and -11 using the same formula as in part b. The z-score for -12 is -0.5303 (as calculated earlier), and the z-score for -11 can be found by substituting the values into the formula: z = (-11 - (-11.5)) / (2 / √58), which simplifies to -1.0607.

Using the z-scores, we can calculate the probabilities associated with each z-score. The probability corresponding to a z-score of -0.5303 is approximately 0.2971, and the probability corresponding to a z-score of -1.0607 is approximately 0.1446.

Learn more about sampling distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31465269

#SPJ11

answer: To find all answers to the equation 2cos(x) + 1 = sec(x), we can use the following steps:

Rewrite sec(x) as 1/cos(x), using the definition of secant.

Multiply both sides by cos(x), to eliminate the fraction.

Simplify and rearrange the terms to get a quadratic equation in cos(x).

Solve the quadratic equation using the quadratic formula or factoring, if possible.

Find the values of x that satisfy the equation, using the inverse cosine function and the periodicity of cosine.

Here are the steps in detail:

2cos(x) + 1 = sec(x)

2cos(x) + 1 = 1/cos(x)

2cos^2(x) + cos(x) - 1 = 0

(2cos(x) - 1)(cos(x) + 1) = 0, by factoring

cos(x) = 1/2 or cos(x) = -1, by setting each factor to zero

x = cos^-1(1/2) or x = cos^-1(-1), by taking the inverse cosine of both sides

x = π/3 + 2πn or x = -π/3 + 2πn or x = π + 2πn, where n is any integer, by using the inverse cosine function and the periodicity of cosine

Therefore, the general solutions are:

x = π/3 + 2πn x = -π/3 + 2πn x = π + 2πn

The chi-square test statistic (X^2) of 9.51 with 2 degrees of freedom and a p-value less than 0.01 indicates that the observed differences are unlikely to have occurred by chance, providing evidence for a significant relationship between the two variables.

The statement that is the best conclusion given the analysis is:

There is a significant relationship between grade and whether a student has taken college algebra, X^2 (2, N = 69) = 9.51, p < .01.

This conclusion suggests that there is a significant difference in the outcomes (passing, failing, or dropping) between the Algebra and No Algebra groups.

To learn more about chi-square test statistic go to :

https://brainly.com/question/30076629

#SPJ11

Answer:

10.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{Percent (\%) Error}=\frac{|\text{Actual-Estimate}|}{\text{Actual}}*100\%=\frac{|38-42|}{38}*100\%\approx10.5\%[/tex]

Therefore, the percent error of Logan's estimate is about 10.5%

To determine if the grading function is a one-to-one correspondence, we need to check if each input percentage corresponds to a unique output grade and if each output grade corresponds to a unique input percentage.

Let's analyze the given grading function:

Percentage Range    Grade

[93, 100]          A

[90, 93)           A-

[87, 90)           B+

[83, 87)           B

[80, 83)           B-

[77, 80)           C+

[73, 77)           C

[70, 73)           C-

[67, 70)           D+

[63, 67)           D

[0, 63)            F

From the definition, we can see that there are overlapping ranges for different grades.

For example, the range [90, 93) corresponds to the grade A- as well as the range [87, 90) corresponds to the grade B+. This indicates that the grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence because multiple input percentages can yield the same output grade.

Therefore, the grading function described above is not a one-to-one correspondence.

To know more about  percentage refer here

https://brainly.com/question/32197511#

#SPJ11

The approximate probability that the pH measurement of a randomly selected water specimen is between 7.5 and 8.2 is approximately 0.7011 or 70.11%.

To find the approximate probability that the pH measurement of a randomly selected water specimen is between 7.5 and 8.2, we can use the properties of the normal distribution.

Given:

Mean (μ) = 8

Standard deviation (σ) = 0.3

We need to find the probability of the pH measurement falling between 7.5 and 8.2. Let's denote this as P(7.5 < X < 8.2), where X represents the pH measurement.

To calculate this probability, we can standardize the values using the z-score formula:

z1 = (7.5 - 8) / 0.3

z2 = (8.2 - 8) / 0.3

Calculating the z-scores:

z1 ≈ -1.67

z2 ≈ 0.67

Now, we can look up the z-scores in the standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find the corresponding probabilities.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find:

P(Z < z1) ≈ P(Z < -1.67) ≈ 0.0475 (approximately)

P(Z < z2) ≈ P(Z < 0.67) ≈ 0.7486 (approximately)

To find the probability between 7.5 and 8.2, we subtract the lower probability from the upper probability:

P(7.5 < X < 8.2) ≈ P(Z < z2) - P(Z < z1)

≈ 0.7486 - 0.0475

≈ 0.7011

Therefore, the approximate probability that the pH measurement of a randomly selected water specimen is between 7.5 and 8.2 is approximately 0.7011 or 70.11%.

Learn more  about probability here:

 https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

Therefore option (a). To find the average, you add up all the scores and divide by the number of students. In this case, (71+73+78+95+80+82+73+94)/8 = (d) 80.75.

To find the standard deviation, you first find the difference between each score and the average, square each difference, add them all up, divide by the number of scores minus 1, and then take the square root of the result. This can be a bit cumbersome to calculate by hand, so it's usually done using a calculator or software. For this set of scores, the standard deviation is 8.11. Remember to express your answer accurate to two decimal places.

To know more about Standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31516010

#SPJ11

The derivative dy/dx of the function y = [tex](\sqrt x)e^{sin(x)}[/tex] is:

dy/dx = [tex](1/2) \times x^{(-1/2)} \times e^{(sin(x))} + x^{(1/2)} \times cos(x) \times e^{(sin(x))}[/tex]

To find dy/dx of the given function y =[tex](\sqrt x)e^{sin(x)}[/tex], we can use the chain rule. Let's break it down step by step:

First, let's rewrite the function using exponentiation notation:

y = [tex]x^{(1/2)} \times e^{(sin(x))}[/tex]

Now, we can differentiate each part separately using the chain rule.

Differentiate [tex]x^{(1/2)}[/tex]:

Using the power rule, we have:

[tex]d/dx (x^{(1/2)}) = (1/2) \times x^{(-1/2)}[/tex]

Differentiate [tex]e^{(sin(x))}[/tex]:

Using the chain rule, we have:

[tex]d/dx (e^{(sin(x))}) = cos(x) \times e^{(sin(x))}[/tex]

Now, applying the chain rule, we can find dy/dx:

[tex]dy/dx = (d/dx (x^{(1/2)})) \times e^{(sin(x))} + x^{(1/2)} \times (d/dx (e^{(sin(x))}))[/tex]

= [tex](1/2) \times x^{(-1/2)} \times e^{(sin(x))} + x^{(1/2)} \times cos(x) \times e^{(sin(x))}[/tex]

For similar questions on derivative

https://brainly.com/question/28376218

#SPJ11

The curve starts at an open circle at (2, 0) and curves downward, eventually approaching an open circle at (4, 2). The rest of the graph is not relevant to the given conditions.

The graph that satisfies the given conditions is the one where a curve starts at an open circle (2, 0) and curves down to an open circle (4, 2).

This graph represents a function f(x) that approaches a limit of 0 as x approaches 2 from the right (x approaches 2+), and approaches a limit of -4 as x approaches 2 from the left (x approaches 2-).

Here's a rough sketch of the graph:

diff

Copy code

                       .

                     .

                   .

               .  

             .

       .    

     .

   .

.

------------------------------------------

The curve starts at an open circle at (2, 0) and curves downward, eventually approaching an open circle at (4, 2). The rest of the graph is not relevant to the given conditions.

For such more questions on Graph for Limit Conditions.

https://brainly.com/question/27545688

#SPJ11

The price of the futures contracts increases to 114 - 230, Dudley Savings Bank will make a net profit of $84,000 on the contracts that it sold.

To calculate the net profit to Dudley Savings Bank if the price of the futures contracts increases to 114 - 230, we need to revisit our calculations from part (a) and incorporate the new price into our analysis.

Recall that in part (a), we determined that Dudley Savings Bank had sold futures contracts at a price of 110 - 220. We also calculated the total value of the contracts to be $1,320,000 (6,000 contracts x $220 per contract).
Now, if the price of the futures contracts increases to 114 - 230, we can calculate the new value of the contracts. To do this, we need to determine the difference between the original contract price and the new contract price, and then multiply this difference by the number of contracts.

The difference between the original contract price of 110 - 220 and the new contract price of 114 - 230 is as follows:
- The price of the first contract has increased from 110 to 114, resulting in a gain of $4 per contract.
- The price of the second contract has increased from 220 to 230, resulting in a gain of $10 per contract.

Multiplying these gains by the number of contracts gives us the total profit for Dudley Savings Bank. Specifically:
- For the first contract, the bank gains $4 x 6,000 = $24,000.
- For the second contract, the bank gains $10 x 6,000 = $60,000.

Adding these two gains together gives us the total profit for the bank, which is:
$24,000 + $60,000 = $84,000

To know more about Dudley Savings Bank visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31964503

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution is found by considering the factors of 90 and selecting the consecutive integers among them. The ages are found to be 9 and 10, where Alonso's age is 10.

Let's assume Alonso's age is x. Since Nayeli is younger than Alonso, her age can be represented as x-1, as they are consecutive integers. According to the given information, the product of their ages is 90. Therefore, we can write the equation:

x * (x-1) = 90

Expanding the equation:

x^2 - x = 90

Rearranging the equation to solve for x:

x^2 - x - 90 = 0

Now, we can factorize the quadratic equation:

(x - 10)(x + 9) = 0

Setting each factor to zero:

x - 10 = 0 or x + 9 = 0

Solving for x:

x = 10 or x = -9

Since we are looking for positive consecutive integers, we discard the negative solution. Hence, Alonso's age is 10, and Nayeli's age is 9.

In conclusion, Alonso is 10 years old, while Nayeli is 9 years old. The product of their ages, 10 * 9, is indeed equal to 90.

Learn more about age calculation: https://brainly.com/question/26423521

#SPJ11

According to the question we have there are 14 people in the group who speak both French and German.

To find out how many people in the group speak both French and German, we need to use a formula called the inclusion-exclusion principle. According to this principle, the total number of people who speak French or German (or both) is the sum of the number of people who speak French plus the number of people who speak German minus the number of people who speak both languages. In mathematical terms:

total = French + German - (French and German)

We know from the problem statement that:

French = 42
German = 55
Neither = 17

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

total = 42 + 55 - (French and German)
total = 97 - (French and German)

We are looking for the number of people who speak both French and German, so let's call that number "x". Then we have:

(French and German) = x

Substituting this value into the formula, we get:

total = 97 - x

We also know from the problem statement that the total number of people in the group is 100, including those who speak neither language. So we have:

total = French + German - (French and German) + Neither
100 = 42 + 55 - x + 17
100 = 114 - x
x = 14

Therefore, there are 14 people in the group who speak both French and German.

To know more about People  visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11198172

#SPJ11

Answer:

how many readers are North American

Step-by-step explanation:

We can't know the % without knowing how many people read it

In programming, output refers to the information that a program sends to the user or to another program. In this particular case, the output of the given code will be an error due to invalid syntax.

The code attempts to print a tuple containing the values (2, 'a') without specifying what to do with it or how to format it. This results in a syntax error that prevents the program from executing properly. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is "error, invalid syntax".

It's important to note that the dictionary dict = {1: 'x', 2: 'y', 3: 'z'} is not used in the code and does not affect the output.

To know more about output refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14227929

#SPJ11

So, the simpler form of the radical expression 4 sqrt 1296 x^16y^12 is 144x^14y^14 sqrt (x) sqrt (y).

To simplify the radical expression 4 sqrt 1296 x^16y^12, we need to first factor the number inside the radical. 1296 can be factored into 36 x 36, which simplifies to 6^4. So, the expression becomes 4 sqrt (6^4 x^16y^12).
Next, we can simplify the expression further by using the property of exponents that says a^m x a^n = a^(m+n). This means that we can combine the exponents of x and y, which gives us 4 sqrt (6^4 x^(16+12) y^(12+16)). Simplifying this, we get 4 sqrt (6^4 x^28 y^28).
Now, we can simplify the radical expression even further by using the property that says sqrt (a x b) = sqrt (a) x sqrt (b). Applying this to our expression, we get 4 x 6^2 x sqrt (x^28) x sqrt (y^28). Simplifying this further, we get 144x^14y^14 sqrt (x) sqrt (y).
To know more about radical visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14923091

#SPJ11

The number of ways to line up five persons to get on a bus is 120. If two of the people refuse to stand next to each other, there are 48 possible arrangements.

To calculate the number of ways to line up the five persons without any restrictions, we can use the concept of permutations. Since the order matters, we can think of it as arranging five distinct objects in a line. The number of ways to do this is given by the factorial of five, denoted as 5!, which is equal to 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 120. Therefore, there are 120 possible arrangements for the first scenario.

In the second scenario, where two people refuse to stand next to each other, we can approach it by considering the two people as a single entity. Now, we have four entities to arrange: the two people treated as one and the three remaining individuals. The number of ways to arrange these four entities is given by 4!. However, since the two people within the single entity can be arranged in two different ways, we multiply the result by 2. Hence, the total number of arrangements in this scenario is 4! x 2 = 48.

To learn more about ways click here:

brainly.com/question/28973219

#SPJ11

Thus, the categorical syllogism in standard form is: 1. All W are S (A) 2. No F are W (E) 3. No S are F (E)

The given categorical syllogism can be put into standard form using the following terms: Starships (S), Ferengi inventions (F), and Warp-capable ships (W). The standard form consists of two premises and a conclusion.

Premise 1: All Warp-capable ships (W) are Starships (S)
Premise 2: No Ferengi inventions (F) are Warp-capable ships (W)
Conclusion: No Starships (S) are Ferengi inventions (F)

The mood of the syllogism is AEO (All, No, No) because the first premise is an A proposition (All), and the second premise and conclusion are E propositions (No).

The figure of the syllogism is 3, as the middle term (W) is in the predicate of the first premise and the subject of the second premise.

Thus, the categorical syllogism in standard form is:

1. All W are S (A)
2. No F are W (E)
3. No S are F (E)

The syllogism's mood and figure are AEO-3.

To know more about categorical syllogism visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/8590978

#SPJ11

The probability that the first fracture in the beam occurs on the third test of weld strength is 0.08, and the mean and variance of the number of tests to find the first fracture in the beam are 5 and 20, respectively.

(a) To make f(x) a valid density, we need to ensure that the integral of f(x) over its entire support is equal to 1.

∫(1 to 3) c(x - 1)^3 dx = 1

Integrating the expression, we get:

[c(x^4/4 - 3x^3/3 + 3x^2/2 - x)] from 1 to 3 = 1

Simplifying further, we have:

[c(81/4 - 27/3 + 9/2 - 3) - c(1/4 - 3/3 + 3/2 - 1)] = 1

Solving for c, we find:

(81c/4 - 27c/3 + 9c/2 - 3c) - (c/4 - c + 3c/2 - c) = 1

Combining like terms, we have:

(57c/12) - (3c/4) = 1

Multiplying through by 12 to clear the fractions, we get:

57c - 9c = 12

Simplifying, we find:

48c = 12

c = 12/48 = 1/4

Therefore, the value of c that makes f(x) a valid density is 1/4.

(b) P(X = 2) is equal to the probability density function (PDF) evaluated at x = 2:

f(2) = (1/4)(2 - 1)^3 = (1/4)(1) = 1/4

So, P(X = 2) = 1/4.

(c) To find E(X), we need to compute the expected value or mean of X:

E(X) = ∫(1 to 3) x f(x) dx

E(X) = ∫(1 to 3) x(1/4)(x - 1)^3 dx

E(X) = (1/4)∫(1 to 3) x(x^4 - 4x^3 + 6x^2 - 4x + 1) dx

E(X) = (1/4)[(x^6/6 - x^5 + 2x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2)] from 1 to 3

E(X) = (1/4)[(3^6/6 - 3^5 + 2(3^4) - 2(3^3) + 3^2) - (1^6/6 - 1^5 + 2(1^4) - 2(1^3) + 1^2)]

E(X) = (1/4)[(729/6 - 243 + 2(81) - 2(27) + 9) - (1/6 - 1 + 2 - 2 + 1)]

Simplifying further, we have:

E(X) = (1/4)(411) = 411/4

So, E(X) = 102.75.

(d) P(1 < X < 2) is the probability that X falls between 1 and 2. This can be calculated by integrating the PDF over the interval (1 to 2):

P(1 < X < 2) = ∫(1 to 2) f(x) dx

P(1 < X < 2) = ∫(1 to 2) (1/4)(x - 1)^3 dx

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)∫(1 to 2) (x^3 - 3x^2 + 3x - 1) dx

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)[(x^4/4 - x^3 + (3/2)x^2 - x)] from 1 to 2

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)[(2^4/4 - 2^3 + (3/2)(2^2) - 2) - (1^4/4 - 1^3 + (3/2)(1^2) - 1)]

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)[(16/4 - 8 + 6/2 - 2) - (1/4 - 1 + 3/2 - 1)]

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)[(4 - 8 + 3 - 2) - (1/4 - 1 + 3/2 - 1)]

P(1 < X < 2) = (1/4)[(-3/4)]

P(1 < X < 2) = -3/16

Therefore, P(1 < X < 2) is equal to -3/16. Note that probabilities cannot be negative, so the probability is 0.

To know more about variance,

https://brainly.com/question/14189285

#SPJ11

5. P(x ≤ 12 ounces) is approximately 0.0025.

6. P(x > 64 ounces) is approximately  0.1056.

7. P(24 ounces < x ≤ 36 ounces) is approximately 0.1432.

8. P(x > 90 ounces) is approximately 0.0006.

9. The cumulative probability for a z-score of 3.28125 is approximately 0.9994.

a) The z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.1788, which is approximately 0.92.

b) The z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.95 is approximately 1.645.

c) The teachers in the top 5% are making at least $51,972.50 in salary

5. P(x ≤ 12 ounces):

To find this probability, we need to calculate the z-score corresponding to 12 ounces and then find the cumulative probability up to that z-score.

Z-score = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the value (12 ounces), μ is the mean (48 ounces), and σ is the standard deviation (12.8 ounces).

Z-score = (12 - 48) / 12.8 = -2.8125

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of -2.8125 is approximately 0.0025.

Therefore, P(x ≤ 12 ounces) is approximately 0.0025.

6. P(x > 64 ounces):

Similarly, we calculate the z-score corresponding to 64 ounces and find the cumulative probability beyond that z-score.

Z-score = (x - μ) / σ

Z-score = (64 - 48) / 12.8 = 1.25

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of 1.25 is approximately 0.8944.

Since we want the probability of x being greater than 64 ounces, we subtract the cumulative probability from 1:

P(x > 64 ounces) ≈ 1 - 0.8944 = 0.1056.

7. P(24 ounces < x ≤ 36 ounces):

We need to calculate the z-scores corresponding to 24 ounces and 36 ounces and find the difference in cumulative probabilities between those z-scores.

Z-score for 24 ounces = (24 - 48) / 12.8 = -1.875

Z-score for 36 ounces = (36 - 48) / 12.8 = -0.9375

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the cumulative probabilities for these z-scores:

P(Z ≤ -1.875) ≈ 0.0304

P(Z ≤ -0.9375) ≈ 0.1736

To find P(24 ounces < x ≤ 36 ounces), we subtract the cumulative probability for 24 ounces from the cumulative probability for 36 ounces:

P(24 ounces < x ≤ 36 ounces) ≈ 0.1736 - 0.0304 = 0.1432.

8. P(x > 90 ounces):

We calculate the z-score corresponding to 90 ounces and find the cumulative probability beyond that z-score.

Z-score = (x - μ) / σ

Z-score = (90 - 48) / 12.8 = 3.28125

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of 3.28125 is approximately 0.9994.

Since we want the probability of x being greater than 90 ounces, we subtract the cumulative probability from 1:

P(x > 90 ounces) ≈ 1 - 0.9994 = 0.0006.

Find the z-score that corresponds with:

a) 82.12%:

To find the z-score corresponding to 82.12%, we subtract the cumulative probability from 1 (since we need the z-score on the right side of the distribution curve).

P(Z ≤ z) = 1 - 0.8212 = 0.1788

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.1788, which is approximately 0.92.

b) The Empirical Rule states that for a normal distribution, approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean.

In this case, the mean salary is $42,000 and the standard deviation is $5,500.

To find the range of salaries for 68% of the teachers, we can calculate the lower and upper limits.

Lower limit: Mean - 1 standard deviation

Lower limit = $42,000 - $5,500 = $36,500

Upper limit: Mean + 1 standard deviation

Upper limit = $42,000 + $5,500 = $47,500

Therefore, the range of salaries for 68% of the teachers according to the Empirical Rule is $36,500 to $47,500.

c) The top 5% of salaries corresponds to the area under the curve that lies beyond approximately two standard deviations above the mean.

To find the salary amount for the top 5%, we can calculate the z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.95 (1 - 0.05).

P(Z ≤ z) = 0.95

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find that the z-score corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.95 is approximately 1.645.

Now we can calculate the salary amount:

Salary amount = Mean + (z-score × standard deviation)

Salary amount = $42,000 + (1.645 × $5,500) = $51,972.50

Therefore, the teachers in the top 5% are making at least $51,972.50 in salary

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The correct statement for using the cumulative distribution function (cdf), F(x), to solve the probability P(X<12) is: F(12) - F(11), We subtract the cdf value at x-1 from the cdf value at x.

The cumulative distribution function (cdf), denoted as F(x), gives the probability that a random variable X takes on a value less than or equal to x. In this case, we are interested in finding the probability that X is less than 12, which can be expressed as P(X<12).

To calculate this probability using the cdf, we need to find the difference between the cdf values at 12 and 11. The cdf value at 12, denoted as F(12), gives the probability that X is less than or equal to 12. Similarly, the cdf value at 11, denoted as F(11), gives the probability that X is less than or equal to 11.

Since we want to find the probability that X is strictly less than 12, we subtract the probability that X is less than or equal to 11 from the probability that X is less than or equal to 12. Mathematically, this can be written as F(12) - F(11).

Therefore, the correct statement for using the cdf to solve P(X<12) is F(12) - F(11).

Learn more about Discrete random variable: brainly.ph/question/2453571

#SPJ11

Answer:

D (- 2, - 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

since the figure is a rectangle , then

D lies directly above A with the same x- coordinate of - 2

D lies on the same line as C with the same y- coordinate of - 4

then coordinates of D = (- 2, - 4 )

Both partial derivatives ∂x/∂z and ∂y/∂z are equal to zero.

To find the partial derivatives of the surface [tex]x^9z^2[/tex]sin([tex]y^5z^2[/tex]) - 2 = 0 using implicit differentiation, we differentiate each term with respect to the corresponding variable and solve for the desired derivative. The partial derivatives are as follows:∂x/∂z: To find this derivative, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to z while treating x and y as constants. We obtain 9[tex]x^9[/tex]z(2[tex]z^2[/tex] sin([tex]y^5z^2[/tex])) = 0. Solving for ∂x/∂z, we get ∂x/∂z = 0.

∂y/∂z: Similarly, we differentiate both sides with respect to z while treating x and y as constants. The derivative of sin([tex]y^5z^2[/tex]) with respect to z is 2[tex]y^5z^3[/tex] cos([tex]y^5z^2[/tex]). We obtain [tex]x^9z^2[/tex] * 2[tex]y^5z^2[/tex] cos([tex]y^5z^2[/tex]) = 0. Simplifying, we have ∂y/∂z = 0.

Therefore, both partial derivatives ∂x/∂z and ∂y/∂z are equal to zero.

Learn more about partial derivatives

brainly.com/question/28751547

#SPJ11