How does the author develop points about Wilson’s populist view?

A. by showing his reaction to curtailing the influence of elitist clubs

B. by focusing on his academic success

C. by listing his accomplishments as president

D. by describing his common system of core requirements

NO LINKS! MARK YOU THE BRAINLIEST!

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

When a car that is not paying attention turns it could cause a bad wreck. They could turn the wrong way and go into the other side of the road. The Car is Responsible for anything that happens to them or someone else.

An example of a civil engineering project in a city that serves the community is roads, which make it possible to transport from one region to another more quickly and safely.

Environmental engineers need to work with many other types of engineers because this is a broader and more complex area.

Environmental engineers aim to preserve the environment through policies and strategies to reduce the impact in different areas of engineering.

All fields of civil engineering need to use topographic survey because all civil engineering projects are based on topographic measurement.

Working in a formal group can always be challenging as each member of a team has a distinct personality and skills, but it is essential to utilize each member's strengths for team integration, communication and cooperation.

Therefore, the integration of engineering professionals is an essential feature for the effectiveness of projects.

A priority for future engineers would therefore be the creation of sustainable projects, given the importance for society of preserving environmental resources.

Learn more about engineering here:

https://brainly.com/question/17169621

Answer:

Based off of what happened in the text, I would say that the theme of the passage is that some people can succeed with different paths to success. Even though Katie didn't understand the subjects very well, her friend was able to assist her in understanding the topics. Ultimately helping her get to success.

Explanation:

This good? ^

Answer:

see explanation

Explanation:

The summary for The Boy in the Striped Pajamas goes as follows:

After spending a few weeks at OutWith, Bruno began looking for a new way of speaking. He wanted to avoid being absorbed in it, as he was walking around crying with his head in his head like one of his old neighbors in Berlin, Mr. Laura. Bruno once recalled that his mother warned him not to make fun of Mr. Laura. He suffered a head injury during World War I, and his mother claimed that Bruno didn't know what the young man was until then.

Bruno hasn't thought much about Mr. Laura in the last few years, but when the man had a headache, Bruno realized he had to be a little distracted. He decided to hang a tire swing on an old oak tree. Bruno collected pitches from the basement and brought them  to the tree. Then he looked for a tire. BN's

Graphic Novel: Macbeth  Bruno went to talk to one of the soldiers because neither his mother nor his father was at home. He met Lieutenant Kotler, a young soldier he saw at home the day his family arrived. Kotler was always dressed neatly and  had impressive muscular arms, but he wore too many colognes. To make matters worse, Gretel was in the habit of  laughing at everything he said he was flirting with him. Gretel was talking to Lieutenant Kotler when Bruno came to him and asked for a spare tire for his swing. The soldier patronized Bruno and then Pavel, a lean old man. Pavel came home every day, peeled the  vegetables and served dinner.  Kotler barked at Pavel and repeatedly called him a name that Bruno couldn't understand. In a voice that offended both Bruno and Gretel, the soldier ordered Pavel to remove Bruno's tires from the vault.

Later that day, Bruno tried a new tire swing. When Bruno tried to raise himself, he lost his foothold and fell, hitting his head and scratching his leg. Pavel appeared and carried the boy to the kitchen, where he got a first aid kit and groomed Bruno's wounds. Bruno was worried that he would die from an injury, but Pavel insisted that he was okay. When Bruno asked him how he knew, Pavel said he was a doctor before. Pavel's revelation confused Bruno, who didn't understand how his servants would become doctors.

Best of luck to you!

Answer:

B ROCKET

Explanation:

I would say rocket because when saying the sentence the words floated,breeze, and gliding, show image of something deligate and gentle while thinking of a rocket it is loud and noisey. That is my opinon tell me if I am wrong. Hope that helps and go shop Quelenasboutique on etsy!

It should be noted that people burn incense in order to show respect to their ancestors.

It should be noted that burning incense is typically done to show respect to loved one's that have passed away.

Therefore, people burn incense in order to show respect to their ancestors. This is a form of respect.

In conclusion, the correct option is B.

Learn more about incense on:

https://brainly.com/question/11536850

Answer:

a. using a plain and simple font for the text

Explanation:

edge2021

Using a plain and simple font for the text is one of the finest methods to leverage the context of the text in a presentation successfully. Hence, Option A is correct.

An audience receives information from a speaker through a presentation. The typical purpose of a presentation is to enlighten, convince, inspire, motivate, build goodwill, or offer a new idea or product. Presentations can also include speeches, introductions, lectures, or demonstrations.

Another way to think of a presentation is as a general phrase that refers to different "speaking engagements," such as giving a speech at a wedding or communicating in a video conference.

Step-by-step planning and the way the material is presented should be carefully studied if want it to be effective. A presentation often includes a "persuasive" aspect in order to convey a message to the audience.

Therefore, Option A is correct.

Learn more about presentation from here:

https://brainly.com/question/649397

#SPJ5

The phrase from the article that best supports the answer to Part A is "that ability is somehow undermined when you're competing with a group" (Paragraph 17). Correct Answer is Option B.

The answer to Part A indicated that the reduction in medial prefrontal cortex signal, which is responsible for self-referential processing, could explain why people might have more difficulty remembering moral statements they heard during a competitive game. The phrase "that ability is somehow undermined when you're competing with a group" directly relates to the idea, suggesting that the ability to remember moral statements is negatively affected when individuals are  involved  in competitive activities due to the impact on self-referential processing. This supports the concept that the competition with a group leads to challenges in retaining moral statements, aligning with the explanation provided in Part A.

To know more about article:
https://brainly.com/question/34276022

#SPJ3

Answer:

C. Number 3 is the answer.

Explanation:

Anuj, why are you wearing a bandage. Can I do anything for you?

No thanks, I can manage. A street dog bit me.

You should be careful. You must get injections after a dog bite

You should have told me in the morning. My father would have dropped us to school in his car.

I should have told you, but my uncle said he would drop me.

Anuj, you should take care. You will not attend the physical training.

Thanks Ma'am, I would not have missed it if I could stand properly.

You ought to follow your doctor's advice. You must bring medical certificate too.

I surely will do that.

When will the doctor remove this bandage?

He shall take it off next week.

Answer:

pertinient

Explanation:

its pertinent :)).....

Answer:

is this an illuminate test?

Answer:

State the "real life problems" on discrimination and injustice. Another thing is  logical facts isn't really "FACTS" if its logical then its ethos , meaning its not professionally cited its personal bias so erase that from your sentence if this is for a report or article. Not only do you need to include a fact , but make it make sense as to why you chose the surrounding fact. down below is an example.

Explanation:

Use this for reference-

It's stating well known issues around the world surrounding prejudice and injustice for example its more likely that a person of color is 1.2-2.0 times more likely to get pulled over then a person of american decent as stated by the NYU Civil Department in a study done in 2020 surrounding racial injustice .

Answer:

1 1/6

Explanation:

Since 7 is bigger than 6 you can subtract 7 with 6 which is 1

Now put a 1 next to the fraction and the remainder "1" on top as the new numerator which is 1 1/6

Hope this helps1

Answer:

Check:

Conclusion:

Therefore, 1 1/6 is the answer in mixed fraction form.

Hoped this helped.

[tex]GeniusUser[/tex]

4am, listen to spotify.

My favorite time of the day is afternoon,when It’s not that hot.Then I either read or play video games.

Answer:

.19261.9999.00111.9.e

Answer:

Its probably way to late but for the future people.

Explanation:

I focused on my topic and viewed my key points to the best of my ability. In a discussion, you are not allowed to interrupt the person who is talking or whenever someone else talks we must be able to listen and respect the other group. In my opinion I think that I did gave my point justice in explaining in great detail. Considering my topic of discussion I did not include personal experience only facts that I researched. I was able to listen and respect my peers including my teammates. When other teams disagree, I will simply show my evidence to deny their views. The other team would use facts as well as their personal experience to get their point through. There were times when the other teams evidence did not line up so my team was quick in disproving it. Of course there were moments when I disagreed with the other teams as it was a debate, but I respectfully allowed them to continue until it was my turn to speak. There were times when my language was grammatically correct and appropriate to the topic. For example I said “With that being said” or “It occurs to me”. When it was my turn to talk I would sit up straight and make sure that my posture represented confidence. For example with my hands I would also move them around to make people feel easy and use it to my advantage. I used eye contact when I felt as if my confidence in the discussion needed to be represented. I used a straight forward voice to my advantage as well as it dominates the attention to my point of discussion. When the group came to a conclusion we did a report and were able to have a mutual agreement that we stayed on task and were able to complete the debate efficiently

. The group discussion was efficient as we all listened and respected our peers and showed passion during our debate as to why we thought out opinion was correct.  

The answer would be the first one.

The first one is incorrect because when you are asking a question you will always need a "?" but in that sentence you have a period which is wrong.

The correct way the first one should look like is Did you get your things? because the person is asking if you got your things.

Answer:

Explanation:

there will be another storm

a warning from heaven's above

clouds filled with water

mirage fades its shapes......

king cloud brings heavy rain

pour onto the princess heart

golden tears fill the air

inspire nature all at once

a soft voice........a hunger beast

a laud laugh........a humble cry

where is peace?.......where it be?...

can i see it in your eyes?

Answer:

Freytag pyramid's five stages are

Exposition.

Rising Action.

Climax.

Falling Action.

Resolution.

Explanation:

Answer:

Understanding Carrying Capacity

There are limits to the life-sustaining resources earth can provide us. In other words, there is a carrying capacity for human life on our planet. Carrying capacity is the maximum number of a species an environment can support indefinitely. ... Humans are a complex species.

Considering the statement in the question, "The swimming pool was inviting me to jump in" is a Personification.

A personification is a form of a figure of speech. It is used to describe non-living things or non-human with human qualities or attributes.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Personification.

Learn more about Personification here: https://brainly.com/question/1013597

Explanation:

Option C is the correct answer

Answer:

B

Explanation:

'will' will become 'would'

Answer: D. It is beautiful

Explanation:

Gold is almost always associated with being luxurious and exclusive, so this would describe her hair as being luxuriously beautiful and one of a kind.

The author includes a simile about Rapunzel's hair to convey its beauty. Therefore option D is correct.

By comparing her hair to "spun gold," the author is highlighting its exceptional attractiveness and allure. The simile suggests that Rapunzel's hair is not only long but also possesses a captivating and radiant quality, similar to the shimmering brilliance of gold.

This comparison evokes a sense of admiration and fascination for her hair, emphasizing its aesthetic appeal and making it a significant characteristic of Rapunzel's overall appearance.

Know more about Rapunzel:

https://brainly.com/question/1593463

#SPJ2

Answer:sure why not

Explanatio

The dress in the mock interview has been similar to the interview dress.  Thus the given statement is false.

Mock interview has been the preparatory interview to be prepared for the real interview days. It has been performed in the training phase, with the details being similar to the interview.

The first impression for an interview has been an important parameter. It mediates the judgment of the interviewer. The dressing style must be formal for an interview, to depict your sincerity and seriousness for the job.

Since mock interviews are similar and representation of the job interview, it is compulsory to dress in interview clothing. Thus, the given statement is false.

For more information about the mock interview, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/9727275

Answer:

its false

Explanation:

yw

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

The answer is A. This is because if organizations have more development programs then more culture and diversity will come through when employees are in these programs. This will also unite the employees together more because they may bond on a personal level.

Best of luck to you!

Answer:

See below!

Explanation:

This is just my opinion, but assuming that you need a paragraph or so, I wrote out a full answer for you :)

I think that without a conflict, there is no story to tell. I believe this because the reason a story is a story, is because there is a reason for it's telling. Whether it is for entertianment, enrichment, or learning opportunities, a story has to have some kind of meaning for itself, and, in my opinion, this meaning is played through the conflict.

The conflict doesn't always have to be dramatic, or even be present(it can be past, or future), but without conflict, there is no meat in a story.

Of course, I can write a story without conflict. I can write a story about anything, for that matter. However, the prompt is asking if there would be a story to tell without a conflict, and I think there wouldn't be.

Education and learning moments aside, a story without conflict won't entertaining either! Without a conflict, there will be no rising action, falling action, or conclusion, which leaves nothing to a story!

Everyone's interpretation of what a "conflict" is can be different, but, in my opinion, there is no story to tell without a conflict involved.

Answer:

This is just my opinion. I think I kinda went of topic and I think some words are misspelled. lol

Explanation:

Dear Faculty and Staff,

I have written this speech in regards to the view on the impact of student having a say in what brought foward and introduced into the school system. Most students feel that they are being controlled and that most of their creative outlets are being flushed out. You expect us to follow the rules that are biased the the society we live in put in our faces. We at least have the right as free children deserve a say in how we live our day to day lives in these school systems. We act out in defiance due to not being heard or understood. You expect us to be compliant with the thought of expultion or suspention if we acted out in the slightest. It would be an honor to stand by you and make these barrier breaking decisions. I leave this up to you to consider with careful consideration. Pave ways and Making a splash.

                                                                                 Counting on you,

                                                                                         Your Students.

Based on the information given, the computation of the perimeter of the rectangle will be 44.8cm.

It should be noted that the perimeter of a rectangle is calculated by using the formula:

Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)

Perimeter = 2(17.8 + 4.6)

Perimeter = 2(22.4)

Perimeter = 44.8

Therefore, the perimeter of the rectangle will be 44.8cm.

Learn more about perimeter on:

https://brainly.com/question/16596982

Answer:

In his lawsuit, Brown claimed that schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools , and that segregation violated the so-called “equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Explanation:

have a good day

hope it helps