identify some of the implications of the recent expansion of marriage to gay and lesbian couples.

In basketball, a goaltending violation occurs when a player interferes with a shot while it's in the process of going into the basket. This can happen if a player touches the ball while it's still on its way up or when it's already on its way down towards the basket.

If a goaltending violation is committed, the opposing team is awarded two points.
Specifically, a goaltending violation can occur when a player touches the ball while it's still within the cylinder above the rim. The cylinder is a virtual space above the basket, and any contact with the ball within this area is considered a violation.
However, if the ball is already on its way down into the basket and a player touches it, this is also considered a goaltending violation. The reason for this is that once the ball is on its way down, it's considered to be in the process of going into the basket.
In conclusion, a goaltending violation is a penalty in basketball that occurs when a player touches the ball while it's going into the basket from below. It's an important rule that helps ensure fair play and prevents players from interfering with the trajectory of the ball.

To know more about goaltending violation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32244330
#SPJ11

Yes, it is possible for someone suffering from a mental illness to be incapable of the state of mind required to commit a crime.

The legal concept of "mental incapacity" or "insanity" recognizes that certain individuals may lack the mental capacity or understanding to form the necessary intent or mens rea to commit a crime.

In many jurisdictions, the criminal justice system takes into account a person's mental state at the time of the alleged offense when determining criminal liability. If an individual's mental illness is severe enough to impair their ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, they may be deemed legally "insane" or "mentally incompetent" and not held fully responsible for their behavior.

Insanity defenses vary by jurisdiction but typically require demonstrating that, at the time of the offense, the defendant did not comprehend the nature and wrongfulness of their actions or could not conform their behavior to the requirements of the law due to a mental illness or defect. This defense is typically used to argue that the defendant should not be held criminally responsible and may instead require treatment or rehabilitation.

It is important to note that the determination of mental capacity or insanity is a complex legal and medical issue. It often involves evaluations and expert testimony from mental health professionals to assess the defendant's mental state at the time of the offense. The legal standards for insanity and the criteria for determining mental capacity can vary between jurisdictions.

Ultimately, whether someone suffering from a mental illness is deemed incapable of the state of mind to commit a crime is a decision made by the legal system based on the specific circumstances and relevant laws in the jurisdiction where the alleged offense occurred.

To know more about mental illness, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28426406

#SPJ11

The crime of knowingly and materially testifying falsely while under oath is commonly referred to as perjury.

Perjury involves intentionally providing false information or making false statements while under oath during legal proceedings, such as in court or during a deposition. It is considered a serious offense as it undermines the integrity of the judicial process and can lead to miscarriages of justice. Penalties for perjury vary by jurisdiction but typically include fines and potential imprisonment

Perjury generally requires specific elements to be established for the crime to be proven. These elements often include knowingly making a false statement, making the false statement under oath, and the materiality of the false statement—meaning that the false statement is relevant and has the potential to impact the outcome of the legal proceedings. For example, some jurisdictions may have separate offenses for perjury in a civil case versus perjury in a criminal case.

To learn more about perjury

brainly.com/question/8189362

#SPJ4

The legal case that established the clear and present danger test in relation to free speech is Schenck v. United States (1919).

In this landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court, led by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., ruled that speech can be restricted if it presents a clear and present danger to the government or society. The case involved Charles Schenck, a socialist who distributed leaflets opposing the military draft during World War I. The Court upheld Schenck's conviction, stating that his speech created a clear and present danger by obstructing the draft and had no First Amendment protection. The clear and present danger test became a standard in evaluating free speech limitations for several decades.

Learn more about free Speech

brainly.com/question/30946890

#SPJ4

An applicant for a real estate license can solicit buyers and sellers upon passing the required licensing exam.

To become eligible to solicit buyers and sellers as a real estate agent, an applicant must pass the required licensing exam. The exam typically covers various topics related to real estate laws, regulations, ethics, and practices. Once the applicant successfully passes the exam, they are granted a real estate license, which allows them to engage in activities such as advertising, marketing, and negotiating real estate transactions. With the license in hand, the applicant can confidently approach potential buyers and sellers to offer their services, provide information about available properties, and facilitate the buying or selling process. It is important for the applicant to comply with all legal and ethical guidelines while conducting business and to continuously update their knowledge to stay current with changes in the real estate industry and regulations.

to learn more about regulations

click here brainly.in/question/7276445

#SPJ11

The "actual malice" standard comes into play in a libel suit when the plaintiff is a public figure or a public official and seeks to prove that the defendant made false statements with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

In a libel suit involving a public figure or public official, the "actual malice" standard, established by the landmark Supreme Court case New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), sets a higher burden of proof. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant made false statements while knowing that they were false or exhibiting reckless disregard for the truth. This standard recognizes the importance of protecting freedom of speech and press, placing the responsibility on the plaintiff to prove the defendant's actual malice in making defamatory statements.

Ordinary citizens, who are not public figures or public officials, are generally held to a lower standard in libel cases, where they only need to establish negligence or a failure to exercise reasonable care in verifying the truth of the statements.

To learn more about Actual Malice, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8961894

#SPJ11

The "actual malice" standard comes into play in a libel suit when the plaintiff is a public figure or a public official and seeks to prove that the defendant made false statements with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

In a libel suit involving a public figure or public official, the "actual malice" standard, established by the landmark Supreme Court case New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), sets a higher burden of proof. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant made false statements while knowing that they were false or exhibiting reckless disregard for the truth. This standard recognizes the importance of protecting freedom of speech and press, placing the responsibility on the plaintiff to prove the defendant's actual malice in making defamatory statements.

Ordinary citizens, who are not public figures or public officials, are generally held to a lower standard in libel cases, where they only need to establish negligence or a failure to exercise reasonable care in verifying the truth of the statements.

To learn more about Actual Malice, click here:

brainly.com/question/8961894

#SPJ11

The term that describes a legal system in which there is a contest between two opposing sides is the "adversarial system".

This system is the basis of many legal systems around the world, including those in the United States, Canada, and Australia. In an adversarial system, each side presents its case to a judge or jury, who then weighs the evidence and decides on the outcome. This system is designed to ensure that both sides have an equal opportunity to present their arguments and evidence and to ensure that the outcome is based on a fair and impartial assessment of the facts. The adversarial system can be contrasted with an inquisitorial system, which is more common in civil law countries, where the judge takes a more active role in investigating the facts and evidence of a case.

To know more about United States visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8147900

#SPJ11

The one that is not one of the three major areas of drug-law enforcement programs is "Prevention." The three major areas of drug-law enforcement programs typically include: Supply Reduction, Demand Reduction, Harm Reduction

Supply Reduction: This area focuses on efforts to disrupt the production, distribution, and supply of illegal drugs. It involves activities such as targeting drug trafficking organizations, intercepting drug shipments, and dismantling drug manufacturing facilities.

Demand Reduction: This area aims to reduce the demand for illegal drugs by implementing strategies to prevent drug use, providing treatment and rehabilitation services for individuals with substance abuse problems, and conducting education and awareness campaigns to promote healthy lifestyles and discourage drug use.

Harm Reduction: This area emphasizes strategies and interventions aimed at minimizing the negative consequences of drug use, such as overdose prevention, needle exchange programs, and access to substance abuse treatment.

Learn more about Demand Reduction,

https://brainly.com/question/29661615

#SPJ4

Option b is the correct statement. Negotiation of an instrument refers to the transfer of the instrument in a form that allows the transferee to become a holder.

When an instrument, such as a negotiable promissory note or a check, is negotiated, it means that the instrument is transferred from one person (the transferor) to another person (the transferee). Option b correctly states that negotiation occurs when the instrument is transferred in such a form that the transferee becomes a holder.

To become a holder, the transferee must meet specific requirements outlined by the applicable law, such as having possession of the instrument, either by physical possession or by lawful means of control, and acquiring the instrument in good faith and for value (usually meaning valuable consideration, such as money, goods, services, or a contractual obligation).

To learn more about Negotiation click here : brainly.com/question/14771080

#SPJ11

This is known as “dual sovereignty” and is a concept in the United States Constitution that allows two separate sovereigns (state and federal governments) to prosecute a person for the same crime.

This is permissible because each sovereign is viewed as independent of the other, and is subject to its own laws and procedures. The dual sovereignty doctrine has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in a number of cases. In some instances, dual sovereignty can be used to protect the rights of a defendant, by allowing the defendant to choose which court will hear their case.

However, in other cases, a defendant may be convicted in both state and federal court, leading to double jeopardy. In this situation, the defendant may be subject to two separate punishments.

To know more about dual sovereignty, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14797755

#SPJ4

The given statement "The preexisting rule allows for midstream changes to be enforceable in a contract" is false because The preexisting rule, also known as the preexisting duty rule, generally states that a promise to do something that a party is already legally obligated to do does not constitute valid consideration for a contract.

In other words, if a party is already obligated to perform a certain action under an existing contract or a preexisting legal duty, promising to do that same action in a new agreement does not create additional consideration or make the new agreement enforceable.

Therefore, under the preexisting rule, midstream changes to a contract that involve a party agreeing to perform an action they were already obligated to do would typically not be enforceable due to lack of consideration.

However, it's worth noting that there may be exceptions or variations to the preexisting rule based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances, such as modifications made under a separate agreement or additional consideration provided beyond the preexisting duty.

To know more about contract refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/32254040

#SPJ11

When you don't see a posted speed limit in New York City, you must drive at a safe and reasonable speed considering the prevailing conditions.

According to New York State law, drivers are expected to adhere to the basic speed law, which states that you must drive at a speed that is reasonable and prudent under the circumstances, taking into account factors such as road conditions, traffic flow, weather conditions, and pedestrian activity.

It is important to adjust your speed accordingly and drive at a speed that ensures the safety of yourself, other drivers, and pedestrian activity, even in the absence of a posted speed limit. While there may not be a specific posted speed limit in certain areas, you should always drive at a speed that is safe and reasonable for the given circumstances.

To learn more about pedestrian, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/30364022

#SPJ4

To have a vote for a write-in candidate actually count, there are a few things that must happen.

To have a vote for a write-in candidate actually count, there are a few things that must happen. Firstly, the voter must specifically write in the candidate's name on the ballot in the space provided. Secondly, the candidate must be eligible to hold the office they are running for and meet any requirements set by the state or local election board. Additionally, the candidate must have registered with the election board as a write-in candidate prior to the election. If these conditions are met, the vote will be counted towards the write-in candidate's total. It is important to note that write-in candidates typically have a lower chance of winning due to the lack of visibility and campaigning compared to registered candidates. However, in some cases, they can still be a viable option for voters who are dissatisfied with the registered candidates.

To know more about vote visit: https://brainly.com/question/21093353

#SPJ11

The 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution firmly established the right of 18-year-olds to vote in all elections.

The right of 18-year-olds to vote in all elections was firmly established by the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Prior to the amendment's passage in 1971, the voting age was set at 21 years old in most states.

However, the Vietnam War and the draft of young men who were too young to vote sparked a movement to lower the voting age.

The amendment was ratified quickly by the required number of states and became law on July 1, 1971. Since then, 18-year-olds have been able to participate in all federal, state, and local elections, becoming an important demographic in many political races.

For more such questions on right of 18-year-olds, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30099788

#SPJ11

Confidential information about formulas, patterns, programs, devices, and methods is considered trade secrets.

Confidential information refers to knowledge that is not publicly available and is protected by the holder as a valuable asset. This information can include formulas, patterns, programs, devices, and methods that are not widely known or easily discoverable. Such confidential information is typically classified as trade secrets.

Trade secrets are valuable business assets that provide a competitive advantage to the owner, as they are not disclosed to the public or competitors. Protecting trade secrets is crucial for businesses to maintain their uniqueness, market advantage, and intellectual property rights. Therefore, the correct answer is B. trade secrets.


Learn more about programs here : brainly.com/question/14368396

#SPJ11

The conditional release of a convicted offender before he or she serves any prison time is called Parole .

Parole is the conditional release of a convicted offender before he or she serves any prison time. Parole is usually granted by a parole board and allows an offender to serve the remainder of their sentence in the community, under the supervision of a parole officer.

Parole can be granted for a variety of reasons, including good behavior, a lack of prison space, or a belief that the offender is rehabilitated and unlikely to re-offend. To be eligible for parole, an offender must meet certain criteria, such as demonstrating good behavior and completing educational or vocational programs. If an offender violates the terms of their parole, they can be sent back to prison to serve the remainder of their sentence.

To know more about Parole , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/25652550

#SPJ4

Aesthetics is a philosophy of the nature and meaning of beauty as it pertains to art.

It explores questions related to the perception, interpretation, and appreciation of art, including its visual, auditory, and conceptual aspects. Aesthetics delves into the study of artistic principles, forms, and expressions, seeking to understand the qualities that make an artwork aesthetically pleasing or meaningful.

It examines various theories and perspectives on beauty, artistic value, creativity, and the relationship between art and human experience. Aesthetics also considers the cultural, historical, and societal influences that shape our understanding and evaluation of art.

Learn more about Aesthetics

https://brainly.com/question/28660977

#SPJ4

The rule of four ensures that a case must have four justices' agreement to be heard, which balances power among the justices.

The rule of four refers to the requirement that at least four of the nine Supreme Court justices must agree to hear a case before it can be placed on the Court's docket.

This rule is significant to the balance of power among the justices because it prevents a single justice or a small group of justices from dominating the Court's agenda.

It ensures that cases with broader support among the justices are given priority and that the Court as a whole has more control over its workload.

Additionally, the rule encourages justices to engage in more negotiation and compromise with their colleagues, promoting a more collaborative approach to decision-making.

For more such questions on justices, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29992339

#SPJ11

The two groups who suffered most from the violation of civil liberties during World War I were:

German-Americans and immigrants: During World War I, there was significant hostility and suspicion towards individuals of German descent living in the United States. German-Americans faced discrimination, harassment, and even violence due to anti-German sentiment. Many experienced social ostracism, loss of employment, and denial of basic civil liberties. Immigrants from Germany and other Central Powers countries also faced heightened scrutiny and were subjected to surveillance, internment, or deportation.

Political dissidents and anti-war activists: The U.S. government enacted measures to suppress opposition to the war effort and maintain national security during World War I. The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were used to prosecute individuals who expressed anti-war sentiments or criticized the government. Political dissidents, socialists, labor leaders, and pacifists were targeted and arrested for their opposition to the war. Their civil liberties, such as freedom of speech and assembly, were curtailed, leading to widespread violations of their rights.

It's important to note that the violation of civil liberties during World War I was not limited to these two groups alone. Other communities, such as African Americans and women suffragettes, also faced challenges and infringements upon their civil liberties during this time period. The impact of civil liberties violations varied across different regions and communities, and the experiences of individuals within these groups were diverse.

To learn more about civil liberties, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/21057720

#SPJ4

The two groups who suffered most from the violation of civil liberties during World War I were Japanese-Americans and conscientious objectors. Explain

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a federal law that establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth labor standards affecting employees in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments.

The answer is C.

It does not regulate wages and working hours. The National Recovery Act, the Walsh-Healey Act, and the Davis-Bacon Act all have provisions that regulate wages and working hours. The National Recovery Act established the National Recovery Administration (NRA) to regulate wages, hours, and other working conditions in the United States.

The Walsh-Healey Act of 1936 required contractors who supplied goods to the federal government to pay their employees a minimum wage and set maximum hours of work. The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 requires contractors to pay their employees the prevailing wages and benefits for similar work in the area where the work is being performed.

To know more about Fair Labor Standards Act , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12300130

#SPJ4

The answer to the question is "false" in a general sense. Road rage is a serious offense and can result in severe consequences, including license suspension or revocation.

However, the exact period of suspension can vary based on the severity of the incident, the state laws, and other factors.
In most states, the penalties for road rage can range from fines, community service, counseling, and license suspension. For instance, in California, a conviction of road rage can result in up to 90 days of license suspension, while in Florida, it can range from 90 days to one year depending on the offense.
It's essential to note that driving with a suspended license is also a crime, which can lead to additional penalties, including imprisonment. Therefore, it's crucial to avoid any form of aggressive driving, including tailgating, cutting off, honking, and making rude gestures on the road. If you feel frustrated or angry while driving, take a break, listen to calming music, or practice deep breathing to avoid any negative consequences.
In conclusion, while the period of license suspension for road rage may vary, it's essential to avoid such behavior and drive responsibly to ensure the safety of yourself and others on the road.

To know more about Road rage visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28221669
#SPJ11

Yes, your license can be suspended for six months if you are convicted of road rage.

The statement 'your license can be suspended for six months if you are convicted of road rage' is true. Road rage is considered a serious offense that can lead to license suspension, among other penalties. When a driver engages in aggressive behavior, such as tailgating, excessive honking, or verbal or physical confrontation, they can be charged with road rage.

https://brainly.com/question/34209599

The process of disguising illegal income to make it appear legitimate is known as "money laundering." Money laundering involves a series of activities that aim to conceal the origin, ownership, or control of illicitly obtained funds. It typically involves three stages: placement, layering, and integration.

Learn more about money laundering.

brainly.com/question/31866889

#SPJ4

The White v. Regester case was significant as it established the principle that racial gerrymandering and intentional vote dilution based on race were unconstitutional violations of equal protection rights. It played a crucial role in shaping future redistricting practices and the protection of voting rights in the United States.

The case of White v. Regester was a landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of racial gerrymandering in Texas. It originated from a series of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of Texas's redistricting plan enacted in 1971. Here is a brief background on how the case reached the Supreme Court:

Redistricting in Texas: Following the 1970 census, the Texas Legislature was responsible for redrawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries to ensure equal representation based on population changes. The redistricting plan, known as House Bill 191, was enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1971.

Lawsuits challenging redistricting plan: Soon after the enactment of House Bill 191, several lawsuits were filed challenging its constitutionality. The lawsuits alleged that the redistricting plan intentionally discriminated against racial minority groups, particularly African Americans and Mexican Americans, by diluting their voting power and creating racially gerrymandered districts.

Consolidation of lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits were filed challenging the redistricting plan, and these cases were eventually consolidated into a single case known as White v. Regester. The named plaintiff, L. A. White, represented African American and Mexican American voters who claimed that the redistricting plan violated their rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

District Court ruling: The consolidated case was heard in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. In 1973, the district court held that the redistricting plan was unconstitutional because it intentionally discriminated against racial minority groups and diluted their voting strength. The court ordered the state of Texas to redraw its district boundaries.

Appeal to the Supreme Court: The State of Texas appealed the district court's ruling to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court agreed to review the case to address the constitutionality of the redistricting plan under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, which protect against racial discrimination and ensure equal protection and voting rights.

Supreme Court ruling: In 1973, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in White v. Regester. The Court affirmed the district court's decision, holding that the redistricting plan violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by intentionally discriminating against racial minority groups. The Court concluded that the plan diluted the voting power of racial minorities and ordered the state of Texas to develop a new redistricting plan that provided fair and equal representation for all citizens.

for more such questions on protection

https://brainly.com/question/14952903

#SPJ11

A fair complaint procedure to investigate charges of sexual harassment should ensure confidentiality, impartiality, promptness, thoroughness, protection against retaliation, and provide appropriate remedies and support for the parties involved.

Learn more about sexual harassment

https://brainly.com/question/9647226

#SPJ4

Retribution relies on the principle of proportionality, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion to the severity of the crime.

The concept of proportionality is fundamental to the idea of retribution in criminal justice systems. It asserts that the punishment imposed on an offender should match the seriousness of their offense. This principle aims to ensure fairness and prevent excessive or inadequate punishment. Proportionality takes into account various factors, such as the nature and extent of harm caused, the intent or culpability of the offender, and the overall impact on society. By aligning the severity of punishment with the gravity of the crime, retribution seeks to achieve a sense of justice and uphold the moral order within a legal framework.

However, the application of proportionality may vary depending on jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case.

To learn more about Retribution, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31424250

#SPJ11

Retribution relies on the principle of proportionality, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion to the severity of the crime.

The concept of proportionality is fundamental to the idea of retribution in criminal justice systems. It asserts that the punishment imposed on an offender should match the seriousness of their offense. This principle aims to ensure fairness and prevent excessive or inadequate punishment. Proportionality takes into account various factors, such as the nature and extent of harm caused, the intent or culpability of the offender, and the overall impact on society. By aligning the severity of punishment with the gravity of the crime, retribution seeks to achieve a sense of justice and uphold the moral order within a legal framework.

However, the application of proportionality may vary depending on jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case.

To learn more about Retribution, click here:

brainly.com/question/31424250

#SPJ11

A legal duty to act arises when a person or entity has a legal obligation to take certain actions in a particular situation.

A legal duty to act arises when a person or entity has a legal obligation to take certain actions in a particular situation. In general, a legal duty to act arises when there is a relationship of some kind between the parties involved. For example, a doctor has a legal duty to act when treating a patient, a teacher has a legal duty to act when supervising students, and a lifeguard has a legal duty to act when someone is drowning in a pool.
Another situation in which a legal duty to act exists is when there is a contractual relationship between the parties. For example, if a contractor agrees to complete a project by a certain deadline, they have a legal duty to act to fulfill their obligation under the contract.
Additionally, a legal duty to act may arise in certain emergency situations. For example, if a person witnesses an accident or crime and fails to act, they may be found to have a legal duty to act and may face legal consequences if they do not fulfill this duty.
In summary, a legal duty to act arises in situations where there is a relationship between the parties involved, a contractual obligation, or an emergency situation that requires action.

To know more about legal obligation visit: https://brainly.com/question/988013

#SPJ11

All county officials in Texas are appointed by the governor and serve two-year terms.  False.

County officials in Texas are generally elected by the voters rather than appointed by the governor. The specific officials and their terms vary depending on the county and the positions involved. In Texas, common elected county officials include the county judge, county commissioners, county clerk, county treasurer, sheriff, and district attorney, among others.

The terms of these officials also vary, with some serving two-year terms and others serving four-year terms. The governor does have the power to fill vacancies in certain county offices, but the regular election process determines the majority of county officials in Texas.

Learn more about county treasurer,

https://brainly.com/question/15694345

#SPJ4

Tax policy and fiscal policy are used to control spending and the distribution of resources, while labor laws protect workers and ensure that they receive fair wages and benefits.

A, B, C are examples of political and regulatory forces of change.

Labor laws also help to ensure that employers are not taking advantage of their employees, and to promote workplace safety. Additionally, career attitudes can be shaped by political and regulatory forces, as laws and policies can affect career opportunities and job security. For example, government regulations can affect the types of jobs available, such as environmental regulations that limit the number of jobs in certain industries.

Political and regulatory forces of change refer to the influence of government or regulatory bodies on the creation of an industry, organization, or other entity.

Examples of political and regulatory forces of change include legislation, policy making, and regulation. For example, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in the United States was a major legislative and regulatory force of change in the healthcare industry.

The ACA led to the expansion of healthcare coverage, the introduction of new insurance plans, and the implementation of new regulations on healthcare providers. Additionally, regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have played a major role in setting standards for environmental protection and telecommunications. These organizations create and enforce regulations that protect public health and safety, and promote fair competition within their respective industries.

To know more about Affordable Care Act , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29398295

#SPJ4

The Question-

which of these are examples of political and regulatory force of change? (check all that apply.)

A. Tax policy.

B. Fiscal policy.

C. Labor laws.

D. Career attitudes.