Based on my political knowledge, the political party I would start would be known as Freedom for People's Party which will be known as FPP
What is a Political Party?A Political Party is a term that is used to describe the group that harmonizes various candidates at different levels to contest in a particular country's elections.
Usually, a Political party for the members of a party to have similar ideas about politics, and parties may nurture particular ideological or policy goals.
My political party's primary goal will be based on the freedom of people.
The kind of candidates the party would run for office will be those that are educated and come and have empathy for the cause of the people.
The message I would use to attract voters is that Your Freedom is Here, Vote for us to achieve true liberty.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that starting a political party requires more than just the name of the party to make it successful.
Learn more about Political Party here: https://brainly.com/question/633543
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not covered by the Consumer Products Safety Act (CPSA)?
Responses
evaluating the safety of consumer products
evaluating the safety of consumer products
developing separate or "case by case" standards for each product
developing separate or "case by case" standards for each product
minimizing conflicting state and local regulations
minimizing conflicting state and local regulations
promoting research and investment into preventing product-related deaths and injuries
I believe the answer is:
developing separate or "case by case" standards for each product
Answer:
developing separate or "case by case" standards for each product
Explanation:
what is considered abuse in Tennessee ?
Answer: Abuse
Explanation:
not Beating up 18 younger people
For each of the following situations, discuss the reasons you may or may not need an attorney.:
1. You hit another car in a parking lot. Your insurance agent indicates that the company will pay for bodily injury and property damage.
2. You borrow a friend's car without his knowledge, and he reports it to the police as stolen.
3. You buy a new laptop for $800. One month later, the laptop stops working. You return to the store, and the salesperson tells you he is sorry but these laptops have only a two-week guarantee.
4. You decide to trade in your old car and buy a new one.
5. Two friends are caught robbing the cashier at a local store, and they name you as someone who helped plan the robbery.
6. You are turned down when you apply for a job. You think you were rejected because you are deaf.
7. You do not want your family to inherit the $10,000 you have saved. After being told you will die within a year, you want the money to be used for cancer research.
8. You and your spouse can no longer get along. You want a divorce.
9. You earn $5,000 working in a restaurant during the year. You want to file your federal income tax return.
I need a answer for each one please.
There is no need to hire a attorney as long as your insurance provider agrees to cover the cost of all property damage and personal injuries.
Who is an attorney?This phrase first appeared in England, where attorneys at law was the term used to describe attorneys admitted to practice in common law courts. Depending on the type of law that was practiced, different terminology was used in the British legal system.
The appropriate responses are-
2. The issue can be addressed amicably; however, if you are detained and booked before the circumstances are understood, you might require legal representation.
3. The buyer in this scenario has two options: file a small claims lawsuit or seek aid from local consumer protection organizations. The issue may likely be resolved without a lawyer, and hiring one might be more expensive than buying the laptop.
4. The best advise for car buyers shouldn't come from an attorney.
5. Since you might be accused of a serious crime in this circumstance, you need to hire a lawyer immediately.
6. You could get in touch with your local human rights commission or the Equal Employment Commission before engaging an attorney. They could act as a mediator. If so, you might benefit from speaking with a lawyer who focuses on employment or discrimination issues.
7. You must retain a wills-focused attorney.
8. You should speak with a lawyer if there are contested issues involving child support, custody, alimony, or property division.
9. Typically, you can file your taxes without a lawyer.
To learn more about attorney
https://brainly.com/question/10527103
#SPJ1
Can you think of any other ways to increase voter turnout without making voting mandatory? (you will be judged by your answers by the court and jury lol.)
Answer:
Mabey you can give tax cuts for regular voters
Apart from voting mandatory, the other way to increase the voter turnout of the citizen to vote in general or presidential election is by increasing the level of sensitization for voting practice.
What should we know about voting turnout?The term "voter turnout" is a very simple political concept but set against the backdrop of a democratic society as its analysis should not be shallow or meagre. Voter turnover often revolves around a percentage pt the percentage of the electorate that participates in an election and acts as a summary of participation.
In a political sphere, level of citizen's participation is one of the primary determinants of a successful democracy. If the participation is lacking then, the legitimacy of democratic polities is undermined.
Using the voting mandatory is a bad idea, because it does not encourage the core value of democracy, which is voluntary participation in electoral practices.
Read more about voter turnout
brainly.com/question/1747503
#SPJ1
What is a key difference between the facts of Baker v. Carr and Wesberry v. Sanders?
The key difference between the facts of Baker v. Carr and Wesberry v. Sanders is that the first decided on Representative district while the latter decided on the court that can rule of redistricting.
What was the significance of Baker v Carr 1961?The Federal case of "Baker v Carr" was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment, thereby enabling the federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
What was the significance of Wesberry v Sanders?The Federal case of "Wesberry v. Sanders" was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population.
Read more about Baker v Carr
brainly.com/question/2407362
#SPJ1
The status of each state and how the laws applied within them were key differences in the facts of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision. Wesberry filed a lawsuit against Georgia's governor, claiming that the Fifth Congressional District, of which he was a part, was two to three times larger than other districts in the state, reducing his right to vote in comparison to other Georgia residents. Baker and other Tennessee residents claimed that a law intended to allocate seats in the state's General Assembly was being disregarded. Baker's lawsuit described how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts were thwarted.
PLS HELP
Historically, which statement is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States?
O
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation.
O
The vast majority were pocket vetoes and thus could not be overridden.
O
The vast majority were determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
O
The vast majority of vetoes were overridden by Congress.
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States.
Has a president veto ever been overridden in the US?When Congress overrode five of Franklin Pierce's nine vetoes during his presidency, it would be more than a decade until it did so again. More than 2,500 measures have been vetoed by American presidents so far, and Congress has only succeeded in overcoming the veto less than 5% of the time.
Since 1789, there have been 2,584 presidential vetoes. The "normal veto" and the "pocket veto" are the two different forms of veto. Reaching the two-thirds barrier requires significant public support, which is a challenging standard to accomplish. Because Congress has only overridden 106 of the 1,484 regular vetoes since 1789, or 7.1%, the President's veto power is significant.
To learn more about presidential vetoes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1087799
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE 40 POINTS, 5 STAR RATING, AND BRAINLIEST, PLEASE HELP ASAPPP!!!!!, if wrong will report and give a 0 rating on personal account. PLEASE HELPPPP!!!!!
The Paine think about the religion is that the true religion is the source of morality. Option C is correct.
Who was Thomas Paine?Thomas Paine was defined as a political activist, revolutionary, and political theorist from England. According to the poet, mankind do not have a clear conscience and mourn all night over their sins. Paine's optimism that the United States can be a place of total religious freedom is a prominent theme throughout Common Sense.
Their faults and transgressions keep them up at night. They simply claim to be religious. According to Thomas, the true religion is the source of morality.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about the Thomas Paine, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/5953344
#SPJ1
Should we strive for high voter turn out why or why not?
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE 40 POINTS, 5 STAR RATING, AND BRAINLIEST, PLEASE HELP ASAPPP!!!!!, if wrong will report and give a 0 rating on personal account. PLEASE HELPPPP!!!!!
Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that as per the beliefs of Thomas Paine, the governments could be formed through Philosophical Aristocracy. Therefore, the option E holds true.
What is the significance of the beliefs of Thomas Paine?The beliefs of Thomas Paine were completely in contrast to the beliefs and ideologies carried by Thomas Jefferson during the same period in the American society. His beliefs were revealed in the composition ''Common Sense''.
His beliefs have clearly stated that the forms of government, such as democracy cannot exist for long term in the society, and that an ideal form of governance could be formed by practicing the methods of Philosophical Aristocracy.
Therefore, the option E holds true and states regarding the significance of Thomas Paine's beliefs.
Learn more about Thomas Paine here:
https://brainly.com/question/5953344
#SPJ1
The factors you should consider when selecting the speed of your
vehicle are:
a) posted maximum speed limit
b) vehicle and cargo
c) both
d) neither
Option A is correct. The factors you should consider when selecting the speed of your vehicle is posted maximum speed limit.
When determining a safe speed to drive at, you must also take into account the road's condition, visibility, and the movement of other traffic in addition to the official speed limit. Additionally, letting other drivers know when you intend to vary your speed would help you stay safe.
Driving safely not only keeps you safe, but it also saves you money and lowers air pollution. Gas, maintenance, and tyres are just a few of the costs associated with operating an automobile. There are some free actions that motorists and auto owners can do to reduce these costs.
To know more about speed limit:
brainly.com/question/10492698
#SPJ1
data shows that engaged employees are how much more effective than their peers
Which of the following statements about victim advocates is true?
They work mostly in murder cases, where the victim can’t speak for themselves.
They are lawyers who mostly work pro bono, with no charge to their clients
They are likely to work with men and women who have been assaulted by their partners.
They must be very fast typists and skilled multitaskers to perform their job.
Answer:
im pretty sure its They are likely to work with men and women who have been assaulted by their partners.
Explanation: