Answer:
One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on:
e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) proposed that a person should always respect the humanity in others and that the person should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone. For example, he claimed that people have a duty to do the right thing even if that action produces a bad result. Thus, telling a lie in order to save a friend from jail is considered to be morally reprehensible by Kantism. For Kant, therefore, a person is doing something good if they are taking a morally right action.
Pls only put the answer nothing other than that
Does that solve you question
There were more than__________ people injured in alcohol-related crashes in Florida
Answer:
It is rounded to 5,000 in the year of 2017.
Explanation:
There were more than 49,100 people injured in alcohol-related crashes in Florida.
Which driver age group has the highest rate of alcohol-related fatalities in Florida?The age which has the highest rate of alcohol-related fatalities in Florida is of the age 21 to 24 years old. It was followed by the age group of the people 25 to 34 years. and the least accident took place in the age group of 35-44 ages.
The estimation was taken out the Florida Government about the alcohol-related crashes. Alcohol is thought to have been a factor in 135,300 collisions in Florida, 1,191 of which resulted in fatalities and 49,100 in injuries.
Learn more about alcohol-related crashes in Florida here:
https://brainly.com/question/14319498
#SPJ2
What does grave injustice mean?
Answer:
to treat someone or something in an unfair way they did her a grave ijustice is by not allowing her to file complaint
which type of Court handles a large annual caseload
Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system, and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law.
Answer:
District Court
Explanation:
Determine if the statement is true or false. The chain of custody document includes information about the location where a piece of evidence was found.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Its true
sorry if wrong but most likely it's true
Following arrest, agents can promise an arrestee only that in exchange for cooperation, they will not have to do jail time!
Group of answer choices
Answer: There are several rights assigned with the arrestee or prisoner.
Explanation:
The following are the rights of the prisoner:
1. The statement given by the prisoner cannot be recorded and but can be used to get leads as people under the police pressure make false statements.
2. The prisoner cannot be taken into remand or no physical offense is allowed.
During the exchange for the cooperation the prisoner can expect that there will be no physical violence against him or her during interrogation.
Read the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed . . . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have [the opportunity] for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
What part of the Sixth Amendment suggests that accused persons will be able to hear the charges against them?
Answer:
to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
C. “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation”
HELPPP!!!!!! POINTS
All of the following are responsibilities of members of the community EXCEPT:
A volunteering to help the local government
B. participating in local government decision-making process
C. providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood
D. organizing with other community members to create awareness of problems and solutions
Answer:
providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood
Explanation:
I did the quiz c:
All of the following are responsibilities of members of the community except providing political interference to support projects in their neighborhood. The correct option is C.
What is the role of the community in community development?Community development is a process where organizations support residents in identifying and resolving issues that are significant to them. Community development gives residents more control over their lives and forges stronger, more cohesive communities.
Healthy communities are built from the ground up by their residents. They comprise everyone who participates in communal activities such as living, learning, working, playing, and praying. Community members may be recognized by friends and neighbors as the go-to person for getting things done or they may hold a formal leadership position in a community organization.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about communities here:
https://brainly.com/question/9673382
#SPJ6
seven more than a number, x, is at least 20
Answer:
the answer should be 13
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your iPhone to secretly record a conversation with him where he admits that he did, in fact, steal the shirts. He is awaiting trial, and you bring the recording to the police station to submit it as evidence. In your state, it is illegal to use a secretly recorded conversation in a court of law. In other words, this piece of evidence is inadmissible. Do you agree with this rule? In your answer, define the exclusionary rule and doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree, and explain how these terms apply to your situation.
Answer: I agree with this rule that secretly recorded conversations cannot be used as evidence in a court of law. I agree with this rule because with technology now days it would be all too easy to takes someones words out of contact or even rearrange what was said. This also violates our rights as Americans and takes away our privacy. The fruit of the poisonous tree rule is an extension of the exclusionary rule meaning, illegally gathered evidence cannot be admissible in a court of law, the fruit being the evidence and the poisonous tree being the means in which the evidence was gathered.
Explanation:
Which statement describes one way the U.S. Constitution created a stronger federal government compared to the Articles of Confederation?
a.The federal government gained the power to disband state legislatures
b.The federal government gained the power to regulate trade between states.
c.The President of the United States gained the power to vote in the legislature.
d.The President of the United States gained the power to levy taxes on the states.
PLEASE LIKE RIGHT NOW ASAP
The president of the United States gained the power to levy taxes on the states
What year did Jean Piaget publish his cognitive development theory?
Explanation:
1974 is when jean piaget published his devolpmwnt theory
Answer:
1953
Explanation:
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is an internal function of a business's accounting
department?
O A. Coordinating accounts receivable
O B. Administering employee payroll
C. Coordinating accounts payable
OD. Managing credit and collections accounts
Answer:
B. Administering employee payroll
Explanation:
I took the test
Administering employee payroll is an internal function of a business's accounting department. Hence, option B is correct.
What is employee payroll?Keeping track of hours worked, determining compensation, and sending checks or direct deposits to employees' bank accounts are all part of the payroll process, which is the procedure for paying employees of a corporation.
Payroll is the process of compensating the employees for the work they perform. It involves calculating their pay, deducting taxes and employee benefit costs, and making money to them, typically via direct deposit. With payroll processing software, these processes can be automated by both small and large businesses.
Salary is the annual remuneration that each employee is contractually required to receive.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about employee payroll, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28257212
#SPJ6
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss..
How does an appellate court differ from a trial court?
A. An appellate court usually has a jury.
B. An appellate court decides issues of fact.
C. An appellate court examines more witnesses.
D. An appellate court reviews another court’s decisions.
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answer: B
Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.
Activity 1: The Takings Clause - Read the following excerpt from the Fifth Amendment and define the terms below IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Then, brainstorm ideas of things that could be considered “public use” (at least 3).
No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
“due process of law”
“Taking”
eminent domain
“public use”
“just compensation”
Examples of things that could be considered “public use”
Activity 2: Read the excerpts below and summarize.
What Does the Fifth Amendment Guarantee?
“Among other things, the Fifth Amendment guarantees that people have the right to their lives, liberty, and property. The government is not allowed to take those things without a reason or without following due process. Due process means that the government must act fairly and obey
legal procedures when it tries to take property. The just compensation clause of the Fifth Amendment means the federal government must pay for any private property it takes for public use.”
Summarize: what does the Fifth Amendment guarantee?
What Is a Taking?
“Although the Constitution protects private property, the government can sometimes seize or restrict the use of that property. It can take property in the name of the public good. This is called a taking.”
Summarize: what is a taking?
What Is Eminent Domain?
“The Founders realized they must reconcile [consider both] the need to sometimes take property for government use and individuals’ rights to use their own property. Sometimes the government needs land to build a road, school, post office, or military base. Historically, most takings happened through eminent domain. Eminent domain refers to the government’s right to take private property for public use. In the 1800s, eminent domain was used to claim land for railroads. In the twentieth century, it was used to remove residents from land along planned interstate highway routes. Even in cases of eminent domain, the government must provide
just compensation.”
Summarize: what is eminent domain?
What Is Just Compensation?
“Individuals can sue the government to be reimbursed [paid back] for the lost value of their property. They are asking for just compensation. It is often difficult to determine the amount
of just compensation. Today, the Supreme Court generally uses the fair market value standard, defining just compensation as “what a willing buyer would pay in cash to a willing seller at the time of the taking.”
Summarize: what is just compensation?
Activity 3: Read the three scenarios on handout C and answer the questions as they relate to EACH scenario.
Is the situation described a “taking” of property?
In the situation described, can the government claim Eminent Domain?
If so, what would be the best way to determine just compensation?
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Activity 4: Read handout D and answer the questions below.
In which case did the government attempt to take physical property?
In which case did the Court rule that a “taking” had occurred, even though no land was actually taken?
In which case did the Supreme Court interpret “public use” as “public benefit? Is there a difference?
How does the Kelo ruling differ from the other property rulings? Why do you think it has been a very controversial decision?
Is redevelopment through eminent domain the only way to revitalize a neighborhood? Is it the best way? What other methods can you think of?
"Due process of law" means the government has to follow the rules and treat people fairly when it does something that could take away their life, freedom, or things they own.
What is the eminent domainIn simple words, "taking" refers to a situation where the government takes over or limits the use of someone's property for a public reason. This usually happens through eminent domain.
Therefore, "Eminent domain" means that the government can take someone's land for public reasons, but they have to pay the owner a fair amount of money for it.
Read more about eminent domain here:
https://brainly.com/question/4281421
#SPJ1
Which Executive Branch department is the most important? Use specific and relevant evidnce to support your argument Respond to at least one other post
Answer:
The Constitution neither establishes administrative agencies nor explicitly prescribes the manner by which they may be created. Even so, the Supreme Court has generally recognized that Congress has broad constitutional authority to establish and shape the federal bureaucracy. Congress may use its Article I lawmaking powers to create federal agencies and individual offices within those agencies, design agencies’ basic structures and operations, and prescribe, subject to certain constitutional limitations, how those holding agency offices are appointed and removed. Congress also may enumerate the powers, duties, and functions to be exercised by agencies, as well as directly counteract, through later legislation, certain agency actions implementing delegated authority.
Due to the stiffer penalties imposed for
"possession with intent" offenses, many states
forbid the inference of intent to deliver merely
on the basis of:
A.possession of a controlled substance.
B.eyewitness testimony.
C. undercover officers' testimony.
D.possession of both a substance and
paraphernalia.
Answer:
D. Possession of both a substance and
paraphernalia.
Explanation:
Howdy! Many states are doing this because of the simple fact that its not all up to officer digression in regards to charging someone with PWI. So to be charged with PWI you need to have the substance and the paraphernalia to go with it.
what you believe the people of Texas should do on gun control and gun violence issue
Answer:
Nah
Explanation:
Answer:
dont ask this
Explanation:
sir this is a Wendy's drive thru
A meeting could begin as a lawful assembly but
develop into an unlawful one.
True
False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Why must criminal statutes carefully and clearly define the prohibited behavior ?
The reason behind criminal statutes carefully and clearly defines the prohibited behavior, so that it can put the attention of people toward the legal action that is in the context of the behavior.
What is prohibited behavior?
There is a certain set of standards which are set inside by society for each and everyone so that there will be no among them about following those standards. It is not only about one segment.
It's about the full pattern on which society works, and this behavior also plays a very important role in some of the behavior standards set inside the society for each and everyone so that the dignity of each and everyone is maintained.
This behavior statement is used to note the types of behavior that fall under the criminal status. This is because it does not support the norms that have been set by society.
Thus, Some behavior patterns have been prohibited so that people always are a lot and always pay attention to what the legal action is for the behavior that has to be created or done with others.
Learn more about prohibited behavior from here:
https://brainly.com/question/28265251
#SPJ2
if you were the chairman of Nepal Disabled women Association what plan would you make for the Disabled women's welfare and make them independent? prepare a detail plan.
Answer:
1 :Provide vocational training to make them independent.
2:Give them support.
3:Conduct awareness programmes.
4: As a chairperson I will try as much as I can provide them their rights.
5: Provide decision makin power.
6: Leverage technology to develop skills.
7: Provide training to improve the required skills for independence.
8: Consider options for learning, employment or volunteering.
Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer
Is the historian, Arthur Schlesinger, the one who wrote about the powers in government, the SR. or Jr. ? I need to know this for an assignment I'm doing that doesn't say which he is.
How does a third party candidate play the role of spoiler in an election?
The third party candidate endorses (supports) one of the major party candidates, causing the opponent to win
The third party candidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
The third party candidate drops out of the race, eliminating their own chance of winning the election.
The third party candidate wins the election
Answer:
b) The 3rd party canidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
Explanation:
Roosevelt and Taft were both running for president against Woodrow Wilson. Roosevelt split from the Republican party to create the Bull Moose Party leaving Taft as the official Republican canidate. Because of this the Republican vote was split between Roosevelt and Taft. This lead to Woodrow Wilson's overwhelming victory.
Answer:
The 3rd party canidate takes votes away from one of the major party candidates causing their opponent to win
Explanation:
In 2016, sports newscaster Erin Andrews and former wrestler Hulk Hogan were both awarded substantial monetary damages after winning their respective cases involving invasion of privacy. It is believed that the juries in both cases wanted to sanction the defendants by sending a clear message that individual's privacy must be respected regardless of who they are. The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as:
Answer:
Punitive damages
Explanation:
Based on the information given the monetary damages that was awarded in these two cases are described as PUNITIVE DAMAGES reason been that we were told that the juries has the intention to sanction the defendants who is the person that was found guilty after been accused of committing a crime by sending a clearer message to the defendants that individual’s or people's privacy have to be respected regardless of who they are in order to serve as a lesson to the defendants and to others who may have the intention of committing the same crime and as well to punish the defendants for the crime that was committed by him or her just as in the case of both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan who were awarded monetary damages after winning their cases that involve the invasion of privacy.
Therefore The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as: PUNITIVE DAMAGES
If a truck is ahead in the left lane with a right turn signal on, stay away from its ___________ side.
what is delegated legislation