»Sasha is a journalist for an online magazine. She wants to know what topic readers are interested
in for the next publication.
Sasha puts a survey on the magazine's website and considers the first 25 responses.
Are conclusions drawn from this sample likely to be true for all readers of the magazine?
No, because the members of the sample are not part of the population of all
magazine readers.
No, because the sample would probably include only readers with strong feelings
about what they want to read about.
Yes, because the sample of the first 25 responses is a random sample.
Yes, because the readers in the sample choose to take the survey.

The optimal strategy for the row player is to always play row 2, as it has the lowest expected value for the column player's choices.

To reduce the 4 x 4 game matrix and find the optimal strategy for the row player, we need to calculate the expected value for each row based on the column player's choices.

For the first row, the expected value is (4x57601 + 3x10 + 9x5/6 + 7x1/60)/60 = 42.72/60 = 0.712.

For the second row, the expected value is (-7x57601 + -5x10 + -3x5/6 + 5x1/60)/60 = -410.16/60 = -6.836.

For the third row, the expected value is (-1x57601 + 4x10 + 5x5/6 + 8x1/60)/60 = -38.58/60 = -0.643.

For the fourth row, the expected value is (3x57601 + -5x10 + -1x5/6 + 5x1/60)/60 = 214.42/60 = 3.574.

From these expected values, we can see that the optimal strategy for the row player is to always play row 2, as it has the lowest expected value for the column player's choices.

To learn more about expected value, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29574962

#SPJ11

Using a table of sample sizes and factors for ratio estimation, we find that a sample size of 90 items is appropriate and based on the information provided, we can project a total misstatement of $405,480.67 using ratio projection.

1. To determine the sample size given the information provided, we can use the formula:

Sample size = (Tolerable misstatement / Expected misstatement)² x (Total gross balance in inventory / Sampled balance)

Plugging in the values, we get:

Sample size = ($155,000 / $55,000)² x ($5,500,000 / Sampled balance)
Sample size = 6.73 x ($5,500,000 / Sampled balance)

Assuming a moderate risk of material misstatement, we can use a confidence level of 95%, which corresponds to a Z-score of 1.96. Using a table of sample sizes and factors for ratio estimation, we find that a sample size of 90 items is appropriate.

2. To calculate the total projected misstatement using ratio projection, we first need to determine the ratio of misstatement in the sample to the total inventory. We can do this using the formula:

Ratio of misstatement = Sample misstatement / Sampled balance

Assuming the expected misstatement of $55,000 and a sample size of 90 items, we can set a sampling interval of:

Sampling interval = Total gross balance in inventory / Sample size
Sampling interval = $5,500,000 / 90
Sampling interval = $61,111.11

Using systematic sampling, we can select every 61,111th item from the inventory. Let's say our sample includes 3 items with misstatements totaling $4,500. Then the ratio of misstatement would be:

Ratio of misstatement = $4,500 / Sampled balance

To project the total misstatement, we can use the formula:

Total projected misstatement = Ratio of misstatement x Total gross balance in inventory

Plugging in the values, we get:

Total projected misstatement = ($4,500 / Sampled balance) x $5,500,000

Since we don't know the actual sampled balance, we can use the average sampled balance as an estimate. Assuming an equal distribution of items, the average sampled balance would be:

Average sampled balance = Total gross balance in inventory / Sample size
Average sampled balance = $5,500,000 / 90
Average sampled balance = $61,111.11

Plugging this value in, we get:

Total projected misstatement = ($4,500 / $61,111.11) x $5,500,000
Total projected misstatement = 0.0736 x $5,500,000
Total projected misstatement = $405,480.67

Therefore, based on the information provided, we can project a total misstatement of $405,480.67 using ratio projection.

To know more about ratio projection refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29990219

#SPJ11

The distance between the line and the point is D = 10/3 units

Given data ,

Let the two points be P ( -4 , 0 ) and Q ( 0 , -2 )

To find the slope (m)

m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

m = (-2 - 0) / (0 - (-4))

m = -2 / 4

m = -1/2

So, the equation of the line is:

y = (-1/2)x + b

To find the y-intercept (b), we can plug in the coordinates of one of the points.

-2 = (-1/2)(0) + b

b = -2

So, the equation of the line is

y = (-1/2)x - 2

Now , Distance of a point to line D = | Ax₀ + By₀ + C | / √ ( A² + B² )

On simplifying , we get

( 1/2 )x + y + 2 = 0

A = 1/2 , B = 1 and C = 2

D = | ( 1/2 )4 + 1 + 2 | / √(9/4)

D = 5 / 3/2

D = 10/3 units

Hence , the distance is D = 10/3 units

To learn more about distance from a point to line click :

https://brainly.com/question/21096072

#SPJ1

We can make the conclusion that the series ∑ 3cos(n)/n is convergent.

The series ∑ 3cos(n)/n satisfies the conditions of the integral test if we consider the function f(x) = 3cos(x)/x.

Using integration by parts, we can find that the integral of f(x) from 1 to infinity is equal to 3sin(1) + 3/2 ∫1^∞ sin(x)/x^2 dx.

Since the integral ∫1^∞ sin(x)/x^2 dx converges (as it is a known convergent integral), we can conclude that the series ∑ 3cos(n)/n also converges by the integral test.

Using the Integral Test, we can determine the convergence or divergence of the series ∑ (3cos(n)/n) from n=1 to infinity. The Integral Test states that if a function f(n) is continuous, positive, and decreasing for all n≥1, then the series ∑ f(n) converges if the integral ∫ f(x)dx from 1 to infinity converges, and diverges if the integral diverges.

In this case, f(n) = 3cos(n)/n. Unfortunately, this function is not always positive, as the cosine function oscillates between -1 and 1. Due to this property, the Integral Test is not applicable to the given series, and we cannot draw any conclusions about its convergence or divergence using this test.

Learn more about integration here: brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The equation that best models the population P(t) of the country, given the constant relative birth and death rates and the number of people emigrating every year, is dP/dt = 0.5P - 30,000.

The rate of population growth is determined by the difference between the birth rate and the death rate, which is (97 - 47) per thousand people per year, or 0.05. This means that the population will grow by 0.05 times the current population each year if there is no emigration. However, since 30,000 people emigrate every year, we need to subtract this number from the population growth rate. Therefore, the rate of population growth can be expressed as 0.05P - 30,000.

To get the population at any given time t, we need to integrate this rate equation concerning time t. The solution to this differential equation is P(t) = (P0 - 60,000)e^(0.05t) + 60,000, where P0 is the initial population at time t=0.

To learn more about differential equations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

To find the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z=0.17 and to the right of z=2.85, and  rounding the answer to four decimal places.

Using a calculator or table, we can find that the area to the left of z=0.17 is 0.4325 and the area to the right of z=2.85 is 0.0021.

Therefore, the total area between these two values is:

1 - (0.4325 + 0.0021) = 0.5654

Rounding to four decimal places, the area under the standard normal curve to the left of z=0.17 and to the right of z=2.85 is approximately 0.5654.

Learn more about normal curve at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ11

Analyzing the fixed and variable cost elements, the TRUE statement about the plumbers' charges is B. Plumber A has a greater initial fee.

Costs can be fixed, variable, or mixed.

Fixed costs are the initial charges and do not depend on the number of hours worked.

Variable costs depend on the number of hours worked by each plumber.

Equation, y = 100 + 30z

y = the total charge in dollars

z = the number of hours worked

Variable cost per unit = $30

Fixed cost = $100

Hours    Total Charges ($)

1                    105

2                   160

3                   215

Variable cost per unit = $55 (215 - $160) or ($160 - $105)

Fixed cost = $50.

Thus, Option B is correct because Plumber A has a greater initial fee of $100 compared to Plumber B's $50.

Learn more about fixed and variable costs at https://brainly.com/question/14872023.

#SPJ1

Answer:

624 rounded 624.3 not rounded

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps <3

Missing side is bc ≈ 24.784

The triangle missing angle γ is approximately 92.507°.

We are given the following information:

ac = 9

α = 60°

We can use the law of cosines to find the missing side bc:

bc² = ab² + ac² - 2ab(ac)cos(α)

Since we don't know ab, we can use the law of sines to find it:

ab/sin(α) = ac/sin(β)

where β is the angle opposite ab. Solving for ab, we get:

ab = (sin(α) x ac)/sin(β)

Since we know α and ac, we just need to find β to compute ab. Using the fact that the angles of a triangle sum to 180°, we have:

β = 180° - 90° - α

= 30°

Substituting the given values, we get:

ab = (sin(60°) x 9)/sin(30°)

= 15.588

Now we can use the law of cosines to find bc:

bc² = ab² + ac² - 2ab(ac)cos(α)

bc² = (15.588)² + 9² - 2(15.588)(9)cos(60°)

bc² = 613.436

bc ≈ 24.784

To find the remaining angle, we can use the law of sines again:

sin(γ)/bc = sin(α)/ac

Solving for γ, we get:

γ = sin⁻¹((sin(α) x bc)/ac)

= sin⁻¹((sin(60°) x 24.784)/9)

≈ 92.507°

Therefore, the missing angle γ is approximately 92.507°.

Learn more about triangle missing angle.

brainly.com/question/28794107

#SPJ11

The solution to the system of linear equations is, [tex]$x = \frac{3}{k(1-k)}$[/tex] and[tex]$y = \frac{3-k}{k(1-k)}$[/tex].

We are given the system of linear equations:

kx(1-k)y = 1

(1-k)xky = 3

We can use Cramer's rule to solve for $x$ and $y$. The determinant of the coefficient matrix is:

[tex]$\begin{vmatrix}k(1-k) & -k(1-k) \(1-k)k & -k^2\end{vmatrix} = -k^2(1-k)^2$[/tex]

The determinant of the x-matrix is:

[tex]$\begin{vmatrix}1 & -k(1-k) \3 & -k^2\end{vmatrix} = -k^2 + 3k(1-k) = 3k - 3k^2$[/tex]

The determinant of the y-matrix is:

[tex]$\begin{vmatrix}k(1-k) & 1 \(1-k)k & 3\end{vmatrix} = 3k - k^2$[/tex]

Using Cramer's rule, we can find x and y:

[tex]$x = \frac{\begin{vmatrix}1 & -k(1-k) \3 & -k^2\end{vmatrix}}{\begin{vmatrix}k(1-k) & -k(1-k) \(1-k)k & -k^2\end{vmatrix}} = \frac{3k - 3k^2}{-k^2(1-k)^2} = \frac{3}{k(1-k)}$[/tex]

[tex]$y = \frac{\begin{vmatrix}k(1-k) & 1 \(1-k)k & 3\end{vmatrix}}{\begin{vmatrix}k(1-k) & -k(1-k) \(1-k)k & -k^2\end{vmatrix}} = \frac{3k - k^2}{-k^2(1-k)^2} = \frac{3-k}{k(1-k)}$[/tex]

Therefore, the solution to the system of linear equations is:

[tex]$x = \frac{3}{k(1-k)}$[/tex]

[tex]$y = \frac{3-k}{k(1-k)}$[/tex]

To know more about Cramer's rule, here

https://brainly.com/question/30682863

#SPJ4

The ways in which we can shade the shape to get the total is: Shape 1: 3/5 shaded. Shape 2: 2/5 shaded. Shape 3: 2/5 shaded. To decompose g we use 7/5 = 4/5 + 3/5.

To express a quantity that is a portion of a whole, use fractions. They are made up of a denominator and a numerator, two integers separated by a horizontal line. The denominator is the total number of equally sized components that make up the whole, while the numerator is the portion of the whole that is being taken into account.

Because they are different ways of expressing the same quantity, decimals and percentages have a relationship to fractions. With a base of 10, decimals can be used to express fractions, with each digit standing for a different power of 10.

Given that, the total shaded area must be 7/5.

The ways in which we can shade the shape to get the total is:

Shape 1: 3/5 shaded

Shape 2: 2/5 shaded

Shape 3: 2/5 shaded

Now, for two shapes we can use the addition of two fractions as follows:

7/5 = 4/5 + 3/5

The example of the form is:

7/5 = 4/5 + 3/5

Learn more about fractions here:

https://brainly.com/question/10708469

#SPJ1

To find the interval of convergence and radius of convergence for the power series sigma^[infinity]_n=1 ((−1)^n x^n/n), we will use the ratio test.

Ratio test: Let the series sigma^[infinity]_n=1 a_n be a power series centered at x = c. Then, the radius of convergence is given by R = lim_n→∞ |a_n/a_n+1|, if the limit exists.

First, we apply the ratio test:

|(-1)^(n+1) * x^(n+1)/(n+1)| / |(-1)^n * x^n/n|

= |x/(n+1)|

Taking the limit as n → ∞, we get

lim_n→∞ |x/(n+1)| = 0

Therefore, the radius of convergence is R = ∞.

Next, we need to find the interval of convergence. Since R = ∞, the series converges for all x. Thus, the interval of convergence is

I = (-∞, ∞).

Therefore,

I = (-∞, ∞)
R = ∞
To find the interval of convergence (I) and radius of convergence (R) for the given power series, we can use the Ratio Test. The power series is:

Σ(−1)^n * (x^n / n) from n=1 to infinity.

Applying the Ratio Test:

lim (n→∞) |(a_(n+1)) / a_n| = lim (n→∞) |((-1)^(n+1) * x^(n+1) / (n+1)) / ((-1)^n * x^n / n)|

After simplification:

lim (n→∞) |n * x / (n+1)|

Since the (-1) terms cancel out, we are left with:

lim (n→∞) |n / (n+1) * x|

As n approaches infinity, the limit becomes 1, and thus:

|x| < 1

This gives us the interval of convergence (I):

I = (-1, 1)

For the radius of convergence (R), since |x| < 1:

R = 1

Visit here to learn more about radius of convergence brainly.com/question/31440916

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly selected 16-bit binary string is a palindrome is approximately 0.0078125 or 0.78%.

A palindrome is a sequence of characters that reads the same forward as backward. In the case of a binary string, this means that the string is the same when read from left to right as when read from right to left.

There are a total of [tex]2^{16}[/tex] = 65,536 possible 16-bit binary strings.

To find the number of palindromic binary strings, we need to consider the number of strings that are the same when read from both directions.

We can break this down into two cases:

Case 1: Strings with an even number of bits

If the binary string has an even number of bits, then it can be split into two halves of equal length. The first half determines the entire string, since the second half is simply a mirror image of the first half.

Therefore, the number of palindromic strings of even length is equal to the number of possible binary strings of length 8 (since there are 8 bits in each half), which is [tex]2^8[/tex] = 256.

Case 2: Strings with an odd number of bits

If the binary string has an odd number of bits, then the middle bit must be the same when read from both directions.

Therefore, we can choose any of the 2 possible values for the middle bit, and the remaining 7 bits can be chosen independently. Therefore, the number of palindromic strings of odd length is equal to 2 * [tex]2^7[/tex] = 256.

Thus, the total number of palindromic binary strings is 256 + 256 = 512.

The probability of selecting a palindromic binary string at random is therefore:

P(palindrome) = number of palindromic strings / total number of strings

P(palindrome) = 512 / 65,536

P(palindrome) ≈ 0.0078125

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected 16-bit binary string is a palindrome is approximately 0.0078125 or 0.78%.

Learn more about palindrome

brainly.com/question/24304125

#SPJ11

The number of 3-permutations of a set of cardinality eight is 336.

To determine the number of 3-permutations of a set of cardinality eight, we need to calculate the number of ways to arrange three distinct elements from an eight-element set.

This is done using the formula for permutations: P(n, r) = n! / (n - r)!, where n is the number of elements in the set, and r is the number of elements to be arranged. In this case, n = 8 and r = 3.

Applying the formula: P(8, 3) = 8! / (8 - 3)!. Calculate factorials: 8! = 40,320 and 5! = 120. Finally, divide 40,320 by 120 to get the answer: 336.

To know more about cardinality click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29093097#

#SPJ11

The milk chocolate bar contains 250 grams in total.

To solve it, we'll use the given percentages of cocoa and sugar in milk chocolate.
Determine the percentage of cocoa in the chocolate:
20% of the chocolate's mass is cocoa.
Find the mass of cocoa in the chocolate:
We are given that there is 50g of cocoa in the bar of milk chocolate.
Calculate the total mass of the chocolate:
Since 20% of the chocolate's mass is cocoa, we can set up the following equation:
(20% * Total Mass) = 50g
Solve for the total mass:
To find the total mass, we need to isolate the Total Mass variable in the equation:
Total Mass = 50g / 20%
Convert the percentage to decimal:
20% = 0.20
Perform the calculation:
Total Mass = 50g / 0.20 = 250g.

For similar question on percentages.

https://brainly.com/question/28515981

#SPJ11

The argument is valid. According to modus tollens, the conclusion "I will not eat" logically follows

The argument follows a valid logical form known as modus tollens, which is a valid deductive argument form. Modus tollens states that if a conditional statement (e.g., "if A, then B") is true and the consequent (B) is false, then the antecedent (A) must also be false.

In this argument, the conditional statement is "If I'm hungry, then I will eat" (A = I'm hungry, B = I will eat), and the premise "I'm not hungry" establishes that the consequent (B) is false.

Therefore, according to modus tollens, the conclusion "I will not eat" logically follows

To learn more about modus tollens here;

brainly.com/question/30886925#

#SPJ11

The period of this function is 6 seconds and it means the time it takes for a person's lung to inhale and exhale in a full cycle.

The function's period alludes to the duration required for one complete cycle, culminating in its initial point. Furthermore, this term represents the length of time necessary for a person's lungs to perform a full inhalation and exhalation sequence.

To determine the period, it is integral to recognize the temporal gap between two successive peaks (or troughs) on the chart. This interval deviation precludes:

8. 5 - 2. 5 = 6 seconds

Find out more on periods at https://brainly.com/question/21675230

#SPJ1

The required equation is [tex]x^2y^4 + 4x^3y^3 - 4x^2y^2 - 12x^2y[/tex] + 25 = 0

The direction of fastest change of a function at a point is given by the gradient of the function at that point. Therefore, to find the points at which the direction of fastest change of the function f(x, y) = [tex]x^2 y^2[/tex] − 6x − 8y is in the direction of the vector i j, we need to find the gradient of f(x, y) and then find the points where the gradient is parallel to the vector i j.

The gradient of f(x, y) is given by:

∇f(x, y) = <∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y> =[tex]< 2xy^2 - 6, 2x^2y - 8 >[/tex]

To find the points at which the direction of fastest change is in the direction of i j, we need to find the points where the gradient is parallel to i j. This means that the dot product of the gradient and i j should be equal to the product of their magnitudes:

∇f(x, y) · i j = ||∇f(x, y)|| ||i j||

Substituting the values, we get:

[tex](2xy^2 - 6, 2x^2y - 8)[/tex]· (1, 0) = sqrt(([tex]2xy^2 - 6)^2 + (2x^2y - 8)^2[/tex]) * sqrt([tex]1^2 + 0^2[/tex])

Simplifying this equation, we get:

[tex]2xy^2[/tex]- 6 = sqrt(([tex]2xy^2 - 6)^2[/tex] + ([tex]2x^2y - 8)^2[/tex])

Squaring both sides and simplifying, we get:

[tex]x^2y^4 + 4x^3y^3 - 4x^2y^2 - 12x^2y + 25 = 0[/tex]

Therefore, the points at which the direction of fastest change of f(x, y) is in the direction of i j are given by the solution of the quartic equation above.

Learn more about direction of fastest change

brainly.com/question/17055351

#SPJ11

Answers are of each function cos(π - t) = -2/5 and cos(t + π) = -2/5.

To evaluate these functions, we can use the trigonometric identity.

(a) To evaluate cos(π - t), use the property of cosine, which is cos(π - x) = -cos(x). So, we have:

cos(π - t) = -cos(t)

Since cos(t) = 2/5, we have:

cos(π - t) = -2/5

(b) To evaluate cos(t + π), use the property of cosine, which is cos(x + π) = -cos(x). So, we have:

cos(t + π) = -cos(t)

Since cos(t) = 2/5, we have:

cos(t + π) = -2/5

So, the answers are cos(π - t) = -2/5 and cos(t + π) = -2/5.

Learn more about property of cosine.

brainly.com/question/1699846

#SPJ11

The power (P) when I = 64.1 A and V = 12.8 V is 819.68 watts (W).

Hello! I understand that you need help in finding the power (P) when the current (I) is 64.1 A and the voltage (V) is 12.8 V.
Understand the relationship between power, current, and voltage.
The power (P) in an electrical circuit can be calculated using the formula P = I × V,

where I is the current in amperes (A) and V is the voltage in volts (V).
Plug in the given values.
In this case, we are given I = 64.1 A

and V = 12.8 V.

Plug these values into the formula:
P = 64.1 A × 12.8 V
Calculate the power.
Multiply the current and voltage to find the power:
P = 819.68 W.

For similar question on power.

https://brainly.com/question/31369005

#SPJ11

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

2(1/2 x 3 x 4) + 4 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 5 x 2

2(6) + 8 + 6 + 10

12 + 24

36

Helping in the name of Jesus.

Since the improper integral converges to a finite value[tex](3e^{-25})[/tex] the infinite series also converges by the Integral Test.

To use the Integral Test to determine if the given infinite series is convergent, we first need to find the corresponding integrand and improper integral. The infinite series is:

[tex]\sum_{n=5}^{infinity}  6ne^{-n^2}[/tex]
The corresponding integrand is:

[tex]f(x) = 6xe^{-x^2}[/tex]

Now, we need to find the value of the improper integral:

[tex]\int _5^{infinity} 6xe^{-x^2}dx[/tex]

To evaluate this integral, we'll first find the antiderivative using substitution. Let u = -x^2, so du = -2xdx. Then, we have:

∫ (-3)e^u du = -3∫e^u du

The antiderivative of e^u is e^u. So, we get:

-3e^u = -3e^(-x^2)

Now we'll evaluate the limit as the upper bound approaches infinity:

[tex]Limit _{ t=infinity} [ -3e^{-t^2} ] - ( -3e^{-5^2} \\= Limit_{ t=infinity} [ -3e^{-t^2}+ 3e^{-25) ][/tex]
As t approaches infinity, e^(-t^2) approaches 0:

[tex]-3(0) + 3e^{-25)} = 3e^{-25}[/tex]

Since the improper integral converges to a finite value[tex](3e^{-25})[/tex] the infinite series also converges by the Integral Test.

learn more about Integral Test

https://brainly.com/question/28157842

#SPJ11

The indicial equation is r^2 - 12 = 0, and the exponents for the specified singularity at x = 1 are r = ±√12.

To find the indicial equation and the exponents for the specified singularity of the given differential equation,

(x - 1)^2y" + (x^2 - 1)y' - 12y = 0 at x = 1:

Follow these steps:

STEP 1: Substitute y(x) = (x - 1)^r into the given differential equation. This will help us find the indicial equation.

STEP 2: Differentiate y(x) with respect to x to find y'(x) and y''(x):
  y'(x) = r(x - 1)^(r - 1)
  y''(x) = r(r - 1)(x - 1)^(r - 2)

STEP 3:Substitute y(x), y'(x), and y''(x) back into the given differential equation:
  (x - 1)^2[r(r - 1)(x - 1)^(r - 2)] + (x^2 - 1)[r(x - 1)^(r - 1)] - 12(x - 1)^r = 0

STEP 4: Simplify the equation:
  r(r - 1)(x - 1)^r + r(x - 1)^r - 12(x - 1)^r = 0

STEP 5: Factor out (x - 1)^r:
  (x - 1)^r[r(r - 1) + r - 12] = 0

STEP 6: Since (x - 1)^r is never zero, we can set the other factor equal to zero to find the indicial equation:
  r(r - 1) + r - 12 = 0

STEP 7: Simplify and solve for r:
  r^2 - r + r - 12 = 0
  r^2 - 12 = 0

STEP 8: Solve the quadratic equation for r:
  r = ±√12

So, the indicial equation is r^2 - 12 = 0, and the exponents for the specified singularity at x = 1 are r = ±√12.

To now more about Indicial equation:

https://brainly.com/question/29071716

#SPJ11

The p-value of .590 is less than .05, which means we reject the null hypothesis, and the result is statistically significant.

P Flag question Is it in the rejection region? Can you reject the null hypothesis? Is it statistically significant? Is the mean difference due to treatment effect or sampling error?

P = 1.061 No fail to reject No Sampling Error

p = .590 Yes reject Null Hypothesis Statistically Significant Treatment Effect

p = 1.130 No fail to reject No Sampling Error

p = 1.008 No fail to reject No Sampling Error

p = 1.040 No fail to reject No Sampling Error

Note: The p-value of .590 is less than .05, which means we reject the null hypothesis, and the result is statistically significant. A p-value less than .05 indicates that the likelihood of obtaining such a result by chance is less than 5%. The mean difference is due to a treatment effect because we reject the null hypothesis. The other p-values are greater than .05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis, and the results are not statistically significant. We cannot conclude that the mean difference is due to a treatment effect as opposed to sampling error.

To learn more about Sampling Error visit: https://brainly.com/question/15375591

#SPJ11

The 4th partial sum of the given series is approximately 0.1164.

The given series is:

[tex]s = \sum_{n=1}^\infty 10/(6n^5)[/tex]

To compute the 4th partial sum, we add up the terms from n=1 to n=4:

[tex]s_4 = \sum_{n=1}^4 10/(6n^5) = (10/6) (1/1^5 + 1/2^5 + 1/3^5 + 1/4^5)[/tex]

We can simplify this expression using a calculator:

[tex]s_4[/tex]= (10/6) (1 + 1/32 + 1/243 + 1/1024) ≈ 0.1164

Therefore, the 4th partial sum of the given series is approximately 0.1164.

Learn more about series

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The 4th partial sum of the given series is approximately 0.1164.

The given series is:

[tex]s = \sum_{n=1}^\infty 10/(6n^5)[/tex]

To compute the 4th partial sum, we add up the terms from n=1 to n=4:

[tex]s_4 = \sum_{n=1}^4 10/(6n^5) = (10/6) (1/1^5 + 1/2^5 + 1/3^5 + 1/4^5)[/tex]

We can simplify this expression using a calculator:

[tex]s_4[/tex]= (10/6) (1 + 1/32 + 1/243 + 1/1024) ≈ 0.1164

Therefore, the 4th partial sum of the given series is approximately 0.1164.

Learn more about series

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The measure of the missing part of proportion is 17.50

Since the relations between variables, either direct or inverse proportional, can be built to find the desired measures in the problem.

Given that Weight Price 2 -lb. $7.00

5 - lb. $

1: 3.50 dollars

Now multiply by 5 on each side

5 : 17.50

More can be learned about proportions at;

brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

If f(x) = 7x and g(x) = 3x+1, the value of given function (fog)(x) is 21x+7. Therefore, the correct option is option D among all the given options.

In mathematics, a function is a statement, rule, or law that establishes the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. In mathematics, functions exist everywhere, and they are crucial for constructing physical links in the sciences. It is equivalent to linear forms in linear algebra, which are linear mappings from a vector space into their scalar field.

f(x) = 7x

g(x) = 3x+1

(fog)(x) = f(g(x))

(fog)(x) = f(3x+1)

(fog)(x) =7(3x+1)

⇒(fog)(x) = 21x+7

To know more about mathematical function, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12195089

#SPJ1

an diverges by the limit comparison test since bn diverges and lim (an or bn) exists and is finite.

Given an = 5/n and bn = 1/(n + ln(n)), we need to find the limit of an/bn and determine the convergence of an.

Step 1: Calculate the limit of an or bn as n approaches infinity.
lim (n→∞) (an/bn) = lim (n→∞) [(5/n) / (1/(√n + ln(n)))]
= lim (n→∞) [5(√n + ln(n))/n]

Step 2: Use L'Hopital's Rule since we have the indeterminate form of (0, 0).
lim (n→∞) [5(1/2n^(-1/2) + 1/n) / 1]
= lim (n→∞) [5(1/2√n + 1/n)]

Step 3: Since the limit exists and is finite, apply the limit comparison test.
We know that the series (1/n) diverges (it's the harmonic series), so let's compare it with an.
If the limit lim (n) (an/bn) exists and is finite, then both series will have the same convergence behavior.

Since the limit exists and is finite, an will have the same convergence behavior as (1/n), which is divergence.

Therefore, Σan diverges by the limit comparison test since bn diverges and lim (an or bn) exists and is finite.

Visit here to learn more about limit comparison test:

brainly.com/question/31362838

#SPJ11

The approximate p-value for this test is 0.0575.

We are given that;

H0: μ = 11 and H1: μ > 11

t0 = 1.948, df = n - 1 = 11 - 1 = 10

Now,

To find the p-value based on these values. One way to do this is to use a cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the t-distribution with 10 degrees of freedom2. The CDF gives you the probability that a random variable from the t-distribution is less than or equal to a given value.

For a one-tailed test, the p-value is equal to 1 - CDF(t0). In this case, using a calculator, we get:

p-value = 1 - CDF(1.948) = 1 - 0.9425 = 0.0575

Therefore, by the statistics the answer will be 0.0575.

To learn more on Statistics click:

brainly.com/question/29342780

#SPJ1

Answer:

1: $1.75

2: 1470 calories

3: $172.32

4: 350 in

5: 14 tabs

6: 2.22 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

1: (2*3.75)+(1*4.85)+(2*2.95) = 18.25

   20-18.25 = 1.75 dollars

2: 2500-(520+220+290) = 1470 cal

3: 209.59+59.33+121.35+137.95+107.14+36.96 = 672.32

   672.32-500 = 172.32 dollars

4: (30*12)-10 = 350 in

5: (3*24)/4 = 18 total doses in 3 days,

   2 tabs per dose ->  18*2 = 36 tablets taken

   50-36 = 14 tabs

6: 45*5 = 225 patients per week

   500/225 = 2.22 weeks