The location where the wallet was found is called the...
A) Primary crime scene
B) Secondary Crime scene
C) Tertiary crime scene
D) Accomplice
Answer:
a) primary crime scene
search on internet
How many years does it take to become an average driver?
Answer: it takes 4 years hope this helps
Explanation:
it all depends on the person and the age they start
What kinds of activities, currently legal, should be labeled criminal in contemporary society? Why?
Answer:
Explanation:
i don't know maybe paparazzi's because its considered stalking and photographing people without their consent.
A court will not apply the Exclusionary Rule if the defendant is obviously guilty even if the evidence was seized illegally true or false
Answer: False
Explanation: The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
The Court of Appeals held that in light of these authorities, Alvarado's age and experience must be a factor. . . . A minor with no criminal record would be more likely to feel coerced by police tactics and conclude he is under arrest than would an experienced adult, the Court of Appeals reasoned. This required extra "safeguards. " According to Justice Kennedy, why did the Court of Appeals overturn Alvarado’s conviction? Check all that apply. The police used extra protections for him. The police coerced his confession. Minors require special legal protections. He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest. He was experienced enough to understand his rights.
According to Justice Kennedy, the reason why the Court of Appeals overturned Alvarado’s conviction is:
The police coerced his confessionHe was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.What is a Conviction?This refers to a legal verdict whereby a person is found guilty of an offence in a competent court of law and given a sentence.
With this in mind, we can see that the case of Alvarado was not one that was very straightforward because of the feelings of being in custody and being coerced by police tactics and thus the verdict was overturned because the Court said that being "in custody" was a matter of law, not of whether Alvarado believed he was in custody.
Read more about convictions here:
https://brainly.com/question/25480701
Answer:
c. Minors require special legal protections.
d. He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.
Explanation:
c. and d.
If you want to pass a slow moving vehicle you should do what
Answer:
As long as you're passing in a legal manner either in a passing zone read below.
Explanation:
Use your turn signal to let other drives know you are changing lanes.Check your side and rearview mirrors for traffic approaching from behind.Glance over your left shoulder if you are moving left. Glance over your right shoulder if you are moving right so you can see if there are any vehicles in your blind spot.(passing on a one lane road is completely different but you did not say which you were referring to)
Nicholas works in the district attorney’s office preparing paperwork related to crimes that the attorney is prosecuting. He takes reports from police officers and crime scene investigators and adds them to the file, making sure that every report is clearly labeled. What category would Nicholas’s career MOST likely fall into?
(A) criminologist
(B) criminalist
(C) criminal justice professional
(D) criminal scientist
Identify the problems of the individual haunting framework
Answer:
The meaning of haunting is lingering a memory. Haunting is used with respect to the memories that are negative and had a negative psychological effect on the person.
Please mark as Brainliest!!
(100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST ASAP) Why are juries required to render a unanimous decision rather than a majority decision in most criminal cases.
Answer:
A unanimous jury verdict is one way to ensure that a defendant isn't convicted unless the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors who seek to convict a criminal defendant must convince jurors that they can conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.
Explanation:
Bankruptcy courts are a special unit of the US Court of Appeals.
A.
True
B.
False
Answer:
true
Explanation: bankruptcy are special courts in the US district court system
What is the primary criterion for authorship
The primary criterion for authorship is that the author must have made a significant intellectual contribution to the work of writing.
Who is an author?
An author is one who is the source of some form of intellectual or creative work; especially, one who composes a book, article, poem, play, or other literary work intended for publication.
Usually a distinction is made between an author and others (such as a compiler, an editor, or a translator) who assemble, organize, or manipulate literary materials.
Sometimes, however, the title of author is given to one who compiles material (as for publication) in such a way that the finished compilation can be regarded as a relatively original work.
The primary criterion for authorship is that the author must have made a significant intellectual contribution to the work of writing.
Learn more about an author here:
https://brainly.com/question/28623865
#SPJ6
Public wrongs such as drug dealing, auto theft, and arson are violations of ____ and are prosecuted by the State.
(ASAP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST) To what extent, if any, do jury trials ensure due process as stated in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Answer:
The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
Explanation:
Some law enforcement professionals believe relying on scientific evidence makes it more
difficult to convict criminals when the scientific evidence is not available. In your opinion,
does the reliance on scientific evidence help or hamper law enforcement?
.
Officers have been called to the scene of an altercation outside a crowded restaurant. Two men were evidently arguing over a sports event. The argument escalated, with both men throwing punches. By the time officers arrived on the scene, one man was holding his nose, which was profusely bleeding. The other was nursing a quickly blackening eye. Several people loitered around the entrance to the club. After speaking with both men on the scene, officers leave without making an arrest. What is the MOST likely reason for their choice in this situation?
Neither man wanted to press charges.
There were no witnesses to verify the fight.
There was no video camera footage of the fight.
The officers did not see evidence of a crime.
Answer:
Neither man wanted to press charges.
Explanation:
I'll just say why the other answers are wrong
B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club
C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.
D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.
→→→What is the difference between the duties of a grand jury and that of a trial jury?←←←
(A) They both have the exact same duty, to render judgment on the defendant’s guilt.
(B)The grand jury decides if there is a probability that the defendant committed the crime, while the trial jury finds guilt or not.
(C)The trial jury decides if there is a probability that the defendant committed the crime, while the grand jury determines guilt or not.
(D)The trial jury consists of members of the judicial bench, but a grand jury is composed of members of the public.
Answer:
A grand jury determines if there is probable cause that the defendant may have committed the crime and if he should go to trial. So your answer is B.
Answer:
Answer is B
Explanation:
Correct on Horizon :)
John has become fixated on a rather paranoid explanation of the facts. What should John do to examine the
situation more rationally?
In order to examine the situation more rationally, John has to try to relax first and forget what is triggering the Paranoia.
What is paranoia?This is a case of mental health that may be caused by delusions. The causes could be:
JealousySchizophreniaDrug abuse.In order to explain the facts with a clear head, John has to first take out time to relax and then paint a clear picture of the issue.
Read more on paranoia here: https://brainly.com/question/2387564
Instructions: Please read the passage and answer the following questions. Please make sure that your response is 200 words or more for each question. You can use outside resources to validate your response.
Just as the law applies to those in correctional institutions and convicted individuals under community supervision, the law also regulates the behavior of correctional staff. It is conceivable, then, that legal rights accorded to staff could be curtailed or expanded.
1. Can an argument be made to expand correctional staff protections against discrimination to go beyond race, gender, national origin, and religion? What other status would you protect? Explain your answer. Should statutes regarding age discrimination and discrimination against disabled people be applied to correctional settings that are potentially violent? Why or why not?
2. Should the civil liability of prison officials be expanded beyond the violation of constit
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
23. The Vice President
A. is appointed by the President
B. does not need to be as qualified as the President
C. presides over the House of Representatives
D, may act as President if the President is seriously ill.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
1st Amendment Violation Help
Alfonso plays basketball for Hope County High School. His team makes it to the state tournament, where they play their
archrival, Duvall County High. After an intense game where tempers run high, the Hope County team wins. While walking
home from the basketball game, Alfonso is confronted by George, a member of the Duvall County team. George pushes
Alfonso, causing him to fall to the ground. Enraged, Alfonso pulls a gun from his gym bag and shoots George in the chest,
killing him instantly. Alfonso is arrested and charged with murder. Alfonso claims he shot George in self-defense. At trial,
Alfonso's claim of self-defense is likely to be:
Answer:
"I shot him because he assaulted me and I felt threatened" Make sure to put the answer in quotations
Explanation:
His claim of self-defense is likely to be "I shot him because he assaulted
me and I felt threatened because he pushed me to the ground"
What is Self-defense?This is a countermeasure which involves individuals protecting
themselves against harm.
Alfonso was assaulted and felt threatened which was why he acted in self-
defense by shooting George.
Read more about Self-defense here https://brainly.com/question/2920735