13 Points! Please help ASAP^^
Please match the word to the correct definition.
Question 1 options:
is a person that is accused of committing a crime or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.
legal reasons, stated in court session, in written and/ or verbal form, based on statutes, regulations, case precedents, and reasoning applied to the facts of the particular situation.
means to be in accordance with the rules, laws, and rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
the official power (of a court) to be able to hear cases and make legal decisions and judgements
The highest ranking or senior member of the court, they preside over the court in its public sessions when the court is hearing arguments of a case and during its private conferences when discussing and deciding cases.
the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court.
the highest judicial court in a state or a country. Is the highest court in the US
comes from the Latin word for city, because in earlier history people identified themselves as belong to cities. It is a legal status that gives you a right to live, work, pay taxes, and vote
anything that a person (or a business) has legal title over. They can be tangible or intangible and ownership give the owner enforceable rights
means to be in violation of one or more of the rules, laws, and/ or rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
a conclusion reached after an evaluation of the facts and the precedent, and law. It is also called a ruling, an opinion, or a judgement.
1.
Property
2.
Citizenship
3.
Supreme Court
4.
Jurisdiction
5.
Plaintiff
6.
Defendant
7.
Chief Justice
8.
Arguments
9.
Decision
10.
Constitutional
11.
Unconstitutional
Answer:
Appellate brief
An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.
Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).
Student brief
A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.
Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.
The parties and how to keep track of them
Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:
Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.
The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.
The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.
For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.
These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.
A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.
A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.
The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.
When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.
At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”
In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.
Student briefs
Explanation:
At Fort Union, what medicine was thought to be the best medicine for children?
a.
Catnip
c.
Cattail
b.
Parsley
d.
Mint
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer: A.
Explanation:
Just Took The Test its Correct i promise
Which type of business is the most common in the U.S.?!
Answer:
Sole Proprietorship
Explanation:
A sole proprietorship is the most common form of business organization.
In Sparta, who could limit the power of the council of elders?
Answer:
Ephors
Explanation:
Ephors- were the people responsible for the day to day operation of the government.
In 2-3 sentences, explain why the United States and Cuba took the actions they did in response to each other during the Cold War.
Answer:
In October 1962, the Soviet provision of ballistic missiles to Cuba led to the most dangerous Cold War confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union and brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Over the course of two extremely tense weeks, US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev negotiated a peaceful outcome to the crisis. The crisis evoked fears of nuclear destruction, revealed the dangers of brinksmanship, and invigorated attempts to halt the arms race.
Explanation: Sorry I got into it haha;)...But there you go...
Who staged a coup and was known as a tyrant in 561 B.C (Key Figures and
Economies in Ancient Civilizations)
Answer: Peisistratus
Explanation:
Why did Jesus use parables?
A. They included none rules for leading a better life
B. They were part of his Sermon on the Mount
C. They helped clarify the meaning of the Lord's Prayer
D. They helped explain his ideas through simple stories that were easy for everybody to understand.
Answer:
D. They helped explain his ideas through simple stories that were easy for everybody to understand.
Explanation:
What kept the Portuguese from paying much attention to Brazil for more than 30 years after there arrived in the region
Answer:
The main focus of the Portuguese was on their colonies and trade in Asia. Therefore, they didn't put much attention on Brazil.
In the space below, construct a claim as to the effect the television has had on politics. Your claim should be at least
250 words and follow these directions:
1. Research on your own and find a primary source on the impact of television on U.S. government
a. A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
b. Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
2. Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning
television's effect on U.S. politics.
3. Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
a. Your claim should clearly state the effect of television on U.S. Politics. Be specific.
b. Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your
source and information from the lesson that supports it.
c. A counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
4. Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
a. Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone.
b. Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and creates cohesion between claims
and evidence.
c. Follows expectations of conventions.
5. Provide a concluding paragraph that:
a. Synthesizes your original claim
b. Summarizes your key points
c. Adds concluding thoughts
6. Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
1 RON
Answer:
2
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT a way that the ancient cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro were similar?
A) Large temples were constructed in each city to honor the gods.
B) They were planned cities filled with structures made from brick.
C) The streets built in each city were based on a grid system.
D) They were protected by thick walls surrounding the cities.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i dont know if its correct but i hope it helps
1. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) may still be in danger from their government.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Displaced persons suffer significantly higher rates of mortality than the general population. They also remain at high risk of physical attack, sexual assault and abduction, and frequently are deprived of adequate shelter, food and health services.
why did some Americans feel the articles of confederation was not suffcient for the new nation?
Explain why the process of industrialization is called a revolution, and summarize the effects of industrialization on the people of the era.
Answer:
The process of industrialization is known as the revolution because it brings new industries and development in a quick session, and also opens up the gate for the other countries to do partnership with the specific country.
Explanation:
thanks me later
Telephone, Electronic Power, Satellite Communications, Computers.
How have you these industries impacted the economic development of the United States ?
a- by decreasing the employment opportunities for workers
b- by increasing the efficiency of business
c- by decreasing public demand for consumer goods
d- by increasing production time for manufacturing products
Answer:d
Explanation:
Why were many mill workers women and children?
A.They enjoyed getting out of their cramped apartments.
B.They petitioned Congress to be allowed to work.
C.They accepted lower wages than men.
D.They had more skills and education than men.
Explanation:I believe it's B. They accepted lower wages than men.
Please HelllppppWhat was one of Japan's major achievements?
A. Building a social system that did not allow violence
B. Creating some of the earliest works of prose literature
C. Giving peasants the right to vote for their leaders
D. Uniting all of Japan under the rule of one daimyo
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I took the test
Describe how an officer's wife would spend her time. (Fort Union)
Answer:
Many enlisted men
Explanation:
John Rolfe introduced what to Jamestown that saved it form certain demise and turned it into a successful settlement? (SSUSH1b)
A
Cotton
B
Sugar Cane
С
Tobacco
D
Indigo
Answer: C
Explanation: Tobacco was a cash crop first discoverde in the new world
What are the duties of the secretary of state of Louisiana? Check all that apply.
act as the chief legal officer of the state
serve as chief election officer
take responsibility for official state records
keep the Great Seal of the State of Louisiana
give official approval of documents
THE ANSWERS ARE B,C,D,E
Answer:
All of them but "give official approval doc"
Explanation:
do hope this helps.
Answer:
The answer is ADE
A(defending the laws of the state in court)
D(serving as the head of the Department of Justice)
E(advising or assisting on criminal cases as needed)
Explanation:
The attorney is head of LEGAL officer of state.
I used guided notes and got this question right.
GIVING BRAINEST
Which statement describes the state of leadership in the later Ming dynasty?
The people took advantage of the rulers' kindness.
Leaders were older and easily influenced by the young.
O The emperors lived in poverty and declined in social status.
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Answer:
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Explanation:
Answer:
C:
Explanation:
Which statement describes the state of leadership in the later Ming dynasty?
The people took advantage of the rulers’ kindness.
Leaders were older and easily influenced by the young.
The emperors lived in poverty and declined in social status.
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Why did trump want to build a wall, and why did he want the Mexicans to pay for the wall
Answer: This is a very controversial topic but can be learned from. Donald J. Trump built the wall for protection around America. Many Mexican immigrants have been crossing illegally with no passport or identification. Many had one goal and that was to move to a better place where they are free with their families. Others had a goal, that was to smuggle illegal things into America for other American drug dealers and weapon dealers. It was a good move on the presidents part and saved us a whole lot of damage. Yes, it may have affected the Mexican immigrants but because of their actions this wall had to be put up. Now don't get me wrong there are many good well manured Mexican people and I have nothing against them. The wall was really meant for the people who wanted to do harm to America and had no right to be here.
Explanation:
The Bessemer process was a method of producing cheap
a. Oil
b. Steel
C. Electricity
d. Cotton cloth
Question 4 of 10
Organizing the battles of the American Civil War according to which
campaign they belong to is an example of which of the following skills?
A. Comparing and contrasting
B. Data analysis
C. Categorization
O D. Sequencing
What was the social impact of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education?
A) It increased support for segregation by business owners.
B) It strengthened the growing civil rights movement.
C) It reduced interest in public protest relating to civil rights issues.
D) It generated interest in the link between grades and emotions.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The main social impact of the result of Brown v. Board of Education was that B) It strengthened the growing civil rights movement.
Brown v. Board of EducationWas a Supreme Court case based on segregation in education. Resulted in the Supreme Court declaring that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.This gave a massive boost to the Civil Rights movement as they then began to argue that if segregation was unconstitutional in education, it should be unconstitutional across the board.
Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at https://brainly.com/question/9857823.
Who was the 19 president
Answer:
It has to have been Rutherford B. Hayes.
Explanation:
It has been said that he was the 19th president of the United States in 1877-1881.
Note to you:
Hope this helped and have a good one!
✍(◔◡◔)52. How did the concept of Social Darwinism affect the colonists after the war?
Pls answer!!
I’ll mark brainliest!
How many times smaller is a group of 7 coins than a group of 21 coins?
Answer:
3
Explanation:
if you divide 7 and 21 you get 3 groups and if you 7x3 is 21
Mostly an agricultural region with work done by slaves
A. North
B. South
PLEASE HELP!!
Please do not put a file link!
What was one of the most important parts of Abraham Lincoln‘s plan to rebuild south south after the Civil War?
A. Using federal power to help the south and force new black codes
B. Making sure that slavery would not return the south
C. Punishing southern leaders for betraying United States
D. Allowing southern states to control their own affairs
7. Other than textiles, what three industries began to grow in South Carolina?
Answer: The nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw the tremendous growth of the aptly named ''Big Three'' North Carolina industries—tobacco, textiles, and furniture. The manufacture of the many products related to these industries grew naturally from the availability of raw materials in the state.
Explanation: