the total amount gail earns, t, is directly proportional to h, the number of house she works. gail worked 40 hours last week and earned $394. what is the constant proportionality in this situation

Answer:

x<3

Step-by-step explanation:

2(x+5)<16

first expand the backers

2x+10<16

take away 10 from each side

2x<6

then divide by 2 on each side

x<3

When U = 10, the value of n is 112.604.

We are given that the number n is the algebraic sum of two terms:

Term 1 varies directly as u.

Term 2 varies inversely as U².

Let's denote the first term as k1 u, where k1 is the constant of proportionality.

And let's denote the second term as k2/U², where k2 is another constant of proportionality.

We have,

When U = 2, n = 22.

When U = 8, n = 56.5.

So, Equation 1: n = k1u + k2/U²

Equation 2: 22 = k1(2) + k2/(2)²

Equation 3: 56.5 = k1(8) + k2/(8)²

Let's solve these equations to find the values of k1 and k2.

Equation 2 becomes: 22 = 2k1 + k2/4

Equation 3 becomes: 56.5 = 8k1 + k2/64

To eliminate k2, let's multiply Equation 2 by 64:

1408 = 128k1 + k2

Now we have two equations with two variables:

128k1 + k2 = 1408

8k1 + k2/64 = 56.5

Let's subtract Equation

120k1 = 1351.5

k1 = 1351.5 / 120

k1 = 11.2625

Substituting the value of k1 back into Equation 2:

22 = 2(11.2625) + k2/4

22 = 22.525 + k2/4

k2/4 = 22 - 22.525

k2/4 = -0.525

k2 = -2.1

Now we have the values of k1 and k2:

k1 = 11.2625

k2 = -2.1

Finally, we can find the value of n when U = 10 by substituting these values into Equation 1:

n = k1u + k2/U²

n = 11.2625(10) - 2.1/(10)²

n = 112.625 - 2.1/100

n = 112.625 - 0.021

n ≈ 112.604

Therefore, when U = 10, the value of n is 112.604.

Learn more about Proportional relation here:

https://brainly.com/question/9184010

#SPJ1

Newton's Method to approximate the positive root of the equation [tex]sin(x)=x^2[/tex] is x ≈ 0.8913959953

Firstly, We know that :

The formula of Newton's Method :

[tex]x_n_+_1=x_n-\frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}[/tex]

We have the equation [tex]sinx=x^{2}[/tex]:

So we need to change the equation into a function. This is done by moving all terms to one side:

[tex]f(x) =sinx-x^{2}[/tex]

And we need the derivative:

[tex]f'(x)= cosx-2x[/tex]

Write f(x) into Y1 and f'(x) into Y2.

[tex]A-\frac{Y_1(A)}{Y_2(A)}[/tex]→A

Finally, you need a starting value, [tex]x_1[/tex]. Since the question is asking for a positive root, we know that sinx has a maximum value of 1 at x =[tex]\frac{\pi }{2}[/tex] and [tex]x^{2} =1[/tex] So we can say that the root is less than 1 and therefore will be the starting value.

then, the value is:

x ≈ 0.8913959953

Learn more about Newton's formula at:

https://brainly.com/question/23950758

#SPJ4

False. The range of a linear transformation is a subset of the codomain, not the domain.

The domain is the set of inputs to the transformation, while the codomain is the set of possible outputs. The range is the set of actual outputs produced by the transformation. The statement "The range of a linear transformation must be a subset of the domain" is false. The range of a linear transformation is a subset of the codomain, not the domain. The domain is the set of input vectors, while the codomain contains the possible output vectors after applying the linear transformation.

To know more about linear transformation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13595405

#SPJ11

We want to find the dimensions of the rectangle of maximum area that can be inscribed in the ellipse $3x + 75y = 75$, with sides parallel to the coordinate axes.

Let the length of the rectangle be $x$, and the width be $y$. Then, the area of the rectangle is $A = xy$.

Since the sides of the rectangle are parallel to the coordinate axes, its vertices lie on the ellipse $3x + 75y = 75$. The endpoints of the rectangle's length must lie on the x-axis, so we set $y=0$ and solve for $x$:

 3x + 75*0 = 75  

  x = 25

Similarly, the endpoints of the rectangle's width must lie on the y-axis, so we set $x=0$ and solve for $y$:

3*0 + 75y = 75

y = 1

Therefore, the rectangle with sides parallel to the coordinate axes and maximum area that can be inscribed in the ellipse has length $x=25$ and width $y=1$.

The area of the rectangle is $A=xy=25*1 = {25}$.

To know more about area refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/16151549?#

SPJ11

The -1 part is not inside the natural log.

==============================================

Work Shown:

1 + 2*e^(x+1) = 9

2*e^(x+1) = 9-1

2*e^(x+1) = 8

e^(x+1) = 8/2

e^(x+1) = 4

x+1 = Ln(4)

x = Ln(4) - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter is 20.2     <=====given

  then radius is 1/2 of this = 10.1

      radius = 5.1 + x   = 10 .1

                        x = 5   units      Tha's it.

Answer:

d< or = to 200

w < 2500

Step-by-step explanation:

no more means it's either less or equal to 200

less than doesn't have and equal sign

The answers that are true about the graph that represents y = 2x(x - 11) are:

         [tex]\sf y = a(x - h)^2 + k[/tex]

         Vertex of the parabola will be (h, k)

Given in the question,

Convert the equation in the vertex form,

[tex]\sf y = 2x^2 - 22x[/tex]

[tex]\sf y = 2(x^2 - 11x)[/tex]

[tex]\sf y = 2[x^2 - 2(5.5x) + (5.5)^2 - (5.5)^2][/tex]

[tex]\sf y = 2[(x - 5.5)^2 - 30.25][/tex]

[tex]\sf y = 2(x - 5.5)^2 - 60.5[/tex]

  Vertex of the parabola will be (5.5, -60.5).

For x-intercepts,

Substitute y = 0,

[tex]\sf 0 = 2x(x - 11)[/tex]

[tex]\sf \rightarrow x = 0, 11[/tex]

   Therefore, x-intercepts of the parabola will be (0, 0) and (11, 0).

Hence, x-intercepts of the parabola are (0, 0) and (11, 0)

           x-coordinate of the vertex is x = 5.5

Learn more about the quadratic equations here,

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

The system of equations has no solution.

An equation is arrangement of variables and coefficient which provides to understand given statement in form of numbers. That means a mathematical statement consisting of an equal symbol between two algebraic expressions that have the same value.

Given equation y = 5x + 10 and other equation y = 5x + 2.

to check if two have any solution possible we will substitute value and check if RHS = LHS or not.

[tex]\sf \therefore y=5x+10=5x+2[/tex]

[tex]\sf =5x+10=5x+2[/tex]

[tex]\sf \rightarrow 0= -8[/tex]

Hence RHS ≠ LHS hence no solution is possible.

Learn more about finding solutions here: https://brainly.com/question/29049521

The solutions are x = -4 and x = 1/2 and the solutions are not extraneous

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

(x + 2)/x = (3 -x)/(2 - 3x)

Cross multiply

So, we have

x(3 - x) = (x + 2)(2 - 3x)

When the equation is expanded, we have

3x - x² = 2x - 6x + 4 - 3x²

Evaluate the like terms

2x² + 7x - 4 = 0

Evalaute

x = -4 and x = 1/2

Hence, the solutions are x = -4 and x = 1/2 and the solutions are not extraneous

Learn more on equation at:

https://brainly.com/question/148035

#SPJ1

No, the events are not independent. In the first scenario, Lacy draws a heart from a standard deck of 52 cards, and without replacing it, draws a second card and gets a club.

The probability of drawing a heart on the first draw is 13/52 (since there are 13 hearts in a deck of 52 cards). However, after the heart is drawn, there are now only 51 cards remaining in the deck, and only 12 clubs. Therefore, the probability of drawing a club on the second draw, given that a heart was already drawn, is 12/51. Since the probability of drawing a club on the second draw changes depending on the outcome of the first draw, these events are not independent.

In the second scenario, Linda draws a heart from a standard deck of 52 cards, returns it to the deck, and then draws a second card. The probability of drawing a heart on the first draw is again 13/52. However, since the heart is returned to the deck before the second draw, the composition of the deck remains the same. Therefore, the probability of drawing a club on the second draw is still 13/52. In this case, the outcome of the first draw does not affect the probability of drawing a club on the second draw, indicating that these events are independent.

Learn more about probability here: https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The volume of the solid region R bounded by the surface f(x, y) = [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] and the planes y = 0, y = x, and x = 1 is 1 - 1/e.

The area that any three-dimensional solid occupies is known as its volume. These solids can take the form of a cube, cuboid, cone, cylinder, or sphere.

To find the volume of the solid region R bounded by the surface f(x, y) = [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] and the planes y = 0, y = x, and x = 1, we need to set up a triple integral.

First, let's find the limits of integration for each variable:

For x, it ranges from 0 to 1.

For y, it ranges from 0 to x.

For z, it ranges from 0 to f(x, y) = [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex].

Now, the volume can be calculated as follows:

V = ∫∫∫R dV

 = ∫[0 to 1] ∫[0 to x] ∫[0 to [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex]] dz dy dx

Let's evaluate this triple integral step by step:

V = ∫[0 to 1] ∫[0 to x] [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] dz dy dx

Integrating with respect to z, the innermost integral, we get:

V = ∫[0 to 1] ∫[0 to x] z |[0 to [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex]] dy dx

 = ∫[0 to 1] ∫[0 to x] [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] - 0 dy dx

 = ∫[0 to 1] [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] * (y)|[0 to x] dx

 = ∫[0 to 1] [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] * (x - 0) dx

 = ∫[0 to 1] x * [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] dx

Now, let's substitute u = [tex]-x^2[/tex], du = -2x dx:

V = ∫[0 to 1] x * [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] dx

 = -∫[0 to 1] [tex]e^u[/tex] du

 = -[[tex]e^u[/tex]]|[0 to 1]

 = -([tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex])|[0 to 1]

 = [tex]-(e^{(-1^2)[/tex] - [tex]e^{(-0^2)})[/tex]

 = -([tex]e^{(-1)[/tex] - [tex]e^0[/tex])

 = -(1/e - 1)

 = 1 - 1/e

Therefore, the volume of the solid region R bounded by the surface f(x, y) = [tex]e^{(-x^2)[/tex] and the planes y = 0, y = x, and x = 1 is 1 - 1/e.

Learn more about volume on:

https://brainly.com/question/6204273

#SPJ4

The value that is minimized in the regression model using the least squares method is the sum of the squared residuals. The least squares method is a common approach for fitting a linear regression model to a set of data, and it is often used in statistical analysis to find the relationship between two variables.

When we use the least squares method in a regression model, we are trying to find the line of best fit that minimizes the sum of the squares of the differences between the predicted values and the actual values. In other words, we are trying to minimize the sum of the squared residuals.
The residuals are the differences between the predicted values and the actual values. Squaring the residuals ensures that they are all positive, which makes it easier to sum and analyze them. By minimizing the sum of the squared residuals, we are finding the line of best fit that is closest to the actual data points.
The value that is minimized in the regression model using the least squares method is the sum of the squared residuals. The least squares method is a common approach for fitting a linear regression model to a set of data, and it is often used in statistical analysis to find the relationship between two variables.

To know more about squares method visit :

https://brainly.com/question/24326530

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 offices in 6 hours 6x2 equals to 12 so the cleaning crew can clean 10 offices in 12 hours

(a) The number of five-digit integers divisible by 5 can be calculated by finding the number of multiples of 5 within the given range.

To determine the count of multiples, we need to find the first and last multiples of 5 within the range. The first multiple of 5 greater than or equal to 10,000 is 10,000 itself. The last multiple of 5 less than or equal to 99,999 is 99,995. Thus, the range contains 99,995 - 10,000 + 1 = 89,996 integers. To calculate the count of five-digit integers divisible by 5, we divide this range count by 5: 89,996 ÷ 5 = 17,999. Therefore, there are 17,999 five-digit integers divisible by 5.

(b) To determine the probability of randomly selecting a five-digit integer that is divisible by 5, we need to calculate the ratio of the number of five-digit integers divisible by 5 to the total number of five-digit integers. The total count of five-digit integers can be calculated by finding the range count from 10,000 to 99,999: 99,999 - 10,000 + 1 = 90,000. Therefore, the probability can be calculated as (17,999 ÷ 90,000) × 100% = 19.999%, which can be approximated as 20%. Hence, the probability that a randomly chosen five-digit integer is divisible by 5 is 20%.

To learn more about integer click here:

brainly.com/question/7585708

#SPJ11

If 6 inches represent 20 feet, then 33 inches would represent 110 feet in reality.

To determine the number of feet represented by 33 inches, we can set up a proportion using the given information:

6 inches represents 20 feet

Let's represent the number of feet represented by 33 inches as "x." The proportion can be set up as follows:

6 inches / 20 feet = 33 inches / x feet

Now we can cross-multiply:

6 inches × x feet = 33 inches * 20 feet

Simplifying further:

6x = 660

Dividing both sides of the equation by 6:

x = 660 / 6

x = 110

Therefore, 33 inches represents 110 feet.

for such more question on feet

https://brainly.com/question/6204273

#SPJ11

The two points where the line meets the circle are (3,6) and (8,3).

To find the coordinates of the point where the line 2x+2y=18 meets the circle (x-2)^2+(y-3)^2=16, we need to first solve the system of equations.

We can start by simplifying the equation of the line by dividing both sides by 2, giving us x+y=9. We can then substitute y=9-x into the equation of the circle,

which results in (x-2)^2+(9-x-3)^2=16. Simplifying this equation yields x^2-4x+4+x^2-12x+81=16. Combining like terms and solving for x, we get x=3 or x=8.

Substituting these values back into the equation of the line gives us the corresponding y-coordinates of 6 and 3, respectively.

To learn more about : line

https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ11

The perfect square trinomials among the given options are A) x²-12x+36 and E) 49x²-56x + 16.

A perfect square trinomial is a trinomial that can be factored as the square of a binomial. To determine which polynomials are perfect square trinomials, we need to check if the polynomial can be factored in the form (ax + b)².

Let's analyze each option:

A) x²-12x+36:

This can be factored as (x-6)², so it is a perfect square trinomial.

B) 36x²-12x+1:

This cannot be factored as the square of a binomial, so it is not a perfect square trinomial.

C) x²-100:

This can be factored as (x-10)(x+10), but it is not in the form (ax + b)², so it is not a perfect square trinomial.

D) 4x² + 81:

This cannot be factored as the square of a binomial, so it is not a perfect square trinomial.

E) 49x²-56x + 16:

This can be factored as (7x-4)², so it is a perfect square trinomial.

Therefore, the perfect square trinomials among the given options are A) x²-12x+36 and E) 49x²-56x + 16.

for such more question on perfect square trinomials

https://brainly.com/question/30069840

#SPJ11

The percentage of spiders that weigh less than 10 grams can be calculated using the normal distribution. The answer is approximately 30.85%, which corresponds to option a.

To determine this percentage, we need to calculate the area under the normal curve to the left of the value 10 grams. We can convert this value into a standardized z-score using the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value (10 grams), μ is the mean (11 grams), and σ is the standard deviation (2 grams). Substituting the values, we get z = (10 - 11) / 2 = -0.5.

We can then use a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator to find the area to the left of the z-score -0.5, which is approximately 0.3085 or 30.85%. This indicates that approximately 30.85% of spiders weigh less than 10 grams, leading to the conclusion of option a.

To learn more about normal distribution click here:

brainly.com/question/17199694

#SPJ11

Therefore, the primary derivatives are: df/dx = 3x^2 * y^4 * z^4, df/dy = 4x^3 * y^3 * z^4, df/dz = 4x^3 * y^4 * z^3.

To calculate the primary derivatives of f(x, y, z) = x^3 * y^4 * z^4, where x = s^3 * t^2, y = st, and z = st, we need to differentiate f with respect to each variable x, y, and z.

The partial derivative with respect to x (df/dx) is obtained by treating y and z as constants and differentiating x^3 with respect to x:

df/dx = 3x^2 * y^4 * z^4

The partial derivative with respect to y (df/dy) is obtained by treating x and z as constants and differentiating y^4 with respect to y:

df/dy = 4x^3 * y^3 * z^4

The partial derivative with respect to z (df/dz) is obtained by treating x and y as constants and differentiating z^4 with respect to z:

df/dz = 4x^3 * y^4 * z^3

To know more about derivatives,

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

Multiple regression analysis is applied when analyzing the relationship between one dependent variable and two or more independent variables. The goal is to determine the extent to which the independent variables predict the dependent variable.

Multiple regression analysis is a statistical technique used to explore and quantify the relationship between a dependent variable and multiple independent variables. It allows researchers to examine how changes in one or more independent variables impact the dependent variable, while controlling for the effects of other variables. By estimating the coefficients for each independent variable, the analysis provides insights into the strength, direction, and significance of their relationships with the dependent variable. This method is commonly employed in various fields, such as economics, social sciences, and business, to understand complex relationships and make predictions based on the interplay of multiple factors.

To know more about Multiple regression analysis , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30011167

#SPJ11

Therefore, the Fourier series representation of f(x) = π - x on the interval -π < x < π is: f(x) = π/2 + Σ((2/π^2) * [(-1)^n - 1.

To find the Fourier series of the function f(x) = π - x on the interval -π < x < π, we can use the standard Fourier series formulas for periodic functions.

The Fourier series representation of f(x) can be expressed as:

f(x) = a₀/2 + Σ(aₙcos(nx) + bₙsin(nx))

where a₀, aₙ, and bₙ are the Fourier coefficients.

To determine the Fourier coefficients, we need to calculate the following integrals:

a₀ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] f(x) dx

aₙ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] f(x) * cos(nx) dx

bₙ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] f(x) * sin(nx) dx

Let's calculate these coefficients step by step:

a₀:

a₀ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] (π - x) dx

= (1/π) * [πx - (x^2/2)] | from -π to π

= (1/π) * [ππ - (π^2/2) - (-ππ + (π^2/2))]

= (1/π) * [π^2 - π^2/2 + π^2 - π^2/2]

= π

aₙ:

aₙ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] (π - x) * cos(nx) dx

= (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] πcos(nx) - xcos(nx) dx

= (1/π) * [π * (sin(nx)/n) - ∫[-π, π] xcos(nx) dx]

= (1/π) * [π * (sin(nx)/n) - [x * (sin(nx)/n^2) + (cos(nx)/n^2)] | from -π to π

= (1/π) * [π * (sin(nx)/n) - [π * (sin(nx)/n^2) + (cos(nx)/n^2) - (-π * (sin(nx)/n^2) + (cos(nx)/n^2))]]

= 0

bₙ:

bₙ = (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] (π - x) * sin(nx) dx

= (1/π) * ∫[-π, π] πsin(nx) - xsin(nx) dx

= (1/π) * [-π * (cos(nx)/n) - ∫[-π, π] xsin(nx) dx]

= (1/π) * [-π * (cos(nx)/n) - [-x * (cos(nx)/n^2) + (sin(nx)/n^2)] | from -π to π

= (1/π) * [-π * (cos(nx)/n) - [-π * (cos(nx)/n^2) + (sin(nx)/n^2) - (-π * (cos(nx)/n^2) + (sin(nx)/n^2))]]

= (2/π^2) * [(-1)^n - 1]

To know more about Fourier series,

https://brainly.com/question/32261876

#SPJ11

a. The equation will be THC(x) = 304 mg * (0.48)^(x/10)

b. After 60 days, there will still be approximately 4.53 mg of THC in the person's body.

a. To describe the amount of THC in a person's body x days after consuming 8 ounces of marijuana, we can use the equation:

THC(x) = 304 mg * (0.48)^(x/10)

In this equation, x represents the number of days since the consumption of 8 ounces of marijuana, and THC(x) represents the amount of THC in milligrams in the person's body at that time.

b. To find out how much THC will be in the person's body after 60 days, we need to substitute x = 60 into the equation:

THC(60) = 304 mg * (0.48)^6

Calculating this expression, we get:

THC(60) ≈ 304 mg * 0.0149

≈ 4.53 mg

Learn more about equations on

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:

$938.46

Step-by-step explanation:

862.95 is 100% of the price before tax.

if sales tax is 8.75%, then we need (100 + 8.75)%.

that's one whole + 8.75%.

862.95 X 1.0875 = 938.458.

this is $938.46 to nearest cent

The following statements are true:

The red light is reflected.

The blue light is absorbed.

When white light, which consists of a combination of all visible colors, illuminates the book with a red cover, the red light component in the white light is reflected by the book cover. As a result, we perceive the book to be red since that is the color of light being reflected back to our eyes.

On the other hand, the blue light component in the white light is not reflected by the red book cover. Instead, it is absorbed by the cover, which means the material of the book cover absorbs the blue light and does not reflect it back. Consequently, we do not see the blue light, and the book still appears to be red.

To learn more about reflection click here: brainly.com/question/15487308
#SPJ11

a) f(2) = 2f(1) + 3 = 2*5 + 3 = 13

b) f(8) = 2f(4) + 3 = 2(2f(2) + 3) + 3 = 2(2(2f(1) + 3) + 3) + 3 = 47

c) f(64) = 2f(32) + 3 = 2(2f(16) + 3) + 3 = 2(2(2f(8) + 3) + 3) + 3 = 515

d) f(1024) = 2f(512) + 3 = 2(2f(256) + 3) + 3 = ... = 4194315

The given recursive formula for f(n) is f(n) = 2f(n/2) + 3 when n is an even positive integer, and f(1) = 5.

To find f(2), we can simply use the formula with n=2, which gives us f(2) = 2f(1) + 3 = 2*5 + 3 = 13.

To find f(8), we can use the formula repeatedly with decreasing values of n, until we get to f(8). We first use n=4, which gives us f(4) = 2f(2) + 3. We then use n=2, which gives us f(2) = 2f(1) + 3. Plugging this into the previous equation gives us f(4) = 2(2f(1) + 3) + 3 = 11. Finally, we use n=8 with f(4) = 11, which gives us f(8) = 2f(4) + 3 = 2(11) + 3 = 47.

Using similar reasoning, we can find f(64) by repeatedly applying the formula with decreasing values of n until we get to f(64), and f(1024) in the same way.

For more questions like Formula click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/20748250

#SPJ11

To solve the given differential equation using the Laplace transform, we will follow these steps:

Step 1: Take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation.

Step 2: Solve for the Laplace transform of the unknown function.

Step 3: Use the inverse Laplace transform to obtain the solution in the time domain.

Let's begin with Step 1:

Taking the Laplace transform of the given differential equation, we have:

s^2 * Y(s) - 2s * y(0) - y'(0) - 15Y(s) = 1/s

Here, Y(s) represents the Laplace transform of the unknown function y(t).

Now, applying the initial conditions y(0) = 0 and y'(0) = 0, we get:

s^2 * Y(s) - 15Y(s) = 1/s

Step 2:

To solve for Y(s), we can factor out Y(s) as a common factor:

Y(s) * (s^2 - 15) = 1/s

Dividing both sides by (s^2 - 15), we have:

Y(s) = 1 / (s * (s^2 - 15))

Now, we need to express the right side in partial fractions. Let's decompose it as follows:

1 / (s * (s^2 - 15)) = A/s + (Bs + C) / (s^2 - 15)

To determine the constants A, B, and C, we multiply both sides by the common denominator:

1 = A * (s^2 - 15) + (Bs + C) * s

Expanding and collecting like terms:

1 = (A * s^2 + Bs^2 + Cs) - 15A

Comparing coefficients of like powers of s:

0s^2: B = 0

1s: C = 0

s^2: A = -1/15

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition is:

1 / (s * (s^2 - 15)) = -1 / (15s) + 0 / (s^2 - 15)

Substituting the partial fraction decomposition into Y(s), we get:

Y(s) = -1 / (15s) + 0 / (s^2 - 15)

Simplifying:

Y(s) = -1 / (15s)

Step 3:

Now, we need to find the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s) to obtain the solution in the time domain.

Using a standard Laplace transform table, we find that the inverse Laplace transform of -1 / (15s) is:

y(t) = -1/15 * (1 - e^(0t))

Since e^(0t) is equal to 1, we can simplify the equation further:

y(t) = -1/15 * (1 - 1)

y(t) = 0

Therefore, the solution to the given differential equation is y(t) = 0.

5.5 hours pass as Ping flies before the two ducks are 493 miles apart.

The distance traveled by Ping can be calculated as the product of its speed (52 mph) and time:

Distance_Ping = 52t

The distance traveled by Pong can be calculated as the product of its speed (46 mph) and time:

Distance_Pong = 46(t - 1)

Distance_Ping + Distance_Pong = 493

52t + 46(t - 1) = 493

Simplifying the equation:

52t + 46t - 46 = 493

98t = 539

Dividing both sides by 98:

t = 5.5

Therefore, Ping flies for 5.5 hours before the two ducks are 493 miles apart.

Learn more about Mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ1

Answer: 82%

To find the probability that a stamp chosen at random from Macie's collection is from Belgium, we need to divide the number of stamps from Belgium by the total number of stamps in her collection.

Probability = Number of stamps from Belgium / Total number of stamps

Probability = 41 / 50

To convert this fraction to a percentage, we can multiply it by 100:

Probability as a percentage = (41 / 50) x 100% = 82%

So, the probability that a stamp chosen at random from Macie's collection is from Belgium is 82%.

User

why do we need to do this? we need to divide the number of stamps from Belgium by the total number of stamps in her collection.

ChatGPT

We need to do this because probability is a way to measure the likelihood of an event occurring. In this case, the event is selecting a stamp from Belgium out of Macie's collection, and the probability is the number of stamps from Belgium divided by the total number of stamps in her collection. By dividing the number of stamps from Belgium by the total number of stamps, we get the proportion of stamps in her collection that are from Belgium, which is a way to measure the likelihood of selecting a stamp from Belgium. Expressing this proportion as a percentage gives us a more intuitive understanding of the probability.