Two of the ingredients of chocolate are cocoa and sugar. In milk chocolate 20% mass is cocoa and 55% is sugar
A bar of milk chocolate contains 50g of cocoa
How many grams does it contain?

Okay, let's solve this step-by-step:

We are given the recursion relation:

D(k) = p(k-1), k = 1, 2, ...

This means each probability depends on the previous one.

So to calculate p(4), we need to start from the beginning:

p(0) is not given, so we'll assume it's some initial value, call it p0.

Then p(1) = p0  (from the recursion relation)

p(2) = p(1) = p0  (again from the recursion relation)

p(3) = p(2) = p0  

p(4) = p(3) = p0

So in the end, p(4) = p0.

We are given the options for p0:

A) 0.07  B) 0.08  C) 0.09  D) 0.10  E) 0.11

Therefore, the answer is E: p(4) = 0.11

Answer:

$1,233

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$1,233

Step-by-step explanation:

$16 an hour for mowing

$25 for pulling weeds

September - she mowed lawns for 63 hours and pulled weeds for 9 hours.

16(63) + 25(9) = $1,233

Answer:

(3)

Step-by-step explanation:

the limit lines are the same (and correct) in all 4 pictures.

the difference is the applicable side of the lines.

y <= x + 3

because of the "<=" the valid area is below the line. in our case to the right and below the line.

that eliminates (1) and (4).

y >= -2x - 2

because of the ">=" the valid area is above the line. in our case right and above the line.

so, (3) is correct.

The statement "If F and G are vector fields, then curl(F + G) = curl F + curl G" is true.

To explain why, let's consider the curl operation which follows the standard rules of vector calculus. The curl of a vector field is given by the cross product of the del (∇) operator and the vector field. For two vector fields F and G, the statement can be represented mathematically as:

curl(F + G) = curl F + curl G

Now, let's compute the curl of the sum of the vector fields (F + G):

curl(F + G) = ∇ × (F + G)

Using the distributive property of the cross product, we can distribute the del operator across the sum of the vector fields:

∇ × (F + G) = (∇ × F) + (∇ × G)

The left side of the equation represents the curl of the sum of vector fields (F + G), and the right side represents the sum of the individual curls of F and G:

curl(F + G) = curl F + curl G

Therefore, the statement is true, and the curl operation follows the linearity property in vector calculus.

Learn more about curl operation:https://brainly.com/question/29898018

#SPJ11

The point of intersection is (0, 3). This means that the graphs of g(x) and h(x) intersect at the point where x=0 and y=3.

To find the point of intersection between the graphs of g(x)=2x+3 and h(x)=5x+3, we need to solve the equation g(x) = h(x) for x:

2x + 3 = 5x + 3

Subtracting 2x from both sides, we get:

3 = 3x + 3

Subtracting 3 from both sides, we get:

0 = 3x

Dividing both sides by 3, we get:

x = 0

So the graphs of g(x) and h(x) intersect at x = 0. To find the y-coordinate of the point of intersection, we can substitute x = 0 into either g(x) or h(x). Using g(x), we get:

g(0) = 2(0) + 3 = 3

To learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/13690481

#SPJ1

The number of bacteria in a bacteria culture after following number of hours are: a) After 3 hours, there are 12,800 bacteria. b) After t hours, there are 200 * 2^(2t) bacteria. c) After 40 minutes, there are 400 bacteria.

Given that the bacteria culture starts with 200 bacteria and doubles in size every half hour.

a) To find this, we first need to determine how many half-hour intervals are in 3 hours. Since there are 2 half-hours in an hour, we have 3 hours * 2 = 6 half-hour intervals. The bacteria doubles in size every half hour, so we have:
200 bacteria * 2^6 = 200 * 64 = 12,800 bacteria

b) To generalize this for any number of hours (t), we need to find how many half-hour intervals are in t hours. That's 2t half-hour intervals. Then we have:
200 bacteria * 2^(2t)

c) First, we need to convert 40 minutes to hours. Since there are 60 minutes in an hour, we have 40/60 = 2/3 hours. We then find how many half-hour intervals are in 2/3 hours: (2/3) * 2 = 4/3 intervals. Since we can't have a fraction of an interval, we'll round down to 1 interval (since the bacteria doubles every half-hour). Then we have:
200 bacteria * 2^1 = 200 * 2 = 400 bacteria

Know more about bacteria culture here:

https://brainly.com/question/29180886

#SPJ11

The molecular shape of beryllium fluoride (BeF2) is linear. The molecular shape of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is bent with a bond angle of approximately 92 degrees.

predict the molecular shape of these compounds:

1. Ammonia (NH3):
Ammonia has a central nitrogen atom with three hydrogen atoms bonded to it and one lone pair of electrons. This gives it a molecular shape of trigonal pyramidal.

2. Ammonium (NH4+):
Ammonium has a central nitrogen atom with four hydrogen atoms bonded to it. It does not have any lone pairs of electrons. This gives it the molecular shape of a tetrahedral.

3. Beryllium fluoride (BeF2):
Beryllium fluoride has a central beryllium atom with two fluorine atoms bonded to it. It does not have any lone pairs of electrons. This gives it a molecular shape of linear.

4. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S):
Hydrogen sulfide has a central sulfur atom with two hydrogen atoms bonded to it and two lone pairs of electrons. This gives it a molecular shape of bent.

to learn more about trigonal pyramidal click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31129852

#SPJ11

The following parts can be answered by the concept of null hypothesis.

a) The best conclusion if H0 is rejected is (ii) The scale is not in calibration.

b) If the scale is actually in calibration but the conclusion is reached that the scale is not in calibration, it would be a Type I error

a) If H0 is rejected, it means that there is enough evidence to suggest that the population mean reading on the scale is not equal to 10, which indicates that the scale is not in calibration. Therefore, the best conclusion in this case would be (ii) The scale is not in calibration.

b) If the conclusion is reached that the scale is not in calibration, but in reality, it is actually in calibration (i.e., μ=10), it would be a Type I error. This is because the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected incorrectly, leading to a false conclusion. Therefore, the type of error in this case would be a Type I error.

Therefore, the answer is:

a) The best conclusion if H0 is rejected is (ii) The scale is not in calibration.

b) If the scale is actually in calibration but the conclusion is reached that the scale is not in calibration, it would be a Type I error

To learn more about null hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/30465063#

#SPJ11

The volume of the region E is 2([tex]2 - \sqrt(2)[/tex]).

The region E is bounded by the plane z = 0, the plane z = 1, and the surface[tex]x^2y^2z^2 = 4[/tex]. To find its volume, we can use a triple integral over the region:

V = ∭E dV

Since the region is bounded by z = 0 and z = 1, we can integrate over z first and then over the region in the xy-plane:

V = ∫∫∫E dV = ∫∫R ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] dz dA

where R is the region in the xy-plane defined by [tex]x^2y^2z^2 = 4[/tex]. To find the limits of integration for the integral over R, we can solve for one of the variables in terms of the other two.

For example, solving for z in terms of x and y gives:

z = 2/(xy)

Since z is between 0 and 1, we have:

0 ≤ z ≤ 1 ⇔ xy ≥ 2

So the region R is the set of points in the xy-plane where xy ≥ 2. This is a region in the first and third quadrants, bounded by the hyperbola xy = 2.

To find the limits of integration for the double integral, we can integrate over y first, since the limits of integration for y depend on x.

For a fixed value of x, the y-limits are given by the intersection of the hyperbola xy = 2 with the line x = const. This intersection occurs at y = 2/x, so the limits of integration for y are:

2/x ≤ y ≤ ∞

To find the limits of integration for x, we can note that the hyperbola xy = 2 is symmetric about the line y = x.

So we can integrate over the region where [tex]x \geq \sqrt(2)[/tex] and then multiply the result by 2. Thus, the limits of integration for x are:

[tex]\sqrt(2)[/tex] ≤ x ≤ ∞

Putting everything together, we have:

V =[tex]2\int \sqrt(2)\infty \int 2/x \infty \int 0^1[/tex]dz dy dx

Integrating over z gives:

V = [tex]2\int \sqrt(2) \infty \int 2/x \infty z|0^1 dy dx = 2\int \sqrt(2)\infty \int 2/x \infty dy dx[/tex]

Integrating over y gives:

[tex]V = 2\int \sqrt(2)\infty [y]2/x\infty dx = 2\int \sqrt(2)\infty (2/x - 2/\sqrt(2)) dx[/tex]

[tex]= 4\int \sqrt(2)\infty (1/x - 1/\sqrt(2)) dx[/tex]

= [tex]4(ln(x) - \sqrt(2) ln(x)|\sqrt(2)\infty)[/tex]

= [tex]4(ln(\sqrt(2)) - \sqrt(2) ln(\sqrt(2))) = 4(1 - \sqrt(2)/2) = 2(2 - \sqrt(2))[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the region E is 2([tex]2 - \sqrt(2)[/tex]).

Learn more about volume of the region

brainly.com/question/15166233

#SPJ11

Note that where the above graph is given, the values of x where f(x) = 0 are:
x =2 and

x= 4.

The value of x where fx) = 0 are the point on the curve where the curve intersects the x-axis.

those points are :

2 and 4.

Note that his is a downward facing parabola or a concave downward curve because of it's u shape.

Examples of real-life downward-facing parabolas are:

The fountain's water shoots into the air and returns in a parabolic route.

A parabolic route is likewise followed by a ball thrown into the air. This was proved by Galileo.

Anyone who has ridden a roller coaster is also familiar with the rise and fall caused by the track's parabolas.

Learn more about graphs:
https://brainly.com/question/17267403
#SPJ1

Full Question:

See the attached

Answer:

0+8=8

8+0=8

8-0=8

8-8=0

Answer:

f(2) = 24

Step-by-step explanation:

to evaluate f(2) substitute x = 2 into f(x) , that is

f(2) = 15(2) - 6 = 30 - 6 = 24

The value of the line integral is [tex]3/10 b^5[/tex].

To integrate [tex]f(x,y)xy[/tex] over the curve [tex]c: x^2y^2[/tex] in the first quadrant from (a,0) to (0,b), we need to parameterize the curve c and then evaluate the line integral.

Let's start by parameterizing the curve c:

[tex]x = t[/tex]

[tex]y = sqrt(b^2 - t^2)[/tex]

where [tex]0 ≤ t ≤ a[/tex]

Note that we used the equation [tex]x^2y^2 = a^2b^2[/tex] to solve for y in terms of x. We also restricted t to the interval [0,a] to ensure that the curve c lies in the first quadrant and goes from (a,0) to (0,b).

Next, we need to evaluate the line integral:

[tex]∫_c f(x,y)xy ds[/tex]

where ds is the differential arc length along the curve c. We can express ds in terms of dt:

[tex]ds = sqrt(dx/dt^2 + dy/dt^2) dt[/tex]

where dx/dt and dy/dt are the derivatives of x and y with respect to t, respectively.

Substituting the parameterization and ds into the line integral, we get:

[tex]∫_c f(x,y)xy ds = ∫_0^a f(t, sqrt(b^2 - t^2)) * t * sqrt(b^2 + (-t^2 + b^2)) dt[/tex]

[tex]= ∫_0^a f(t, sqrt(b^2 - t^2)) * t * sqrt(2b^2 - t^2) dt[/tex]

[tex]= ∫_0^a t^3 * (b^2 - t^2) * sqrt(2b^2 - t^2) dt[/tex]

Now, we can integrate this expression using substitution. Let [tex]u = 2b^2 - t^2[/tex], then [tex]du/dt = -2t and dt = -du/(2t)[/tex]. Substituting, we get:

sq[tex]∫_0^a t^3 * (b^2 - t^2) * sqrt(2b^2 - t^2) dt = -1/2 * ∫_u(2b^2) (b^2 - u/2) *[/tex]

[tex]rt(u) du[/tex]

[tex]= -1/2 * [∫_u(2b^2) b^2 * sqrt(u) du - 1/2 ∫_u(2b^2) u^(3/2) du][/tex]

[tex]= -1/2 * [2/5 b^2 u^(5/2) - 1/10 u^(5/2)]_u(2b^2)[/tex]

[tex]= -1/2 * [2/5 b^2 (2b^2)^(5/2) - 1/10 (2b^2)^(5/2) - 2/5 b^2 u^(5/2) + 1/10 u^(5/2)]_0^(2b)[/tex]

[tex]= -1/2 * [4/5 b^5 - 1/10 (2b^2)^(5/2)][/tex]

[tex]= 2/5 b^5 - 1/20 b^5[/tex]

[tex]= 3/10 b^5[/tex]

Therefore, the value of the line integral is [tex]3/10 b^5[/tex].

To learn more about parameterize visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31055234

#SPJ11

The 0.790 is first-quandrant area inside the rose r = 3 sin 20 but outside the circle r = 2. The correct answer is (C).

For more such question on quandrant

https://brainly.com/question/25038683

#SPJ11

If a and b are both positive integers, then (2a − 1) mod (2b − 1) = 2a mod b − 1, because the left side can be rewritten as (2a mod (2b − 1)) - 1, which equals the right side.

To show that (2a − 1) mod (2b − 1) = 2a mod b − 1, let's break it down step-by-step:

1. Consider (2a − 1) mod (2b − 1). Apply the property of modular arithmetic, which states that (A mod N) = (A mod N) mod N.

2. This gives us (2a mod (2b − 1)) - 1.

3. Observe that 2a mod (2b − 1) can also be written as 2a mod (2(b − 1) + 1), which equals 2a mod 2(b - 1) + 2a mod 1.

4. Since 2a mod 1 = 0, we have 2a mod 2(b - 1) + 0 = 2a mod 2(b - 1).

5. Apply the distributive property of modular arithmetic to get 2(a mod (b - 1)) = 2a mod b.

6. Substitute this back into the expression from step 2: (2a mod b) - 1.

7. Therefore, (2a − 1) mod (2b − 1) = 2a mod b − 1.

To know more about modular arithmetic click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29022762#

#SPJ11

The measure of angle 8, based on the definition of a corresponding angle is determined as: 98 degrees.

From the image given, angle 8 and 98 degrees are corresponding angles. Corresponding angles can be defined as angles that lie on the same side of a transversal that crosses two parallel lines and also occupy similar corner along the transversal.

Corresponding angles are said to be equal to each other. This means they are congruent.

Therefore, the measure of angle 8 is equal to 98 degrees.

Learn more about the Corresponding angles on:

https://brainly.com/question/28793685

#SPJ1

So dw/dt by using appropriate chain rule is [tex]3e^t + 2e^-t.[/tex]

To find dw/dt, we can use the chain rule of differentiation:

dw/dt = dw/dx * dx/dt + dw/dy * dy/dt

First, we can find dw/dx and dw/dy using the product rule of differentiation:

dw/dx = [tex]y * d/dx(e^t) + x * d/dx(-e^-2t) = ye^t - xe^-2t[/tex]

dw/dy = [tex]x * d/dy(-e^-2t) + y * d/dy(xy) = -xe^-2t + x^2[/tex]

Next, we can substitute the given values of x and y to get w as a function of t:

w = xy =[tex]e^t * (-e^-2t) = -e^-t[/tex]

Finally, we can find dx/dt and dy/dt using the derivative of exponential functions:

dx/dt =[tex]d/dt(e^t) = e^t[/tex]

dy/dt = [tex]d/dt(-e^-2t) = 2e^-2t[/tex]

Substituting all these values into the chain rule expression, we get:

dw/dt =[tex](ye^t - xe^-2t) * e^t + (-xe^-2t + x^2) * 2e^-2t[/tex]

Substituting w = -e^-t, and x and y values, we get:

dw/dt = [tex](-(-e^-t)e^t - e^t(-e^-2t)) * e^t + (-e^t*e^-2t + (e^t)^2) * 2e^-2t[/tex]

Simplifying and grouping like terms, we get:

dw/dt = [tex]3e^t + 2e^-t[/tex]

Therefore, dw/dt =[tex]3e^t + 2e^-t.[/tex]

Learn more about chain rule

brainly.com/question/30117847

#SPJ11

Number of books - 4

Number of pencils - 7

Now, we can order this as a ratio.

A ratio is two numbers put as a proportion. It's normally written out as first number: second number.

In this case, it's the ratio of number of

books: number of pencils.

Fill in the number of books and number of pencils into each side of the equation.

number of books: number of pencils

4 books: 7 pencils (the unit is normally dropped)

So therefore, 4:7 would be your final answer.

Note

Note you have asked for ratio but option is in fraction

Hope this helped!

please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied with my answer is updated

Answer: Ratio of the books to pencil is

Step-by-step explanation:

There are:

7 pencils

5 books

So the ratio of books to pencils is 5:7

To know more in detail about https://brainly.com/question/12145500?referrer=searchResults

The magnitude of the magnetic flux through the circular ring is 3.741×10−4 Tm².

To find the magnitude of the magnetic flux through the circular ring, we can use the formula:

Φ = BA cosθ

where Φ is the magnetic flux, B is the magnetic field strength, A is the area of the ring, and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the ring.

Given that the magnetic field strength is 8.5×10−2 T, the radius of the ring is 3.9 cm (or 0.039 m), and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the ring is 24∘, we can calculate the area of the ring:

A = πr²
A = π(0.039)²
A = 0.0048 m²

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

Φ = (8.5×10−2)(0.0048)cos24∘
Φ = 3.741×10−4 Tm^2

Therefore, the magnitude of the magnetic flux through the circular ring is 3.741×10−4 Tm².

To learn more about magnetic flux here:

brainly.com/question/29447889#

#SPJ11

The constraint for node 8 is not provided in the given information. The constraint x36 x38 − x13 = 0 corresponds to nodes 36, 38, and 13 in the network.

The constraint x36 x38 − x13 = 0 involves three variables: x36, x38, and x13.

The nodes in the network are typically represented by variables, where each node has a corresponding variable associated with it.

The given constraint involves the variables x36, x38, and x13, which means that it corresponds to nodes 36, 38, and 13 in the network.

The constraint indicates that the product of the values of x36 and x38 should be equal to the value of x13 for the constraint to be satisfied.

However, the constraint does not provide any information about the constraint for node 8, as it is not mentioned in the given information.

Therefore, the constraint x36 x38 − x13 = 0 corresponds to nodes 36, 38, and 13 in the network, but no information is available for the constraint for node 8.

To learn more about constraint here:

brainly.com/question/171568483

#SPJ11

The counterclockwise circulation of the field F around the boundary of the region C is given by 2x + 4tx⁴, and the outward flux of F across the boundary of C is zero.

The counterclockwise circulation of the field F=4xyi + 4y^2j around and over the boundary of the region C enclosed by the curves y=x^2 and y=x in the first quadrant is a line integral of the field F along the closed curve C. The outward flux of the field F across the boundary of C can also be calculated as a surface integral over the region C.

To calculate the counterclockwise circulation of the field F around the boundary of C, we can parametrize the curve C as a vector function r(t) = ti + ti^2j, where t varies from 0 to 1. The derivative of r(t) with respect to t, dr/dt, gives us the tangent vector to the curve C.

dr/dt = i + 2tj

Next, we can calculate the dot product of the field F with dr/dt:

F · dr/dt = (4xyi + 4y^2j) · (i + 2tj)

= 4xt + 8ty^2

Substituting y = x^2 (since the curve C is y=x^2), we get:

F · dr/dt = 4xt + 8t(x^2)^2

= 4xt + 8tx⁴

To find the counterclockwise circulation, we integrate F · dr/dt with respect to t from 0 to 1:

∮ F · dr = ∫(0 to 1) (4xt + 8tx⁴) dt

= 4x(1/2)t² + 8tx^4(1/2)t² evaluated from 0 to 1

= 4x(1/2)(1)² + 8tx⁴(1/2)(1)² - 4x(1/2)(0)² - 8tx⁴(1/2)(0)²

= 2x + 4tx⁴

Next, to calculate the outward flux of F across the boundary of C, we can use Green's theorem, which relates the counterclockwise circulation of a field around a closed curve to the outward flux of the curl of the field across the enclosed region.

The curl of F is given by:

curl F = (∂Fy/∂x - ∂Fx/∂y)k

= (0 - 0)k

= 0

Since the curl of F is zero, the outward flux of F across the boundary of C is also zero. Therefore,

The counterclockwise circulation of the field F around the boundary of the region C is 2x + 4tx⁴, and the outward flux of F across the boundary of C is zero.

THEREFORE, the counterclockwise circulation of the field F around the boundary of the region C is given by 2x + 4tx⁴, and the outward flux of F across the boundary of C is zero

To learn more about counterclockwise here:

brainly.com/question/29971286#

#SPJ11

The cylindrical coordinates of the point with rectangular coordinates (x, y, z) = (-3, 5, -1) are (ρ, θ, z) ≈ (sqrt(34), -1.03, -1).

Cylindrical coordinates are a type of coordinate system used in three-dimensional space to locate a point using three coordinates: ρ, θ, and z. The cylindrical coordinate system is based on a cylindrical surface that extends infinitely in the z-direction and has a radius of ρ in the xy-plane.

To convert rectangular coordinates (x, y, z) to cylindrical coordinates (ρ, θ, z), we use the following formulas:

ρ =[tex]\sqrt(x^2 + y^2)[/tex]

θ = arctan(y/x)

z = z

Substituting the given values, we get:

ρ = [tex]\sqrt((-3)^2 + 5^2)[/tex]= sqrt(34)

θ = arctan(5/-3) ≈ -1.03 radians or ≈ -58.8 degrees (measured counterclockwise from the positive x-axis)

z = -1

Therefore, the cylindrical coordinates of the point with rectangular coordinates (x, y, z) = (-3, 5, -1) are (ρ, θ, z) ≈ (sqrt(34), -1.03, -1).

To learn more about cylindrical coordinates   visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31046653

#SPJ11

Answer:

Let’s call the width of the rectangle “w”. Since the length of the rectangle is twice its width, we can call the length “2w”. We know that the diagonal of the rectangle is equal to the square root of 45 cm. Using Pythagorean theorem, we can find that:

diagonal^2 = length^2 + width^2 45 = (2w)^2 + w^2 45 = 4w^2 + w^2 45 = 5w^2 w^2 = 9 w = 3

So the width of the rectangle is 3 cm and its length is twice that, or 6 cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of x for [tex]9^x - 12(3^x) + 27[/tex] = 0 is 1.

We can factor the given expression as follows:

[tex]9^x - 123^x + 27[/tex] = 0

Rewrite 27 as [tex]3^3[/tex]:

Factor out the common factor of 3^x:

Now we can solve for x by setting each factor equal to zero:

[tex]3^x[/tex] = 0 (This has no solution since 3 to any power is always positive)

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

y = (4 ± √(16 - 4))/2

y = 2 ± √(3)

Now substitute y back in terms of x:

Take the natural logarithm of both sides:

Note that both solutions satisfy the original equation, but only x = 1 is a valid solution since [tex]3^x[/tex] cannot be zero.

Learn more about expressions

https://brainly.com/question/25968875

#SPJ4

a. The probability that X is greater than 1/2 is 3/4.

b. The probability that X is greater than 1/2 given that it is greater than 1/4 is 4/5.

a. To find P(X > 1/2), we need to integrate the pdf f(x) from x=1/2 to x=1, since this is the range of x values where X is greater than 1/2:

P(X > 1/2) = ∫(1/2 to 1) f(x) dx = ∫(1/2 to 1) 2x dx

Evaluating the integral:

P(X > 1/2) = [tex][x^2]_{(1/2 to 1)} = 1 - (1/2)^2[/tex] = 3/4

Therefore, the probability that X is greater than 1/2 is 3/4.

b. To find P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4), we need to use the conditional probability formula:

P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4) = P(X > 1/2 and X > 1/4) / P(X > 1/4)

We can simplify the numerator as follows:

P(X > 1/2 and X > 1/4) = P(X > 1/2) = 3/4

We already calculated P(X > 1/2) in part (a). To find the denominator, we integrate the pdf f(x) from x=1/4 to x=1:

P(X > 1/4) = ∫(1/4 to 1) f(x) dx = ∫(1/4 to 1) 2x dx

Evaluating the integral:

P(X > 1/4) = [tex][x^2]_{(1/4 to 1) }[/tex]= 1 - (1/4)^2 = 15/16

Plugging these values into the conditional probability formula:

P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4) = (3/4) / (15/16) = 4/5

Therefore, the probability that X is greater than 1/2 given that it is greater than 1/4 is 4/5.

Learn more about pdf

brainly.com/question/31064509

#SPJ11

a. The probability that X is greater than 1/2 is 3/4.

b. The probability that X is greater than 1/2 given that it is greater than 1/4 is 4/5.

a. To find P(X > 1/2), we need to integrate the pdf f(x) from x=1/2 to x=1, since this is the range of x values where X is greater than 1/2:

P(X > 1/2) = ∫(1/2 to 1) f(x) dx = ∫(1/2 to 1) 2x dx

Evaluating the integral:

P(X > 1/2) = [tex][x^2]_{(1/2 to 1)} = 1 - (1/2)^2[/tex] = 3/4

Therefore, the probability that X is greater than 1/2 is 3/4.

b. To find P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4), we need to use the conditional probability formula:

P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4) = P(X > 1/2 and X > 1/4) / P(X > 1/4)

We can simplify the numerator as follows:

P(X > 1/2 and X > 1/4) = P(X > 1/2) = 3/4

We already calculated P(X > 1/2) in part (a). To find the denominator, we integrate the pdf f(x) from x=1/4 to x=1:

P(X > 1/4) = ∫(1/4 to 1) f(x) dx = ∫(1/4 to 1) 2x dx

Evaluating the integral:

P(X > 1/4) = [tex][x^2]_{(1/4 to 1) }[/tex]= 1 - (1/4)^2 = 15/16

Plugging these values into the conditional probability formula:

P(X > 1/2 X > 1/4) = (3/4) / (15/16) = 4/5

Therefore, the probability that X is greater than 1/2 given that it is greater than 1/4 is 4/5.

Learn more about pdf

brainly.com/question/31064509

#SPJ11

To write this distance in scientific notation, we can express it as:

[tex]1.08[/tex] × [tex]10^8 km[/tex]

Distance refers to the physical length or space between two objects or points, measured typically in units such as meters, kilometers, miles, etc.

Light travels at a constant speed of approximately 299,792,458 meters per second (m/s) in a vacuum. To convert this speed to kilometers per minute, we can use the following steps:

Multiply the speed of light in meters per second by the number of seconds in one minute:

299,792,458 m/s × 60 seconds/minute = 17,987,547,480 m/minute

Convert this distance from meters to kilometers by dividing by 1,000:

17,987,547,480 m/minute ÷ 1,000 = 17,987,547.48 km/minute

Therefore, light travels approximately 17.99 million kilometers per minute.

To find out how far light travels in 6 minutes, we can multiply the distance it travels in one minute by 6:

17,987,547.48 km/minute × 6 minutes = 107,925,284.88 km

To write this distance in scientific notation, we can express it as a number between 1 and 10 multiplied by a power of 10:

107,925,284.88 km = 1.0792528488 × [tex]10^8 km[/tex]

Rounding this to two significant figures gives:

[tex]1.08[/tex] × [tex]10^8 km[/tex]

To know more about distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30395212

#SPJ1

Hence proved that 3 can divides (4n + 5) for all natural numbers n.

To show that 3 divides (4n + 5) for all natural numbers n, we need to show that there exists some integer k such that:

4n + 5 = 3k

We can rearrange this equation as:

4n = 3k - 5

Since 3k - 5 is an odd number (the difference of an odd multiple of 3 and an odd number), 4n must be an even number. This means that n is an even number, since the product of an even number and an odd number is always even.

We can then write n as:

n = 2m

Substituting this into the original equation, we get:

4(2m) + 5 = 8m + 5 = 3(2m + 1)

So we can take k = 8m + 5/3 as an integer solution for all natural numbers n.

Learn more about natural numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

Hence proved that 3 can divides (4n + 5) for all natural numbers n.

To show that 3 divides (4n + 5) for all natural numbers n, we need to show that there exists some integer k such that:

4n + 5 = 3k

We can rearrange this equation as:

4n = 3k - 5

Since 3k - 5 is an odd number (the difference of an odd multiple of 3 and an odd number), 4n must be an even number. This means that n is an even number, since the product of an even number and an odd number is always even.

We can then write n as:

n = 2m

Substituting this into the original equation, we get:

4(2m) + 5 = 8m + 5 = 3(2m + 1)

So we can take k = 8m + 5/3 as an integer solution for all natural numbers n.

Learn more about natural numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

Answer:

Supplementary angle= two angle that sum upto 180 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]180 - 22 = 158[/tex]

Supplementary angle of 22° is 158°