Mendel proposed three laws of inheritance- Law of Dominance, Law of Separation, Law of Independent Assortment.
Mendel's law of dominance states that "if a homozygous organism is crossed for the contrasting traits of the pair, only one trait of the pair will appear in the first generation."
The law of segregation states that all organisms contain two alleles for each trait, and these alleles separate (segregate) during meiosis, so that each gamete contains only one allele. increase.
Law of Independent Sorting - The law of independent sorting states that different traits and traits have different genes, which influence each other and classify independently of other genes.
To learn more about 'Mendels law', here:
https://brainly.com/question/2707222?
#SPJ4
Gangs exist to provoke fear! Is this a true statement, why or why not?
Gangs are groups of three or more people who come together to form a collective identity and spread fear or intimidation.
What is intimidation?Making someone feel afraid or timid is considered intimidation. This includes actions that are done on purpose to make someone else feel uncomfortable in general, such as humiliation, embarrassment, inferiority, a lack of freedom, etc. The victim may be chosen based on a variety of criteria, including gender, race, class, skin color, competence, knowledge, wealth, temperament, etc. Intimidation is used to coerce cooperation, destabilize/undermine the other person, make them submit (also known as cowing), mask insecurities, elevate oneself in society, and other purposes. The unwelcome behaviors or tools of intimidation, including but not limited to condescending, unpleasant, sarcastic, insulting, patronizing, humiliating, disparaging, etc., would legitimately cause apprehension in the victims and make them fearful of damage or injury, among other things.
To learn about freedom, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29775318
#SPJ1
Who makes the laws at the local state and federal level?
Answer:
The legislature makes the law
Why is the opinion of the Supreme Court so important?
The opinion of the Supreme Court so important because they are disseminated to the public electronically and in print.
The Supreme Court's opinions and also its related materials are considered to be disseminated to public electronically and also in print. So, here the main purposes of a legal opinion are- to inform the addressee of the legal effect of a matter or transaction.
However, prior to the issuance of the bound volumes which is of the U.S. Reports, the Court's official decisions tend to appear in the 3 temporary forms: (1) slip opinions; (2) bench opinions; and (3) preliminary prints. Hence, there are a few other different types of the Supreme Court opinions.
To learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/253649
#SPJ4
n Washington, you can lose your license for leaving the scene of a collision without first identifying yourself
True, In Washington, you can lose your license for leaving the scene of a collision without first identifying yourself.
You may lose your license for any of the following violations of Washington traffic laws:
- Driving or physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
- Refuse to be tested for alcohol or drugs by a police officer.
- leaving the scene of an accident in which you were involved without revealing your identity.
- There was an error in the information when applying for a license.
- Failure to appear for a retest when requested by the Licensing Department.
- use of a motor vehicle to commit a criminal offense or cause death in a motor vehicle accident.
- Too many traffic violations in the logbook (general traffic violations),
hazards due to negligent driving or negligence of road workers.
race, robbery or murder,
- Dodge police cars,
- Fail to appear or respond to a traffic subpoena or notice of violation.
- Driving while your driver's license is suspended, revoked, revoked, or denied
To learn more about license, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27768777
#SPJ4
What is it called when a state does not follow a federal law?
Answer:
It's called nullification
What was Thoreau's purpose in writing civil disobedience?
The primary purpose of writing the Civil Disobedience was to cause resistance to civil government. This was to explain the need to prioritize one's conscience over the dictates of laws.
Thoreau begins his essay on Civil Disobedience by contending that the government rarely proves itself resourceful for the people.
He goes on to say that it derives authority solely because it is has the support of the majority and not due to the fact that they have the most legitimate viewpoint.
He reaffirms that an obligation rests on every person which is to do what they believe is the right thing and this self assertion is a right that each one holds.
This becomes more important in times when the government itself is unjust. Here the people must respond by disobeying the law and voicing their resistance.
A person is obligated not to participate in such evils but also not obligated to devote his life to eliminating evils from the world.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10905304
#SPJ4
Alison, a data analyst and software engineer, worked for Dellis, Inc. When she joined Dellis, she signed an employment contract. In that employment contract, among other provisions, was an arbitration clause, which read:
"any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association."
During her work for Dellis, Alison created a software program that would better track Dellis’ clients. Alison attempted to register for a patent to the program, claiming personal ownership in the rights to the software. Dellis learns Alison is applying for patent protection and claims the program was created as a result of Alison's work for the company and therefore it belongs to the company.
Alison files a lawsuit in Court. She is requesting that the Court enter a Declaratory Judgment--essentially an order that she is the rightful owner of the patent associated with the program.
Dellis immediately files a motion to dismiss Alison’s lawsuit. Should the court hear Alison’s lawsuit. Why or why not?
Any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Was an arbitration clause.
What is employment?In most cases, employment refers to the status of having a paid job—of being employed. Employing someone is paying them to work. Employees are employed by an employer. Employment can also refer to the act of hiring individuals, as in We're trying to hire more women.
The term employment contract may include an employment arbitration clause, which means you agreed not to pursue any legal action against your employer in court. Instead, any disputes that you have with your employer must be settled through a process known as arbitration
Therefore, Thus option (A) is correct.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ1
What law states that two alleles for a heritable character separate during gamete formation and end up in different gametes?
Mendel’s second law states that two alleles for a heritable character separate during gamete formation and end up in different gametes.
By the law of segregation, parents with two copies of each gene can inherit any allele. Both alleles are equally likely to end up in a fertilized egg.
By the law of segregation, each allele is its own entity, always equally likely to be passed on to the next generation.
This means that alleles are inherited in the same way and with the same frequency regardless of whether they are dominant or recessive in relation to other alleles.
To learn more about ‘Law of segregation’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8881583
#SPJ4
describe the articles of confederation and explain why it needed to be replaced.
The Articles of Confederation established a loose union of independent states with a meagre central administration that delegated most authority to the state governments.
The failure of the Articles of Confederation to regulate trade, collect taxes, and create consensus in their decision-making processes necessitated their replacement. The incapacity of the Articles of Confederation to regulate intrastate, interstate, and foreign trade was one of its main flaws. The Continental Congress approved the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.
This text functioned as the first constitution of the United States. It lasted from March 1, 1781, until the current Constitution took effect in 1789.
Read more about Articles of Confederation at
https://brainly.com/question/29612229
#SPJ4
An individual who has been the subject of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal.
a. True
b. False
A person who has been the victim of a crime may prosecute the alleged criminal. False.
The body of law that governs crime is known as criminal law. It denotes behavior that is perceived to be threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral well-being of others, including oneself. The vast majority of criminal law is established by statute, which means that it is enacted by a legislature. Criminal law is concerned with the punishment and rehabilitation of those who violate the law.
Criminal law varies by jurisdiction and is distinct from civil law, which focuses on dispute resolution and victim compensation rather than punishment or rehabilitation.
Learn more about Criminal law to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/14529086
#SPJ4
The main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees is that the?
Option c: the main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees that The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all United States federal and state court actions relating to provisions of the United States Constitution or federal law.
It also has unique jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which the state is said to be a party.
To learn more about 'supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Complete question:
The main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees is that the
A) Constitution is too specific.
B) guarantees protect citizens against unfair processes, but not unfair laws.
C) The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.
D) courts do not want to give away too much specific information to potential lawbreakers.
What are federal state and local laws?
[tex]\huge\pmb{\red{A}\pink{N}\orange{S}\blue{W}{E}\purple{R}\purple{→}}[/tex]
Federal state is one where both the central government and state governments are autonomous.Local laws include all legal norms given by organisms of government whose jurisdiction is less than the national level, such as departmental, municipal and customary norms.Explanation:
Hope it helps you!!A center traffic lane enclosed by double yellow lines on each side with the inner lines broken may be used to start and complete left hand turns and start U-turns from either direction of traffic, but cannot be used for passing.T/F
It is TRUE that passing is not permitted in the center lane, bordered by double yellow lines on either side with the inner lines broken. Left turns and U-turns, on the other hand, can be made from any direction of traffic.
A vehicle making a U-turn and heading back the opposite way: Unauthorized U-turns are not allowed on public roads. a complete shift from one point of view or tactic to the adversarial When the prime minister received the bad news, he promptly changed his course of action. The tale revolves around the murder of lawbreakers at a specific flyover, and a team of police inspectors and a budding journalist are tasked with catching the killer. The three-point turn, from which the term "three-point turn" derives, allows you to turn your car three times while driving down a narrow path.
You may read more about traffic here:
brainly.com/question/16988162
#SPJ4
A typical example of a passive activity is an interest in a: Limited partnership in which the partner does NOT materially participate in the business activities. Limited partnership in which the partner materially participates in the business activities. Limited partnership in which the general partner participates in the business activities over 500 hours. Limited partnership which has no general partner.
A typical example of a passive activity is an interest in a: Limited partnership in which the partner does NOT materially participate in the business activities. Option A
What is a limited partnership?A limited partnership is a type of partnership identical to a general partnership, with the exception that a limited partnership needs at least one general partner (GP) and at least one limited partner rather to the minimum two required for a general partnership.
The general partners are in charge of running the company and making choices that will help it accomplish its stated objectives. The limited partners, sometimes known as silent partners, are solely accountable for making investments in the company; they are not in charge of managing it.
Read more on limited partnership here:https://brainly.com/question/25012970
#SPJ1
Can the Supreme Court remove a justice?
The Justices can only be removed through impeachment, and the Constitution stipulates that they serve for as long as they see fit.
Yes, through the same process that was used to remove a U.S. president from office: impeachment. After the House decided to impeach, the Senate would hold a trial and decide whether to remove the justice. In Article II, section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, the grounds for impeachment and conviction are listed as treason, bribery, or other serious offences. Only Samuel Chase, a judge of the Supreme Court, has ever been impeached. In 1804, the associate justice was charged with "arbitrary and repressive administration of cases" and it was said that political bias was a factor in his judgments.
He was ruled not guilty in 1805 after going through with his Senate trial.
To learn more about Impeachment, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ4
What can the Supreme Court Cannot do?
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to carry out its rulings. It is unable to mobilize the military or order Congress or the president to comply.
To implement its decisions, the Court looks to the executive and legislative departments. The Supreme Court has occasionally had trouble enforcing its decisions.
For instance, some public schools continued to hold class prayers long after the Court had outlawed official religious events.
The only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution expressly mandates, the United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the land.
The Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices; Congress sets that number.
The Supreme Court often does not undertake trials, despite the fact that it may hear an appeal on any legal issue as long as it has jurisdiction.
To learn more about Supreme Court, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Describe the importance of social responsibility in the context of being on a jury and the problems that result from putting individual needs ahead of obligations to society?
The importance of the jury is to take right decisions as per to society. Putting personal problems ahead would lead to unfair decisions.
What is a jury?An impartial decision (a finding of fact on a subject that has been formally presented to them by a court) can be made by a jury, which is a group of persons (jurors) who have been sworn to secrecy. They may also decide to impose a fine or judgment. In England, juries emerged throughout the Middle Ages and are a distinctive feature of the common law system. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Ireland, Australia, and other nations whose legal systems were influenced by the British Empire as a result employ them. However, most other nations follow either of European civil law or Islamic sharia law, both of which rarely employ juries. Petit juries, which often include twelve members, make up the majority of trial juries. In the past, a grand jury—a bigger jury—was employed to look into possible crimes and issue charges against suspects. All nations under common law, with the exception of the US and Liberia, have gradually phased them away. The medieval jurors in England gave rise to the jury system used in criminal courts today. Members were expected to get familiar with crimes and their specifics. Their role consequently resembled that of a grand jury more so than a jury in a court case.
To know more about jury, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/393653
#SPJ1
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to which of the following
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to Some people with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a state civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in everyday life.
The ADA prohibits discrimination based on disability, just as other civil rights laws prohibit discrimination based on race, color, sex, national origin, age, or religion.
The ADA ensures that people with disabilities have equal opportunities with all others to pursue employment opportunities, purchase goods and services, and participate in state and local government programs.
To prevent discrimination against people with disabilities, the ADA has requirements that apply to many everyday situations.
To know more about ‘The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28202627
#SPJ4
What is an important factor for high-intensity jobs such as firefighters that can be controlled by the individual
through choices?
O quick memory for procedures
O humor and mental health
O healthy lifestyle
O always handling high stress situations
It is important for firefighters to have a healthy life style since their jobs are highly intense.
How did fire fighters become essential part of the country?A town could be completely destroyed by fire. Runaway fire came dangerously close to destroying Jamestown, Virginia. Chimneys developed into fire risks. Therefore, it was crucial to create effective firefighting techniques in colonial America.
Firefighters were either funded by the insurance companies or were volunteers by the middle of the 19th century.
To help with spatial awareness, tool handling, seeing in low light, and operating the engine, firefighters need good vision.
Regular duties for firefighters include extinguishing flames with hoses, pumps, and other equipment, discover the occupants of burning buildings and save them.
Since the jobs of fire fighters is very intense, they would have to maintain their health individually.
To know more about Fire fighters, check out:
brainly.com/question/14657395
#SPJ1
When HUD receives a complaint, how many days may pass to determine if there is reasonable cause to charge discrimination?
1. 30
2 60
3. 75
4. 100
When HUD receives a complaint, 100 days may pass to determine if there is reasonable cause to charge discrimination. Hence, option 4 is correct.
One of the executive departments of the U.S. federal government is the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Federal housing and urban development legislation are administered by it.
The federal department in charge of developing and enforcing fair housing legislation, as well as national policies and programs that address the housing needs of the country, is the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
In 1965, the FHA joined the Office of Housing inside the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
To know more about HUD: https://brainly.com/question/28166985
#SPJ4
When is using your headlights required by Virginia law?
When is it legal in Virginia to use your headlights. Every vehicle operating on a Commonwealth highway must have functioning headlights and other lighting.
From dusk to dawn, when a driver can see no further than 500 feet, and when the windscreen wipers are in operation, headlights must be used. the USA: VIRGINIA Most drivers activate their windscreen wipers when it starts to rain. The requirement to also have the vehicle's headlights on is legal in Virginia. When the new year arrives, a number of new laws will go into effect in Virginia, including a limit on police ticket quotas, a new marijuana possession charge, modifications to medicinal marijuana licences, misdemeanour reporting requirements for school principals, among other things.
Virginia law at the moment According to Virginia State Law 46.2-1030, every driver on a route inside the Commonwealth must use lit headlights between the hours of sunset and daybreak. when rain, fog, sleet, or snow is the cause of the need for windscreen wipers.
Read more about Virginia law at
https://brainly.com/question/30194965
#SPJ4
jeff is accused of shoplifting at a department store he is arrested goes to trial and is found not guilty the district attorney however after the trail is given new videotape evidence that jeff did in fact shoplift jeff is brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting
Answer:
This is known as double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is the prosecution of a person for the same crime more than once. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution includes a prohibition against being "subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," and most state constitutions have similar clauses.
Explanation:
In the scenario you've provided, Jeff has already been found not guilty of shoplifting in a trial. If he is then brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting, this would constitute double jeopardy and would be unconstitutional. However, there is an exception to this rule: if new evidence comes to light that was not available at the time of the first trial, and that evidence might reasonably have led to a different outcome, a person may be retried. But in such case it should be cleared that this new evidence is that substantial which would change the outcome of the trial, otherwise it will be considered as double jeopardy.
What is the law of Independent Assortment explain with an example?
Mendel's Law of Independent Sorting is a principle in genetics that pairs of alleles segregate independently during gametogenesis and are sorted independently during fertilization.
According to the law of independent sorting, alleles of the other two genes are independently grouped into gametes. Alleles obtained in one gene do not affect alleles obtained in another gene.
Mendel's experiments always showed that the combination of traits in the offspring was always different from the traits of the parents. Based on this, he formulated the Law of Independent Sorting.
Example of the law of independent assortment
Let's say the father has red hair (RR) and straight hair (SS), and the mother has brown hair (BB) and curly hair (CC). A son or daughter (offspring) of this couple (parents) may have the following genetic traits:
straight red hair (RS)
straight brown hair (RB)
curly red hair (CR)
curly brown hair (CB)
To learn more about Mendel's law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13717030
#SPJ4
What was Mendel first conclusion?
Mendel's first conclusion was: that hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
Although Gregor Mendel's rules serve as the theoretical foundation for our knowledge of the genetics of heredity, genetic analysis precedes Mendel.
Mendel contributed two new ideas to the field of genetics:
created clean lines
kept statistics notes and counted his findings
Mendel's Findings
1. The hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
2. For each investigated characteristic, a gene pair from each parent is present in each cell. One allele for the dominant phenotype and one for the recessive phenotype are present in the F1 from a cross of two pure lines. The gene pair is made up of these two alleles.
3. Since just one of the gene pair's members segregates into each gamete, each gamete carries only that one gene.
4. Gametes mate randomly, regardless of the other gene pairs that are involved.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
2. Describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does
not have political agthority. Then explain whether you think the rule of law would
likely be respected under such a government.
A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.
Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.
What was Mendel's explanation for his observation?
Mendel derived his first concept, the principle of uniformity, from this straightforward observation. According to this theory, every offspring from a cross like this—where the parents differ by only one trait—will look the same.
Mendel also conducted tests to determine the results of cross-breeding plants with two or more pure-bred features. He discovered that each attribute has its own 3:1 ratio and was inherited independently of the others. This is the independent assortment guiding concept.
Mendel came to the conclusion that the traits might be split into expressed and latent features after gathering his findings for tens of thousands of plants. He referred to these qualities as being dominant and recessive, respectively.
Mendel noticed that all of the F1 plants were the same. Like one of the two parents, each of them possessed spherical yellow seeds. However, the F2 generation of plants produced by the self-pollinated F1 generation displayed every feasible combination of the two traits.
For more questions on Mendel's Explanation
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
Which law passed by parliament led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as native americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction?a. Stamp Actb. Sugar Actc. Townshend Actsd. Tea Act
The Tea Act was passed by parliament that led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as Native Americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction.
Tea act is one of the intolerable acts that preceded the American Revolution. In the history of the British American colonies, Lord North's legislative maneuver was used by the British ministry to legalize the sale of English tea in the country.
All Townshend Acts charges were removed in 1770, averting a prior crisis. The only duty left was only tea, which since that peridd has been mostly imported into the Colonies by Dutch smugglers.
The Tea Act changed excise laws so that the financially precarious British East India Company could pay the Townshend duty and still shortchange its rivals in order to help it sell the 17,000,000 pounds of tea it had stored in England.
To know more about Tea Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5567830
#SPJ4
If a party against whom enforcement of an oral contract is sought admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract will be enforceable
True
False
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract is enforceable. True
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract "admits" in court that a contract was made, the contract, however admitted, will be enforceable.Contrary to popular belief, oral contracts are legally binding. They are usually not in your best interests and result in a "he said, she said" argument. However, as long as there is sufficient evidence, a court will enforce an oral agreement. However, there is one exception to this rule, and it is known as the Statute of Frauds. An oral agreement can be legally enforceable if it complies with a law known as the statute of frauds.
Lerarn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ4
How does the use of the word twitches in the stage direction?
Option b: Death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale, emphasizing the fact that it makes him uncomfortable.
Trifles examines identity issues by excluding the physicality of the central character, Mrs. Wright, from the stage. By taking that character off the stage, Glaspell shows how a person's identity was "innately created."
On-stage characters examine and discuss Mrs. Wright's personal life and her alleged crimes, allowing the audience to form an opinion about her. light.
The themes of the play revolve around sexism and oppression. Sheriffs and other men look down on women and say that men take care of the really important things and take care of the little things.
It is clear that his biased experts are already holding him back. But he acts like he's "on duty," so you could say he's at least trying to look professional.
To learn more about 'Trifles', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29618269
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Read the excerpt from part one of Trifles.
HALE. Well, my first thought was to get that rope off. I looked...(Stops, his face twitches.)...but Harry, he went up to him, and he said, “No, he’s dead all right, and we’d better not touch anything.”
How does the use of the word “twitches” in the stage direction most affect this scene?
It characterizes Hale as someone who is weak and cannot handle difficult aspects of the job.
It emphasizes the fact that death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale and causes him discomfort.
It hints to the reader that Hale may have somehow been involved and is acting out of guilt.
It reveals to the reader that Hale is extremely upset because he and Mr. Wright were very close.
What are some reasons underlying the requirements that before a person can be convicted of a crime, every member of a jury voted for conviction?
There are several reasons why the requirement that every member of a jury must vote for conviction before a person can be found guilty of a crime is in place:
The requirement for a unanimous verdict helps to ensure that the defendant is not convicted unless there is a high level of agreement among the jurors that they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This helps to prevent wrongful convictions and protect the rights of the accused.A unanimous verdict helps to ensure that all jurors have thoroughly considered the evidence and arguments presented during the trial. It requires them to engage in deliberation and come to a consensus about the guilt of the defendant, rather than simply relying on the opinions of a few jurors.A unanimous verdict is more likely to be viewed as fair and legitimate by the general public, as it demonstrates that all jurors were in agreement about the verdict. This can help to maintain public trust in the justice system.The requirement for a unanimous verdict can also help to prevent deadlocks and mistrials, as it ensures that all jurors are in agreement about the verdict before it can be returned.To conclude, the requirement for a unanimous verdict helps to ensure that defendants are not convicted unless there is a high level of agreement among the jurors that they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and helps to protect the rights of the accused and maintain public trust in the justice system.
Hope This Helps You!