The executive branch plays no role in interpreting the law.
The interpretation of law is the distinct function of the judiciary.
The role of the executive is the administration and governance of the state. The legislature is tasked with the function of creating the law and amending it as it deems fit.
This type of distribution of powers amongst the executive, the legislature and the judiciary rests on the doctrine of separation of powers.
The Federal Courts are the sole custodians of the Rule of law. They decide whether a law passes the test of constitutionality and also interpret laws in the right light.
They adhere to strict principles of natural justice and apply law to the case in hand keeping in mind the contours of judicial restraint.
To know more about the interpretation of law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10527637
#SPJ4
Harvey, a resident of Indiana, has an accident with Janette, a resident of Kentucky, while driving through that state. Janette files a suit against Harvey in Kentucky. Regarding Harvey, Kentucky has
a. diversity jurisdiction.
b. in personam jurisdiction.
c. in rem jurisdiction.
d. no jurisdiction.
In regard to Harvey, Kentucky court has 'In personam jurisdiction', which means option B is the right answer.
Since the accident between Harvey and Janette took place in the bordering area of Kentucky, so it is obvious that the jurisdiction will lie with the Kentucky court. The term 'In personam' means that a judgment can be made enforceable against the person wherever he/she is (in any place). It is a law which counts designated actions to be taken against the guilty after filing a summon for that person. It is a general jurisdiction, wherein the court has the authority to determine the rights and liabilities of the party in lawsuit. Thus in this case, the punishment can be levied against Harvey for the inconvenience caused to Janette.
Learn more about In personam jurisdiction at:
brainly.com/question/21085374
#SPJ4
What are the 3 basic principles that Mendel was able to discover about genetics?
Mendel translated the findings of his studies on pea plants into three main principles that define the fundamentals of inheritance in diploid species. They are the independent assortment principle, the dominance principle, and the principle of segregation.
Mendel's Findings
1. The hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
2. For each investigated characteristic, a gene pair from each parent is present in each cell. One allele for the dominant phenotype and one for the recessive phenotype are present in the F1 from a cross of two pure lines. The gene pair is made up of these two alleles.
3. Since just one of the gene pair's members segregates into each gamete, each gamete carries only that one gene.
4. Gametes mate randomly, regardless of the other gene pairs that are involved.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
How is the philosophy of judicial activism different from the philosophy of judicial restraint?
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint have philosophies that are polar opposites of each other.
These two terms of Judicial activism and Judicial restraint are the used to express the philosophy and motivation of the judicial decisions
Judicial activism, simply put, is a theory of wherein it states certain judgements are passed after taking into account the essecne of law along with the dynamics of society and time.
Judicial Restraint, on the other hand, adheres to a more strict interpretation of the law and focuses on the significance of legal precedent.
Thus see, the expression `judicial activism’ is actually used in contrast to `judicial restraint’.
Judicial activism is a dynamic process of judicial outlook in a changing society. In recent years judicial activism has given new dimensions to the process of law making by courts.
To know more about Judicial Activism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30035277
#SPJ4
The totality of the circumstances test is used to determine if a pretrial identification procedure has violated which right
To evaluate whether a pretrial identification technique breached the protection against self-incrimination, the totality of the circumstances test is utilised.
Criminal defendants are also shielded from testifying by the Fifth Amendment if they could implicate themselves in the testimony. If a witness feels that providing an answer could put them in jeopardy, they may "plead the Fifth" and refuse to answer.
Self-incriminating remarks made by a person will not be admissible in court if they are not informed of their rights, which include the right to an attorney and the right to keep silent.
These techniques include DNA profiling, the most widely used Test Identification Parade, the skull superimposition technique, and fingerprints and footprints.
Read more about identification procedure at
https://brainly.com/question/15992025
#SPJ4
The Ohio state legislature is concerned because people guilty of lesser drug offenses are languishing in prison
Answer:
It is not clear what specific action the Ohio state legislature is considering or what information is being requested. Could you provide more context or clarify the question?
Which of the following resources could be a good place to start if you are researching case law? (Select all that apply.)
-The website of the court where the decision was made.
-Annotated codes for the law the case deals with.
-Legislative history of the law the case deals with.
-The daily Federal Register
(multiple choice)
The following resources could be a good place to start if you are researching case law:
The website of the court where the decision was made.Annotated codes for the law the case deals with.The legislative history of the law the case deals with.Where is the best place to start your legal research?Secondary sources, such as law journals, practice manuals, legal encyclopedias, and treatises, are the ideal place to start if you're looking into a novel legal concept or an uncharted territory of the law. They are a wonderful place to start your legal investigation since they have already done the legwork.
Make a research plan and note the case's facts. To handle a legal duty with authority, one must have faith in the procedure. This is true regardless of the profession, the legal environment, or the amount of legal experience. Making the effort to discover and comprehend the facts of your case should be the first step in a productive approach.
Learn more about research in cases, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30066460
#SPJ1
What is Blackstone known for?
Sir William Blackstone was an English jurist, magistrate, and Tory politician, best known for writing commentaries on England law. William Blackstone made common law records.
He is famous for writing commentaries on English law. His four volumes of papers deal with ``human rights'', ``object rights'', ``private injustices'' and ``public injustices''.
Blackstone intended his work as an examination of common law as it developed in England. His work was also used in early US courts.
William Blackstone was important because he wrote a widely acclaimed commentary on English law that analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of English law.
To know more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133255
#SPJ4
Which section of the osh act prohibits employers from discriminating against workers
Section 11(c) of the OSH act prohibits employers from discriminating against workers.
The law gives the right to any employee, who believes that he has been discriminated against in violation of section 11(c) of the Act, to lodge a complaint with the Secretary of Labor alleging such violation.
This must be done within 30 days after such violation occurs. Appropriate investigation shall than be carried out by the Secretary.
In case the investigation results prove to be against the accused, then and the Secretary determines that the provisions of section 11(c) have been violated, the company can institute civil action in the appropriate forum.
The company can be ordered to take restraining measures that include to restrain violations of section 11(c)(1) and to obtain other appropriate relief.
To know more about OSHA, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6637567
#SPJ4
The amount is credited to the account of the taxpayer and reduces the amount of tax otherwise due to the government on the due date of the return.
The withholding amount is credited to the account of the taxpayer and reduces the amount of tax otherwise due to the government on the due date of the return.
For employees, withholding is the amount of federal income tax that is deducted from your salary. The amount of payroll tax that your employer withholds from your regular salary depends on two factors:
Amount earned.
Information you provide to your employer on Form W–4.
To calculate withholding tax, you can use the Tax Withholding Estimator. You can estimate your 2020 income tax using the withholding estimator tool.
The Withholding Estimate Tool compares this estimate with your current withholding and helps you determine if you need to change your withholding with your employer.
To learn more about ‘tax withholdings’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2178436
#SPJ4
Does the Supreme Court protect constitutional rights?
The Supreme Court does indeed uphold constitutional rights. These courts are, nevertheless, occasionally referred to as "constitutional courts."
For instance, because it was one of the first courts to find a statute to be unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of the United States is regarded as the oldest constitutional court in the world.
The Supreme Court, which serves as the final arbitrator of law, upholds the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans.
In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's advocate and interpreter.
In this system, the Supreme Court has a challenging job since it can strike down legislation or executive orders that, in its expert opinion, are unconstitutional.
To learn more about Constitution, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
What is the conclusion of civil disobedience movement?
The conclusion of civil disobedience movement is the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The Civil Rights Legislation of 1968, was an act that outlawed discrimination in the sale or rental of housing, The Voting Rights Act of 1965, which restored voting rights, and this act, which forbade discrimination in employment practises and public accommodations.
Civil disobedience has generally been proven to be effective throughout history.
Government and public policy have been changed as a result, and it has also helped socially marginalized groups gain acceptance and equality for people who have experienced discrimination.
Rosa Parks made the equal rights movement for people of color more well-known by refusing to give up her seat to a white man out of respect for his civil rights.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10905304
#SPJ4
What are some of the basic responsibilities of law enforcement supervisors? How do these responsibilities affect their obtainment of the best performance from their subordinates? How important is it to lead by example as a supervisor?
The subordinate power has been increased and they've been made into a superior law enforcement person. they are the ones who defined the law and help them to execute it.
What is a law?The exact meaning of the law is up for debate, but it is generally understood to be a collection of rules that are made and enforced by social or governmental bodies to control behavior.
Some of the basic responsibility of law ensuring supervisor is to make sure and analyze if there is any situation and to diffuse it. This helped them to create a peaceful environment in society. If there is a police officer then he would do it would do everything that is according to the law to defend the person and to make sure that the crime rate has been brought to a minimum.
Learn more about law, Here:
brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
What happens when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional ?
If a law is deemed unconstitutional, the courts can declare it unenforceable, and Congress can repeal the unconstitutional law to avoid confusion or include similar policies to try to achieve its goals.
A new version may choose to replace that law.
The Supreme Court has the power to conduct judicial review whenever Congress proposes new legislation.
During its review, the Supreme Court carefully considers each content of the proposed law. If any part of the content violates the rules laid down in the Constitution, those laws are considered "unconstitutional" and must be amended before they can pass.
To learn more about 'Supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
What is Mendel's first law ?
How do these responsibilities affect their obtainment of the best performance from their subordinates?
The responsibilities affect their obtainment of the best performance from their subordinates as it will help to boost the morale of an individual.
What is Performance?The performance of an individual in a workplace is evaluated by the way of working. It helps to analyze how effectively an individual is working by utilizing all the available resources and achieving the given objective timely.
The responsibility of the supervisor is to monitor and guide the employees at the workplace and provide them with constructive feedback which helps them to improve their skills and achieve the best results.
Learn more about performance, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29387354
#SPJ1
“Police have the power to investigate under the Criminal Procedure Code...” Based on the above statement, discuss the criminal investigative process under the criminal justice system in Malaysia.
Answer:
The criminal investigative process in Malaysia is guided by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). The Code outlines the powers of the police to investigate criminal offences and provides a framework for the investigation process.
The CPC sets out the powers of the police to investigate criminal matters, such as the power to arrest and search suspects, to collect evidence, to question suspects and witnesses, and to carry out investigations. It also provides guidelines on when the police should seek the assistance of the Attorney General, and when they should refer investigations to the Public Prosecutor.
Under the CPC, the police have the power to investigate and collect evidence related to criminal offences. The police are empowered to investigate the scene of the crime, search the premises of suspects, take statements from witnesses, and collect physical evidence. In order to identify suspects, the police may also use surveillance techniques such as wiretapping.
The CPC also provides guidelines on the treatment of suspects. The police must treat suspects fairly and must not use any force or coercion to obtain information from them. The police must also inform suspects of their rights and allow them to consult a lawyer before answering any questions.
Once the police have completed their investigation, they will submit the evidence to the Public Prosecutor for consideration. The Prosecutor will then review the evidence and decide whether to prosecute the suspect or not. If the Prosecutor decides to prosecute, then the case will proceed to court.
In conclusion, the criminal investigative process in Malaysia is guided by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Code outlines the powers of the police to investigate criminal offences and provides a framework for the investigation process. It also outlines the rights of suspects and the procedures for submitting evidence to the Public Prosecutor.
What mood do the opening stage direction and setting description create in A Streetcar Named Desire?
In 1947, the French Quarter in downtown New Orleans introduced the play on a realistic opening stage facing an impoverished urban area, accented by notes of jazz music played on a "blue piano," turning the audience into blue.
Creates a full mood. lead to fear.
Set in the French territory of New Orleans, where the opening stage of "A Streetcar Named Desire" takes place.
It uses tragic theatrical techniques represented by the lonely blue piano to create a dramatic and dramatic depiction of melancholy, loneliness, and violence. depicted realistically.
It takes place on his first floor in a two-room apartment, and the cycle of violence is told.
A blue piano appears in the direction of the introductory stage of the first scene, expressing themes of longing and spiritual loneliness for the people of New Orleans.
To learn more about 'A Streetcar Named Desire', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29906601
#SPJ4
An attempt to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions is termed
a. theories.
b. case studies.
c. data collection.
d. causation determination.
Theories are attempts to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions.
While there are numerous sociological theories about crime, four major perspectives on deviance exist: structural functionalism, social strain typology, conflict theory, and labeling theorCesare Lombroso founded the Italian positivist school of criminology, which argued that a criminal mind was inherited and could be identified by physical characteristics and defects.Behavioral intention - This refers to the motivational factors that influence a given behavior, with the stronger the intention to perform the behavior, the more likely it will be performed. Subjective norms - This is the belief that the majority of people approve or disapprove of the behavior.
Learn mpore about behavior here:
https://brainly.com/question/28362085
#SPJ4
If you find yIf you find yourself in need of cash, the LEAST expensive option is likely to be:
Answer: no one gonna help you :0
Explanation:
School is lame
Which of the following statements is true of right-to-work laws?
a. They promote closed shops in organizations.
b. They restrict compulsory union membership.
c. They require that all union members have legal work permits.
d. They prohibit union meetings during work hours.
They limit compulsory union membership. THe correct answer is
option (b).
Which of the following acts is referred to as right to work?India has ratified both the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Articles 23 and 6, respectively, recognise the duty of the state to defend this right as well as the right to work in a profession of one's choosing.
The Taft-Hartley Act essentially gave rise to the nation's right-to-work legislation, which enable states to forbid requiring union membership as a condition of employment in both the private and public sectors. Every person has the right to decent working conditions. Every employee has the right to establish and join a union.
To know more about Human Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
What is law of segregation also called?
The Law of Segregation is also called as the law of purity of the gametes. Law of segregation is considered to be the second law of inheritance.
The Law of Segregation tends to explain that the pair of the alleles tend to segregate from each other which is during the meiosis cell division which is the gamete formation, so that the only one allele will be then present in each gamete.
However, according to the Law of Segregation, the two alleles of a gene tend to separate during formation of the gametes. Thus, they do not tend to blend but segregate or separate into different gametes.
Hence, here each gamete is pure and tend to possess only one allele of a gene.
To learn more about the Law of Segregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1594166
#SPJ4
within how many days of the last instance of harassment or discrimination must charges be filed with the eeoc?
Employees must file a complaint with the United States within 180 calendar days from the date the discrimination occurred. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports discrimination.
The EEOC enforces laws that discriminate against people in the workplace based on race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity and sexual orientation), religion, disability, age (over 40), or genetic information.
Harassment is prohibited.
Laws enforced by the EEOC also protect you from workplace harassment and penalties for filing a harassment complaint by you or someone you have a close relationship with (such as a relative or close friend).
This is called the right to protection from retaliation.
To learn more about ‘EEOC’, here;
https://brainly.com/question/17245692
#SPJ4
Broker Audrey has a listing agreement with seller Scarlett. One of Audrey's salespeople commits a license law violation while interacting with Scarlett. Audrey
1 could be responsible due to vicarious liability.
2 cannot be responsible for the actions of others as a broker even if she knew they were breaking the law.
3 will not receive as large of a commission.
4 should void the listing agreement.
In case of Audrey's salesperson violating license law, Audrey could be held responsible due to vicarious liability, which means option A is correct.
Listing agreement is the legal contract made between the service broker and the property owner which consists of exclusive rights to sell listing. Thus the right of selling the property to a new customer is given to the broker. If any of the employee from the broker's side breaks the law, then they are liable for the compensation and punishment. Vicarious liability is the responsibility one individual has over the actions committed by other. It is caused due to negligence of the top employee and and breach of duty bound care. It can occur due to lack of communication between the broker and the salesperson.
Learn more about listing agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28474097
#SPJ4
Can some one help me I have to write in 200 words about “ What are the top 1–2 soft skills you currently have that you can showcase in a resume?
How has your current (or a past) job helped you acquire or polish these skills?”
Can some one write something for me in 200 words about this please ? And thank you it’s due today and I need help
Answer: I possess a strong set of soft skills that I have developed throughout my career. The top two skills that stand out are communication and problem solving.
Communication is essential in all aspects of life, but especially in the workplace. I have developed excellent communication skills through my current job as a customer service representative. Everyday I am required to speak with customers and provide them with the best possible service. My job has helped me become a better listener, more articulate and able to express myself effectively.
Problem solving is another important skill that I have acquired and perfected during my job. I am often faced with difficult problems that require quick and accurate solutions. My current job has enabled me to use my creativity and sharp analytical skills to come up with innovative solutions to customer issues. I am confident that I can bring my problem solving skills to any other job I may pursue.
These two skills are highly valued and are essential in many job roles, and I believe showcasing them in my resume will be beneficial. I have worked hard to refine and hone my communication and problem-solving skills and I am confident that I can use them to make a positive contribution to any organization.
Explanation: I'm not sure if I made it on time but I hope this helps.
Mia offers Nevin, a building inspector, money to overlook the violations in her new warehouse. Nevin accepts the money and overlooks the violations. Mia is charged with the crime of bribery. The crime occurred when ?
a. Mia offered the bribe.
b. Mia decided to offer the bribe.
c. Nevin accepted the bribe.
d. Nevin overlooked the violations.
Mia has been charged with bribery. Mia committed the crime by offering the bribe. Bribery is punishable by imprisonment of any kind for a term up to a year, a fine, or both.
Bribery is defined as the offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving of anything of value in order to influence the actions of someone with a public or legal duty. This type of action results in matters that should be handled objectively being handled in the manner best suited to the decision-maker's private interests. Bribery is thus a crime, and both the offer and the recipient can face criminal charges.
To learn more about Bribery, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/13808122
#SPJ4
What is the Supreme Court's rule regarding citizens rights?
The Supreme Court has interpreted the 14th Amendment in decisions that have influenced civil rights and freedoms in America for 150 years.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is unlawful to restrict someone's ability to exercise their right to vote, serve on a jury, own property, criticize the government,
engage in a variety of occupations, and remain in the United States on the basis of their race, religion, gender, or other protected characteristics.
The amendment was developed to address the racial injustice that Black people who had just been set free from slavery experienced.
It confirmed citizenship rights and benefits and, for the first time, ensured that all Americans would get equal protection under the law.
The struggle for racial equality and numerous other social justice movements continue to revolve around the 14th Amendment.
To make sure that its protections are comprehensive, much work still needs to be done.
To know more about Rights, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28685310
#SPJ4
Do you agree that verdicts in criminal trials should be unanimous and that jurors should vote for guilt only if they are convicted of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Answer: yes.
Explanation:
What is your idea about the composition of the Supreme Court?
My idea about the composition of the Supreme Court is that, the Supreme Court would be composed of the Chief Justice and also with these seven other judges are included.
The Supreme Court is said to be established under the Article 163 of the Constitution, which is consisting of the Chief Justice, who is known to be the President of the Court. Where, the Deputy Chief Justice, who is the Deputy President of the Court.
However, the number of Associate Justices in the Supreme Court is currently fixed at eight. Whereas, all the Justices here are said to be nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate. Hence, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort.
To learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/19532364
#SPJ4
A farmer purchased a tract of farmland adjacent to a factory. For months, the factory had emitted a foul-smelling chemical cloud that hovered approximately one foot over the farmland. The farmer invited the factory foreman to his farmland to show him the damage the chemical cloud was doing to his land. The foreman informed the farmer that there was nothing he could do, and that the previous landowner had not complained about the cloud. The farmer brought suit against the factory for trespass to his land.Will the farmer’s trespass suit against the factory be successful?
A.No, because nothing is physically touching the farmer’s property.
B.No, because the factory was in operation and producing the cloud before the farmer purchased the land.
C.Yes, because the chemical cloud constitutes a physical invasion of the property.
D.Yes, because the factory’s agent, the foreman, physically entered the farmer's property.
The farmer brought the suit against the factory for trespass to his land. So, yes the farmer’s trespass suit against the factory will be successful because the chemical cloud tends to constitute a physical invasion of the property.
The trespass to the land tends to occur when a defendant's intentional conduct is said to have caused a physical invasion of the land of the another. So, the defendant here need not personally enter onto the plaintiff's land.
However, a trespass may be committed on, or above, or below the surface which is of the plaintiff's land. Thus, here the chemical cloud produced by the factory tends to constitute a physical invasion of the land.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about the trespass here:
https://brainly.com/question/29869713
#SPJ4
Leah gains access to government records and alters certain dates and amounts in her favor. This is a. embezzlement. b. forgery. c. larceny. d. no crime.
The correct answer is B) forgery. Leah obtains access to official documents and changes specific dates and quantities to her advantage. This is a fabrication of embezzlement.
Altering, using fake documents and tools, and writing falsely on any documents with the intent to fool the other are all examples of forgery and fabrication. When someone else signs or when someone writes something that is false, it happens.
False document utterance is a serious offence that carries a penalty. Documents that can be falsified include checks, negotiable instruments, contracts, wills, and deeds, to name a few. However, forgery also includes some documents that are routinely used in the business sector despite having no legal standing, such as a fake letter of recommendation for employment.
Read more about records embezzlement at
https://brainly.com/question/12882997
#SPJ4