.Which character in The Great Gatsby is the most deceitful and why (which character lies the most or hides the truth the most)? You don't have to use quotes, but you do have to be specific about their actions

Answer:

dum

Explanation:

Answer:

A the answer is a.

Explanation:

They are both in SD

Wind caves allows camping.

they are both national parks.

Badlands national park and wind cave are tourist attractions. The false statement is option D.

Badlands has more cliffs and wildflower when compared to wind cave. Badlands park also has a wide variety of wildflowers, which add to the beauty of the place. Wind cave does not have camping, while badlands has great options for camping overnight. Also, Badlands national park is a properly defined national park while wind cave is a national park unit.

The only false statement in the above question is that both are situated in different states. Both of these are situated in South Dakota.

Therefore, in the above question, the false statement is option D.

Learn more about national parks here:

https://brainly.com/question/32120992

#SPJ6

The correct question is:

How are Badlands National Park and Wind Cave different? Find the incorrect statement.

A. Badlands has more cliffs and wildflowers.

B. Wind Cave does not allow camping.

C. Only Badlands is a national park.

D. They are in different states.

Answer:

I believe trust is a lot of things!!

trust is giving someone the keys to drive

trust is a parent letting their child go to a party

trust is confidence in a persons integrity

trust is your boss allowing you to close by yourself

Explanation:

these are just a few examples! I hope they help!!!!

Answer:  This is an example of an IDIOM

Explanation:

There was a farmer. He had vast lands. He was, however, not happy. His sons were lazy and good-fo9r –nothing. When he was about to die, he sent for them and told them that there was a treasure hidden in their fields. The sons were eager to know this. “Where is it hidden, father?” They enquired, the father remained mum. Soon after he died. The sons went to the fields.

What does a informal risk assessment mean?

informal risk assessment does not follow any strict criteria and coder can use automation tools for unit testing.

Is the knowledge you can gain from it worth the risk?

That depends a lot, on what you mean by "it".

Which risk is generally considered only a paper gain or loss?

There are a couple of risks that are generally considered only apaper gain or loss. One of these risks is a loan.

They dug the fields knee deep, but to their despair, they did not find any treasure. The fields were now ready and therefore they sowed wheat. In course of time, they had a rich harvest and they became rich by selling the crop. They now understood what their wise father meant. They became hard-working and gave up their idle pursuits. Moral : No pains, no gains.

Answer:

The day was long. She studied all day and night for her exam. she was exhausted but in order to achieve the score she wanted, she had to stay up. she studied and studied. when she went to school the next day she scored the highest score you could get.

Explanation:

the pain is staying up and the gain is her grade

sorry if its bad I hope this helps you

Answer:

it might be A... try that

Explanation:

Answer:

outsiders tend to be misjudged and misunderstood because of the way they dress, the things they take interest in, and the way they act, and is "different" from others.

Explanation:

hope this help and can i get brainlyest if possible

Answer:

if it were me i would say A

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

In most of the stories the narrator is a first person so i think it is A

forgive if wrong

Answer: the first person?

I’m not 100% sure what the questions asking

Explanation:

Answer:

rhyme scheme.

Explanation:

The given lines are an example of rhyme scheme.

A rhyme scheme can be defined as the sound at the end of each verse in a poem. This is a repetitive sound that occurs at the end of each verse in a song or poem. There are various types of rhyme schemes in literature such as internal rhyme, slant rhyme, etc.

In the given lines, the end of each verse rhyme with each other, that is sky and high. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

Answer:

She uses dialogue that is true to the time period.

Explanation:

To complete this exercise, you have to read the story "A friend in need" and then select the correct answer, which is "she uses dialogue that is true to the time period" because when she starts telling the story about this man that she met once, she says the dialogues in a way that you feel like you are there although it was years ago.

For example:

"Do you know Turner?" said Burton as I nodded a greeting.

"I've met him at the club. I'm told he's a remittance man."

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer: Yes and it should.

Explanation: If the elephants have no safe enviornment to inhabit, there is no point in protecting the elephants. The elephants need just as much protection as their enviornment.

Answer:

The answer is B.

Explanation:

It is a true statement, backed up with reasonable, and correct, evidence.

Answer:

1. Collide

2. possession

3. introduce

4. discuss

5. estimate

6.  instruct

7. estimation

8. possess

9. introduction

10. collision

Explanation:

Answer: Let’s say someone is giving you detailed directions “hey can you help me find where Max’s diner is?” -johns “yeah, you make a left on 76th go straight on the third traffic light make a right on simmons ave and I’ll be in the left side” -Alex.

(sorry if i'm wrong)

:(

Answer:

Future robots

past just do the lord of the rings

Explanation:

Answer:

the expression means that you will keep an eye on your future think kindly about the past and live in the present

Explanation:

Answer:

c. Government oversight to uphold agreement and prevent unfair practices in farming industry and the workers employed in these sectors.

Explanation:

In his "Fi re side Ch ats", President R o os e v el t used the opportunity to address and discuss the numerous problems faced by the country. And in addressing the fears and concerns of the American people, he also used the platform to inform and re-assure them of the numerous works and solutions that his administration had done to get such problems solved.

In the given excerpt from his May 7 1933 address, President Roosevelt used the term "partnership" in describing the role of the government in taking control over "farming and industry and transportation". The use of this particular word is to show the agreement and oversight of the government in trying to prevent unfair practices in the farming industry and that the workers are given employment too. He stated that "[it is] not a partnership in profits, for the profits would still go to the citizens, but rather a partnership in planning and partnership to see that the plans are carried out."

Thus, the correct answer is option c.

Answer: C. Government oversight to uphold agreements and prevent unfair practices in farming, industry, and the workers employed in these sectors.

Explanation:

Answer:

1) "Jogging is more than exercise"

2) The second paragraph is explaining the second reason to why jogging is more than exercise

3)

"Jogging causes the body to produce a group of hormones called endorphins" (shows how jogging can help with arthritis, etc.)

"A bonus can be increased self-esteem through weight loss and better body image" (shows how jogging can increase confidence)

"Sustained running also requires self-discipline, which can benefit a runner's ability to stay with a task to completion." (shows how jogging can increase confidence)

Explanation:

for number 1:

"Jogging is more than exercise" is the writer's claim because usually the first sentence of the paragraph explains what they think, and the rest is why they think what they think (evidence and explanation of evidence).

for number 2:

The paragraphs to explain the writer's reasoning behind their claim in general, so naturally the second paragraph is just that, the second reasoning behind why the writer thinks jogging is more than exercise.

for number 3:

Evidence and explanation of evidence is what makes up the middle of every body paragraph in essays, so it's just a matter of seeing which sentences are the evidence and which are the explanations of evidence. I'm not sure about the third evidence I put, but I think it's right.

This passage discusses the benefits of jogging beyond just exercise. The first paragraph explains how jogging can trigger relief from pain and reduce suffering from certain ailments. The second paragraph highlights how jogging can build confidence, self-esteem, and self-discipline.

A paragraph is a group of related sentences that focus on a single main idea or topic. It is a unit of writing in which a writer expresses a complete thought or idea. A well-written paragraph contains a topic sentence that states the main idea, supporting sentences that provide evidence or examples, and a concluding sentence that ties the ideas together. Paragraphs are used in both fiction and non-fiction writing and are an essential component of effective communication in written form. They help to organize ideas and make writing easier to read and understand.

Here in the Question,

1. The sentence that directly states the writer's claim about jogging in the first paragraph is: "Jogging might actually trigger relief from pain and help ward off the common cold."

2. The main point, or reason, of the second paragraph is that jogging can build not only muscles but also confidence, self-esteem, and self-discipline.

3. Three specific details the writer presents as evidence are: (1) a program of regular jogging enables a runner to complete run after run while becoming stronger and more self-assured; (2) sustained running can lead to increased self-esteem through weight loss and better body image; and (3) self-discipline required for sustained running can benefit a runner's ability to stay with a task to completion.

Therefore, This passage emphasizes jogging's advantages that go beyond health benefits. The first paragraph describes how jogging might cause pain alleviation and lessen suffering from specific illnesses. The second paragraph emphasizes how jogging can increase self-discipline, confidence, and self-worth.

To learn about context clues click:

brainly.com/question/3072385

#SPJ2

the answer to your question is stressful

Answer:

lightweight fabric

Explanation: What is organdy made of?

A lightweight, sheer, stiff fabric, usually made of cotton, and used for collars, cuffs, aprons and on the inside of garments to stiffen them.

Answer:

A cotton fabric

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

3 or 4 one

i read all summer in a day and those two make most sense to me

sorry if it wrong

Answer:

"They stood looking at the door"

Explanation:

If this is not correct I am sorry I have not read the book.

Answer:

It's 9

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Therefore, However and Then  

2. Refer to it, Paraphrase it, Summarize it, Use someone else's ideas

Explanation:

1. "Therefore", "However" and "Then" are words that indicate that you are finalizing a thought by concluding on all the facts, evidence and arguments addressed in relation to a given subject. These words should always be used in an essay or speech at the time the author's position is being finalized and a resolution is being applied.

2. You must cite the sources of research in an article whenever you use elements written by other authors or even mention those elements or the author. This prevents you from committing plagiarism and allows your work to be considered correct and legal. In summary, you should cite the sources whenever you refer to it, paraphrase it, summarize it or use someone else's ideas

Answer:B

Mark me brainliest if this helps,

Until the past decade, scientists, research institutions, and government agencies relied solely on a system of self-regulation based on shared ethical principles and generally accepted research practices to ensure integrity in the research process. Among the very basic principles that guide scientists, as well as many other scholars, are those expressed as respect for the integrity of knowledge, collegiality, honesty, objectivity, and openness. These principles are at work in the fundamental elements of the scientific method, such as formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, and collecting and interpreting data. In addition, more particular principles characteristic of specific scientific disciplines influence the methods of observation; the acquisition, storage, management, and sharing of data; the communication of scientific knowledge and information; and the training of younger scientists.1 How these principles are applied varies considerably among the several scientific disciplines, different research organizations, and individual investigators.

The basic and particular principles that guide scientific research practices exist primarily in an unwritten code of ethics. Although some have proposed that these principles should be written down and formalized,2 the principles and traditions of science are, for the most part, conveyed to successive generations of scientists through example, discussion, and informal education. As was pointed out in an early Academy report on responsible conduct of research in the Suggested Citation:"2 SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH PRACTICES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.×

Add a note to your bookmark

health sciences, “a variety of informal and formal practices and procedures currently exist in the academic research environment to assure and maintain the high quality of research conduct” (IOM, 1989a, p. 18).

Physicist Richard Feynman invoked the informal approach to communicating the basic principles of science in his 1974 commencement address at the California Institute of Technology (Feynman, 1985):

[There is an] idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school—we never explicitly say what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked—to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. In summary, the idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution, not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another. (pp. 311-312)

Many scholars have noted the implicit nature and informal character of the processes that often guide scientific research practices and inference.3 Research in well-established fields of scientific knowledge, guided by commonly accepted theoretical paradigms and experimental methods, involves few disagreements about what is recognized as sound scientific evidence. Even in a revolutionary scientific field like molecular biology, students and trainees have learned the basic principles governing judgments made in such standardized procedures as cloning a new gene and determining its sequence.

In evaluating practices that guide research endeavors, it is important to consider the individual character of scientific fields. Research fields that yield highly replicable results, such as ordinary organic chemical structures, are quite different from fields such as cellular immunology, which are in a much earlier stage of development and accumulate much erroneous or uninterpretable material before the pieces fit together coherently. When a research field is too new or too fragmented to support consensual paradigms or established methods, different scientific practices can emerge

Answer:

Either A or B

Explanation:

Once a scientist has finished with their experiment, Other scientists usually repeat the experiment to see if it's correct, and usually talk about it and see, if it's wrong, what could be done to fix it.

Answer:

haa

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is and,so,yet, or