Which scenario can lead to an unintentional introduction of a nonnative species into an aquatic ecosystem?
A.) a different type of fish is used to replace an overfished fish species
B.) a pet eel is release into a lake when a family moves away
C.) fish from another state is released into a river for food
D.) a new species of bacteria is introduced by a boating family into a lake
E.) a species of seaweed is added to a waterfront to feed fish
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It says an unintentional all the other people did on purpose
Explain two potential positive outcome of the enactment of a greenbelt law.
Answer:
Explanation:
Here are some of the benefits that the Greenbelt provides:
Local food is better food. ...
It helps us grow smarter.
It helps us grow smarter.
It's key to a prosperous region. ...
It keeps us healthy and reduces our stress.
It keeps us healthy and reduces our stress.
It protects nature.
You can choose 2 of those hope this helps
Shigenobu’s point of view regarding Western attitudes toward Japan as expressed in the passage is significant in that similar ideas were used by members of the Japanese government during the period between the First and the Second World Wars to justify
Answer:
militarizing the Japanese state and expanding its territories in Asia
Explanation:
The Western attitudes toward Japan as expressed in the passage is significant as they both wants to militarize the Japanese state and widen its territories in all of Asia.
What lead to Japanese militarism?The idea that expansion can only be gotten via military conquest is known to be the solution the handling Japan's economic problems which were said to have emanated as a result of currency in the times of the Great Depression.
Conclusively, It was said to have brought about quick growth of Japan's population as there was also a lot of large food imports.Note that militarizing the Japanese state will help them to widen their territories in all of Asia.
Learn more about Japan from
https://brainly.com/question/25954063
mention four impacts of toxic relationships on setting life goals
Answer:
And toxic relationships ruin your life in these 5 ways.
Toxic relationships destroy your self-esteem and self-confidence. ...
Toxic relationships consume your energy. ...
Toxic relationships breed negativity. ...
Toxic relationships form a template for your other relationships.
Explanation:
go to https://www.huffpost.com/entry/5-ways-toxic-relationships-are-ruining-your-life_b_9145078
pepeeppeppepe
pepeeppeppepe
Explanation:
lol what's that .......
a music major might choose to specialize in
Answer:
A music major might choose to specialize in music theory.
Which of the following is true concerning sources of water pollution?
A)
Mine wastes and heavy metals become water pollution through storm water runoff.
B)
Biodegradable materials like food, wood, and leaves are not considered pollution.
C)
Petroleum byproducts and fuels end up as pollution principally from oil spills.
D)
Pesticides and herbicides do not commonly become water pollutants.
E)
Polluted and contaminated precipitation pollutes lake water.
Answer:
A)
Mine wastes and heavy metals become water pollution through storm water runoff.
Answer:
the answer is a. mine wastes and heavy metals become water pollution through storm water runoff
hope this helps :)
have a wonderful day!
Explanation:
i just took the test
Which of the following best describes the effects of using
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) or hydrochlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) to replace chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in industrial
processes?
while HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone, they
contribute more to global warming than CFCs do
while HFCs and HCFCs are more likely to deplete stratospheric ozone, they contribute
less to global warming than CFCs do
HFCs and HCFCs are more likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less
to global warming than CFCs do
HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less
to global warming than CFCs do
there is no difference between HFCS, HCFCS, CFCs in terms of stratospheric ozone
depleting and global warming effects
Answer:
Option D, HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less to global warming than CFCs do
Explanation:
HFCs have the ability to replace CFCs. They are able to deplete the stratospheric ozone because they have chlorine. However, their ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is quite less as compared to that of CFCs. HCFCs ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is between 0.01 to 0.1 while that of CFCs is around 1. Hence, HCFCs deplete less stratospheric ozone and hence their contribution to global warming is comparatively low
Hence, option D is correct
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
what percent of earths freshwater is surface water available for human use?
about 1%
about 7%
about 50%
about 97%
about 99%
Answer:
1%
Explanation:
and most of that 1% is groundwater
Answer: about 1% because most of the freshwater on Earth are frozen. Such as glaciers,etc.
Explanation: