Answer:
Correct answer:
THEY INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF SURVIVAL IN MOST TYPES OF ACCIDENTS.
Brainliest plz
Safety belts increases our chances of survival in most types of accidents. The correct option is a.
Why safety belts are important?As we all know wearing safety belts can prevent us to get injured during an accident, therefore wearing one is utmost necessary. Safety belts are most effective when used properly. All vehicles made today have a lap or shoulder belt combination. Shoulder belts should go over the shoulder and across the center of the chest. Lap belts should fit snugly across the hips, not over the stomach. We should never leave slack in our seatbelt.
We should also never tuck a shoulder belt under our arm or behind our back for any reason, including to defeat the seatbelt alarm. Wearing a safety belt improves survival by 50 percent for front seat passengers during a crash. Wearing lap and shoulder belts is the most effective way to reduce fatalities and serious injuries in traffic collisions.
Nowadays we can also see that wearing safety belts has been made mandatory by law.
Learn more about safety, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2964363
#SPJ2
HELPPPPP!!!!!!!
Blake offers to sell to Poe a copy of Lord Byron’s first edition of poetry for $22,000 and specifies the acceptance has to be in writing, accompanied by a check for the required amount, and delivered by certified mail. Poe follows the offer’s instructions exactly and mails the certified letter at 3 p.m. on April 1. However, at 9 a.m. on April 1, Blake accepted an offer of $30,000 for the edition. He then mailed a revocation of his offer to Poe at 1 p.m. the same day. The revocation arrived at Poe’s address at noon on April 2. Which contract will be upheld by the courts? Provide a CLEAR answer to the question.
Answer:
q
Explanation:
since blake has 50 dollars and get 30,00 dollar each month what he should do is buy 1 dollar food at dollar store to be able to survive and not waste that much moeny unitil he gets is 30,000 dollars again
Each of these statements about communist is true except
Answer:
5445=-tb
Explanation:
Without going into the specifics of the charge, the defendant was found guilty of violating an obscure state law in a county court. Since the law was enacted a century ago, not a single person has been charged with violating it in the state. As a result, this case was essentially new territory for state prosecutors and the presiding county court judge. The case is being appealed. The defense attorney is confident that the verdict will be overturned based on a failure of what they perceive as the judge not abiding by precedent. This claimed precedent refers to a recent highly publicized case in another state that involved a similar law. As a noted legal scholar, the state judiciary has called you in to assess the validity of the appeal. When asked for your preliminary thoughts by a senior state prosecutor, specifically if you believe the judge failed to follow precedent in offering his opinion, how do you respond
In the situation described and following the definition and common use cases of precedent, I would confirm that it is my opinion that the judge in question did in fact fail to follow precedent.
Precedent is described as a past event and/or action which is used as a guide when considering the course of action for a similar situation. Given the keyword "similar" in this definition, it can be argued that in order for precedent to apply to a situation, it is not necessary for the details of each situation to be identical.
Therefore, the defense attorney can argue the failure to follow precedent based solely on the similarly obscure nature of each law. Furthermore, if the defense attorney is able to procure evidence of past infractions of this law for which no charges were upheld, it would almost certainly result in the appeal being granted and the subsequent review of the law in question.
To learn more visit:
https://brainly.com/question/885855?referrer=searchResults
Under California law, any person seeking relief for a breach of contract must do so within the time limits of the:
Answer:
action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? OA. criminologist B. criminalist C. criminal justice professional CD. jurist
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly—on the criminal side—during criminal investigation, as governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure.
The title that would doubtlessly depict Carson's profession is criminalist.Therefore, choice (B) is exact response.
A criminalist is a legal researcher who spends significant time in gathering, examining, and deciphering actual proof connected with criminal examinations. For this situation, Carson's activities of tidying for fingerprints, utilizing exceptional tape to lift the prints, and safeguarding the proof in a proof sack for additional examination demonstrate that he is associated with criminological examinations.
Criminalists assume a significant part in crime location examination, looking at proof to assist with recognizing suspects and add to settling criminal cases. They frequently work in legal research centers and team up with policing to offer logical help in criminal examinations.
Accordingly, choice (B) is exact response.
Learn more about criminalist, from:
brainly.com/question/31030668
#SPJ3
When does the law give a blind pedestrian special consideration at intersections where there are no traffic lights
In a medical malpractice case, an individual alleges that he or she has been injured by another’s negligence or malfeasance. Medical malpractice cases such as this one involve which kind of law
Answer:
Tort
Explanation:
what 1978 law amended title vii of the civil rights act?
The United States Supreme Court can overrule a decision made by a state's highest appellate court only when an issue of _____ is involved.
Answer:
The United States Supreme Court can overrule a decision made by a state's highest appellate court only when an issue of constitutional procedure is involved.
I hope this helped at all.
Safety belts usually consist of a lap belt and __________
Answer:
a shoulder belt
Explanation:
Do I go to jail if I hit a car and run
Answer:
You could face a lot of charges for the car and damage but you go to jail.
Explanation:
Which section of this diagram represents the highest court that has the power to rule that a law violates the U.S. Constitution? (3 points)
Group of answer choices
A
B
F
D
Answer:
I think it's A or F
Explanation:
Hope it helps,
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
When the factories in Brian's city closed, people quickly found that they could no longer afford their homes. Many homes were abandoned, soon to be taken over by those who were engaging in criminal activity. Because there were fewer taxpayers, the city could no longer afford a large police force. This meant that if a crime was being committed, a person may have to wait a substantial amount of time before law enforcement arrived. People eventually stopped calling the police. Crime seemed to flourish. What happened in Brian's neighborhood is MOST closely aligned to which crime theory? OA. social pathology B. social disorganization theory OC. differential opportunity theory D. labeling theory
Answer:
Social Disorganization Theory
Explanation:
Answer:
social disorganization theory
Explanation:
a person's residential location is more significant than the person's characteristics when predicting criminal activity and the juveniles living in this areas acquire criminality by the cultures approval within the disadvantaged urban neighborhoods
which type of government provides the best protection of individual rights?
Answer:
A democratic, strong government provides the best protection of individual rights.
I hope this helped at all.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
To be found guilty of breaking the law, a prosecutor must prove that the person committed the crime. Once this is proven, the guilty verdict is rendered by the court. OA. True СВ. False
This is true because the prosecutor must have evidence to show to the court that this person, or suspect, was someone who broke this law. Without proof, the court cannot accuse the suspect of a wrong doing. Hope this helped, but who knows, im just a 7th grader, lol
Does the method a profiler uses to create their profile matter? Why or why not?
Answer:
This would be called Offender profiling.
Offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative strategy used by law enforcement agencies to identify likely suspects and has been used by investigators to link cases that may have been committed by the same person.
Explanation:
what is the punishment for drunk driving and killing someone
Answer:
You could face 10 years in jail, and a 25000$ fine.
This only applies to Philadelphia. It is different for other states/countries.I hope this helped at all.
when may you be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative
Answer:
Under which circumstances may you be subject to criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative action due to online misconduct? Any time you participate in or condone misconduct, whether offline or online.
Explanation:
Mark me brainly please
Any time when you are involved or participate in or condone misconduct, either online or offline mode subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
What is a criminal?A criminal is a person who breaks the law by an overact, omission, or neglect that may result in punishment.
when you are involved or participate in the misconduct either offline or online mode, it will be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
Learn more about Criminal here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ2
is there a difference between not guilty and acquitted
What rationale upheld by SCOTUS supports subjecting individuals charged with a crime but not yet found guilty to strip searches while awaiting trial in jail
Answer:
Explanation:
Not or guilty
will give brainliest
thank you so much.......
Morrey and Veronica get into an accident. Both sides have worked to settle their claims but are unable to do so. The case is __________ because the judge would be able to make a decision which would affect the parties.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? A. criminologist B. criminalist OC. criminal justice professional D. jurist
Answer:
Criminalist
Explanation:
A.K.A forensics
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
forensics
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called
Answer:
Are called secondary sources.
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called secondary sources.
Other secondary sources are...
Biographies.Textbooks.Journal articles.A secondary source is a source that analyzes a specific event, but most of time, it is a historical event.
I hope this helped at all.
if the appellate court thinks a decision was wrong, it will:
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Ever since he was young, Kai was fascinated with fires. He loved to play with matches, eventually using kerosene or gasoline to create bigger fires. When Kai visits the library, all he can think about is how quickly the paper would go up in flames. He waits until it is after hours and throws a wadded-up cloth soaked with kerosene through one of the windows. Kai watches from the shadows as the building quickly goes up in flames. Firefighters arrive on the scene to put out the fire. Kai continues to watch as an ambulance pulls up and wonders if one of the firefighters has gotten a little to close to his flames. As Kai watches, firefighters bring out a body on a stretcher. Evidently someone was inside the library when the fire erupted and did not survive. When investigators track down Kai for starting the fire, what charge besides arson will he MOST likely face? OA. aggravated assault OB. first-degree murder C. second-degree murder OD. manslaughter
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Manslaughter
Manslaughter is the charge besides arson will he most likely face. Hence, option D is correct.
What is meant by Manslaughter?Homicide is a broad category of crimes that includes manslaughter and murder. Manslaughter can be committed in three different ways: by killing with the intent to kill but where there is a partial defence, like loss of control; by assuming less responsibility; or by killing in accordance with a pact.
Those found guilty of murder must receive a life sentence from the court. Manslaughter carries no mandatory sentence, and the following are examples of possible punishments under UK law: a jail term of between two and ten years.
If parole is granted, a person serving a life sentence will spend the rest of their time under the PBC's supervision.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Manslaughter, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment are based on the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, even though mendel did not know about chromosomes during his lifetime. can you match each of the following events with the law it illustrates?
According to Mendel, the law of segregation posits that an individual has two alleles and a parent typically passes only one allele to the offspring.
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the law of segregation and independent assortment will be given. Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment implies that the inheritance of one gene is independent of the inheritance of the other pair.
It should be noted that the law of segregation and independent assortment are vital during meiotic division. Mendel's law of segregation simply entails how homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis.
Learn more about laws of segregation on:
https://brainly.com/question/25783034
According to the data, which statement is true about Hispanic voters in 2020?
A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
O A majority of male Hispanic voters favored Donald Trump over Joe Biden.
© Hispanic voters with college degrees were less likely to vote for Joe Biden than those without college degrees
O Hispanic women over 50 were more likely to vote for Donald Trump than those aged 18–49.
A. A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
The findings indicate that a majority of Hispanic voters of all ages preferred Joe Biden to Donald Trump, which is the accurate assertion regarding the Hispanic voters in the 2020 election.
Looking at this map will help you find the solution to this query. Voters who support Joe Biden are referred to as "blue voters," whereas supporters of Donald Trump are referred to as "red voters."
Joe Biden was found to have a higher percentage of Hispanic voters than Trump in all areas.
Nationwide, Latino voters supported Democratic candidate Joseph R. Biden by extremely large proportions, similar to the margins obtained by Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Whereas in Georgia and Wisconsin, the distinction between winning and losing contender received between 12,000 and 21,000 votes from Latino voters, whose support for Biden was strong and their number of votes cast increased, helping the Democratic candidate win the state.
Learn more about Hispanic voters here
https://brainly.com/question/25098596
# SPJ 2
Reporters have a responsibility both to inform the public and to protect their sources. From an ethical standpoint what should Jordan do?
Answer:
I believe that Jordan shouldn't post the story despite the fact reporters have a responsibility to inform the public, people shouldn't be put in the spotlight if they don't want to be in the spotlight. There are hundreds of things that could go wrong. What if someone out there sees this story and goes after the family right after they became a victim.
A judge tries to save his friend, the defendant in a drug related case, from embarrassment by closing the trial to public and the media.
Amendment involved: Was it violated?: How?:
Answer:
It has also decided that the right to a public trial is not absolute, and that both the government and the defendant might request a secret trial in specific circumstances. The Sixth Amendment mandates that criminal defendants be informed of the nature and basis of their charges.