The one that was supported by followers of Thomas Jefferson, but not by supporters of Alexander Hamilton is a strong business culture.
Thus, Option B is correct.
Why was Alexander Hamilton disliked by Thomas Jefferson?Hamilton, therefore, viewed Jefferson as cunning and disingenuous, as well as someone with irrational ambition who was skilled at disguising it. Jefferson viewed Hamilton as a ruthlessly ambitious attack dog who would use any means necessary to achieve his goals. An insider's perspective of what it could have been like to have the two of them present at a cabinet meeting can be found in their own notes and letters.
Jefferson expressed displeasure with another of Hamilton's 45-minute jury speeches in his notes. And on the other side, Hamilton couldn't stand it when he could see Jefferson smirking at him whenever something didn't go his way, as he said in a letter to Washington.
For more information about Alexander Hamilton refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27837951
#SPJ6
For all practical purposes, only _____ were able to hold public office, since these positions did not pay a salary.
A. free African Americans
B. educated women
C. men from the middle class
D. men from the gentry
Answer:
. men from the gentry
Explanation:
What is one thing the Persian's contributed to society or one idea they shared with other societies?
Answer: Whatever Alexander tells you, this was the world's first great empire. ... Keep in mind that when you read the article, it is a good idea to write down any vocab you ... This made the transition to Persian rule smoother and helped keep the ... and experiences of women had much in common with other ancient societies.
What is a characteristic that pulled the Greek city-states together?
poetry of Homer
food growth and preparation
national anthem
If anybody can name the actual name of egypt I will give them brainliest.
Answer:
Junhuriyah Misr al-Arabiyah
Today, its official name is Junhuriyah Misr al-Arabiyah, which in English means the Arab Republic of Egypt. Egyptians themselves refer to Egypt as Misr, though this can also be a name for Cairo.
Answer:Junhuriyah Misr al-Arabiyah
Explanation:
Giving brainliest!!!! Please help asap!!!
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!
1. "If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
— Marbury v. Madison, 1803
The Marbury v. Madison decision created the —
A. principle that federal law prevails over state law
B. Supreme Court's right to declare a law unconstitutional
C. federal government's ability to regulate trade between states
D. ruling that slaves were not citizens of the United States
2. "If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
— Marbury v. Madison, 1803
What constitutional principle was established with this ruling?
A. Popular sovereignty
B. Judicial review
C. Implied powers
D. Trial by jury
Answer:
Its C for 1 and D for 2
Explanation:
Answer:
1. c 2. d
Explanation:
hope i helped <3
Hey answer the question below cuz I don’t know
Answer:
is "S" the last one
Explanation:
What could a person do if they felt their trial was unfair to get their sentence reverse or lightened?
A.
Go before the Vizier
B
Go before the Nomarch
Explanation:
B. Go before the Nomarch
Please help me with my work on amendment work I will give brainliest if you help me.
Answer:
1.An amendment is a formal or official change made to a law, contract, constitution, or other legal document. ... It is based on the verb to amend, which means to change for better. Amendments can add, remove, or update parts of these agreements.
2.The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the freedom of assembly and the freedom to petition. It also prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment and compelled self-incrimination.
Explanation:
I will help find the rest okie
Answer:
1). Amendments are formal or official changes made to the law.
2). Some of the constitutional rights protected by the constitution are the freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and the right to a fair trial.
3). If people feel that the government is violating their constitutional rights, they can bring a civil action against the government.
4). I'm not sure what this means.
5). Lawyers have an ethical duty to not represent clients who may have adverse interests. Also, if a lawyer is related to a party in the case, it can be seen as a conflict of interest.
6). The purpose of amendments is to provide a law with the protection of the federal government.
7). All the amendments are important, but the Fifth and Tenth Amendments ensure maximum freedom and minimal government intervention. This is more of an opinion question. If you feel differently, feel free to change this.
8). If individual rights were not protected, people would not be able to protest against their leader or injustice. Without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution would fall apart. Since the Constitution is the framework of our government, our nation would also drastically change.
9). I'm not 100% what this is asking.
Compare the life of a Roman of the lower class to the life of a Grecian from the lower class. IN YOUR OWN WORDS
Answer:
do you have pictures of the article by any chance?
Explanation:
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
Answer:
Yes, the declaration of independence is a big thing
Explanation:
what is the difference between constitutional law and statutory law?
Answer:
Stautory law: The written law established by enactments expressing the will of the legislature, as distinguished from written or common law.
Constitutional Law: Refers to laws carved out in federal and state constitutions.
Explanation:
Statutory Law is the acts passed by the United States Congress.
Constitutional Law: It involves the rights and powers of the branches of government.
Think of this as a diary/journal entry about what happened at the US Capitol building yesterday. You can put anything you want in your "journal"...feelings, thoughts, questions, summary of events, opinions...unlimited possibilities.
I will give extra based on the amount of thought that went into the response. (Example: minimal writing, generic, non-specific, no personal thoughts/feelings will only get brainliest. Detailed, specific, thoughtful, full of personal opinions/thoughts/feelings/questions will get brainliest)
Answer:
Explanation:
So this is how it ends. The presidency of Donald John Trump, rooted from the beginning in anger, division and conspiracy-mongering, comes to a close with a violent mob storming the Capitol at the instigation of a defeated leader trying to hang onto power as if America were just another authoritarian nation.
The scenes in Washington would have once been unimaginable: A rampage through the citadel of American democracy. Police officers brandishing guns in an armed standoff to defend the House chamber. Tear gas deployed in the Rotunda. Lawmakers in hiding. Extremists standing in the vice president’s spot on the Senate dais and sitting at the desk of the speaker of the House.
The words used to describe it were equally alarming: Coup. Insurrection. Sedition. Suddenly the United States was being compared to a “banana republic” and receiving messages of concern from other capitals. “American carnage,” it turned out, was not what President Trump would stop, as he promised upon taking office, but what he wound up delivering four years later to the very building where he took the oath.
The convulsion in Washington capped 1,448 days of Twitter storms, provocations, race-baiting, busted norms, shock-jock governance and truth-bending from the Oval Office that have left the country more polarized than in generations. Those who warned of worst-case scenarios only to be dismissed as alarmists found some of their darkest fears realized. By day’s end, even some Republicans suggested removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment rather than wait two weeks for the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The article continues:
While Washington has seen many protests over the years, including some that turned violent, the uprising on Wednesday was unlike anything that the capital has seen during a transition of power in modern times, literally interrupting the constitutional acceptance of Mr. Biden’s election victory. Mr. Trump all but egged them on during a “Save America March” on the Ellipse south of the White House just as Congress was convening to validate Mr. Biden’s election.
“We will never give up,” Mr. Trump had declared. “We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”
It ends with this paragraph:
With Mr. Pence unwilling and unable to stop the count, the president’s supporters made it their mission to do it themselves. And for several hours, they succeeded. But after they were finally cleared out of the Capitol, lawmakers resumed the process of ending the Trump presidency, no matter how much he resists.
Answer:
the way i feel about the capital things happen is if i ere there i would fell terroriz and unconmterbal that people knew where i work and could easy to break in but way did they do it that way they could of march around the capital not break onto it they could of done some serious damage
Help guys I don’t know
Answer:
Its C
Explanation:
What is “habeas corpus”?
the principle that a person’s property cannot be taken by the government without legislative approval
a written list of freedoms that a government promises to protect
the principle that a person cannot be imprisoned without being charged for a specific crime
the idea that no monarch or other government leader can levy taxes without legislative approval
Answer:
c the principle that a person cannot be improsoned without being charged for a specific crime its like being locked up for a crime you didnt do
Answer:
the principle that a person cannot be imprisoned without being charged for a specific crime
Explanation:
"a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention." this is what l go when looking it up.
Answer all please? tysvm!!!!!
Answer:
lol thought forgot the question
Read the excerpt from "Egyptian Tombs: A Grave Matter.”
From the twenty-fifth century BCE, pharaohs’ tombs were located inside grand pyramids. The pyramids served as giant grave markers; however, they also served as treasure markers for grave robbers. These wicked people would strip the tombs bare of all valuables. Then they would sell the stolen items for a large amount of money. Stealing from the dead was bad enough, but for the ancient Egyptians, the act also threatened the pharaoh’s afterlife.
Based on the details in the excerpt, what conclusion can be drawn about the pharaohs of ancient Egypt?
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
They liked the pyramid shape, so they used it as a tomb.
They thought that giant grave markers would protect them against grave robbers.
They placed more emphasis on their current lives than on their afterlives.
Answer:
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
Explanation:
ill give brainliest
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
yes i do
Explanation:
Please help with these two questions from the book Black Ships Before Troy
Answer:
Poseidon
Explanation:
Zeus may be the king of the gods but his only power is being able to throw lightning since he is god of lightning and thunder. Poseidon was god of the sea, horses, and earthquakes. poseidon being god of sea had the largest impact since he WAS the god of the sea and all of it was in the sea.
Read the excerpt from Through the Looking-Glass by Lewis Carroll.
“It was a glorious victory, wasn’t it?” said the White Knight, as he came up panting.
“I don’t know,” Alice said doubtfully. “I don’t want to be anybody’s prisoner. I want to be a Queen.”
“So you will, when you’ve crossed the next brook,” said the White Knight. “I’ll see you safe to the end of the wood—and then I must go back, you know. That’s the end of my move.”
“Thank you very much,” said Alice. “May I help you off with your helmet?” It was evidently more than he could manage by himself; however, she managed to shake him out of it at last.
“Now one can breathe more easily,” said the Knight, putting back his shaggy hair with both hands, and turning his gentle face and large mild eyes to Alice. She thought she had never seen such a strange-looking soldier in all her life.
What do the details in the excerpt show about the relationship between Alice and the White Knight?
Alice wants the White Knight to always protect her.
The White Knight wants to protect Alice.
The White Knight does not want Alice to become a Queen.
Alice is afraid of the White Knight.
Mark this and return
Answer: The white knight wants to protect Alice.
Explanation:
This is my answer because if you go back into the passage the white knight says " So you will, when you’ve crossed the next brook I’ll see you safe to the end of the wood and then I must go back, you know. That’s the end of my move." He is taking her to the end where he knows she is gonna be safe and then he is going to turn around and head back home once he knows she is safe.
Answer:
The White Knight wants to protect Alice.Explanation:
We can conclude this answer from the statement
“I’ll see you safe to the end of the wood—and then I must go back, you know. That’s the end of my move.”
White Knight will protect Alice as long as possible, but knows his limitations.
The War of 1812 and the American Revolutionary War both took place in American territory. What is another factor that these wars had in common? (5 points)
Group of answer choices
They were both about claiming territory
They were both about taxes and slavery.
They were both about American authority.
They were both about financial independence.
The Gold Rush caused towns to expand. These towns built along the path of the Gold Rush were called what?
Boomtowns
Settler towns
Ghost towns
Explain why the War of 1812 led to an increase in American manufacturing?
List these event from first to last
Bill of rights
United states contusion
Declaration of independence
Articles of confederation
¿Cómo hago esto plssssssssssss
Where did the state's 25,000 Tejanos reside after the Civil War?
please help if you answer it i will give you brainliest
Answer:
Then people would literally be able to do whatever the want. The world will just be based on opinions and not rules/laws.
Explanation:
After the War of 1812, which set of proposals called for protective tariffs and infrastructure improvements?
the Truman Doctrine
The Monroe Doctrine
The Factory System
The American System
Answer:
The American System i think
Explanation:
an Economic program advance by henry clay ,, that included supports for a national bank, high tariffs, and internal improvements; emphasized strong role for federal government in the economy.
Answer:
This protective tariff helped American industry by raising the prices of British manufactured goods, which were often cheaper and of higher quality than those produced in the U.S.
Explanation:
What was Washington’s foreign policy?
Answer: foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating enemies or international friendships of dubios value
Explanation: this is what I have read
Answer:
Washington's address argued for a careful foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating implacable enemies or international friendships of dubious value, nor entangle the United States in foreign alliances.
Explanation:
What was the issue in the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education?
voting rights
bus transportation
school segregation
employment opportunity
Answer:school segregation
Explanation: school segregation
Answer:
1954- court decision that declared state laws segregating schools to be unconstitutional. Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Linda Brown, 8 years old, lived 3 blocks from an all-white school, and had to walk 21 to hers. Oliver Brown tried to register hear at the white school, and this was 1 of 5 cases challenging segregation in schools; lawyer was Thurgood Marshall
Explanation:
but to answer you question the answer is C, or SCHOOL SEGREGATION
The mountains in Mesoamerica are called the___ and the mountains in South America are the ____
PLEASE HELP 20 POINTS
Answer:
Sierra madre Andes mountains
Explanation:
i took quiz it was right