The only body with the authority to ratify treaties and confirm presidential appointments is the Senate. However, there are two exceptions to this rule: any treaty involving international trade and the approval of Vice President nominees by the House.
Which authority only belongs to the Senate?Impeachment trials must be conducted by the Senate alone, which acts as both jury and judge. Three presidents and 20 other federal officials have been tried by the Senate since 1789. Since 1792, the Congress has looked into corruption in the executive branch and other areas of American society.
There are situations when the Senate's jurisdiction exceeds that of the President or the House of Representatives. Impeachment proceedings before the Senate have the power to remove the President for misbehavior.
To learn more about power to ratify treaties, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/845592
#SPJ4
what type of law deals primarily with relations between individuals and organizations, as in marriage and family law, contracts, and property.?
Private law is that portion of a civil law legal system that deals with interpersonal interactions and is a part of the jus commune.
Describe private law?
Any situation involving interactions between people in a legal system is subject to private law. As a result, this kind of law controls how people and governments interact. This also goes by the name of common law. Civil law (such as the law of contracts, torts, and property), labor law, commercial law, companies law, and competition law are all examples of private law. Slip laws could refer to both public and private legislation. Slip laws are official publications of the law that are admissible in all state and federal courts and tribunals in the United States as "competent evidence" (1 U.S.C. 113). Congress often enacts public laws.
To learn more about Private law refer to
https://brainly.com/question/28225445
#SPJ4
interest groups typically have more time, money, and expertise to offer politicians than do average citizens.
TRUE, interest groups typically have more time, money, and expertise to offer politicians than do average citizens.
A politician is someone active in celebration politics, or a person preserving or looking for an elected workplace in authorities. Politicians suggest, aid, reject and create laws that govern the land and via extension its people. broadly speaking, a baby-kisser may be anybody who seeks to gain political energy in a government.
A flesh presser is someone lively in birthday party politics, or someone maintaining or in search of an elected office in government.a person who acts in a manipulative and devious way, commonly to benefit advancement inside an organization.
Learn more about politicians here:https://brainly.com/question/16256239
#SPJ4
the bill of rights extends a wide array of protections to individuals. match the relevant amendment(s) to the examples.
The first ten amendments safeguard fundamental liberties; particularly of minority groups. It was incorporated into the Constitution to safeguard the populace from an excessively powerful national government.
Many people were persuaded to ratify the Constitution after it was amended to include the Bill of Rights.
What rights are guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?Any law that reduces a citizen's rights or privileges shall not be enacted or enforced by any state; State deprivations of life, liberty, or property are not permitted without due process of law; neither will it deny anyone in its jurisdiction equal legal protection.
What is the Bill of Rights' primary purpose?The Bill of Rights' primary goal is to protect each citizen's constitutionally guaranteed rights. These rights should be explicitly stated in writing, according to advocates, so that the federal government cannot arbitrarily limit them.
Learn more about Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
supreme court justices will sometimes ignore their own political leanings or judicial philosophy if they believe the integrity of the institution is at stake.
a. true
b. false
Electioneering can best be described as _________. A. Actively campaigning for and supporting a poltical candidate b. Rigging an election to get the result you want c. Running for public office in order to support a specific cause d. Pursuading public officials to take actions favorable to an interest group please select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d.
ELECTIONEERING Actively supporting a political candidate.
What exactly is meant by "electioneering"?
The act of persuading voters to vote for or against particular candidates, parties, or issues (like ballot issues, school board budgets, or referendums) is known as electioneering.
Is there a spending limit for candidates?
In the primary elections, publicly funded presidential candidates are limited to spending a total of $51,850,800.
Does the Seal Act apply to nearby government workers?
The Seal Act limits the political action of people basically utilized by state, Region of Columbia, or neighborhood leader offices and who work regarding programs funded in entire or to some degree by government credits or awards.
Learn more about ELECTIONEERING here:
https://brainly.com/question/17950804
#SPJ4
A subject some nations disagree on regarding palestinians is whether they shouldjoin the eu. Join the un. Have a right to independence. Negotiate with israel.
A subject some nations disagree on regarding Palestinians is whether they should join the UN. Hence the correct choice of option for this question would be option (b).
Write a brief account on State of Palestine.Western Asia is home to the country of Palestine, formally the State of Palestine. The West Bank, which includes East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip are officially claimed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), despite the fact that Israel has occupied the whole region since the 1967 Six-Day War.
The West Bank is currently divided into 165 Palestinian enclaves that are partially governed by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), as a result of the Oslo Accords of 1993–1995; the remainder, which includes 200 Israeli settlements, is fully governed by Israel. The Gaza Strip is governed by the militant Islamic organization Hamas, and Egypt and Israel have been enforcing a long-term siege on it since 2007.
To know more about, State of Palestine, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2826069
#SPJ4
Under the code, an athlete in the registered testing pool with any combination of three whereabouts filing failures and/or missed tests from any entity in __________ may result in an anti-doping rule violation.
Under the code, an athlete in the registered testing pool with any combination of three whereabouts filing failures and/or missed tests from any entity in 12 month period may result in an anti-doping rule violation.
The Registered Testing Pool (RTP) is the pool of highest-preference competitors settled alone at the worldwide level apiece ITTF and at the nationwide level by National Anti-Doping Organisations. RTP professionals are necessary to determine the following location news on a periodic base: Home address, electronic mail address, and assigned number for the telephone.
Under the accurate responsibility law, an anti-doping rule breach happens at whatever time a Prohibited Substance is in the direction of an Athlete's bodily Specimen. The defilement happens whether or not the Athlete purposely or inadvertently secondhand a Prohibited Substance or was indifferent or alternatively deserving blame.
To know more about Registered Testing Pool refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29409003
#SPJ4
Camille has been caught on more than one occasion with illicit drugs. In the past, she was sentenced to rehab so that she could try to break her drug addiction. In her most recent trial, the judge sentenced Camille to five years of prison instead. What law enforcement goal is this an example of?
Camille has been caught on more than one occasion with illicit drugs. In the past, she was sentenced to rehab so that she could try to break her drug addiction. In her most recent trial, the judge sentenced Camille to five years of prison instead. This is an example of the detention of individuals suspected of criminal offenses.
What is the most important goal for a police department?Our primary goal as a police department is to protect all citizens while also protecting the safety and health of our own employees. Our role as public safety officers is to ensure the safety of ALL people wherever possible.
Law enforcement's primary responsibilities include investigating, apprehending, and detaining individuals suspected of criminal offenses. Some law enforcement agencies, particularly sheriff's offices, play an important role in the detention of criminally charged individuals.
Learn more about law enforcement here:
https://brainly.com/question/27896350
#SPJ1
Answer:
specific deterrence
Explanation:
TREC promulgated contracts allow the buyer to have the property inspected:
a. By anyone personally selected by the buyer
b. By inspectors licensed by TREC or otherwise permitted by law
c. No more than three times
d. At any time by any person selected by the buyer's agent
TREC promulgated contracts allow the buyer to have the property inspected "By inspectors licensed by TREC or otherwise permitted by law."
The governmental entity in charge of overseeing real estate activities in the state of Texas is called the Texas Real Estate Commission. The organization's main office is located in Austin at 1700 North Congress. TREC is made up of nine people who the governor appoints with the support of the Texas Senate.Three members' tenure expire every two years, while the members are selected for six-year terms. Six members must be licensed real estate brokers who have spent the five years prior to their appointments working primarily in the real estate brokerage industry. Three of the members must be from the general public and not work for or be employed by organizations governed by the Commission or that receive funding from it.Thus the correct answer is Option B.
Refer here to learn more about TREC: https://brainly.com/question/28252198
#SPJ1
which of the following aspects of donald trump's ascent in the republican party has helped to breathe new life into the party?
After the Kansas–Nebraska Act was passed in 1854, the Republican Party was formed to fight the spread of slavery into American territories.
Northern Protestants, factory workers, professionals, businessmen, wealthy farmers, and, following the Civil War, former black slaves made up the early Republican Party.
Which three initiatives were backed by the Democratic Republican Party?The Democratic-Republican Party criticized the Federalists as supporters of monarchy and aristocracy and saw itself as a champion of republicanism. A "commitment to broad principles of personal liberty, social mobility, and westward expansion" characterizes the party, according to Ralph Brown. James A., a political scientist,
What is the Republican Party's primary focus?The Republican Party is known to support ideologies like social conservatism, economic libertarianism, and conservatism on the right. Consequently, Republicans generally support traditional values, a low level of government intervention, and the private sector.
Learn more about Republican Party here:
https://brainly.com/question/888140
#SPJ4
Which of the following careers can be pursued with only 30 hours of training?
A.
Bodyguard
B.
Police officer
C.
Private security officer
D.
Secret Service agent
Answer: C Private security officer
Explanation:
Creer of a 'Private security officer' can be pursued with only 30 hours of training. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.
What is the role of a Private security officer?Any person who is regularly employed by a person, firm, or corporation as a private security officer has among their responsibilities conducting investigations into the reputation or character of current or potential employees as well as inquiries into the whereabouts of lost or stolen employer property, in addition to patrolling, guarding, transporting, and keeping an eye on the property of the employer or any client of the employer.
Persons employed by an armored vehicle service are not considered "private security officers" for the purposes of this chapter. Any person engaged by a security services provider or the security division of a private company to carry out security guard, security watchman, security patrolman, or armored car guard responsibilities is referred to as a private security officer.
Learn more about 'Private security officer', here:
https://brainly.com/question/12505716
#SPJ2
What is the due process clause?
It prohibits the government from taking any action that would deprive a person of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
What is due process of law?A due process clause is found in every amendment, which forbids the government from taking any action that would violate someone's "life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Multiple forms of protection are offered by the due process clause.Every amendment contains a due process clause that prohibits the state from doing anything that would violate someone's "life, liberty, or property without due process of law." The due process provision provides for several types of protection.It is against the law for a state to enforce a judgment against a party without first giving him the chance to be heard before the final judgment is rendered.Hence,It prohibits the government from taking any action that would deprive a person of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
learn more about due process click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19959863
#SPJ4
How have the courts played a vital role in protecting the media under the first amendment?.
The courts played a vital role in protecting the media under the first amendment in the following ways-
The American people are shielded from governmental censorship by the First Amendment. However, the First Amendment's rights are not unqualified, which has led to Supreme Court disputes regarding the issue of what speech is and is not protected speech. The Court has been unwilling to ban publication, even of previously classified material, when it comes to press freedoms.
The Supreme Court reversed a court order preventing the newspaper from publishing more portions from the "Pentagon Papers" in the historic case New York Times v. United States, ruling that such a prior restriction was unconstitutional. Workers in the New York Times composing studio examine a proof sheet of a page featuring the classified Pentagon report on Vietnam.
Freedom of the press and of speech are protected by the First Amendment and are essential to democracy. Since Gitlow v. New York (1925), the Supreme Court has used the Fourteenth Amendment's due process provision to extend to the states the First Amendment freedoms of speech and the press.
To learn more about the first amendment- https://brainly.com/question/9194486
Mrs. Patterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare. What can you tell her about Medigap as an option to address this concern?
Since Mrs. Paterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare, you can tell her this about Medigap as an option to address this concern: b. Medigap plans help beneficiaries cover coinsurance, co-payments, and/or deductibles for medically necessary services.
What is a health care plan?A health care plan can be defined as a medical plan or an insurance for the medical care of a particular patient which covers a part or whole risk of the medical expenses incurred such as Medicare.
What is Medigap?Medigap can be defined as a set of private health plans and supplemental insurance policies that are designed and developed to work in conjunction with Medicare, especially by taking care of the following:
Coinsurance for medically necessary services.Co-payments for medically necessary services.Deductibles for medically necessary services.Read more on Medigap here: https://brainly.com/question/13172551
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Mrs. Paterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare. What can you tell her about Medigap as an option to address this concern? a. If Mrs. Paterson applies during the Medigap open enrollment period, she will have to undergo a medical review to determine if she has a pre-existing condition that would increase the premium for a Medigap policy. b. Medigap plans help beneficiaries cover coinsurance, co-payments, and/or deductibles for medically necessary services. c. All costs not covered by Medicare are covered by some Medigap plans. d. Medigap plans are not sold by private companies and are a government insurance product.
The power of judicial review allows courts to decide whether an act of government is __.
The power of judicial review allows courts to decide whether an act of government is constitutional.
The Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power of judicial review, and the Court has the final say on whether a law or government action is constitutional. Judicial review is a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches, and it helps to ensure that the government acts in accordance with the Constitution.The power of judicial review allows courts to decide whether an act of government is within the bounds of the law. If a court finds that an act of government is outside the bounds of the law, it can strike it down.
Learn more about Judicial review at : https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
The "Old Terrorism" profile included unclear grievances promoting ambiguous causes.
Select one:
True
False
The statement is false.
What is Old terrorism?
The old terrorism is more comprehensible, limited and more specific, with its roots in political ideology. The old terrorism was regarded as being a political weapon, designed to produce chaos with the strategic purpose of, either to maintain a regime, or to create the conditions for a new one.
The old terrorist’s organization is thought to have been hierarchical and centralized.
What are the causes of terrorism?
Causes of Terrorism are:
Ethno-nationalism. The desire of a population to break away from a government or ruling power and create a state of their own can cause the formation of terrorist groups.Alienation /Discrimination. Religion.Political Grievances. The Accidental Guerrilla.Learn more about terrorism here:
https://brainly.com/question/21184152
#SPJ1
Do the diverse group in Ethiopia have common cultural and ethical values
Ethiopians are polite, tolerant, and nationalistic. The nation is varied, home to numerous ethnic groups, and 98% of people answered that religion plays a significant role in their daily lives. This indicates that religion is an extremely delicate topic.
Ethiopia is a country in northeastern Africa, with 108,386,391 people living there. People from a wide variety of ethnic groups, including the Oromo (34.4%), Amara (27%), Somali (6.2%), Tigray (6.1%), and others, reside in Ethiopia. Ethiopia's official national language is Amharic.
The working languages of the Ethiopian states of Oromiya, Sumale, and Tigray are Oromo, Somali, and Tigrinya, respectively. In Ethiopia, the majority of people practice Christianity. While 18.5% of Ethiopians identify as Protestant Christians, 43.5% of the population practices Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity. 33.9 percent of Ethiopia's people identify as Muslims. The percentage of Catholics in the population is just 0.7%. The country's population of 2.7% adheres to indigenous traditional religions.
Learn more about African culture here:
https://brainly.com/question/26551605
#SPJ1
The principle of _________ _________ states that athletes are responsible for everything that goes into or on their bodies, whether the ingestion of a prohibited substance is intentional or not.
The principle of Strict Liability states that athletes are responsible for everything that goes into or on their bodies, whether the ingestion of a prohibited substance is intentional or not.
In criminal and civil law, strict liability is a standard of liability under that one is constitutionally the reason for the consequences abounding from an endeavor even in the lack of weakness or criminal intent on the accused. In both crime and criminal law, strict liability endures when an accused is liable for delivering an operation, however, what welcome/the intent or frame of mind when delivering the operation.
Under the strict liability law, an antagonistic-doping rule defilement happens on any occasion a Prohibited Substance is in the direction of an Athlete's bodily Specimen. The violation happens if the Athlete purposely or involuntarily used a Prohibited Substance or was careless or alternatively deserving blame.
To know more about strict liability refer to: https://brainly.com/question/28173731
#SPJ4
Please, I'm giving out huge points if someone solves it <:(
o What is the significance of the Executive branch on the national level? Give examples in detail of how they impact our daily lives.
o What is the significance of the State level of government? Give detailed examples of
how they impact our daily lives.
o What is the significance of the local level of government? Give detailed examples of how they impact our daily lives.
Which two statements explain the passage of the fair housing act on april 11, 1968?.
Discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, sex, handicap, and family status in the sale, rental, and financing of housing was outlawed by the 1968 Act, which added to previous laws. The Fair Housing Act of 1968 is another name for Title VIII of the Act.
Who composed the Social equality Demonstration of 1968?
The bill was first introduced in both the House and the Senate on February 17, 1967, by Rep. Manny Celler and Senator Philip A. Hart, respectively. Both HR 10805, which extended the Civil Rights Commission's lifespan for an additional five years, and HR 2516, a civil rights bill, were approved by the House Judiciary Committee.
Learn more about Fair Housing Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/8292778
#SPJ4
What is a substantive due process decision?
Answer: Substantive Due Process
Explanation: This asks the question of whether the government's deprivation of a person's life, liberty or property is justified by a sufficient purpose.
A person's life, liberty, or property may be taken from them by the government if there is a valid reason for doing so, according to substantive due process.
What are some examples of substantive due process?A person's life, liberty, or property may be taken from them by the government if there is a valid reason for doing so, according to substantive due process.Contrarily, procedural due process investigates whether the government has adhered to the correct processes for denying someone their life, liberty, or property. Meaningful due process the right to contraception and, more specifically, the right to privacy.Connecticut v. Griswold, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)the ability to terminate before conception.The freedom to wed a partner of a different race is protected by Roe v.The ability to wed someone of the same sex. Loving v.v. Obergefell While substantive due process is a legal principle that enables courts to avoid government interference with basic rights, procedural due process refers to the method used to try and convict persons accused of crimes. Before the government may take away someone's "life, liberty, or property," the Due Process Clause ensures that they will get "due process of law."In other words, the Clause only mandates that the government adhere to; it does not forbid the government from denying someone of "substantive" rights like life, liberty, or property.
To learn more about substantive due process refer
https://brainly.com/question/11889629
#SPJ4
which of the following is a role anti-immigrant sentiment or racial prejudice played in motivating and shaping progressives' social control initiatives?
The role played by anti immigrants sentiments was that some reformers started to focus on restricting immigration.
Progressives were those people who believed in establishing a more transparent government. Anti-immigrants opposed the immigration of people in their native places and the brutal treatment was faced by people of Asians nations. In the early twentieth century, reformers succeeded in restricting immigration and Congress banned illiterates who could not read English from entering the country. Immigration was protested against the concept because of the lowered wages which were offered to the native people in the US. Better working conditions, amendment vote for senators, ability for women to vote and child labor laws, were the steps taken by Progressives for the upliftment of living conditions.
Learn more about Anti-Immigrants at:
brainly.com/question/12118250
#SPJ4
8. Which exception resets the 60- or 70 hours limit?
To completely reset the 70-hour clock, it requires a 34-hour restart.
Example: A driver can be ON-Duty a maximum 60 hours in a 7 day cycle. In order to reset the cycle, drivers must take a consecutive 34 hours of OFF-Duty
One of the most time-consuming activities that long-haul truck drivers routinely carry out is hours of service (HOS) tracking. Both drivers and fleet management need to understand these regulations. Many motor carriers are reviewing HOS regulations to better understand the changes and exceptions to the specific rules for when drivers can be on the road as a result of the new electronic logging device (ELD) legislation that is overhauling the methods that drivers use to track their record of duty status.
Despite a number of exceptions, the 16-hour guideline can be quite helpful for drivers whose frequent routes have certain characteristics. In this essay, we'll quickly review the primary motivations for HOS legislation, their intended functionality, and any forthcoming modifications.
Learn more about regulations https://brainly.com/question/27289175
#SPJ9
The supreme court decision in schenck v. United states established which principle?.
According to the Supreme Court, the First Amendment's protections for freedom of the press and speech can only be curtailed when the circumstances warrant it. This was the principle in case of schenck v. United states.
The Supreme Court validated Charles Schenck & Elizabeth Baer's convictions for violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 by blocking the "recruiting or enlistment service" during WW I in the famous Schenck v. United States case, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
The decision established the clear and present danger threshold as well as the fact that Congress has broader freedom to restrict speech during wartime than during peacetime.
To know more about Schenck v. United states.
brainly.com/question/24938794
#SPJ4
using a derogatory term to describe individuals who identify as bisexual cannot be considered sexual harassment if it wasn't intended to offend someone.
The mindset of using derogatory terms for people identifying themselves as bisexuals and then neglecting it by not calling it as sexual harassment would be illogical and wrong.
People of LGBTQ community are creations of God and any comments on them would be counted against humanity and basic human dignity. Bisexuality refers to the sexual attraction or intimate behavior towards both males and females. Such comments would be uncomfortable for most people, and it may also create hostile environment that causes sexual harassment to people of this community, and they may find them in isolation or depression. Sexual remarks on anyone could be valued as discrimination and violation of human integrity and dignity. It creates a negative impact on the young minds, and they can turn abusive to such people and so it is necessary that such remarks are avoided completely.
Learn more about Sexual harassment at:
brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ4
Fact Pattern 33-1A
Ulani indicates that she's acting as an agent on behalf of an unidentified clientm-Thoroughbred Stallions, LLC- when she enters into a contract with Shana.
Liability to Shana for nonperformance of the contract may be imposed on
Ulani suggests that she's appearing as an agent on behalf of an unidentified clientm-Thoroughbred Stallions, LLC- whilst she enters right into a agreement with Shana. Liability to Shana for nonperformance of the agreement can be imposed on a partially disclosed major.
A in part disclosed major is one whose agent well-known shows that he has a major, however does now no longer monitor the major's identity. This idea has vital implications in legal responsibility law. Partially disclosed marketers fluctuate from disclosed and undisclosed marketers because, on this situation, the in part disclosed agent stays at risk of the 0.33 celebration so long as the 0.33 celebration believes the agent is the real celebration.
If the major is disclosed, the agent has no contractual legal responsibility for the nonperformance of the major or the 0.33 celebration. If the major is in part disclosed in maximum states the agent is likewise dealt with as a celebration to the agreement, and the 0.33 celebration can preserve the agent responsible for contractual nonperformance.
Learn more about contract visit : brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
spencer was driving over the speed limit that was allowed on the texas state highway 21.which of the following did spencer commit by violating the traffic rule?
How does hamilton further define the role of the courts? what line of reasoning does he employ here to support his claim?.
Hamilton acknowledged that no federal judge could defy the Constitution by imposing his or her will on the people: The assertion that every delegated authority action that goes against the spirit of the commission under which it is exercised is null and void is the clearest principle-based position.
Why did Hamilton support the Supreme Court's creation?In Federalist 78, Hamilton wrote, "Justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security."
What was Alexander Hamilton's take on the judicial system?The judicial systempossesses no power over the purse or sword; no indication of the strength or wealth of the community; and cannot tolerate any active resolution."It may truly be said to have only judgment, not FORCE or WILL," Alexander Hamilton writes in The Federalist Papers, No.78.
Learn more about Hamilton here:
https://brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ4
What is a practical example of historical costs as a limitation for financial statements
A practical example of historical costs as a limitation for financial statements are:
fails to disclose the current worth of the enterpriseincomparable items in Financial Statementsits difficult to replace Fixed Assetsleads to inaccurate determination of profit etc.What are significance of historical costs?Basically, a historical cost refers to the measure of value used in accounting in which the value of an asset on the balance sheet is recorded at its original cost when acquired by the company. This costing method is used for fixed assets in the United States under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
In United States, the principle of historical cost is a basic accounting principle under U.S. GAAP where most assets are to be recorded on the balance sheet at their historical cost even if they have significantly increased in value over time. However, not every assets are held at historical cost. For instance, a marketable securities are recorded at their fair market value on the balance sheet and impaired intangible assets are written down from historical cost to their fair market value.
Read more about historical costs
brainly.com/question/27622433
#SPJ1
Who was responsible for initially filing the lawsuit questioning the use of quotas as affirmative action?.
The lawsuit that questioned the use of quotas as a form of affirmative action was initiated by Allan Bakke.
What was the choice in Officials versus Bakke?Officials of the College of California v. Bakke is a 1978 High Legal dispute which held that a college's confirmations models which involved race as an unmistakable and selective reason for a confirmation choice disregarded the Equivalent Security Statement of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Social equality Demonstration of 1964.
Who was Allan Bakke, and what was the Supreme Court's decision regarding his application for admission to the UC Davis medical school?After being rejected twice for admission, Allan Bakke filed a lawsuit against the UC Davis Medical School in the early 1970s.He claimed in his lawsuit that its unconstitutional affirmative action policies made him a victim. On June 28, 1978, a divided 5-4 decision was made by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about Allan Bakke here:
https://brainly.com/question/17935562
#SPJ4