According to the given question, the correct option is 1, which refers to Ida B. Wells saying that the United States had no right to call itself the "land of the free" because of the huge number of lynchings of innocent black men. She was a prominent journalist and civil rights activist who investigated and reported on the lynchings of African Americans in the late 1800s.
Wells saw that the justice system in the United States was not serving African Americans fairly and that many black men were being lynched without a fair trial or due process. She believed that until the country addressed this issue and ensured that all people were treated equally under the law, it could not rightfully call itself the "land of the free." Ida B. Wells said the United States had no right to call itself the "land of the free" primarily because of the first reason: she was referring to the huge number of lynchings of innocent black men.
Wells was a prominent journalist, activist, and suffragist in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. She fiercely advocated for the rights and protection of African Americans, particularly in response to the horrific lynchings that were prevalent during that time. She believed that the country could not truly be called "free" when a significant portion of its citizens were subjected to such violent and unjust treatment based on their race.
To know more about journalists, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10160256
#SPJ11
world war i veterans marched to washington during the summer of 1932 for what reason?
Answer:
The Bonus Army was the name applied a group over 17,000 U.S. World War I veterans who marched on Washington, D.C. during the summer of 1932 demanding immediate cash payment of the service bonuses promised to them by Congress eight years earlier.
During the summer of 1932, more than 20,000 World War I veterans marched to Washington, D.C., in protest of the government's delay in paying their promised bonus. These veterans, known as the Bonus Army, were promised a cash bonus for their service during the war, but the payment was not due until 1945. As the Great Depression worsened, many veterans found themselves in dire financial straits and wanted the bonus paid immediately. The Bonus Army established a makeshift camp near the Capitol, but their presence was met with resistance from President Hoover's administration, which ordered the army to disperse. In the end, the Bonus Army was forcibly removed by the military, with violence erupting in the process.
During the summer of 1932, more than 20,000 World War I veterans marched to Washington, D.C., in protest of the government's delay in paying their promised bonus. These veterans, known as the Bonus Army, were promised a cash bonus for their service during the war, but the payment was not due until 1945. As the Great Depression worsened, many veterans found themselves in dire financial straits and wanted the bonus paid immediately. The Bonus Army established a makeshift camp near the Capitol, but their presence was met with resistance from President Hoover's administration, which ordered the army to disperse. In the end, the Bonus Army was forcibly removed by the military, with violence erupting in the process. The incident served as a reminder of the struggles faced by many veterans during the Great Depression and their fight for fair treatment.
To know more about Washington visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31450766
#SPJ11
what is considered to be the greatest artistic achievement of the shang dynasty?
Answer:
Jade carving is considered to be the greatest artists achievement of the Shang dynasty.
johnson's great society failed to reduce poverty in america to any significant degree.
The statement that "Johnson's Great Society failed to reduce poverty in America to any significant degree" is a subject of debate and interpretation.
It is important to consider various factors and perspectives when evaluating the impact of the Great Society programs implemented during President Lyndon B. Johnson's administration in the 1960s.
The Great Society was a set of domestic policies and programs aimed at addressing social issues, including poverty, inequality, and racial injustice. It included initiatives such as the War on Poverty, the creation of Medicare and Medicaid, education reforms, and civil rights legislation.
While it is true that poverty rates did not significantly decline during the Johnson administration, it is important to note that poverty reduction is a complex and multifaceted issue influenced by numerous factors beyond government policies alone. Economic conditions, demographic shifts, and systemic challenges can all play a role in poverty rates.
Critics argue that some of the Great Society programs had unintended consequences or did not effectively address the root causes of poverty. However, supporters contend that the Great Society made important strides in improving access to healthcare, expanding educational opportunities, and advancing civil rights.
Ultimately, assessing the success or failure of the Great Society in reducing poverty requires considering long-term trends, analyzing the specific programs implemented, and acknowledging the broader context of socioeconomic factors impacting poverty rates in the United States.
Learn more about education here:
https://brainly.com/question/2759572
#SPJ11
what stimulated the expansion of demand for american cotton in the late 1700s?
The expansion of demand for American cotton in the late 1700s can be attributed to several factors:
Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution was a period of rapid industrialization and technological advancements in Europe and North America. The development of new machinery, such as the spinning jenny and the water frame, created a high demand for raw materials, including cotton. Cotton was a crucial input for the textile industry, which experienced significant growth during this time.
2. Advancements in Cotton Textile Production: The invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 revolution ized cotton processing. The cotton gin made it much easier and more efficient to separate cotton fibers from the seeds, leading to increased productivity and the ability to process larger quantities of cotton. This, in turn, stimulated the demand for raw cotton.
3. British Cotton Industry: Britain, at the forefront of the Industrial Revolution, became a major consumer of cotton. British textile manufacturers required large quantities of cotton to meet the growing demand for cotton goods. American cotton, with its high quality and long staple fibers, became particularly favored by the British textile industry.
4. Slave Labor and Southern Plantations: The expansion of cotton production in the United States was heavily reliant on enslaved labor, particularly in the southern states. The invention of the cotton gin made it more economically viable to cultivate and process cotton on a larger scale, leading to the establishment of vast cotton plantations in the southern regions. The availability of cheap labor and fertile lands contributed to the exponential growth of American cotton production, meeting the rising demand.
5. Global Trade Networks: The expansion of international trade and the establishment of global trade networks facilitated the flow of goods, including cotton, across continents. American cotton was exported to markets around the world, particularly to Europe. The growth of global trade and the integration of economies further stimulated the demand for American cotton.
These factors, including the Industrial Revolution, technological advancements, the British cotton industry, slave labor, and global trade, all played significant roles in driving the expansion of demand for American cotton in the late 1700s.
Learn more about revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29158976
#SPJ11
Senator John C. Calhoun said, "We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection—never of incorporating them into our Union....To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes.... Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race.... [I]t is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project."
The excerpt most directly reflects which of the following developments in the United States during the first half of the nineteenth century?
Options:
A The end of the Spanish-American War
B Westward expansion
C The booming internal slave trade
D: Increased manufacturing
Answer:
Westward expansion
Explanation:
this the right answer pls also help me
Which of the following developments from the period 1750–1900 C.E. most directly undid the trade patterns mentioned in the first paragraph?
A. The discovery of certain goods that the Chinese were interested in purchasing from European merchants
B. Enlightenment revolutions in Europe and the Americas
C. The Industrial Revolution
D. The colonization of Africawww.crackap.com
---------------------
The Industrial Revolution, which occurred from the late 18th century to the mid-19th century, is the development that most directly undid the trade patterns mentioned in the first paragraph.
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, European countries primarily traded with China for luxury goods such as tea and porcelain, which were paid for with silver. However, with the development of new technologies and manufacturing processes during the Industrial Revolution, European countries were able to produce these goods domestically and export them to China at a lower cost. This resulted in a shift in trade patterns, with European countries exporting more manufactured goods to China and importing fewer luxury goods. Additionally, the Industrial Revolution also led to increased colonization of Africa by European powers, which further disrupted traditional trade patterns. European countries began to extract natural resources from Africa and export them to their home countries, rather than trading with African nations as they had done previously.
Learn more about industrial revolution from here:
https://brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ11
in the early period of roman expansion, the principle power in the western mediterranean was the
In the early period of Roman expansion, the principle power in the western Mediterranean was Carthage, a powerful city-state located in present-day Tunisia.
The rivalry between Rome and Carthage, known as the Punic Wars, lasted for over a century and ultimately resulted in Rome's dominance over the Mediterranean. The first Punic War began in 264 BC and lasted for 23 years, during which Rome gained control of Sicily. The second Punic War saw the famous general Hannibal cross the Alps with his army and win several battles against Rome, but ultimately he was defeated and Carthage was forced to surrender its territory in Spain and pay heavy reparations. The third Punic War resulted in the complete destruction of Carthage in 146 BC. This allowed Rome to become the dominant power in the Mediterranean, paving the way for its further expansion and eventual control over much of Europe.
To know more about Carthage visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13035311
#SPJ11
Select the statement that is unlikely to happen when Miguel scales down from 40 to 25 hours per week, thus lowering his income. a. Miguel's budget constraint will shift outward. b. Miguel will buy more inferior goods. c. Miguel will purchase goods that provide him with the highest level of utility. d. Miguel will buy fewer normal goods.
The statement that is unlikely to happen when Miguel scales down from 40 to 25 hours per week, thus lowering his income is Miguel will purchase goods that provide him with the highest level of utility. (C)
When Miguel scales down his work hours and lowers his income, it is unlikely that he will be able to purchase goods that provide him with the highest level of utility. With a decrease in income, Miguel's purchasing power is reduced, and he may need to make adjustments to his consumption patterns. He may prioritize essential goods and reduce spending on luxury or non-essential items.
While he may still aim to maximize his utility within his constrained budget, the options available to him may be limited. Thus, it is less likely that Miguel will be able to purchase goods solely based on providing him with the highest level of utility as his income decreases.
Learn more about income:
https://brainly.com/question/30157678
#SPJ4
CONTENT: Women's identity in South Africa KEY QUESTION: What role did women play in the struggle against apart from 1950 to the 1990s? Write a research assignment on the following topic: A local heroine who participated in the struggles against apartheid between and the 1990's: How did the courage of South African women activists such Ngoyi influenced her?
When it comes to women's identity in South Africa, there is no denying that they played a crucial role in the struggle against apartheid from the 1950s to the 1990s. Women activists were integral in organizing boycotts, protests, and other forms of resistance against the oppressive regime.
They faced immense challenges and often endured violence, imprisonment, and torture, but their bravery and determination ultimately helped to bring about the end of apartheid.
One local heroine who exemplified this courage was Lilian Ngoyi, a leader in the anti-apartheid movement who became the first woman elected to the executive of the African National Congress (ANC). Ngoyi was known for her powerful oratory and unwavering commitment to the cause of freedom and equality.
Her leadership and activism inspired countless other women to join the struggle and fight for their rights. Overall, the contributions of women like Ngoyi were instrumental in the fight against apartheid and continue to serve as an inspiration for future generations.
For more question on boycotts
https://brainly.com/question/16454452
#SPJ11
why was the wergeld (life-price) of a thane higher than that of a thrall?
The wergeld, also known as life-price, was a monetary value placed on a person's life in Anglo-Saxon society. The amount of wergeld varied based on one's social status and the severity of the crime committed against them. In this context, a thane was a nobleman, while a thrall was a slave or servant. The wergeld of a thane was higher than that of a thrall because the thane held a higher social status and was considered more valuable to society.
The wergeld, also known as life-price, was a monetary value placed on a person's life in Anglo-Saxon society. The amount of wergeld varied based on one's social status and the severity of the crime committed against them. In this context, a thane was a nobleman, while a thrall was a slave or servant. The wergeld of a thane was higher than that of a thrall because the thane held a higher social status and was considered more valuable to society. Additionally, a thane was expected to contribute to the defense and protection of the community, which further increased their value. The wergeld system served as a means of deterrence for violent behavior, as the punishment for harming someone was a payment of their wergeld to their family or kin group. Thus, the higher wergeld for a thane served to reinforce the importance of their status in society and deter others from harming them.
To know more about monetary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28199887
#SPJ11
in 1882 and again in 1902, the united states congress passed laws excluding immigrants from china. T/F.
True, in 1882 the United States Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which excluded Chinese immigrants from entering the country for 10 years and denied them citizenship. In 1902, the Geary Act extended these restrictions and required all Chinese residents to carry identification papers or face deportation.
The United States Congress passed laws in 1882 and 1902 that excluded Chinese immigrants from entering the country. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 prohibited Chinese immigrants from coming to the United States for 10 years and prevented them from obtaining citizenship. In 1902, the Geary Act extended these restrictions and required all Chinese residents to carry identification papers or face deportation. These laws were a result of anti-Chinese sentiment and discrimination that had been growing in the United States since the 1850s. The exclusion laws remained in effect until 1943 when they were repealed by the Magnuson Act.
The United States Congress passed laws in 1882 and 1902 that excluded Chinese immigrants from entering the country and denied them citizenship. These laws were a reflection of the anti-Chinese sentiment and discrimination that existed in the United States during that time. The exclusion laws remained in effect for several decades until they were eventually repealed in 1943.
To know more about immigrants visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ11
By the time he died, at the age of thirty-two, Alexander had conquered all excepta. western Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, and Egypt.b. ancient Mesopotamia, including Babylon, Susa, and Persepolis.c. northern India as far east as modern Pakistan.d. modern-day Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Israel and other areas.e. central Gaul.
By the time he died, at the age of thirty-two, Alexander had conquered all except western Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, and Egypt.
The correct option is A.
Alexander the Great was a Macedonian king who is widely considered to be one of the greatest military commanders in history. By the time he died, at the age of thirty-two, Alexander had conquered most of the known world of his day, spanning from Greece and Egypt in the west to India in the east.
His conquests included all of the lands in the eastern Mediterranean, including ancient Mesopotamia, including Babylon, Susa, and Persepolis, and parts of northern India as far east as modern Pakistan. He had succeeded in conquering all of these lands except for western Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, modern-day Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Israel and other areas, and central Gaul (modern-day France).
Alexander's conquests had a huge impact on the ancient world, as he spread Greek culture, language, and traditions throughout his empire. Even after his death, the legacy of his conquests lived on through the Hellenistic kingdoms that he left behind.
To know more about Macedonian king, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31629294
#SPJ4
Which of the following states faced the same kinds of European domination as did the Chinese in the nineteenth century?
A. Australia
B. Russia
C. Japan
D. The Ottoman Empire
The correct option is D. The Ottoman Empire. During the nineteenth century, the Ottoman Empire faced similar kinds of European domination as China did.
Both the Chinese and the Ottoman Empire experienced increased pressure from European powers, leading to a decline in their political and economic power.
In the case of the Ottoman Empire, European influence led to significant territorial losses and a weakening of their economy. European powers, such as Britain, France, and Russia, exploited the weakening empire through diplomatic pressure and military interventions. The Ottoman Empire struggled to modernize its military and administrative systems to resist European domination but was ultimately unsuccessful.
Similarly, China experienced a decline in power during the nineteenth century, partly due to European imperialism. The Opium Wars and subsequent treaties, such as the Treaty of Nanking, led to the Chinese losing control over their own trade, opening their ports to foreign powers, and ceding territories like Hong Kong to the British.
In both cases, the European powers' influence and interventions weakened these states and contributed to their decline.
To know more about European visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1683533
#SPJ11
what did parisians hope to find in the bastille, which they attacked on july 14, 1789?
Parisians attacked the Bastille on July 14, 1789, in an effort to gain control of the armory stored there.
The Bastille was a prison, but it was also a symbol of the oppressive monarchy, so it was a primary target for revolutionaries. The people hoped to find weapons and ammunition to help them in their fight against the monarchy, as well as political prisoners who could be freed and serve as symbols of freedom and justice.
The attackers also hoped to find records of taxes and other debts, as well as documents that could be used to discredit the monarchy and its officials. Additionally, they may have been looking for gold and other treasure, or for evidence of corruption and other injustices committed by the monarchy.
To know more about Parisians , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31623271
#SPJ4
why did arab states decide to cut off oil exports to the united states in 1973?
Answer:
During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations.
Explanation:
In 1973, Arab states decided to cut off oil exports to the United States due to political reasons. This event, known as the 1973 Oil Crisis, was primarily triggered by the Yom Kippur War between Israel and a coalition of Arab nations. The United States provided support to Israel during the conflict, which angered the Arab states. As a result, OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) members, led by Arab nations, imposed an oil embargo on the United States and other countries supporting Israel. The embargo aimed to exert political pressure and emphasize the importance of Arab states in global oil supply.
In 1973, the Arab states decided to cut off oil exports to the United States as a response to the US support of Israel during the Yom Kippur War. This decision was taken by the members of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) as a way of exerting political and economic pressure on the US. This led to an oil crisis that lasted for several months, with oil prices skyrocketing and causing widespread economic disruption. The embargo was eventually lifted in 1974, but it had a lasting impact on US foreign policy and the global oil market. In conclusion, the Arab states' decision to cut off oil exports was a political move to protest US support of Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
To know more about Yom Kippur War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10488439
#SPJ11
what is the purpose of UN troops in Rwanda?
Answer:
Its activities were meant to aid the peace process between the Hutu-dominated Rwandese government and the Tutsi-dominated rebel Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). (After the genocide)
To what extent was resistance successful? (How was resistance successful? How was resistance unsuccessful?)
The success of Resistance varied in different contexts. Resistance movements achieved success through nonviolent protests, civil disobedience, and international support. However, some resistance efforts faced violent suppression, failed to achieve immediate goals, or faced prolonged struggles against oppressive regimes.
The success of resistance movements can vary depending on the specific context and goals of the movement. Resistance can be successful in bringing about significant changes, but it can also face challenges and limitations.
Successful resistance often relies on various strategies such as nonviolent protests, civil disobedience, strikes, boycotts, and the mobilization of public opinion. These methods can create social and political pressure, disrupt systems of power, and force authorities to negotiate or make concessions. Successful resistance movements have often garnered international support, which can increase their visibility and legitimacy.
However, resistance can also face obstacles and be unsuccessful in achieving its goals. Repressive regimes may respond with violence, repression, and crackdowns, leading to setbacks or the suppression of the movement. Internal divisions, lack of resources, or poor organization can hinder resistance efforts. Additionally, resistance movements may face opposition from powerful interests or lack sufficient popular support to bring about meaningful change.
Overall, the extent of success in resistance movements is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including the nature of the movement, the strategies employed, the response of authorities, external support, and the socio-political context in which the resistance unfolds.
For more such question on Resistance
https://brainly.com/question/31272277
#SPJ11
The question involves designing a deflection bridge using a platinum resistance sensor to obtain an output range of 0 to 100 mV for an input range of 0 to 100 °C. The specifications include the initial resistance of the sensor at 0 °C, its temperature coefficient of resistance, and the available supply voltage of 15V. The task is to determine the design parameters of the deflection bridge to achieve the desired output range.
To design the deflection bridge, we need to consider the relationship between the resistance of the platinum sensor and the corresponding temperature. The temperature coefficient of resistance indicates how the resistance changes with temperature. Given that the resistance is 100 Q at 0 °C and the temperature coefficient of resistance is 4 x 10^-3 °C^-1, we can calculate the resistance at different temperatures within the desired input range of 0 to 100 °C.
To obtain an output range of 0 to 100 mV, we can utilize a bridge configuration where the sensor is one of the bridge arms. By adjusting the resistances in the other arms of the bridge, we can balance the bridge and achieve the desired output voltage range. The balance condition occurs when the voltage across the bridge is zero. By using the available supply voltage of 15V and adjusting the resistances in the bridge arms, we can design the bridge to produce an output voltage range of 0 to 100 mV for the corresponding input temperature range of 0 to 100 °C.
In summary, the problem involves designing a deflection bridge using a platinum resistance sensor to obtain a specific output range for a given input temperature range. By considering the temperature coefficient of resistance and using a bridge configuration, we can adjust the resistances in the bridge arms to achieve the desired output voltage range. The calculations require understanding the relationship between resistance and temperature for the platinum sensor and utilizing the available supply voltage to design the bridge accordingly.
Learn more about resistance:
https://brainly.com/question/32301085
#SPJ11
what right did massachusetts, unique among the colonies, grant its black residents in 1783?
Massachusetts was the only colony to grant black residents the right to vote in 1783.
This was through the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780, which stated that "all men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness."
This document also granted voting rights to "all inhabitants" of the state, which was interpreted by some to include free black men. However, this right was not extended to enslaved black people, and the vast majority of them were still denied the right to vote in Massachusetts.
Learn more about Massachusetts
https://brainly.com/question/13960542
#SPJ4
describe the foreign and military policy of ronald reagan and his successor george h.w. bush. how did the cold war affect their decision making, budgets, fuel policies, and cabinet selections? where was u.s. military action used throughout these two presidents tenure? how did they seek to pursue peace or otherwise isolate the soviet union?
Ronald Reagan's foreign and military policies focused on ending the Cold War and promoting democracy worldwide. He advocated for a strong military and supported programs such as the Strategic Defense Initiative. His successor, George H.W. Bush, continued this policy and prioritized improving relations with the Soviet Union and promoting free trade. The Cold War greatly influenced their decision-making and budgets, as they both allocated significant resources toward military spending. Fuel policies also played a role, as both presidents sought to decrease the U.S.'s dependence on foreign oil and increase domestic production.
Overall, Reagan and Bush's foreign and military policies were driven by a desire to end the Cold War and promote American values worldwide while maintaining a strong national defense. Reagan's and Bush's foreign and military policies were heavily influenced by the Cold War. They prioritized a strong military with increased defense budgets to counter Soviet influence. Key policies included Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) and Bush's handling of the Gulf War.
US military action during their tenure included interventions in Grenada, Lebanon, Libya, and Panama under Reagan and the Gulf War under Bush. Both presidents sought peace through diplomacy and arms control agreements, such as the INF Treaty (Reagan) and START I (Bush), while maintaining pressure on the Soviet Union through economic and military means.
To learn more about the Gulf War, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32035046
#SPJ11
what was the significance of the first battle at manassas (or bull run) in july 1861?
The First Battle of Manassas (or Bull Run), fought in July 1861, was the first major battle of the American Civil War.
It was a major Confederate victory and a shock to Union forces, who had expected to win the war quickly. The battle was significant in that it demonstrated the strength of Confederate forces and showed that the war would be much longer and bloodier than the Union had anticipated. It also demonstrated the inexperience of Union forces and proved to the North that they had to prepare for a tougher, longer fight.
Moreover, the battle had a major psychological impact on both sides, with the North feeling the sting of defeat and the South gaining a much-needed confidence boost. The battle also marked the end of the Union's early strategy of moving south into Confederate territory, and shifted the focus of the war to the more tactically sound strategy of controlling the border states.
To know more about American Civil War, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/769992
#SPJ4
according to the statistics presented by dr. allen, the transatlantic slave trade lasted 366 years and moved 12.5 million africans across the atlantic ocean. it was the smallest dorced migration in human history
True or False
False. The statement you presented is not accurate. The transatlantic slave trade lasted approximately 400 years, from the 16th century to the 19th century.
It involved the forced migration of millions of Africans to the Americas, primarily to work on plantations and in other forms of labor.
The exact number of Africans transported during the transatlantic slave trade is a topic of debate among historians, as records from that time are incomplete. However, it is estimated that between 12 to 12.5 million Africans were forcibly transported across the Atlantic Ocean as part of the slave trade. These individuals endured unimaginable suffering and were subjected to inhumane conditions during their journey and upon arrival in the Americas.
Contrary to the claim in your statement, the transatlantic slave trade was not the smallest forced migration in human history. It was, in fact, one of the largest and most significant forced migrations, with a profound and lasting impact on the African continent and the societies of the Americas.
learn more about migrations here :
https://brainly.com/question/14929423
#SPJ11
juan peron was an unpopular military ruler in guatemala during the 1970s. true or false
As per the historical sources Juan Peron was an unpopular military ruler in Guatemala during the 1970s is False.
Juan Peron was not a military ruler in Guatemala during the 1970s. He was actually a former president of Argentina who died in 1974. Guatemala's ruler during that time was General Carlos Arana Osorio.
False. Juan Peron was not a military ruler in Guatemala during the 1970s. In fact, he was an Argentine politician and military officer who served as the President of Argentina for three terms: 1946-1955 and 1973-1974. Peron was known for his populist policies and the establishment of a political movement known as Peronism.
The military rulers in Guatemala during the 1970s were separate individuals, and it's important not to confuse Juan Peron's role in Argentina with the events in Guatemala.
To know more about sources visit
https://brainly.com/question/19242877
#SPJ11
What action did Joseph Stalin take to build his cult of personality during his
rule?
A. Inspiring fear in citizens by killing his political opponents
B. Securing economic aid from European totalitarian states
C. Ending aggressive policies of collectivization in rural areas
D. Separating himself from Vladimir Lenin's policies
Answer:
A. Inspiring fear in citizens by killing his political opponents
Explanation:
During his time in power in the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin employed a variety of strategies to create a cult of personality, including boosting his reputation as a great leader, rewriting history to highlight his contribution, and utilizing propaganda to sway public opinion. However, one of his most important deeds was to instill fear in the populace by assassinating his political rivals, which enabled him to cement his control and remove any potential threats to his rule.
Learn more about Stalin here: https://brainly.com/question/20507308?
the spanish king who faced the jersey devil abdicated and fled to america following which battle?
The Spanish king you're referring to is King Joseph Bonaparte, who faced the Jersey Devil legend after he abdicated the throne and fled to America.
The key event that led to his abdication was the Battle of Vitoria.
The Battle of Vitoria took place on June 21, 1813, during the Peninsular War. This battle was a decisive victory for the British-led coalition, consisting of Portuguese, British, and Spanish forces, against the French army under King Joseph Bonaparte's command. Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, commanded the coalition forces.
Here are the key steps that led to the outcome:
The French army was caught off-guard while retreating, and the coalition forces launched a surprise attack.
The coalition forces attacked the French positions from multiple directions, forcing the French army to defend on all fronts
The French army was outnumbered, and their defensive lines began to collapse under the pressure of the coalition's advance.
King Joseph Bonaparte made a tactical error by positioning his artillery poorly, making it vulnerable to capture by the coalition forces.
As the French army's situation became dire, King Joseph Bonaparte fled the battlefield, abandoning his troops.
After the Battle of Vitoria, Joseph Bonaparte abdicated the throne of Spain and eventually settled in the United States. It was during his time in America that he reportedly encountered the legendary creature known as the Jersey Devil.
For more question on throne visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30288694
#SPJ11
King Joseph Bonaparte of Spain ended up in America following the Battle of Vitoria in 1813 and later had a supposedly encounter with the legendary creature known as the Jersey Devil in New Jersey.
Explanation:It appears there may be some confusion in your question, as the Jersey Devil is a piece of folklore and not connected to any Spanish king. However, it sounds like your inquiry might be related to King Joseph Bonaparte of Spain, who did end up in America, more specifically in New Jersey, after being dethroned. His abdication and subsequent move to the United States occurred after the Battle of Vitoria in 1813 during the Peninsular War. This major defeat for the French led to Joseph Bonaparte's ousting and to him eventually making his way to America. While living in New Jersey, there are stories that he encountered the legendary Jersey Devil, hence perhaps the connection in your inquiry.
Learn more about King Joseph Bonaparte here:https://brainly.com/question/35915365
#SPJ2
why did a labor crisis develop in the cotton south in the first few decades of the 1800s?
In the early 1800s, the cotton industry was booming in the southern United States. However, this also led to a labor crisis in the cotton south. One of the main reasons for this was the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade in 1808. As a result, slave owners could no longer import new slaves.
This created a labor shortage, as the demand for cotton continued to grow.
Additionally, the harsh conditions of slavery made it difficult to retain enslaved workers, many of whom would attempt to escape or rebel. This further compounded the labor crisis in the cotton south.
The labor crisis led to the development of new forms of labor, such as the use of convict labor and the hiring of white indentured servants. However, these alternatives were often not as reliable or efficient as slave labor, and they also had their own set of problems.
Overall, the labor crisis in the cotton south was a complex issue that was rooted in the institution of slavery and the economic demands of the cotton industry.
To know more about The Transatlantic Slave Trade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14260809
#SPJ11
The labor crisis in the cotton South in the first few decades of the 1800s was mainly due to the high demand for cotton and the decline of indentured servitude as a labor source.
The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 increased the production of cotton, leading to a rise in demand for labor. However, the ending of the transatlantic slave trade in 1808 resulted in a scarcity of slaves, which were the primary labor force in the cotton South. This shortage led to an increase in the price of slaves, making it difficult for plantation owners to purchase them. As a result, many plantation owners turned to other forms of labor such as poor white farmers, free blacks, and immigrants, but none of these options were as efficient as the use of slaves.
This labor crisis contributed to the growth of the institution of slavery as plantation owners sought to maintain their source of labor.
To know more about cotton visit
https://brainly.com/question/10808088
#SPJ11
During American Imperialism
How was the war against Spain supposed to not be a war for imperialism and taking land?
The United States claimed that it was fighting for humanitarian reasons, to free Cuba from Spanish rule.
Why did the U.S. claim to be helping Cuba ?The Spanish-American War was a conflict between the United States and Spain from 1898 to 1899. The war was fought over a number of issues, including Cuba's desire for independence from Spain, the United States' desire to expand its influence in the Caribbean, and the United States' desire to protect its interests in the Philippines.
The United States claimed that it was not fighting for imperialism or taking land. The United States also claimed that it was fighting to protect its interests in the Caribbean and the Pacific. However, the United States did take land from Spain as a result of the war.
Find out more on American imperialism at https://brainly.com/question/29781014
#SPJ1
in 1962, the marginal tax rates were as high as ________ percent.
In 1962, the marginal tax rates in the United States were as high as 91 percent.
Tax rates refer to the percentages at which individuals, businesses, or other entities are taxed on their income, assets, or transactions. These rates are set by the government and play a crucial role in generating revenue to fund public services and infrastructure. Tax rates vary across countries and jurisdictions and can differ based on the type of income or asset being taxed.
Income tax rates typically operate on a progressive scale, where higher income brackets are taxed at higher rates, while lower income brackets face lower rates or may even be exempt. Corporate tax rates apply to the profits earned by businesses, with different rates for small enterprises and larger corporations.
To know more about Tax rates refer to-
brainly.com/question/30709324
#SPJ4
by the end of the nineteenth century, the world's preeminent imperial power was
Answer:
After the defeat of France in the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), Britain emerged as the principal naval and imperial power of the 19th century and expanded its imperial holdings.
Explanation:
By the end of the nineteenth century, the world's preeminent imperial power was undoubtedly Great Britain.
The British Empire at this time was massive, spanning over a quarter of the world's land and population. Its wealth and power were unmatched, as it controlled valuable resources such as gold, diamonds, and rubber. British dominance was maintained through their advanced navy and military power, as well as their economic and political influence over many nations. The empire's reach extended from India and Southeast Asia to Africa and the Caribbean, with a significant presence in Australia and New Zealand. The British Empire was the largest and most powerful empire the world had ever seen at this point in history, and its impact can still be felt today in many parts of the world.
In conclusion, Great Britain was undoubtedly the preeminent imperial power by the end of the nineteenth century, with its vast empire exerting significant influence over much of the globe.
To know more about imperial power visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16780831
#SPJ11
in the second half of the 19th century there was a philosophical split in music over what issue?
In the second half of the 19th century, there was a philosophical split in music over the issue of program music versus absolute music. Program music is music that has a narrative or descriptive element, such as a story or scene, while absolute music is music that has no extramusical associations and is appreciated purely for its musical qualities.
In the second half of the 19th century, there was a philosophical split in music over the issue of program music versus absolute music. Program music is music that has a narrative or descriptive element, such as a story or scene, while absolute music is music that has no extramusical associations and is appreciated purely for its musical qualities. The debate over program versus absolute music was largely led by two prominent composers: Richard Wagner, who championed program music, and Johannes Brahms, who believed in absolute music. Wagner believed that music should be used to express a story or emotion, while Brahms argued that music should be appreciated for its inherent musical qualities and should not rely on an external narrative. This philosophical divide had a significant impact on the direction of classical music in the late 19th century and continues to influence music composition and interpretation today.
To know more about philosophical visit:
https://brainly.com/question/715989
#SPJ11
were the terms of the treaty of versailles fair to the germans? (agree and disagree) (10 mark question, please answer in essay form)! :)
Answer:No.
Explanation: The Treaty Of Versailles was meant to stop Germany from having any more wars. so the Entente Placed Very Harsh Terms.
EG. 100,000 Troops only. No Armored cars, and Very little factories to produce firearms and other.
-Pay a unbelievable amount of money,
- Give Up All Overseas Territory To The Entente.
Imagine seen with children playing with german mark*
This is also the cause for Adolf Hitler To Rise To Power And start his “thousand” year reich.