Ulani suggests that she's appearing as an agent on behalf of an unidentified clientm-Thoroughbred Stallions, LLC- whilst she enters right into a agreement with Shana. Liability to Shana for nonperformance of the agreement can be imposed on a partially disclosed major.
A in part disclosed major is one whose agent well-known shows that he has a major, however does now no longer monitor the major's identity. This idea has vital implications in legal responsibility law. Partially disclosed marketers fluctuate from disclosed and undisclosed marketers because, on this situation, the in part disclosed agent stays at risk of the 0.33 celebration so long as the 0.33 celebration believes the agent is the real celebration.
If the major is disclosed, the agent has no contractual legal responsibility for the nonperformance of the major or the 0.33 celebration. If the major is in part disclosed in maximum states the agent is likewise dealt with as a celebration to the agreement, and the 0.33 celebration can preserve the agent responsible for contractual nonperformance.
Learn more about contract visit : brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
For which group is the U.S.' inflation rate the least accurate?
Group of answer choices
Households in Chicago
Households with only one person
Households of senior citizens
Households with young children
Answer:
The answer to this question is letter B. Household with only one person
Explanation:
Households with only one person because compared to all of the other options, these are calculated and have expected results, along with other reliable data to support them. Households with only one person could be spending money on things they don't need, as there is no one there to stop nor redirect them in their decision making. Along with this, you cannot tell what their income is / what their financial status is.
Like always, don't have a good day, have a great day!
If you _____ and it results in a crash, six additional license points will be added to your offense.
If you Text while driving and it results in a crash, six additional license points will be added to your offense.
What is the Point system ?Courts and state motor vehicle licensing agencies use the points system as a tool to punish offenders who repeatedly commit the same traffic infractions. Although not all states use it, this system first became popular in the US in the 1970s. Points make it easier for law enforcement to spot repeat offenders and discourage motorists from committing the same crime in the future.Having points assessed to your license can have serious and unpleasant repercussions, including:Increased expenses for car insuranceA license that is revoked or suspendedLarge fines, fees, and penaltiesTo Learn more About Point system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26668636
#SPJ4
Write on why people fail to observe
People fail to observe laws because they act out of sheer carelessness in life. Due to non-observance of law they might get into risk of becoming lawbreakers.
They will breach the law due to their prior experiences with it; if people feel the police has behaved them unjustly, people would see it as an chance to rebel and exact rev-enge. They believe their cri-minal behaviour is worth taking the risk with themselves and its repercussions for society.
It is important to observe laws because lawbreaking erodes social trust; society requires order and law to function; without laws, there would be anarchy; and lawbreaking infringes on the rights of specific individuals, including such individual rights to life or property.
To know more about individual rights:
brainly.in/question/4303394
#SPJ1
Discuss supermax prison. Do you agree with prisoners being in perpetual lock-down?
(The definition: A supermax is a stand-alone unit or part of another facility and is designated for violent or disruptive inmates. It typically involves up to 23- hour-per-day, single-cell confinement for an indefinite period of time. Inmates in supermax housing have minimal contact with staff and other inmates.)
Explanation:
Can someone help me answer this questions, I need long answers though. Than you in advanced.
The COVID-19 pandemic-related panic and bewilderment seemed to have contributed to a rise in fraud and identity theft incidents since past few years. The amount of money lost as a result of those crimes grew both globally and per event.
US citizens can do following to prevent ID theft: Keep their Social Security number private (SSN). their Social Security card shouldn't be kept in your wallet. Don't divulge sensitive information just because someone asks them to (such as your birthdate, or bank account number). daily mail collection When they will be gone for a few days, put a hold on their mail. Pay attention to the tooltip for your billing periods. Contact the sender if any bills or financial statements arrive late.
Once identity thieves have gathered this data, they can use it to place orders, access the victims' internet accounts, or file lawsuits on their behalf. Affected people may experience short-term financial loss as a result of unlawful withdrawals and purchases made in their identities.
To know more about Indentity theft:
brainly.com/question/17112484
#SPJ1
Do you feel bicameralism actually satisfies representation for both sparsely and densely populated states? Why/why not?
Instead of consolidating authority in one body, this bicameral system divides power among two houses that serve as a check and balance on one another.
What is the bicameralism for both sparsely and densely?As a safeguard against tyranny, the founders formed Congress as a bicameral legislature. They were concerned about one government entity becoming overly powerful.
Instead of consolidating authority in one body, this bicameral system divides power among two houses that serve as a check and balance on one another.
Therefore, Bicameral, which means “two chambers” in Latin, refers to a system of government with two houses, or legislative bodies, that are distinct from one another when debating.
Learn more about bicameralism here:
https://brainly.com/question/20295264
#SPJ1
which of the following was one way the constitution attempted to reconcile a weakness of the articles of confederation?
The government was more centralized under the Constitution.
How did the Constitution work around its flaws?A strong, centralized government was part of the new plan, but state rights and autonomy were protected.
The Articles of Confederation's issues were attempted to be resolved in various ways by the US Constitution.The establishment of the three branches of government was one of the most significant modifications made between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Power would not be concentrated in a single branch because of this separation of powers.
Which of the Articles of Confederation was a flaw?The Articles of Confederation began to show signs of weakness over time; State governments eager to maintain their power did not show much respect for Congress and did not offer any assistance. Without the voluntary consent of the states, Congress could not conduct foreign policy, regulate trade, or raise funds.
Learn more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
identify the questions that courts would ask when determining whether nondisclosure under exemption 3 of the freedom of information act applies to a specific record or document.
The courts will ask several questions when determining if nondisclosure under exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act applies to a specific record or document.
These questions include:
1. Was the information properly classified as exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act?
2. Is the information exempt from disclosure because it is protected by another law?
3. Is the information exempt from disclosure because it is part of an ongoing law enforcement investigation?
4. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would harm national security?
5. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would invade an individual's privacy?
6. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would interfere with an ongoing judicial proceeding?
7. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would harm the interests of the government?
8. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would cause a chilling effect on the government's ability to collect information?
9. Is the information exempt from disclosure because its disclosure would cause a chilling effect on the government's ability to protect its sources and methods?
The court will also consider any other relevant factors when determining if nondisclosure under exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act applies to a specific record or document.
Learn more about government at : https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
Why did the international law under the UN Mercenary Convention not solve the situation created by the Blackwater USA incident in 2007?
International law was not operative at the time.
Blackwater USA was not considered to be bound by U.S. law in a war zone.
The U.S. never signed the treaty.
Lawyers for Blackwater proved they were only hired to protect diplomats.
Answer:
The US never signed the treaty
Explanation:
Since they never signed the treaty, this meant that they couldn't be tried or have to follow the convention at all. They could be sued though.
a deputy conducts a traffic stop on a car for speeding, at which he then conducts an illegal search of the car without a warrant or consent from the owner. during the search, the deputy finds three kilos of cocaine and $35,000 in cash, and several stolen guns. based on the exclusionary rule, what are the courts likely to do with the evidence in this case?
The courts are likely to admit the evidence in this case as the exclusionary rule doesn’t just apply to what the police initially seized from car.
About the exclusionary rule
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle based on constitutional law in the United States that forbids the use of evidence gathered or examined in defiance of a defendant's constitutional rights in a court of law. This might be viewed as an illustration of a preventative rule created by the judiciary to safeguard a constitutional right. The Fifth Amendment's prohibitions against being forced to testify against oneself in a criminal proceeding and against being deprived of one's life, liberty, or possessions without due process of law may be considered to directly contradict the exclusionary rule in certain instances, if not all.
To know more about the exclusionary rule:
brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ4
the law provides a remedy for nearly every breach of a contract. the law provides a remedy for nearly every breach of a contract. true false
The regulation/law offers a remedy for nearly each and every breach of a settlement/contract. so it is True.
Equitable treatments consist of rescission and restitution, unique performance, reformation. Is basically an movement to undo, or to terminate, a settlement - to go back the contracting events to the positions they occupied previous to the transaction. A breach of settlement takes place while one birthday celebration in a binding settlement fails to supply in line with the phrases of the settlement. A breach of settlement can occur in each a written and an oral settlement.
The events concerned in a breach of settlement may also solve the problem amongst themselves, or in a courtroom docket of regulation. An award of compensatory damages is the maximum not unusualplace of the felony treatments for breach of settlement. The calculation of compensatory damages is primarily based totally at the real losses you've got got sustained due to the breach of settlement. They generally fall into categories: expectation damages and consequential damages.
Learn more about law visit : brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
which of the following laws provides that following a worker's death or divorce, the employee's family has the right to buy group-rate health insurance for as long as three years
COBRA provides that following a worker's death or divorce, the employee's family has the right to buy group-rate health insurance for as long as three years.
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act(COBRA) of 1985 is a standard neglected by the U.S. Congress on a conciliation action and marked by President Ronald Reagan that, containing, authorities a protection program that gives few representatives the capability in the second place medical insurance inclusion after leaving the business.
Health insurance or healing protection is a type of protection that covers all or any of the risks of one acquiring healing expenses. As accompanying added types of protection, the risk is joined with many things. The various types of health insurance contain Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPOs) Point-Of-Service (POS) Plans.
To know more about COBRA refer to: https://brainly.com/question/8891400
#SPJ4
After the st valentine's day massacre, the fbi increased resources to get at the mob bosses in chicago, working hard to shut down their organizations. What was it about this event that most likely spurred authorities into action?.
Authorities were most likely spurred into action by the sheer number of innocent bystanders who were injured during the incident.
What is meant by bystanders?
A chance A person is said to be a spectator when they are present but not actively participating in a situation or event: the shooting hurt bystanders.
a person who attends an event but does not participate; also known as a bystander or observer. A bystander is someone who observes an action from a distance without participating. A person who unintentionally enters a store as it is being robbed is known as a bystander.
The inability to assist someone in need when other people are around is known as the "bystander effect." According to research, even with a parking brake.
To know more about bystanders:
brainly.com/question/29347561
#SPJ4
_______________ is when judges who go beyond what the law requires seek to impose their own policy preferences on society through their judicial decisions.
Judicial activism is when judges who go beyond what the law requires seek to impose their own policy preferences on society through their judicial decisions.
Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint.The term usually implies that judges make rulings based on their own views rather than on precedent. Judicial activism, an approach to the exercise of judicial review, or a description of a particular judicial decision, in which a judge is generally considered more willing to decide constitutional issues and to invalidate legislative or executive actions. The definition of judicial activism and the specific decisions that are activist are controversial political issues. The question of judicial activism is closely related to judicial interpretation, statutory interpretation, and separation of powers.
To know more about Judicial activism visit:https://brainly.com/question/4669219
#SPJ4
when scanning the road, glance away from the road ahead for . at least two seconds no more than two seconds no more than one second at least one second submit answer
When scanning the road, glance away from the road ahead for atleast two seconds.
Reason for answer:
The driver can become more aware of the area around their vehicle with the aid of scanning. It offers information on any accidents or unusual traffic patterns that might call for increased caution or other responses. The driver can change the route or adjust speed with proper scanning.
It is recommended that when scanning, you spend at least 10-15 seconds looking down the road rather than simply at the cars in front of you. If there is an abrupt braking due to an accident up ahead or further down the road, focusing just on the nearby vehicle can be dangerous.
To know more about Scanning:
brainly.com/question/28799317
#SPJ4
Answer:
The top is wrong!
Explanation:
Identify a true consequence that journalists generally face when they refuse to turn over their notes, photographs, or videotapes related to a confidential source.
They are forced to pay a hefty fine for defying a judge's order to turn over their notes.
About Fine
A fine or mulct is a monetary penalty that a court of law or other authority determines must be paid as punishment for a crime or other transgression. The latter synonym is commonly used in civil law. A fine's amount can vary depending on the circumstances, but it is frequently disclosed in advance.
A cautionary sign in Singapore that details the cost for unblocking wheels that have been clamped by private security in a private area. The phrase is most frequently used to refer to monetary penalties for crimes, particularly minor ones, or as the resolution of a claim. A parking attendant imposing a fine for unauthorised parking.
To know more about Fine:
brainly.com/question/15817879
#SPJ4
which of the following elements do pollsters have to consider before conducting a poll that will forecast the election?
A sample of a population in which it is equally likely that every person in the population will be included in the sample. There are four fundamental characteristics of public opinion: intensity, stability, direction, and salience.
What factors can affect a poll's results?The poll tends to be more accurate (with less sampling error) the larger and more random or diverse it is. However, the following elements may have an impact on these polls: the diversity and size, as well as the demographic and questions themselves, which may or may not be objective.
What causes opinion polls to be inaccurate in the first place?A poll can be inaccurate for many reasons; limited options for respondents, insufficient data, challenging intensity measurements, and lack of interest in political issues.
Learn more about public opinion here:
https://brainly.com/question/984649
#SPJ4
The failure to behave as an ordinary,responsible and prudent person would in the same situation is know as
The failure to behave as an ordinary, responsible and prudent person would in the same situation is known as Negligence.
What is Negligence?Negligence can be described as the failure to behave when trying to maintain some level of care which an individuals with ordinary prudence would have exercised when considering same circumstances.
It should be noted that Neglgence can bring about losses because most of the time when people do not pay attention due to negligence, it can result to death as well as other hazards for instance a driver that ignore the road sign can cause accident on the road.
Read more about Negligence at:
https://brainly.com/question/25911081
#SPJ1
a state judge decides that, because a couple lived together for many years, they must split their assets equally between them now that they have ended their relationship, despite not being legally married. he bases his decision upon other court cases in the same state. which type of law is the judge applying to this case?
A state decide and makes a decision that, due to the fact a couple lived collectively for plenty years, they have to split their property similarly among them now that they've ended their relationship, Common law is applied by judge in this case.
No matter now no longer being legally married. he bases his choice upon different courtroom docket instances withinside the equal country. not unusualplace regulation is a form of regulation that the decide follow to this case. Common regulation, additionally called case regulation, is a frame of unwritten legal guidelines primarily based totally on prison precedents installed via way of means of the courts. Common regulation attracts from institutionalized reviews and interpretations from judicial government and public juries. Common legal guidelines from time to time show the foundation for brand new law to be enacted.
Common regulation is primarily based totally on all preceding prison rulings made via way of means of judges in a not unusualplace regulation courtroom docket. Examples of such rulings are not unusualplace regulation necessities for humans to examine contracts, doctor-affected person confidentiality, copyright, and not unusualplace regulation marriage.
Learn more about law visit : brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
How has Congress sought to limit inmate appeals?
(Your answer should briefly explain each of these congressional actions.)
Congress sought to limit inmate appeals the strict exhaustion requirement of the PLRA is arguably its most significant feature.
What is PRLA ?In other words, since exhaustion is not allowed while a lawsuit is pending, all of a prisoner's claims must be exhausted administratively before a lawsuit is even filed. Case dismissal may occur if this is not done.
Since each state is free to design its own administrative procedure for resolving prisoner complaints, the PLRA leaves open the question of what administrative remedies the states must offer to convicts. Whatever the method, the Supreme Court has ruled that inmates must follow the rules before launching a lawsuit.
Learn more about PRLA here
https://brainly.com/question/9717897
# SPJ 1
To avoid issues with evidence collection,
what do you think should be done about the scene? Explain.
Who should be brought in immediately? Why?
• Where should you look for the owner of the property? Why?
Evidence that has been preserved can assist close cases and clear the guilty. It is crucial to preserve biological evidence from crime scenes because, when a case is reviewed, DNA can offer the strongest indication of guilt or innocence.
The scene should be meticulously kept to protect any evidence if it has to be inspected as part of a criminal inquiry. Simple activities, like wiping off equipment after an event, may have unexpected consequences that harm or destroy evidence.Public property records, deeds, and other information that can be used to identify the owner of a piece of property are available at the county clerk's office. This will not only reveal who owns a home, but your county recorder might also be able to shed some light on the property's past.The first two parts deals with the the first question of evidence and the last bullet point deals with the question of owner of property.
Refer here to learn more about owner of property: https://brainly.com/question/25734244
#SPJ1
Imagine the federal government has a national debt of $12. 6 trillion. Congress's budget for the coming year includes a spending projection of $5. 1 trillion. Tax revenue is expected to be $4. 8 billion. Which fiscal policy should congress adopt to avoid increasing the national debt?.
Given that tax revenue is expected to be less than spending for the coming year, congress should adopt a fiscal policy of austerity in order to avoid increasing the national debt.
This would involve reducing government spending in order to bring it in line with tax revenue. This would likely involve making cuts to government programs and services, which could be controversial and politically difficult to implement.
However, it would be necessary in order to avoid adding to the already large national debt.There are a few options that Congress could adopt to avoid increasing the national debt. One option would be to cut spending by $300 billion. This could be done by reducing the budget for each government department and agency.
Another option would be to increase taxes by $300 billion. This could be done by increasing the marginal tax rates for individuals and businesses, or by instituting new taxes. Finally, Congress could adopt a combination of spending cuts and tax increases to avoid increasing the national debt.
Learn more about national debt at : https://brainly.com/question/22684204
#SPJ4
Speculate on the different social dynamics behind lower - class drug use and middle -class drug use. For example , are there likely to be differences in motivation for use ? In the way individuals are introduced to drugs ? In the consequences for drug use ?
a primary in which the voters indicate their choice for office, but actual selection is left to party elites
Religion, class, and gender are the three cleavage-based voting factors that are the focus of research. First, choosing a party is frequently influenced by one's religious beliefs.
What are ideological groups called?A political party is a group of people who compete for political offices.A political party competes in elections under a common banner.A political party can be thought of as merely the group of candidates who run for office under the banner of the party.
How do various political parties select their candidates?Currently, candidates participate in a series of state primaries and caucuses where, depending on the number of votes they receive, they are given a certain number of delegates to vote for at their party's convention.
Learn more about political party here:
https://brainly.com/question/1860138
#SPJ4
How can anticipatory labeling of students as future prisoners in need of coercive control or exclusion create a self-fulfilling prophecy ? Think about what happens to troubled students if they are kicked out of school? What do their future prospects look like?
Labelling theory holds that if a teacher labels a pupil a certain way, they will accept that label and it will become true. The labels which teachers give to pupils can influence the construction and development of students’ identities, or self-concepts
what is Labelling theory ?
The labeling theory suggests that people receive labels from how others have perspective of their tendencies or behaviors. Each individual is aware of how they will be judged by others because he or she has been attempting many different roles and functions in social interactions and has been able to gauge the reactions of those present.This theory is most commonly associated with the sociology of crime since labeling someone unlawfully deviant can lead to poor conduct. Describing someone as a criminal, for example, can cause others to treat the person more negatively, and, in turn, the individual acts out.The premise of Labeling Theory is that, once individuals have been labeled as deviants, they face new problems stemming from their reactions to themselves and others to the stereotypes of someone with the deviant label.According to the criminological literature, Frank Tannenbaum's theory of “The Dramatization of Evil” was the first formulation of an approach to deviance that in the 1960s became known as the “labeling” theory.to know more about Labelling theory follow
https://brainly.com/question/11667184
#SPJ1
Pls help ASAP I need a good grade on this
Answer:
Representative Democracy
Answer:
D. Representative Democracy
Explanation:
The U.S. is a representative democracy, meaning that citizens elect our government
andy hired a lawyer to defend him in a criminal case of stealing a car. andy was found guilty after a four day jury trial, during which his lawyer cross-examined every state witness and direct examined ten witnesses for andy. the lawyer routinely made objections during the trial, and filed a motion to produce evidence, requesting the court to order the prosecutor to provide to the defendant a copy of all witness statements who had any knowledge about the case. andy is unhappy with the result and with his lawyer. to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the andy must:
Andy must prove that his lawyer's performance was ineffective and that this ineffectiveness resulted in prejudice to his case.
In order to do this, Andy must show that his lawyer's performance was below the standard of care that a reasonable lawyer would have provided and that, but for this below-standard performance, the outcome of his case would have been different.
In order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the Andy must show that his lawyer's performance was deficient and that this deficient performance actually prejudiced his defense. The Andy must show that, but for his lawyer's errors, the result of his trial would have been different.
To show that his lawyer's performance was deficient, the Andy must demonstrate that his lawyer did not provide him with the level of skill and knowledge that a reasonably competent lawyer would have in his particular circumstances. The Andy must also show that his lawyer's errors were so serious that they deprived him of a fair trial.
Learn more about fair trial at : https://brainly.com/question/15669425
#SPJ4
The common term used by most analysts for a voter who does not belong to any organized political party is
The alteration of voting patterns is a crucial aspect of realignment. In contrast to DE alignment, which occurs when a group of voters abandons a party to become independent or nonvoting, realignment refers to the change in voter preference from one party to another.
The general patterns of voter party identification and election-day behavior are referred to as "party in the electorate."
What is a nonvoting citizen ?Elections in the off-year"Nonvoting voters" are people who vote for the presidential election but not for congressional elections. These elections are held in even-numbered years between presidential elections and have lower turnout rates.
Learn more about Nonvoting voters here:
https://brainly.com/question/29042121
#SPJ4
which of the following provides voters the chance to directly approve or disapprove a legislative proposition?
A. a recall petition
B. a secondary primary
C. a referendum
D. a run-off primary
E. an indirect primary
if clodhopper resided in the bahamas, her injury occurred in the bahamas, and there were no forum selection or choice of law clauses in her ticket, a florida court considering her lawsuit against shady cruises might invoke the doctrine of forum non conveniens which is defined as
The doctrine of forum non conveniens is a legal principle that allows a court to dismiss a case if it is not the most convenient forum for the parties involved.
This principle is based on the idea that courts should adjudicate cases where it will be most fair and efficient for all parties involved. If a court finds that another forum would be more convenient for the parties, it may dismiss the case and allow the parties to litigate in that other forum.
The doctrine of forum non conveniens is a legal principle that allows a court to dismiss a case if it is not the most convenient forum for the parties involved. This principle is based on the idea that courts should adjudicate cases where it will be most fair and efficient for all parties involved. If a court finds that another forum would be more convenient for the parties, it may dismiss the case and allow the parties to litigate in that other forum.
Learn more about courts at : https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4