find the domain of the function. (enter your answer using interval notation.) h(x) = x − 3 x(x − 7)

Based on the given equation, the population of the country in the year 2000 should be approximately 3,167,277 (option D).

The equation log(population) = -13.5 + 0.01 x (year) represents a logarithmic regression model for the population of a country. The equation relates the logarithm (base 10) of the population to the year.

To find the population in the year 2000, we substitute the year value (2000) into the equation. Plugging in x = 2000, we have:

log(population) = -13.5 + 0.01 x 2000

log(population) = -13.5 + 20

log(population) = 6.5

To find the population, we need to take the antilogarithm of both sides to undo the logarithm:

population = 10^(6.5)

Evaluating this expression, we find that the population of the country in the year 2000 should be approximately 3,167,277 (option D).

Therefore, the correct answer is D) 3,167,277.

Learn more about regression model here:

https://brainly.com/question/28560106

#SPJ11

To find the tax per item that will maximize total revenue, we need to consider the effect of taxation on both the demand and supply functions. After taxation, the supply function becomes isp = (4 + t) + 5q, where t is the tax per item.

To determine the quantity of goods that will be sold, we need to find the intersection of the demand and supply curves. Setting the demand and supply functions equal to each other, we get 112 - q = (4 + t) + 5q.

Solving for q, we get q = (108 - t)/6.

To find the price per unit after taxation, we substitute the value of q into the supply function and simplify: isp = (4 + t) + 5((108 - t)/6) = 26 + (5/6)t.

Total revenue is the product of price per unit and quantity sold, so we have: R = (26 + (5/6)t) * ((108 - t)/6).

To maximize total revenue, we take the derivative of R with respect to t and set it equal to zero:

dR/dt = (5/6)(108 - 2t)/6 = 0.

Solving for t, we get t = 54.

Therefore, a tax of $54 per item will maximize the total revenue.

To know more about supply function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28708595

#SPJ11

Answer:

please see detailed answers below

Step-by-step explanation:

we can work these out with z scores and use of a z-table.

formula is z = (X - υ) / σ, where X is test statistic, υ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

a)  z = (X - υ) / σ

= (235 - 204) / 55 = 0.5636.

now go to a z-table. find +0.5 along left column. now find 0.06 on top row. look where these two meet on the table. number is 0.71226. this is area to the left of z = 0.5636. since we want to find probability of at least $235, we need area to the right.

*total area under a normal curve always = 1.

so, area to the right is 1 - 0.71226 = 0.2877 = p(at least $235).

b)  z = (X - υ) / σ

= (120 - 204) / 55 = -1.527.

we find just like in part a). area for this z-score is 0.6301, to the left.

p(< $120) = 0.6301.

c) for $300:

z = (X - υ) / σ

= (300 - 204) / 55 = 1.745.

area to left is 0.95950.

for $210:

z = (X - υ) / σ

= (210 - 204) / 55 = 0.109.

area to left = 0.54380.

p($210 < Z < $300) = p($300) - p($210)

= 0.95950 - 0.54380

= 0.4157.

d) top 10% means we need z area of 0.9.

z-score for that is 1.285.

z = (X - υ) / σ

1.285 = (X - 204) / 55

X - 204 = 1.285(55) = 70.675

X = 70.675 + 204

= 274.675

so cost of 10% most expensive is $274.68 (to nearest cent).

False. A vertical line drawn through a normal distribution at z = 1.25 will not separate the distribution into two sections with a proportion of 0.1056 in the smaller section.

In a normal distribution, the area under the curve represents probabilities, and the total area under the curve is equal to 1. The proportion in any specific section of the distribution is represented by the area under the curve within that section. However, the exact proportion will depend on the specific value of z and the distribution's parameters.

When looking up a proportion in a standard normal distribution table, the table typically provides the area to the left of a given z-score. In this case, if we look up a z-score of 1.25 in the table, we find that the proportion to the left of z = 1.25 is approximately 0.8944. Therefore, the proportion in the smaller section (to the left of z = 1.25) would be 0.8944, not 0.1056. The proportion in the larger section (to the right of z = 1.25) would be 1 - 0.8944 = 0.1056.

Learn more about distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

In simple linear regression, the predictor variable is the independent variable, which is used to predict the value of the dependent variable. It is also referred to as the explanatory variable, as it is used to explain the variability in the response variable.

For example, in a study that examines the relationship between the hours studied and exam scores, the predictor variable is the number of hours studied, and the dependent variable is the exam score.

The predictor variable is plotted on the x-axis, while the dependent variable is plotted on the y-axis in a scatter plot. The relationship between the predictor and the dependent variable is represented by a straight line, which is determined by the regression equation.

The slope of the line represents the change in the dependent variable for each unit change in the predictor variable.

In summary, the predictor variable is the variable that is used to predict or explain the changes in the dependent variable in simple linear regression.

To know more about linear regression refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13328200#

#SPJ11

Answer: A scatterplot with a correlation coefficient closest to r = –1 would have a strong negative linear relationship between the two variables. In other words, as one variable increases, the other variable decreases in a nearly straight line.

Visually, this would appear as a tightly clustered set of points that slope downwards from left to right, with little to no scatter or deviation from the line of best fit.

The scatterplot would show a clear and strong negative correlation, with most if not all of the points falling close to the line of best fit. The further the points are from the line, the weaker the correlation.

So, the scatterplot that has a correlation coefficient closest to r = –1 would be the one that shows a strong negative linear relationship between the two variables with little to no scatter or deviation from the line of best fit.

Step-by-step explanation: :)

Dennett is a philosopher of mind who developed the idea of the intentional stance(a).

Dennett, a philosopher of mind, introduced the concept of the intentional stance. This perspective suggests that when interpreting the behavior of other entities, whether human or non-human, we can attribute intentions, beliefs, and desires to them in order to predict and explain their actions.

The intentional stance involves treating the entity as having mental states and engaging in rational decision-making processes. It allows us to make sense of complex behaviors by adopting a "mind-reading" approach, even if the entity in question does not possess actual consciousness or mental states.

Dennett's intentional stance is a way of understanding and explaining behavior in terms of internal mental processes, even if those processes may not exist in a literal sense. So a is correct option.

For more questions like Dennett click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31987408

#SPJ11

v · (2u - 3~v) equals -18.

What is Distributive Property?

This is the definition of distributive property:

The Distributive Property is an algebra property which is used to multiply a single term and two or more terms inside a set of parentheses.

For example:

3 (2+4)

According to the distributive property, you first have to add these two numbers (2+4 = 6) and then multiply the result 6 by 3 = 18.

To find v · (2u - 3~v), we can use the properties of the dot product and the given information.

Let's break down the expression step by step:

v · (2u - 3~v)

Using the distributive property, we can expand the expression:

= v · 2u - v · 3v

Now, let's calculate each term separately.

v · 2u:

Since ~u · ~v = -3, we can substitute this value:

= v · 2u

= 2(~v · ~u)

= 2(-3) (substituting ~u · ~v = -3)

= -6

Next, we calculate the second term:

v · 3v:

The dot product of a vector with itself gives us the square of its magnitude:

= v · 3v

= 3(|~v|²)

= 3(2²) (substituting |~v| = 2)

= 3(4)

= 12

Now, let's substitute the values back into the original expression:

v · (2u - 3~v)

= -6 - 12 (substituting v · 2u = -6 and v · 3v = 12)

= -18

Therefore, v · (2u - 3~v) equals -18.

To learn more about from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ4

The probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female is 0.160. None of the answer choices provided (A, B, C, D) matches the calculated probability of 0.160.

To find the probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female, we can consider the different possible combinations of students.

Let's denote the event of selecting a female student as F and the event of selecting a male student as M.

The probability of selecting at least two female students can be calculated by summing the probabilities of the following mutually exclusive events:

Selecting exactly 2 female students and 1 male student.

Selecting all 3 female students.

The probability of selecting exactly 2 female students and 1 male student can be calculated as follows:

P(2F and 1M) = P(F) * P(F) * P(M)

Since there are 40% female students and 60% male students, we have:

P(F) = 0.4 and P(M) = 0.6

Therefore, P(2F and 1M) = 0.4 * 0.4 * 0.6 = 0.096

The probability of selecting all 3 female students can be calculated as follows:

P(3F) = P(F) * P(F) * P(F) = 0.4 * 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.064

Now, we can find the probability that at least two students are female by summing the probabilities:

P(at least 2F) = P(2F and 1M) + P(3F) = 0.096 + 0.064 = 0.160

Therefore, the probability that among the students in the sample at least two are female is 0.160.

None of the answer choices provided (A, B, C, D) matches the calculated probability of 0.160

Learn more about mutually exclusive events here:

https://brainly.com/question/28565577

#SPJ11

The domain is [tex]\{2\}[/tex] as it is the only argument for which the relation has a corresponding value.

We are comparing the difference in mean commuting distance (in miles) between commuters in Atlanta and commuters in St. Louis. The standard error is calculated using the sample standard deviations as estimates of the population standard deviations.

To find the standard error of the bootstrap distribution, we need to use a statistical software or tool like StatKey. This tool allows us to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample differences in means based on the given data. We input the commuting distances for Atlanta and St. Louis and use the software to perform the bootstrap sampling procedure.

Once we have the bootstrap distribution, we can calculate the standard error by using the sample standard deviations as estimates of the population standard deviations. The standard error represents the variability of the sample means and provides an estimate of the uncertainty in our estimate of the population mean difference.

By comparing the standard error obtained from the bootstrap distribution to the standard error calculated using the Central Limit Theorem, we can assess the agreement between the two methods. The Central Limit Theorem states that as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the mean approaches a normal distribution, and the standard error calculated using the sample standard deviations becomes a good approximation of the standard error of the population mean difference.

By rounding our answers to two decimal places, we obtain the final values for the standard errors, allowing us to evaluate the accuracy and precision of our estimates.

To learn more about Central Limit Theorem, click here: brainly.com/question/898534

#SPJ11

The objective of a hypothesis test is to "Reject the null hypothesis when it is false and not reject the null hypothesis when it is true."

In hypothesis testing, we start with a null hypothesis (H0) that represents a statement of no effect or no difference.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) represents the opposite, suggesting there is an effect or difference.

The objective is to gather evidence from the data to make a decision about the null hypothesis.

If the evidence strongly suggests that the null hypothesis is false (i.e., there is evidence of an effect or difference), we reject the null hypothesis.

On the other hand, if the evidence does not provide sufficient support to reject the null hypothesis, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

The objective is not to reject the null hypothesis when it is true, as that would be a Type I error (false positive).

It is also not to decrease the probability of committing a Type I error and increase the probability of committing a Type II error.

The aim is to make an informed decision based on the evidence and the pre-specified significance level, which leads to either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis based on the observed data.

To learn more about hypothesis test go to:

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

To minimize the cost, 100 bicycles must be manufactured, and the minimum cost is $0.

To find the number of bicycles that must be manufactured to minimize the cost, we need to find the vertex of the quadratic function C(x) = [tex]5x^2 - 1000x + 60,000[/tex]. The x-coordinate of the vertex corresponds to the number of bicycles that must be manufactured.

The x-coordinate of the vertex can be found using the formula x = [tex]\frac{-b}{(2a)}[/tex], where the quadratic function is in the form [tex]ax^2 + bx + c[/tex].

In this case, a = 5 and b = -1000. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

x = -(-1000)/(2*5)

x = 1000/10

x = 100

Therefore, the number of bicycles that must be manufactured to minimize the cost is 100.

To find the minimum cost, we substitute x = 100 into the cost function C(x):

C(100) = [tex]5(100)^2 - 1000(100) + 60,000[/tex]

C(100) = 50000 - 100000 + 60000

C(100) = 60000 - 60000

C(100) = 0

The minimum cost is $0.

To know more about quadratic function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29775037#

#SPJ11

Answer: A (3,4)   D(4,-3)    B (-4,-2) C(-5,-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

what you want to do is basically do from left to right first the x-axis/line and that's the first number then go up or down on the y axis/line then with both number make the coordinate the x number goes first then the y one

not sure if i explained good but i tried

Answer:

A = (3, 4)

B = (-4, -2)

C = (-5, -3)

D = (4, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

      Coordinate points are written as (x, y). The x-axis is the horizontal axis ad the y-axis is the vertical axis. You can think of finding coordinate points as walking and riding an elevator. First, walk right (positive) or left (negative), then ride the elevator up (positive) or down (negative).

      For point A, we move three units right and four units up to (3, 4).

      For point B, we move four units left and two units down to (-4, -2).

      For Point C, we move five units left and 3 units down to (-5, -3).

      For point D, we move four units right and three units down to (4, -3).

Answer:

[tex]a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2 \\9 \end{array}\right]}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]b=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4\\-18\end{array}\right]\\\\-2a=b[/tex]

Find:

[tex]a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}??\\??\end{array}\right][/tex]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[tex]-2a=b\\\\\Longrightarrow a=-\frac{1}{2}b\\ \\\Longrightarrow a=-\frac{1}{2}\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4\\-18\end{array}\right] \\\\\Longrightarrow a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4(-\frac{1}{2}) \\-18(-\frac{1}{2}) \end{array}\right]\\\\\therefore \boxed{\boxed{a=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2 \\9 \end{array}\right]}}[/tex]

1. The probability that a randomly selected U.S. household has no smartwatches is approximately 0.281.

2. The probability of selecting both kings from a standard deck of 52 cards without replacement is approximately 0.0045.

1. To find the probability that a randomly selected U.S. household has no smartwatches, we can use the complement rule. The total number of U.S. households is not provided in the question, so we'll assume it to be a very large number (N) for the calculation. The probability of a household having no smartwatches is given by (N - 186) / N. However, since N is very large, the difference (N - 186) is negligible compared to N. Therefore, the probability is approximately 1 - 186 / N, which simplifies to approximately 0.281.

2. When two cards are selected from a standard deck of 52 cards without replacement, the probability of getting both kings can be calculated by dividing the favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes. The number of favorable outcomes is 4 (since there are 4 kings in a deck), and the total number of possible outcomes is the number of ways to choose 2 cards out of 52, which is denoted as C(52, 2) or 52 choose 2. Using the formula for combinations, we can calculate C(52, 2) = 52! / (2!(52-2)!), which simplifies to 52 * 51 / 2. Dividing the number of favorable outcomes (4) by the total number of possible outcomes (52 * 51 / 2) gives us the probability of approximately 0.0045.

Learn more about complement rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/13655344

#SPJ11

To find the probability P(X ≤ 3) for a binomial random variable with parameters n = 14 and p = 0.13 using Excel, you can utilize the BINOM.DIST function. The BINOM.DIST function calculates the probability of a specific number of successes in a binomial distribution.

In this case, you need to calculate the cumulative probability from 0 to 3 successes. Here's how you can use Excel to find the result:

1. Open Excel and enter the formula:

  =BINOM.DIST(3,14,0.13,TRUE)

  This formula calculates the cumulative binomial probability for 3 or fewer successes (X ≤ 3) in a binomial distribution with n = 14 and p = 0.13. The TRUE argument specifies that it calculates the cumulative probability.

2. Press Enter to get the result.

The resulting value will be the probability P(X ≤ 3) rounded to four decimal places.

To know more about BINOM.DIST function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28027510#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Question 56 is C.
Question 57 is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first question, notice how PQSR is a square (despite not looking like one). This mean RS is also 6 (all sides of a square is equal) and ST is 6 as well (12-6). Now we can find the area of the square and the triangle: 6*6 = 36 cm^2 and (6*6)/2 = 18 cm^2. Then, we can add the two areas together, which is 36 cm^2 + 18 cm^2 = 54 cm^2.

For the second question, we have two approaches: A) Enclose the shape then subtract additional area, or B) Separate the shape into three shapes and find them respectively. I am going to show you the first method. Imagine that this entire shape is an rectangle with the dimensions 7cm x 12cm (3+6+3). The enclosed area will be 84 cm^2. Then, we have to subtract the 5cm x 6cm rectangle from the 84 cm^2, because that's an additional area that does not exist. The final answer will be 84 cm^2 - 30 cm^2 = 54 cm^2.

The value of the integral ∫7 |2x − 7| dx from 0 to 7 is 24.5.

To evaluate the integral ∫7 |2x − 7| dx from 0 to 7, we can interpret it in terms of areas.

First, let's find the points where the absolute value function |2x − 7| changes sign. The expression 2x − 7 equals zero when 2x = 7, which gives us x = 7/2 or 3.5. Therefore, the integrand changes sign at x = 3.5.

Now, let's break down the integral into two parts based on the sign of the integrand:

For 0 ≤ x < 3.5:

In this range, the expression 2x − 7 is negative, so |2x − 7| = -(2x − 7) = 7 - 2x. Therefore, the integral becomes:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = ∫7 (7 - 2x) dx

For 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 7:

In this range, the expression 2x − 7 is positive, so |2x − 7| = 2x − 7. Therefore, the integral becomes:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = ∫7 (2x − 7) dx

Now, let's evaluate each part separately:

For 0 ≤ x < 3.5:

∫7 (7 - 2x) dx = [7x - x^2] evaluated from 0 to 3.5

= [(7 * 3.5 - 3.5^2) - (7 * 0 - 0^2)]

= [(24.5 - 12.25) - 0]

= 12.25

For 3.5 ≤ x ≤ 7:

∫7 (2x − 7) dx = [x^2 - 7x] evaluated from 3.5 to 7

= [(7^2 - 7 * 7) - (3.5^2 - 7 * 3.5)]

= [(49 - 49) - (12.25 - 24.5)]

= [0 - (-12.25)]

= 12.25

Finally, adding the results from both parts:

∫7 |2x − 7| dx = 12.25 + 12.25 = 24.5

Learn more about Integral

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

Answer:

Solution is in attached photo.

Step-by-step explanation:

The matrix is (a) [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0&2&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

The set elements of (A u B) - C is (a) {a, b, 1}

Given that

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&2&3&4\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{cc}a&d&b&c\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{cc}2&2&5&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

When the matrices are added, we have

1 + a = 2

2 + d = 2

3 + b = 5

4 + c = 5

When the equations are evaluated, we have

a = 1

d = 0

b = 2

c = 1

So, the matrix is (a) [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0&2&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

Here, we have

A = {a, b}

B = {1, 2}

C = {2, 3}

The set (A u B) - C is calculated as

A u B = {a, b, 1, 2}

So, we have

(A u B) - C = {a, b, 1, 2} - {2, 3}

Evaluate

(A u B) - C = {a, b, 1}

Hence, the set elements of (A u B) - C is {a, b, 1}

Read more about sets at

https://brainly.com/question/24713052

#SPJ1

The right-endpoint Riemann sum for the given integral is indeterminate due to the limit (∞ * 0).

To evaluate the integral ∫[2, 0] (3x² + 1) dx using a right-endpoint approximation to generate the Riemann sum, we can divide the interval [2, 0] into subintervals and calculate the sum of the areas of rectangles formed using the right endpoints of these subintervals.

Let's assume we divide the interval into n subintervals, each with a width of Δx. The width of each subinterval is given by Δx = (2-0)/n = 2/n.

Now, we can calculate the right endpoints of these subintervals as follows:

x_i = 2 - iΔx

where i ranges from 1 to n.

Next, we evaluate the function at the right endpoints:

f(x_i) = 3(x_i)² + 1

The Riemann sum is then given by:

R_n = Σ[1 to n] f(x_i)Δx

Substituting the values:

R_n = Σ[1 to n] (3(2-iΔx)² + 1)(2/n)

Simplifying the expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ Σ[1 to n] 3(4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²) + Σ[1 to n] 1 ]

Now, we can evaluate the summations:

Σ[1 to n] 3(4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²) = 3Σ[1 to n] (4 - 4iΔx + (iΔx)²)

= 3Σ[1 to n] (4Δx - 4iΔx² + i^2Δx²)

Σ[1 to n] 1 = n

Substituting back into the Riemann sum expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3Σ[1 to n] (4Δx - 4iΔx² + i^2Δx²) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 4(Δx²)Σ[1 to n] i + (Δx²)Σ[1 to n] i²) + n ]

The summations Σ[1 to n] i and Σ[1 to n] i^2 can be evaluated using the formulas:Σ[1 to n] i = n(n + 1)/2

Σ[1 to n] i² = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6

Substituting these formulas into the Riemann sum expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 4(Δx²)(n(n + 1)/2) + (Δx²)(n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(4nΔx - 2(Δx²)(n^2 + n) + (Δx²)(n² + n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

Now, we can substitute Δx = 2/n and simplify the expression:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 4(4/n)(n² + n) + (4/n)(n² + n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16(n² + n) + (2n² + 2n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (4n² + 4n)(2n + 1)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 8n² + 4n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

Simplifying further:

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + (8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ 3(8n - 16n² - 16n + 8n^3/3 + 12n²/3 + 4n/3) + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (24n - 48n² - 48n + 8n^3 + 12n² + 4n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 44n + 24n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 20n)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 36n² - 20n + 3n²)/3 + n ]

R_n = (2/n) * [ (8n^3 - 33n² - 20n)/3 + n ]

Now, we take the limit of the Riemann sum as n approaches infinity:

lim[ n→∞ ] R_n = lim[ n→∞ ] (2/n) * [ (8n³ - 33n^2 - 20n)/3 + n ]

Taking the limit of each term:

lim[ n→∞ ] (2/n) = 0

lim[ n→∞ ] (8n³ - 33n² - 20n)/3 = ∞

lim[ n→∞ ] n = ∞

Therefore, the limit of the Riemann sum as n approaches infinity is indeterminate (∞ * 0), and we cannot directly evaluate the integral using this method.

In summary, using a right-endpoint approximation to generate the Riemann sum, we have derived the expression for the Riemann sum but cannot evaluate it directly as the limit is indeterminate.

Learn more about integral

brainly.com/question/31433890

#SPJ11

The value of b and c are 15 and 17.

We are given that;

OK=13+7, JL=5+b, LM=10

Now,

To find the value of b substituting the equations

5+b=13+7

5+b=20

b=20-5

b=15

By pythagoras theorem;

c^2+LM^2=LN^2

c^2+ 169=100

c=17

Therefore, by pythagoras theorem the answer will be 15 and 17.

Learn more about Pythagoras theorem;

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

To graph the functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 in the viewing rectangles [0, 10] by [0, 1] and [0, 100] by [0, 1], we can use a graphing calculator or an online graphing tool.

For the first viewing rectangle [0, 10] by [0, 1], we can set the x-axis range to [0, 10] and the y-axis range to [0, 1]. Then, we can graph the functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 on the same graph. The graph should show that the function f(x) increases faster than the function g(x) as x increases. This is because the exponent in f(x) is greater than the exponent in g(x). For the second viewing rectangle [0, 100] by [0, 1], we can set the x-axis range to [0, 100] and the y-axis range to [0, 1]. Then, we can graph the same functions f(x) = 0.4 x1.1 and g(x) = 0.4 x0.9 on the same graph.
The graph should show that the difference between the functions f(x) and g(x) is less noticeable than in the first viewing rectangle. This is because the x-axis range is larger, which means that the values of the functions are spread out more over the x-axis.

To know more about graphing calculator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30127177

#SPJ11

a) Comparing the estimated probabilities, Rory had the best estimate for the probability because 0.6 is closest to the expected value of 0.5.

b) The estimated probability of the spinner landing on 5, when combining all their results, is 0.42.

c) The combined estimated probability of 0.42 is likely to be closer to the true probability of the spinner landing on 5 compared to the individual estimates of 0.6, 0.2556, and 0.5167.

The estimated probability, we divide the number of times the spinner landed on 5 by the total number of spins for each person.

For Rory:

Estimated probability = Number of times spinner landed on 5 / Total number of spins = 30 / 50

= 0.6

For Elisha:

Estimated probability = Number of times spinner landed on 5 / Total number of spins = 23 / 90

≈ 0.2556

For Harry:

Estimated probability = Number of times spinner landed on 5 / Total number of spins = 31 / 60

≈ 0.5167

To find the combined estimated probability, we add up the number of times the spinner landed on 5 for each person and divide it by the total number of spins.

Total number of times spinner landed on 5 = 30 + 23 + 31 = 84

Total number of spins = 50 + 90 + 60 = 200

Combined estimated probability = Total number of times spinner landed on 5 / Total number of spins = 84 / 200 = 0.42

The combined results gives a better estimate than using only one person's results.

When combining the results, we have a larger sample size, which tends to provide a more reliable estimate.

For similar questions on probabilities

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

The absolute maximum and absolute minimum values of f(x) over each of the indicated intervals are for Interval = [-2,0], Absolute maximum = f(-2) = 37, Absolute minimum = f(0) = 9, Interval = [1,10], Absolute maximum = f(10) = -671,
Absolute minimum = f(1) = -29, Interval = [-2,10], Absolute maximum= f(10) = -671, Absolute minimum = f(-2) = 37

To find the absolute maximum and absolute minimum values of [tex]f(x)=x^3-12x^2-27x+9[/tex] over each of the indicated intervals, we need to first take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero to find critical points. The derivative of f(x) is[tex]3x^2-24x-27[/tex].

Setting this equal to zero, we get x=-3 and x=3. We then plug in these critical points and the endpoints of each interval into the original function to find the maximum and minimum values.

(a) Interval = [-2,0]
Absolute maximum = f(-2) = 37
Absolute minimum = f(0) = 9

(b) Interval = [1,10]
Absolute maximum = f(10) = -671
Absolute minimum = f(1) = -29

(c) Interval = [-2,10]
Absolute maximum= f(10) = -671
Absolute minimum = f(-2) = 37

To know more about absolute minimum value refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31402315

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its 56

Step-by-step explanation:

A VERY tall cell tower !

Set up as a ratio

6 ft is to 16 inches    as  height is to 124(12) inches

6/16 = height/(124*12)

height = 6/16 * 124*12 = 558 ft tall

The uniform continuous probability for the interval (25 < x < 45) within the uniform distribution U(15, 65) can be found by calculating the proportion of the total range that falls within that interval.

To calculate the probability, we need to determine the length of the interval (45 - 25) and divide it by the length of the entire range (65 - 15).

Length of the interval: 45 - 25 = 20

Length of the entire range: 65 - 15 = 50

Now, we divide the length of the interval by the length of the entire range to obtain the probability:

Probability = (Length of interval) / (Length of entire range) = 20 / 50 = 0.4

Therefore, the uniform continuous probability for p(25 < x < 45) within the uniform distribution U(15, 65) is 0.4, rounded to one decimal place.

To learn more about uniform continuous probability click here brainly.com/question/13257446

#SPJ11

We can see here that some strategies needed to order and group the factors are:

A factor in mathematics is a number that divides another number by itself without producing a residue. As an illustration, 2 is a factor of 6 since 6 divided by 2 equals 3 with no residue.

We can see here that some reasons needed to reorder some factors:

Factors are an important concept in mathematics and in many other fields. They are used to solve problems, to design things, and to understand the world around us.

Calculating the given factors, we have:

5. 2 × 10 × 5 = 100

6. 2 × 8 × 2 = 32

7. 3 × 9 × 3 = 81

8. 5 × 2 × 6 = 60

9. 4 × 5 × 2 = 40

10. 2 × 9 × 2 = 36

11. 3 × 8 × 3 = 72

12. 4 × 2 × 2 = 16

Learn more about factors on https://brainly.com/question/219464

#SPJ1

If the level of significance is 0.05 and the p value is 0.06, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

The level of significance (alpha) is the threshold that we use to determine whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. It is usually set at 0.05, meaning that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of making a type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true). The p value is the probability of obtaining the observed results (or more extreme results) if the null hypothesis is true. If the p value is less than or equal to the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If the p value is greater than the level of significance, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. In this case, since the p value (0.06) is greater than the level of significance (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30899146

#SPJ11