pleaseee help! I’ll mark you too! pwease !

Answer:

with what?? u have to put the question on the thing

Answer:

"Over There" is a 1917 song written by George M. Cohan that was popular with the United States military and public during both world wars. It is a patriotic song designed to galvanize American young men to enlist and fight the "Hun".

Explanation:

I hope i can help Songs that were composed during the war also served to raise the morale of soldiers and civilians alike.

Answer:

the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life

Explanation:

Answer:

the origin of species

Explanation:

btw u didnt make it worth 50 points HDSGFHSD

Answer:

please I don't know

Explanation:

because I am not taught

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Got it right on Edge :)

Answer:

the answer is:DDDDDDDD

Explanation:

Answer:

a:payments

Explanation:

The correct answer to that is payment which is number a

Answer:

I only know how they were used during, sorry.

Explanation:

Beginning with the invasion of Poland during World War II, the Nazi regime set up ghettos across German-occupied Eastern Europe in order to segregate and confine Jews, and sometimes Romani people, into small sections of towns and cities furthering their exploitation. In German documents, and signage at ghetto entrances, the Nazis usually referred to them as Jüdischer Wohnbezirk or Wohngebiet der Juden, both of which translate as the Jewish Quarter. There were several distinct types including open ghettos, closed ghettos, work, transit, and destruction ghettos, as defined by the Holocaust historians. In a number of cases, they were the place of Jewish underground resistance against the German occupation, known collectively as the ghetto uprisings.

(From Wikipedia)

Answer: a. Austin

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

Answer:

A) The height of the water increases 2 inches per minute

Explanation:

i don’t know  if I’m right

Answer:

use quizlet. go over the answer to each question and instead of trying to memorize word for word each answer, try to convert them into your own words so less time will be consumed and start now dont be a bum

Answer:

Explanation:

just read what she gave to you and hope you remember what the answers were

Answer:

Loyalist and Patriot views compare and contrast in many ways as their views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain differed. Loyalists were people who stayed loyal to the King during the 1700s whereas patriots were people who wanted independence from the King. These two view points differed in many events and were shared in speeches throughout the 1700s.

   Reconciliation was a huge topic during the 1700s as loyalist believed that was the greatest option. For example William Smith, in document 6, expressed that reconciliation is better than trying to gain independence as it was in both countries mutual interests and safety. He explained that independence will further damage Great Britain and the colonies relationship and it would make the colonies life harder. In document 7, Charles Inglis made it clear that reconciliation would restore peace and the colonies could go back to their normal lives. However the patriots, such as the majority of the colony in Malden, Massachusetts, in document 1, believed that Great Britain did many wrong doings which could not be made up through peace.

  The arguement of whether the colonies should be indepenent states was highly debated between the loyalists and the patriots. In document 4, loyalist Samuel Seabury shared that the colonies, if they became independent states, would dispute about many things causing them to go to war against each other. As he explained, it would “turn our arms on one another;—province against province,—and destruction and carnage would dessolate the land.” without a stable monarchy. Furthermore, patriots such as Thomas Paine, in document 5, wrote Common Sense to explain that staying connected to Great Britain would cause trade ruin in the colonies if Great Britain ever went to war with another country.

   The view of the King of Great Britain can also be compared between the loyalist and the patriots as both sides thought differently on his influence within the colonies. In Document 3, John Dickinson shared that liberty under the English Monarchy was still enjoyable while England also supplied us with support in military arms and the pride of their name. He stated that the King would tear them apart due to him being so powerful. Whereas the patriots, expressed in document 1, believed that independence from the King would bring them closer to a well established country and they would not serve under any King any longer. Furthermore, patriot beliefs also included those that thought the King was being greedy and had ruined trade for the colonies with other countries many times.

   In conclusion, loyalist and patriots expressed different views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain. Loyalist views were usually loyal to the King and supported Great Britian’s ideals. Whereas, patriot views were usually regarded to independence for the colonies and to be free from royal rule.

Explanation:

cus

Answer:

It is an unsuccessful strategy because they will keep wanting and demanding more.

Answer:

Flashy is how they portion millionaires in hong kong that show off.

Explanation:

Answer:

Tt had replaced its governor, Sam Houston, who had refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Answer:

the use of a new fertilizer effects the nations production by possibly reducing or increasing production based on whether the new fertilizer was good or not and healthy

Explanation:

Answer:

di ko alam

Explanation:

sorry hehe

Answer:

After the end of World War II, the Soviet Union kept most of the territories it occupied in 1939, while territories with an area of 21,275 square kilometers with 1.5 million inhabitants were returned to communist-controlled Poland, notably the areas near Białystok and Przemyśl.

Explanation:

Answer:

ExplaAn intimate dialog between race and gender at Women’s Suffrage Centennial

Mimi Yang  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume 7, Article number: 65 (2020) Cite this article

10k Accesses

3 Altmetric

Metricsdetails

Abstract

Women’s Suffrage Centennial has arrived in a culturally divisive time in the United States as well as in a high-stakes presidential election year. All this is accompanied with the emergence of Black Lives Matter movement on a global-scale in the wake of the African American man George Floyd’s death under the knees of white police officers. In an “I cannot breathe” America at a new cultural awakening moment, is the Centennial a divider or unifier for American women in 2020? This article aims to answer the question by revisiting the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution and iconic figures like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, and Mary Church Terrell. In an interdisciplinary approach anchored in both historical and cultural studies, the article scrutinizes the split between the two visceral elements pertinent to cultural identity—gender and race—in Women’s Suffrage Movement, draws a pattern of their intersection, and maps out a “double consciousness” (to borrow W.E.B. DuBois’ term). The article argues that the women’s suffrage movement was indeed a gigantic step towards the American ideal of gender equality but it fell short of racial equality. There is a mixed legacy to embrace and to reevaluate at the same time. Therefore, Women’s Suffrage Centennial should not and cannot be a single-issue gender celebration, nor a one-size-fits-all symphony, but a landmark occasion for an intimate and nuanced dialog between gender and race. The article suggests that the Centennial should not only celebrate white American suffragists, but should be an opportunity to make a historic step to cross the color line that has cutoff African American women, as well as women of color from other races, ethnicities, and heritages from the power center.

Introduction

The right to vote defines constitutional citizenship. A century ago, the long-and-hard-fought victory of women’s right to vote culminated with the passage of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on August 18, 1920, thus completing a full circle of citizenship for woman. She could now vote like her (white) male counterparts as an equal and full citizen. On the surface, this is an indisputable narrative, and in fact, has found its way into textbooks and seeped through the nation’s imagination for a century. However, if the constitutional right to vote is a basic definition of a citizen, women of color were still not able to exercise their full citizenship in 1920 but until 45 years later in the era of the Civil Rights Movement, with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson. As one of the most far-reaching pieces of civil right legislation, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 addressed manmade obstacles that had prevented African Americans and women of color in general from participating in nation’s political life. The 1965 Act eventually removed literacy tests, poll taxes,nation:

Answer:

The 2nd one resisted the demands of slavery.

Explanation:

Answer:

answer should be in points or paragraph

Explanation:

Presents a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and responds to all parts of the

question. The thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in one place, either in

the introduction or the conclusion.

Does not present a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and responds to all

parts of the question.

-- Is completely blank.

Answer: Yes

Explanation: I would feel really guilty about it

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The Prime Minister is appointed by the President, who also appoints other ministers on the advice of Prime Minister. The Council is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.

Answer:

in a representative democracy, people elect representatives to make political decisions and pass laws for them. In a direct democracy, people make all political decisions and pass laws themselves.

Explanation:

Answer:

In a representative democracy people vote for representatives who then enact policy initiatives. In direct democracy, people decide on policies without any intermediary

Answer:

The answer is he based the events of the story on something that happened to a friend of his.

Explanation:

I took the quiz and got it correct.

He based the events of the story on something that happened to a friend of his. Thus, the option is D.

A short story is a work of prose fiction that is meant to be read in one sitting and concentrates on a single event or a chain of connected events with the goal of evoking a particular feeling or mood.

The short story is one of the oldest genres of writing and has been present in different ancient cultures all over the world as legends, mythic tales, folktales, fairy tales, tall tales, fables, and anecdotes.

Early in the 19th century, the contemporary short story began to take shape.  There is no clear distinction between an anecdote, a short story, and a book in terms of word count.

Instead, the rhetorical and practical context in which a particular story is created determines the form's parameters.

Learn more about story, here

https://brainly.com/question/29796591

#SPJ3

Answer:

PCR analysis (which mimics DNA replication but confines the process to a specific sequence of interest) is key in identification and profiling now. It’s different variations, from allele-specific to inverse to asymmetric, have all individually changed the world of forensics.

Explanation: I did my own research, this is the best I could do! Thanks!

Identification and profiling currently heavily rely on PCR analysis, which mimics DNA replication but limits the process to a single sequence of interest. Allele-specific, inverse, and asymmetric variants, among others, have all independently altered the field of forensics.

the molecule found inside cells that carry the genetic material necessary for an organism to develop and function.

Since DNA was first used in a criminal case in 1986, science and technology have created new avenues for its application in the legal system and elsewhere. DNA is now used by forensic genealogists to solve crimes that have been unsolved for decades.

Four basic processes make up the DNA testing procedure: extraction, quantification, amplification, and capillary electrophoresis.

Therefore, DNA has changed our world.

Learn more about DNA, here;

https://brainly.com/question/264225

#SPJ2