When tightening the lug nuts after attaching a spare tire, how can you make
sure the tire is properly aligned against the mounting surface behind it?

Answer:

they are bystantders and they should be fired

Explanation:

Answer:

The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions. As well as in the principles of the rule of law. Separation of powers and recognition of individual rights.

Answer:

After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."

Introduction

In recent years, however, many writers have criticized the idea that the United States should attempt to spread democracy. The Clinton administration's commitment to spreading democracy seems to have faltered, and critics from across the political spectrum have argued that the United States should scale back or abandon efforts to foster global democratization.4 In a prominent article, Robert Kaplan has argued that holding democratic elections in many countries may actually hinder efforts to maintain ethnic peace, social stability, and economic development.5 Fareed Zakaria has suggested that elections in countries without liberal values create illiberal democracies, which pose grave threats to freedom.6

This paper argues that the United States should make promoting democracy abroad one of its central foreign-policy goals. Democracy is not an unalloyed good and the United States should not blindly attempt to spread democracy to the exclusion of all other goals, but U.S. and global interests would be advanced if the world contained more democracies. It often will be difficult for the United States and other actors to help countries to become democracies, but international efforts frequently can make a difference. The United States can promote democracy. In many cases it should.

I develop the argument for promoting democracy in three parts. The first section of this paper defines democracy and the closely related concept of liberalism. It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.

Explanation:

Answer:

A to speak freely hope it hopes beb

Answer:

D. run for feder office

Answer: Side lighting

Explanation:

Side lighting is a light that is placed at a 45-degree to an angle of an object to show the detail f tool marks, textures, surface irregularities, polished surfaces, vehicle accident damage and small spaces.

Answer:

Explanation:  The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives.  Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.

Answer:

Explanation:  The United States has a complex government system. One important tenet of this system is democracy, in which the ultimate power rests with the people. In the case of the United States, that power is exercised indirectly, through elected representatives.  Although the U.S. has been a strong proponent of democracy, it did not invent democracy. The Greeks are often credited with pioneering a democratic government that went on to influence the structure of the United States. Read this article that describes how elements of ancient Greek democracy heavily influenced the figures that designed the United States government.

Explanation:

Answer:

Legislation .

Explanation:

This table breaks down the bills and resolutions introduced in each two-year ... Therefore, the generally decreasing number of bills enacted into law does not reflect ... Congress, Enacted Laws, Passed Resolutions, Got A Vote, Failed Legislation ... cumulative percent of bills enacted for December in the first year of a session

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps.

Answer: lying about military service

Explanation:

free medication for all

abortion should be the woman's choice, not yours

if people come to seek asylum, they should be offered a home and jobs, especially if they're willing to work and contribute to our country

Answer:

sovereignty, land, population, and government.

Answer:

The nation state is a system of organization defined by geography, politics, and culture. The nation is cultural identity that is shared by the people, and the state is the governing administration. A nation state must have a shared national identity, physical borders, and a single government.

Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up

Answer:

the country is divided!!!

Explanation:

some shops want to open up and others are closing down. the government is making it look like a bigger issue than it really is.  all this is hurting little business and all the people people are afraid of going outside you have to wear a mask when you meet people all this is unnecessary.  

Answer:

put your hands up with your pome facing them

Explanation:

Answer:

In the United States, state police power comes from the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which gives states the rights and powers "not delegated to the United States." States are thus granted the power to establish and enforce laws protecting the welfare, safety, and health of the public.

Explanation:

Answer: I would say Damage

Explanation: cause if the suspect or murder damage somethin with their own hands their would be fingerprints on them

Answer:

D.Adversarial

Explanation:

Answer:

Adversarial

Explanation:

"The American legal system is known as an adversarial due process system. In order to understand what this means, it is helpful to take each term on its own. Once you understand each term, you can combine them to understand what this description of the American legal system truly means. Adversarial means that, within the context of a court case, the two sides are adversaries, or opponents. "

The documentation of movement and location of physical evidence best describes the chain of custody.

Learn more about chain of custody:

https://brainly.com/question/17899853

Answer:

C. He insisted on the right of the accused to have a defense lawyer.

Explanation:

Answer: c.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. crime is too widely dispersed for a limited number of police officers and vigilantes

Explanation:

I think it's A because we don't have much police officers that are always available to help others and they don't always come on time. So in conclusion this is a ineffective crime prevention strategy. -I hope this helped answer your question.

Answer:

no nobody should take anybody's life leave that to the lord

Explanation:

SWAT officers are the officers who specialize in high-risk tasks such as tactical entry.

Tactical entry is a kind of making an entry into a planned building in high-risk situations with arms and ammunition.

In the US country, SWAT officers are a team of officials who enforce laws by using specialized equipment and tactical entries. SWAT stands for Special Weapons and Tactics.

Therefore, the officers who are engaged in high-risk tasks are the SWAT officers.

Learn more about the SWAT officers in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/14665659

#SPJ1

Answer:

Medicare for All would guarantee that everyone in the U.S. can get the health care they need regardless of their ability to pay. They would be able to receive that care with the doctor or hospital of their choice, as there would be no more out-of-network care. a company would spend the same amount for healthcare on a low-wage employee and an executive, possibly leading to lost wages that disproportionately affects those with smaller paychecks

hope this helps u

Answer:

who should i be??? idek

Explanation:

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

Answer:

yeah...

Explanation:

its the hard truth. I should have known that gave you my heart but you messed around and broke that.

Answer:

a deck of cards.

Explanation:

Answer:

I need help with this,

Explanation:

How has the American model of democracy affected the cause of civil rights around the world? (I need a CONCLUSION for this question)