Answer:
FCCExplanation:
I hope it's helpful for you
Often times, ___
killed in alcohol-related crashes.
A. no one is
B. only the guilty party is
C. passengers
Answer:
I think it's C.passengers
Often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is passenger?A passenger is a person who travels in a vehicle but has no responsibility for the chores required for that vehicle to arrive at its destination or to run the vehicle in any other way. A passenger is not a steward. A passenger is someone who travels in a transportation such as a bus, boat, or plane but is not operating it or working on it.
Young people, according to statistics, are the most vulnerable to intoxicated driving. Passengers are frequently killed in alcohol-related accidents. Other typical injuries caused by alcohol drinking include falls and fire burns. Falls, in particular, are the greatest cause of fatal and non - fatal injury in the United States. As inebriated over the legal limit, the probability of falling increases 60-fold when compared to a sober individual.
As a result, the often times, passengers killed in alcohol-related crashes. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on passengers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/199361
#SPJ2
There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
Answer:
the 2 types are Visual and Manual drivers
Answer:
There are three main types of distraction:
Visual: taking your eyes off the road. Manual: taking your hands off the wheel. Cognitive: taking your mind off driving.Explanation:
Hope it helps^^
orange zest or star frost? PLEASE HELP I NEED IT
Answer:
Starfrost
Explanation:
<3
Answer:
Orange Zest
Explanation:
<3 ( ' o ')
A
is a one-on-one identification procedure. The suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm
B:
identity.
IP
A
Lineup
8
B Showup
C Pretrial examination
D
Bringup
Under the 1 -1 identification procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.
The 1 -1 identification procedure is a procedure used by the police to test the ability of witnesses to identify a person they have seen on a previous occasion.
Hence, under this procedure, the suspect is brought to a witness so the witness can confirm the witness identity.Therefore, the Option A. is correct.
Read more about 1 -1 identification procedure:
brainly.com/question/17939627
Type the correct answer in the box Spell all words correctly
Which type of agreement have the defense and prosecution entered in the given scenario?
Mervin has been accused of committing burglary. His defense attorney, Robert, has realized that his client has a weak case, Robert has thus
advised Mervin to state he has committed the crime in return, the prosecution has agreed to offer Mervin a lighter sentence. The defense and
prosecution have thus entered a
agreement
Pleasantville police officers Fred and Barney were dispatched to investigate a robbery alarm call at the Hop-In liquor store. Central dispatch advised the responding units that they had attempted to call the store by phone, but there had been no answer. Upon arrival at the Hop-In, responding officers found the front door standing wide open and a male store clerk lying on the floor inside, deceased from an apparent gunshot wound to the chest. The cash register was empty and the store had been ransacked.
Officers quickly reviewed the store’s security videotape for evidence. The video depicted two male suspects, one wearing a red hooded sweatshirt and the other wearing a green T-shirt and blue baseball cap. Officers broadcast the suspects’ descriptions to other Pleasantville officers, and within an hour, two suspects were under arrest for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. The suspects were identified as Larry and Moe. Larry and Moe were booked into the Pleasantville jail and placed in separate cells pending follow-up by Pleasantville detectives.
The following morning Detective Smith interviewed the suspects separately about the robbery and murder. Detective Smith advised each of the suspects of his rights under Miranda. Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections) and demanded that they be placed back in their respective cells. Detective Smith called for jail guards to take the suspects back to their cells. As the guards were doing so, they noticed graffiti on the jail cell walls. In Moe’s cell, the wall read, “Sorry God for what I have done, no one was meant to die.” In Larry’s cell, the wall read, “I am innocent of murder, I may be guilty of robbery, but I didn’t kill anyone, it was Moe!”
Larry and Moe are charged criminally for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. During the trial the prosecutor attempts to enter the writings on the jail cell walls as evidence against both defendants. The prosecutor calls the jail guards as witnesses to testify that the graffiti writings were not on the wall prior to Larry and Moe being placed in their individual cells. The attorneys for Larry and Moe object to the writings being admitted as evidence. They base their objection on the fact that each defendant had clearly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.
The judge advises the courtroom that she will need a few minutes to review the defendants’ objection and orders the court into a thirty-minute recess. Now it is your turn to be the judge. While reviewing defense counsels’ objection, you must decide the following:
1.Should the writings be allowed into the trial as evidence?
2.Can Moe's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
3.Can Larry's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
4.Can Larry’s writings be used against Moe? Why or why not?
Answer:
1-2-3-4 NO / Who's to say an officer didnt write that inside the cell to have a quick and speedy trial where they are both found guilty but one with a lesser term ? Even if prior to Moe and Larry being kept in SEPERATE cells , this would make it seem more evident that they are blaming Moe for the murder. Larry could have accepted a plea deal to get a shorter sentencing then Moe and only face Burgulary charges indefinite to the counts of murder Larry could face.
Explanation:
EVEN if this is true and Larry commited the henious crime , it cannot be used against him in terms of evidence since when he first got arrested and it was informed to him of his rights under Miranda Law he still pleas the fifth here in the excerpt "Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections)" this is prior to getting arrested and prior to being interrogated , This does'nt mean either of them are guilty yet BUT makes them look suspicious/guilty infront of the jury. This is because they didn't want to be interrogated or questioned.
THE RIGHT REASONING WOULD BE NO UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES!!!what are seven reasons police officers are allowed to exercise discretion in the day to do work?
Answer:
the law should be flexible in some ways in order to ensure that the spirit of the law is satisfied
whether to draw his weapon. whether to make an arrest. whether to issue a traffic ticket or other violation
Explanation:
Deidre McFadden came to the offices of Webber & Associates seeking help in organizing her business, Fashion Angels, a toy-making enterprise focusing on dolls with multiple outfits. She wants to run the business and has few personal assets so is not worried about personal liability. Deidre’s aunt, Penelope, is elderly, wealthy, and adores her only niece. Penelope is willing to invest $500,000 to start the business, and Deidre has $10,000 to contribute on her own. Deidre expects to do all the work without compensation as it will take at least a year before Fashion Angels will make any profit. Penelope will sign any agreement terms, with one condition. Penelope is insisting that Deidre cannot leave the company, stating “I don’t want my money going to a stranger, it’s for Deidre.”
Deidre is looking for your advice as to the type of entity that would suit her best. “I don’t want my aunt to become the target for bill collectors if I fail. And to be honest, I really don’t want her interfering in the business because she can be quite aggressive.”
What advice would you give Deidre?
Considering the situation described above, the best advice to be given to Deidre is to establish a Sole Proprietorship.
As a Sole Proprietorship, she would be the alpha and omega of the business, thereby avoiding the interference of her aunt, Penelope.
Also, as a Sole Proprietor, should the business fail, she would be the only one responsible for the liability when the bill collectors come, thereby freeing her aunt from any indebtedness.
Again, given that Deidre is not worried about personal liability and Penelope wants her not to leave the company, Sole Proprietorship is the best deal for her.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "Sole Proprietorship."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/21203378
In the dual court system, the three basic tiers include trial courts, ________, and supreme courts.g
Answer:
intermediate appellate courts
What is the process of redistricting?
[tex]\huge\text{Hey there!}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\star \downarrow \mathsf{YOUR\ RUN\ DOWN\downarrow}\star}[/tex]
[tex]\bullet\ \large\textsf{When you hear or see the word \underline{} think of the word(s) \boxed{\bf distribute} or}\\\large\textsf{\boxed{\bf divide}. Now that we have that synopsis of what redistricting could}\\\large\textsf{possibly mean, we can now answer your given question.}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\mathsf{\star \downarrow ANSWER\downarrow}\star}[/tex]
[tex]\bullet \ \large\textsf{Basically, \underline{\underline{process of redistricting}} means: \boxed{\bf the \ illustration}}\\\large\textsf{\boxed{\bf or \drawing \ of \ a(n) \ electoral \ district \ map.}}\huge\checkmark[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\star \downarrow\mathsf{RANDOM\ FACTOID}\downarrow\star }[/tex]
[tex]\bullet \ \large\textsf{Electoral district map shows the administration (distribution) of a}\\\large\textsf{region (constituency) over a particular country}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\text{Good luck on your assignment \& enjoy your day!}[/tex]
~[tex]\large\boxed{\frak{Amphitrite1040:)}}[/tex]
Answer with Explanation:
Redistricting is the process of redrawing district boundaries when a state has more representatives than districts. Redistricting occurs every ten years, with the national census. Gerrymandering. manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class.
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
[tex] \: \: \: \: [/tex]
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps[tex] \: \: \: \: \: [/tex]
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, it: None of these answers. Can remove the unconscionable clause but may not refuse to enforce the contract. Can amend the unconscionable clause but may not remove it completely. Can refuse to enforce the contract but cannot amend it.
Answer:
If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, they can amend the unconscionable clause, but may not remove it completely.
I hope this helped at all.
Isabelle found shell casings at the secondary crime scene. What type of evidence does this BEST represent?
Answer:
A weapon was used at the scene
what are the factors of 108 and 999
[tex]70 \time 80 + [/tex]
Operating under the “color of law” refers to _____.
the requirement that jails treat incarcerated individuals equally the person bringing
a legal action against a defendant
the legal authority that some persons have over citizens
the use of police force against a person of color
Answer:
The legal authority that some persons have over citizens.
Explanation:
To act "under color of state law" means to act beyond the bounds of lawful authority, but in such a manner that the unlawful acts were done while the official was purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his official duties.
The PMC industry performs a service that cannot be provided by any other source
A PMC (private military company) is a private company that provides security services in exchange for money. Technically speaking, armies are able to preform the same service. So the PMC industry DOES preform a service that CAN be provided by another source. Also mercenaries, pirates, and rent-a-cop companies do the same thing.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A private military company (PMC) is a private company providing armed combat or security services for financial gain. PMCs refer to their operationally deployed personnel as "security contractors" or "private military contractors".
Explanation:
PMCs specialize in providing combat and protection forces. Their work ranges from running small-scale training missions to providing combat units composed of up to several hundred highly trained soldiers equipped with powerful weapons platforms, including tanks and attack helicopters.
Explain why the field of criminology is considered a social science and not a natural science.
Answer:
"Criminology is a multidisciplinary field because it involves social and psychological components in its basic goal of understanding crime and criminal behavior. Criminology is not primarily concerned with the criminal justice system. Rather, it involves study and research intended to better comprehend why crime occurs." – www.enotes.com
Explanation:
The field of criminology is considered a social science and not a natural science because it uses social trends to explain crime and justice.
What is criminology?Criminology refers to the investigation of the criminal behavior of an individual which is influenced by social theory as well as those from other subjects that are not related to the law including economics, statistics, anthropology, and so on.
Understanding the underlying causes of illegal wrongdoing and creating effective and compassionate solutions for dealing with and eliminating it are the two main objectives of criminology.
Criminology considers crime and justice as social phenomena rather than natural science because it takes place due to situational factors and will be considered as a cultural component rather than a natural element.
Learn more about criminology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10296980
#SPJ2
if a mind reader reads another mindreaders mind whose mind are they reading
Answer:
Each other's minds(?)
But, perhaps, the second mindreader is not reading the first mindreader's mind, so, the first mindreader is reading the second mindreader's mind.That made no sense.I hope this helped at all.
DO AGREE THAT MOST CRIMINAL IN PRISON TODAY ARE WITH LOW LEVEL OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE?WHY?
Answer: Yes
Explanation: From an article, it said, "Within three years of their release, two out of three former prisoners are rearrested and more than 50% are incarcerated again." It shows that most of the criminals get rearrested which means they do not have emotion of guilt so they have low level of emotional intelligence.
What are 10 issues discussed in Article 1 of the Constitution?
Is anyone able to list 10 plz help me. Thank you
Which law gives an organization more instruction and insight into the type of information security plans/policies required
Information security policy (ISP) is the law that gives organizations and companies insight into the type of plans and policies required for information security. They go over data leakage, data breaches, snooping, and control to information.
I hope this helps! :)
Which court system (of the model countries: Japan, China, Germany, France, England) would you least like to be involved with as a defendant and why?
Answer: Try this answer:
Explanation:
An inquisitorial system is a legal system in which the court, or a part of the court, is actively involved in investigating the facts of the case.
I hope it helped a little.
Should questions of social policy be left to Parliament rather than being decided by the court?
Answer:
No,
Explanation:
They must be repeatedly be checked in Court because if they don't the government / parliament can misuse the power.
What do you think is the most important goal of the criminal justice system? Why?
Answer:
The main purpose of the Criminal Justice System is to provide justice to every citizen of its nation and protecting the innocent by finding and punishing those proved to be guilty and also helping them to stop repeating crimes. It keep people aware of the crimes and protects the right the citizens. Criminal justice system ensures that justice will be provide to all irrespective of anything.
Explanation:
What is a label claiming patent protection for an application not yet granted.
Answer: patent pending
Explanation:
What factors may have contributed to the training and overall subculture of the police force in question?
Answer: In most cases, police officers are influenced by formal organizational struc- tures and expressed organizational values and also by informal values, beliefs, norms, rituals, and expectations of other police officers that are passed along through the orga- nizational culture (Adcox, 2000, p. 20).
Explanation:
Fires that occur as result of human action or inaction but without malicious intent are classified as:
Select one:
A. unintentional.
B. natural.
C. accidental.
D. negligent.
Answer:
C. accidental.............
Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
with little risk. Which should he invest in?
O A. Government bonds
O B. Stocks
O C. Mutual funds
D. Hedge funds
Answer:
Government bonds............
Answer:
O A. Government bonds
Explanation:
2. What other things need to happen in order for a new
correctional paradigm to be transformed and
embraced?
Answer:
Deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation are all arguments that look to the consequences of punishment.
Explanation:
the house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it
Answer:
July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.
Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.
In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.
By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”
The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.
Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.
Explanation:
~L~