Answer:
The Embargo Act of 1807 was an attempt by President Thomas Jefferson and the U.S. Congress to prohibit American ships from trading in foreign ports. It was intended to punish Britain and France for interfering with American trade while the two major European powers were at war with each other.
The embargo was precipitated primarily by Napoleon Bonaparte's 1806 Berlin Decree, which announced that neutral ships carrying British-made goods were subject to seizure by France, thus exposing American ships to attacks by privateers. Then, a year later, sailors from the USS Chesapeake were forced into service by officers from the British ship HMS Leopard. That was the final straw. Congress passed the Embargo Act in December 1807 and Jefferson signed it into law on December 22, 1807.
The president hoped that the act would prevent a war between the United States and Britain. At the same time, Jefferson saw it as a way to keep ships as military resources out of harm's way, buy time for the preservation, and signify (after the Chesapeake event) that the U.S. recognized that a war was in the future. Jefferson also saw it as a way to cease non-productive war-profiteering which was undermining the coveted but never achieved goal of American autarky—economic independence from Britain and other economies.
Perhaps inevitably, the Embargo Act was also a precursor to the War of 1812.
Effects of the Embargo
Economically, the embargo devastated American shipping exports and cost the American economy about 8 percent in decreased gross national product in 1807. With the embargo in place, American exports declined by 75%, and imports declined by 50%—the act did not completely eliminate trade and domestic partners. Before the embargo, exports to the United States reached $108 million. One year later, they were just over $22 million.
Yet Britain and France, locked in the Napoleonic Wars, were not greatly damaged by the loss of trade with Americans. So the embargo intended to punish Europe's greatest powers instead negatively impacted ordinary Americans.
Although the western states in the Union were relatively unaffected, as they had at that point little to trade, other parts of the country were hit hard. Cotton growers in the South lost their British market entirely. Merchants in New England were the hardest hit. In fact, discontent was so widespread there that there was serious talk by local political leaders of seceding from the Union, decades before the Nullification Crisis or the Civil War.
Jefferson's Presidency
Another result of the embargo was that smuggling increased across the border with Canada, and smuggling by ship also became prevalent. So the law was both ineffective and difficult to enforce. Many of those weaknesses were addressed by a number of amendments and new acts written by Jefferson's Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1769–1849), passed by Congress, and signed into law by the president: but the president himself essentially ceased active support on his own after signaling his decision to not seek a third term in office in December 1807.
Not only would the embargo taint Jefferson's presidency, making him fairly unpopular by its end, but the economic effects also didn't fully reverse themselves until the end of the War of 1812.
End of the Embargo
The embargo was repealed by Congress early in 1809, just days before the end of Jefferson's presidency. It was replaced by a less restrictive piece of legislation, the Non-Intercourse Act, which prohibited trade with Britain and France.
The newer law was no more successful than the Embargo Act had been, and relations with Britain continued to fray until, three years later, President James Madison obtained a declaration of war from Congress and the War of 1812 began.
Explanation: Hope this helps !!
HELP ASAP all uk is pic
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
c
Who were colonists that quickly assembled in response to the presence of British troops ?
Privateers
Redcoats
Loyalists
Minutemen
Robert is disgruntled with the current political party in Presidential office. He decides to publicly voice his opinions in the middle of the city square with a speech outlining the faults of the party, the mistakes of the President, and the overall decline of the administration. What right is being violated?
Answer:
The right being violated in this scenario is the freedom of expression or freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Robert's act of publicly voicing his opinions in the city square is an exercise of his right to freedom of speech, which is considered a fundamental human right in democratic societies. This right is enshrined in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from government censorship and allows them to express their opinions, ideas, and beliefs without fear of persecution or punishment.
Robert's speech is a form of political expression and criticism, which is protected by the First Amendment. He has the right to voice his opinions about the current political party and the President, as well as the administration's policies and actions.
However, while the First Amendment protects free speech, it is not an absolute right, and there are limitations to it. For instance, if Robert's speech poses an immediate and substantial danger or incites violence, it may not be protected by the First Amendment. Moreover, there are laws that protect individuals from defamation or slander, which are forms of speech that harm a person's reputation and can result in legal consequences.
In addition, the time, place, and manner of Robert's speech may also be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the city may require him to obtain a permit for the public demonstration, set limits on the size of the gathering, or designate a specific area for the protest. These regulations are intended to ensure public safety and prevent disruptions to the normal functioning of the city.
In conclusion, Robert's act of publicly criticizing the current political party and President is an exercise of his right to freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment. However, this right is subject to limitations and regulations that balance the interests of free expression and public safety.
What was the issue in the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education?
voting rights
bus transportation
school segregation
employment opportunity
Answer:school segregation
Explanation: school segregation
Answer:
1954- court decision that declared state laws segregating schools to be unconstitutional. Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Linda Brown, 8 years old, lived 3 blocks from an all-white school, and had to walk 21 to hers. Oliver Brown tried to register hear at the white school, and this was 1 of 5 cases challenging segregation in schools; lawyer was Thurgood Marshall
Explanation:
but to answer you question the answer is C, or SCHOOL SEGREGATION
Think of this as a diary/journal entry about what happened at the US Capitol building yesterday. You can put anything you want in your "journal"...feelings, thoughts, questions, summary of events, opinions...unlimited possibilities.
I will give extra based on the amount of thought that went into the response. (Example: minimal writing, generic, non-specific, no personal thoughts/feelings will only get brainliest. Detailed, specific, thoughtful, full of personal opinions/thoughts/feelings/questions will get brainliest)
Answer:
Explanation:
So this is how it ends. The presidency of Donald John Trump, rooted from the beginning in anger, division and conspiracy-mongering, comes to a close with a violent mob storming the Capitol at the instigation of a defeated leader trying to hang onto power as if America were just another authoritarian nation.
The scenes in Washington would have once been unimaginable: A rampage through the citadel of American democracy. Police officers brandishing guns in an armed standoff to defend the House chamber. Tear gas deployed in the Rotunda. Lawmakers in hiding. Extremists standing in the vice president’s spot on the Senate dais and sitting at the desk of the speaker of the House.
The words used to describe it were equally alarming: Coup. Insurrection. Sedition. Suddenly the United States was being compared to a “banana republic” and receiving messages of concern from other capitals. “American carnage,” it turned out, was not what President Trump would stop, as he promised upon taking office, but what he wound up delivering four years later to the very building where he took the oath.
The convulsion in Washington capped 1,448 days of Twitter storms, provocations, race-baiting, busted norms, shock-jock governance and truth-bending from the Oval Office that have left the country more polarized than in generations. Those who warned of worst-case scenarios only to be dismissed as alarmists found some of their darkest fears realized. By day’s end, even some Republicans suggested removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment rather than wait two weeks for the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The article continues:
While Washington has seen many protests over the years, including some that turned violent, the uprising on Wednesday was unlike anything that the capital has seen during a transition of power in modern times, literally interrupting the constitutional acceptance of Mr. Biden’s election victory. Mr. Trump all but egged them on during a “Save America March” on the Ellipse south of the White House just as Congress was convening to validate Mr. Biden’s election.
“We will never give up,” Mr. Trump had declared. “We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”
It ends with this paragraph:
With Mr. Pence unwilling and unable to stop the count, the president’s supporters made it their mission to do it themselves. And for several hours, they succeeded. But after they were finally cleared out of the Capitol, lawmakers resumed the process of ending the Trump presidency, no matter how much he resists.
Answer:
the way i feel about the capital things happen is if i ere there i would fell terroriz and unconmterbal that people knew where i work and could easy to break in but way did they do it that way they could of march around the capital not break onto it they could of done some serious damage
The War of 1812 and the American Revolutionary War both took place in American territory. What is another factor that these wars had in common? (5 points)
Group of answer choices
They were both about claiming territory
They were both about taxes and slavery.
They were both about American authority.
They were both about financial independence.
Answer all please? tysvm!!!!!
Answer:
lol thought forgot the question
What is the difference between criminal law and military law?
what is the difference between constitutional law and statutory law?
Answer:
Stautory law: The written law established by enactments expressing the will of the legislature, as distinguished from written or common law.
Constitutional Law: Refers to laws carved out in federal and state constitutions.
Explanation:
Statutory Law is the acts passed by the United States Congress.
Constitutional Law: It involves the rights and powers of the branches of government.
The Gold Rush caused towns to expand. These towns built along the path of the Gold Rush were called what?
Boomtowns
Settler towns
Ghost towns
please help if you answer it i will give you brainliest
Answer:
Then people would literally be able to do whatever the want. The world will just be based on opinions and not rules/laws.
Explanation:
What could a person do if they felt their trial was unfair to get their sentence reverse or lightened?
A.
Go before the Vizier
B
Go before the Nomarch
Explanation:
B. Go before the Nomarch
Read the excerpt from "Egyptian Tombs: A Grave Matter.”
From the twenty-fifth century BCE, pharaohs’ tombs were located inside grand pyramids. The pyramids served as giant grave markers; however, they also served as treasure markers for grave robbers. These wicked people would strip the tombs bare of all valuables. Then they would sell the stolen items for a large amount of money. Stealing from the dead was bad enough, but for the ancient Egyptians, the act also threatened the pharaoh’s afterlife.
Based on the details in the excerpt, what conclusion can be drawn about the pharaohs of ancient Egypt?
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
They liked the pyramid shape, so they used it as a tomb.
They thought that giant grave markers would protect them against grave robbers.
They placed more emphasis on their current lives than on their afterlives.
Answer:
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
Explanation:
What is a characteristic that pulled the Greek city-states together?
poetry of Homer
food growth and preparation
national anthem
List these event from first to last
Bill of rights
United states contusion
Declaration of independence
Articles of confederation
¿Cómo hago esto plssssssssssss
Please help me with my work on amendment work I will give brainliest if you help me.
Answer:
1.An amendment is a formal or official change made to a law, contract, constitution, or other legal document. ... It is based on the verb to amend, which means to change for better. Amendments can add, remove, or update parts of these agreements.
2.The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the freedom of assembly and the freedom to petition. It also prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment and compelled self-incrimination.
Explanation:
I will help find the rest okie
Answer:
1). Amendments are formal or official changes made to the law.
2). Some of the constitutional rights protected by the constitution are the freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and the right to a fair trial.
3). If people feel that the government is violating their constitutional rights, they can bring a civil action against the government.
4). I'm not sure what this means.
5). Lawyers have an ethical duty to not represent clients who may have adverse interests. Also, if a lawyer is related to a party in the case, it can be seen as a conflict of interest.
6). The purpose of amendments is to provide a law with the protection of the federal government.
7). All the amendments are important, but the Fifth and Tenth Amendments ensure maximum freedom and minimal government intervention. This is more of an opinion question. If you feel differently, feel free to change this.
8). If individual rights were not protected, people would not be able to protest against their leader or injustice. Without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution would fall apart. Since the Constitution is the framework of our government, our nation would also drastically change.
9). I'm not 100% what this is asking.
Would you have considered settling on the Texas frontier during this era? Why or why not? Give your opinion.
Answer:
The population of Texas continued to grow during the 1840s and 1850s. Settlers from the United States as well as Europe came to Texas in search of land and opportunity.
Explanation:
RIP to all that were lost last year if you feel comfortable to say so say a loved one who died last year
Answer: my great grand mother she died to cancer. She was 76. What messed me up the most was that me and my mother practically lived at her house the last year of her life.and the first year of my life was spent with her, but now I’m twelve almost thirteen
Explanation:
Why did Milgram’s experiment become so famous?
Answer:
Explanation:
Milgram's experiment became famous because it showed us that contrary to expectations, most people will obey an order given by an authority figure to harm someone, even if they feel that it's wrong, and even if they want to stop.
Jefferson allowed access to his person collection of maps to Lewis.
True
False
ill give brainliest
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
yes i do
Explanation:
After the War of 1812, which set of proposals called for protective tariffs and infrastructure improvements?
the Truman Doctrine
The Monroe Doctrine
The Factory System
The American System
Answer:
The American System i think
Explanation:
an Economic program advance by henry clay ,, that included supports for a national bank, high tariffs, and internal improvements; emphasized strong role for federal government in the economy.
Answer:
This protective tariff helped American industry by raising the prices of British manufactured goods, which were often cheaper and of higher quality than those produced in the U.S.
Explanation:
For all practical purposes, only _____ were able to hold public office, since these positions did not pay a salary.
A. free African Americans
B. educated women
C. men from the middle class
D. men from the gentry
Answer:
. men from the gentry
Explanation:
Please help with these two questions from the book Black Ships Before Troy
Answer:
Poseidon
Explanation:
Zeus may be the king of the gods but his only power is being able to throw lightning since he is god of lightning and thunder. Poseidon was god of the sea, horses, and earthquakes. poseidon being god of sea had the largest impact since he WAS the god of the sea and all of it was in the sea.
I will mark branliest
Who was the last ruler of ancient Egypt?
A.
Hatshepsut
B.
Alexander
C.
Cleopatra VII
D.
Cambyses
E.
Nefertiti
Answer:
Cleopatra VII Philopator
Explanation:
Which of these section titles shows that Jacksonianism helped white men?
A"Property owners were the only ones who could vote"
B"Slavery becomes a bigger issue"
C"Jackson loses, but then his support grows"
D"Social changes spark a movement in the early 1800s"
Answer: A
Explanation:
How can young people help fulfill Dr. Martin Luther King's dream for America?
Answer:
He wanted African-Americans to trust and work with white people, to be nonviolent, and to be persistent. ... King, then, wanted African Americans to fulfill his dream of racial equality through nonviolent protest that would preserve their own integrity and respect the humanity of those they opposed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King merged radical thinking, social we and oratory light. His speech I had a dream described a future of America that motivated millions of people to achieve racial equality. There was a mistake. King has been very successful in helping the African Americans to end their alienation and disenfranchisement.
Explanation:
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
Answer:
Yes, the declaration of independence is a big thing
Explanation:
I need help in the First Amendment
you should be able to talk about freedom of religion because we have a right to do anything that our heart tell us to and also it is good for for people to be religious. People might be scared bc to talk about it bc they dont know god and if other people know him so it might be embracing that they dont know him. there is nothing scary about talking about religion it is already safe to talk about it.
HOPE THIS HELPS I TRIED MY BEST
Explain why the War of 1812 led to an increase in American manufacturing?