write a three sentence summary of the most important information about the compromise.
please answer not with random letters! if you do, you will be reported. I will give brainliest
Answers
Related Questions
Example of student-written caption: This is an image of Machu Picchu. It has stone walls. The Incas were skilled stoneworkers. They built temples and walls with smooth, cut stones. The stones fit together so well that they did not need any mortar to hold them together.
Requirements: Write a three to five sentence caption for the following six images. Don’t forget that your caption should:
1. Name and describe the image
2. Explain how the image shows the Inca’s contribution to civilization
Make sure to label each of your captions in your file that you send to your instructor. It should look like similar to this example.
Image #1 Social Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #2 Political Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #3 Religious Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #4 Intellectual Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #5 Technological Contribution: (Your caption)
Image #6 Economical Contribution: (Your caption)
Answers
Yet only one part of my blood loves that memory.
Another voice speaks
of native lands
within this nation.
Lands invaded
when the earth became owned.
Lands of those who followed
the changing Moon,
knowledge of the seasons
in their veins.
—"Ellis Island," Joseph Bruchac
What evidence supports the theme “America denied freedom to many already living here”?
Yet only one part of my blood loves that memory.
Lands invaded when the earth became owned.
those who followed the changing Moon
knowledge of the seasons in their veins
Answers
The line that showed that America denied freedom to many was "Lands invaded when the earth became owned."
How does this line support the claim?The claim is that the U.S. denied freedom to a lot of people who were already living in American lands before they were American lands.
This is shown by the line that refers to the lands of these Natives being invaded and then owned.
If the Natives had freedom, their lands would not be invaded and they would own their lands rather than those lands being owned by others.
Find out more on the poem, "Ellis Island" at https://brainly.com/question/10317849.
Answer:
the answer is B
Explanation:
I didn't get it right because i choose a different one but it showed it and its B on edge here's proof .
Are modern organisms different from organisms of the past?
Answers
Answer: One of the most convincing arguments for evolution is the nature of the fossil record. In many of the fossil layers there are strange flora and fauna unlike any seen today, and very few of the fossil plants and animals found in these layers are similar to modern organisms. This convinces many people that evolution must be true, because only a change in life forms could explain how the fossils are so different from modern organisms, and such changes would take many millions of years.
How can one explain this feature of the fossil record in a creationist framework, especially from a young earth viewpoint? If life has only existed on earth for six thousand years or so, how can life forms have changed so much?
There is a very simple answer to this question. Consider the plants and animals found in temperate climates, such as in the United States. Compare them to the plants and animals found in the Amazon jungle, or in a swampy region of the United States, or in the African Savannah. There will be very few similarities. Probably very few of the birds, flowers, trees, et cetera from temperate climates will be found in the Amazon jungle. And probably very few plants and animals from the Amazon jungle will be found in the African Savannah. It is hard to believe that such different ecologies could exist at the same time on the same planet, but it is so.
This explains how the ecology in fossil layers can differ so much from that on earth today. Differences in climate and ecology explain the different kinds of organisms found in the past and today. The existence of giant insects and birds suggests that something was very different in the past. Perhaps the air pressure was higher and some past catastrophe caused much of the earth's atmosphere to be lost to space. Perhaps the composition of the atmosphere was somewhat different. In addition, the fierce dinosaurs would have made life difficult for any modern mammals, which explains their absence from fossil layers containing dinosaurs. Only some very small mammals that can hide in cracks in rocks could have co-existed with the dinosaurs.
Then what happened to all those ancient animals? Some died due to changes in climate, some died due to natural catastrophes, and some died due to human hunting. Also, some changes took place by evolution and adaptation; evolution proceeds most rapidly when populations are very large and conditions change drastically. In fact, under the right conditions, "evolution" (within limits) can take place very fast.
So where were the humans and modern animals in ancient times? They may have been living in higher altitudes where the climate was cooler and drier and the air pressure was less. Thus they would be less likely to have been covered and fossilized during the flood. In addition, the animals that existed in past ages may have been somewhat different than those we know today, due to the evolution and adaptation that has taken place since then.
Therefore the unusual plants and animals found in fossil layers, and the comparative lack of modern organisms in most fossil layers, is not a problem for creationism, not even for young earth creationism.
Explanation:
Answer:
One of the most convincing arguments for evolution is the nature of the fossil record. In many of the fossil layers there are strange flora and fauna unlike any seen today, and very few of the fossil plants and animals found in these layers are similar to modern organisms. This convinces many people that evolution must be true, because only a change in life forms could explain how the fossils are so different from modern organisms, and such changes would take many millions of years.
How can one explain this feature of the fossil record in a creationist framework, especially from a young earth viewpoint? If life has only existed on earth for six thousand years or so, how can life forms have changed so much?
There is a very simple answer to this question. Consider the plants and animals found in temperate climates, such as in the United States. Compare them to the plants and animals found in the Amazon jungle, or in a swampy region of the United States, or in the African Savannah. There will be very few similarities. Probably very few of the birds, flowers, trees, et cetera from temperate climates will be found in the Amazon jungle. And probably very few plants and animals from the Amazon jungle will be found in the African Savannah. It is hard to believe that such different ecologies could exist at the same time on the same planet, but it is so.
This explains how the ecology in fossil layers can differ so much from that on earth today. Differences in climate and ecology explain the different kinds of organisms found in the past and today. The existence of giant insects and birds suggests that something was very different in the past. Perhaps the air pressure was higher and some past catastrophe caused much of the earth's atmosphere to be lost to space. Perhaps the composition of the atmosphere was somewhat different. In addition, the fierce dinosaurs would have made life difficult for any modern mammals, which explains their absence from fossil layers containing dinosaurs. Only some very small mammals that can hide in cracks in rocks could have co-existed with the dinosaurs.
Then what happened to all those ancient animals? Some died due to changes in climate, some died due to natural catastrophes, and some died due to human hunting. Also, some changes took place by evolution and adaptation; evolution proceeds most rapidly when populations are very large and conditions change drastically. In fact, under the right conditions, "evolution" (within limits) can take place very fast.
So where were the humans and modern animals in ancient times? They may have been living in higher altitudes where the climate was cooler and drier and the air pressure was less. Thus they would be less likely to have been covered and fossilized during the flood. In addition, the animals that existed in past ages may have been somewhat different than those we know today, due to the evolution and adaptation that has taken place since then.
Therefore the unusual plants and animals found in fossil layers, and the comparative lack of modern organisms in most fossil layers, is not a problem for creationism, not even for young earth creationism.
Explanation:
Please mark the person on top of me brailist
Which event occurred last?
a.
Texas President Jones called for a convention to approve annexation and draft a state constitution.
b.
U.S. President Tyler signed the Texas Annexation Bill.
c.
President Polk signed a bill making Texas the 28th state of the Union.
d.
J. Pickney Henderson became the first governor of the State of Texas.
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Which future state did we acquire? Hawaii? or Alaska?
Answers
Answer:
Both during the alaskian purchase from russia and the annexation of hawii
Explanation:
Answer:
Important Dates: 1867: Alaska territory purchased from Russia for $7 million. 1898: Hawaii annexed as a United States territory. 1959: Alaska and Hawaii admitted, respectively, as the 49th and 50th states of the Union.
Explanation:
Why is my mother gushing ketchup?
Answers
Answer:
she probably just really likes ketchup packets
Hope this helps!
what was the Historical Significance of the xyz affair?
Answers
Answer: The XYZ Affair was a diplomatic incident between French and United States diplomats that resulted in a limited, undeclared war known as the Quasi-War. U.S. and French negotiators restored peace with the Convention of 1800, also known as the Treaty of Mortefontaine.
What caused problems between French Canadians and the British?
They had different cultural traditions.
The British wanted to end the fur trade.
They could not agree on Canada's southern border.
The French Canadians controlled the Grand Banks.
Answers
Answer:The British wanted to end the fur trade.
Explanation:
ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!
No explanation needed, just the answer is fine. Thank you!
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
James Walker Fannin Jr. was a 19th-century slave-trader and American military figure in the Texas Army and leader during the Texas Revolution of 1835–36.
William Barret "Buck" Travis (August 1, 1809 – March 6, 1836) was a 19th-century American lawyer and soldier. At the age of 26, he was a lieutenant colonel in the Texas Army. He died at the Battle of the Alamo during the Texas Revolution.
William Barret "Buck" Travis (August 1, 1809 – March 6, 1836) was a 19th-century American lawyer and soldier. At the age of 26, he was a lieutenant colonel in the Texas Army. He died at the Battle of the Alamo during the Texas Revolution
He led the Texan Army to victory at the Battle of San Jacinto, the decisive battle in Texas's war for independence
Summarize Jesus’ life according to the gospel.
.
Answers
Answer:
Jesus is the best thing that ever happened
Explanation:
Bible
halp
Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.01 LC)
Which of the following is a "social contract?"
A belief that government has final authority over citizens
An agreement between citizens and non-citizens in government
An agreement between citizens and their government
A belief that government should be divided into three branches
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
The passage below was written by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. Writings like this greatly influenced the creators of the Declaration of Independence.
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power
on earth, and...to have only the __________ for his rule.
Based on what you know of the Declaration of Independence, which phrase completes the quotation?
divine king
law of nature
law of Parliament
limited monarchy
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
Which quote from the Declaration of Independence shows that the colonists believed the king did not support the colonial legislatures?
"He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries."
"He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good."
"For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us."
"For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world."
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(02.03 MC)
Why were the colonists angered at the king's response to the Olive Branch Petition?
They believed certain colonies were granted more rights than others.
They said it was unfair that only one colony was granted special rights.
They did not approve of the high tax that was placed on tea.
They believed the king did not view them as equal citizens with the right to petition.
Answers
Answer:
Question1:a belief that the government should be divided into three branches
Which of the religions below has no single founder and is considered eternal?
Sanatana Dharma
Buddhism
Islam
Ajivika
Sikhism
Please help, I'm stuck.
Answers
Answer:
A, Santana Dharma which is actually Hinduism
Explanation:
has no single founder, no single scripture, and no commonly agreed set of teachings
Why might the English government have agreed to send debtors to the New World?
Answers
Answer:
The 3rd one
Explanation:
A. It's the complete opposite of what the article is about
B. This might be a trick question, but it's not England who needs workers, it's the colonies.
C. This is correct because it states that the colonies themselves needed workers from jails to make the economy better but this did not work out.
Which Mexican general felt the Texas forces were crushed and easily could be defeated after loses at the Alamo and Goliad? *
Answers
Answer:
retreated several times, in order to recruit additional troops and to provide at least some military training for these volunteers
Explanation:
where were women treated more equally during the 19th century?
Answers
AnswerYES they were treated right
Explanation:
Answer: They were not treated more equaly. People thought of them as the most weakest sex.
Explanation: Women and men were not equal in the 19th century. Women were seen as 'the weaker sex'. This particularly affected middle class women because they had no reason to leave the home or go to work. The middle classes took the role of women very seriously because they did not have to worry about things like poverty.
What responsibilities can you fulfill without waiting until you turn 18 years old?
Answers
Answer:
Get a job
Get a license
Explanation:
work towards your permit and license
volunteer in your community
join a club in school
Calculate the distance between Florida in The U.S. and the island of Cuba.
and Why was this distance a concern to Americans?
Answers
Answer:
the distance was 103 miles and it was a concern because of the missle crisis that happend in 1969
Explanation:
Answer:
thanks lol
Explanation:
Why did the American student Adichie spoke to think all African men were physically abusive like the father in Adichie's book?
The student hadn't actually read the book.
The student had travelled to Africa and experienced this herself.
The student had previously had a single story about African men until reading Adichie's book.
Physical abuse fit with the student's single story about Africans.
Answers
Answer:
I think its C.
Explanation:
I don't really know because there wasn't enough context, but that's what I can infer.
Answer:
The student had travelled to Africa and experienced this herself
Explanation:
What term means to stay separate or not expand? isolationism? or expansionism?
Answers
Answer:
expansionism
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
Both but go with Expansionism is right
Explanation:
How may the introduction of the slave data change the discussions over representation?
The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in May 1787. The 55 delegates included many leaders from the American Revolution. All of the delegates who attended were known as the Framers, or the Founding Fathers of the nation.
While everyone agreed that the United States needed a new government, there was a big disagreement on what that government would look like and how much power it should have. There were many issues that required a great deal of compromising, which is why the United States Constitution is known as a “Bundle of Compromises.”
Answers
Answer:
umm ok but it is a question or not
How did the Republic of Texas guarantee freedom and rights of its citizens?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
On March 2, 1836, Texas declared itself an independent republic because of a lack of support in the United States for the Texas Revolution.The Texas Constitution also protected the right to own slaves and prohibited "Indians" and "Africans" from living freely in the country and from becoming Texan citizens.
PLZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Direct Democracy is made up of what two principles? (Must choose 2 answers)
Consent of the Governed
Minority rules
Majority rules
Rule of Law
All men vote
Limited Government
Answers
Answer:
1, 3, 6
Explanation:
Use impressment in a sentence about Washington’s presidency.
Answers
Answer:
During Washington's presidency, some British sailors off the coast of America were practicing impressment, in which they would force Americans to work on British ships. ... Washington made treaties to avoid problems.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Which of the religions below has no single founder and is considered eternal?
Sanatana Dharma
Buddhism
Islam
Ajivika
Sikhism
(25 points) NO TROLLS
Answers
Answer:
A, sanatana dharma which is actually Hinduism
Explanation:
has no single founder, no single scripture, and no commonly agreed set of teachings
how was the dakota reservation 1851-1863 important
Answers
Answer:
Between it and the Treaty of Mendota, the Dakota were to cede 35 million acres of land at 12 cents an acre in exchange for $3,750,000 to be paid over time—money that they never received.
Explanation:
hope this helps
what provided James madison with motivation in writing the bill of rights?
Answers
Answer:
In 1785, Madison had written one of the most significant essays regarding separation of religion and government (often referred to as the separation of church and state), which no doubt gave him inspiration for some of the Bill of Rights.
Madison envisioned a bill of rights that would have prevented both the federal government and the states from violating basic liberties. The Bill of Rights as ultimately ratified restricted only the federal government.
PLS give me brainliestwhich job did spanish king charles III assign to marques de rubi
this is a multiple choice question if you know the question please anwser
Answers
Charles III implemented extensive changes as king of Spain to provide revenue to the crown and fortify the empire against outside attacks.
What Spanish king Charles III assign to marques de rubi?As part of his reforms, Charles III also gave the Marques de Rub the task of inspecting and making recommendations for improvements.
He encouraged science and academic research, modernized agriculture, and trade and commerce. He also reformed land tenure.
Rub proposed building fifteen presidios in a line across the frontier, leaving only Santa Fe and San Antonio beyond the line.
He also suggested that the best way to reduce the threat of Comanche invasions in Texas would be to forge agreements with them against the local Apache tribes.
Therefore, Spanish king Charles III assign to marques de rubi.
Learn more about king Charles III here:
https://brainly.com/question/17836633
#SPJ5
Help C:...................... . . .. .
Answers
When Great Britain won the French and Indian war they became the only Colonial Power in North America
true or false
Answers
Answer:
I think it's false
Explanation:
What does the phrase out of the woods mean?
Thank you so so much!
Answers
Option D. To be safe from danger
Out of the woods means to be safe from danger.
Reason:In the woods may refer to a person who's in the forest, lost. We all know about the dangers of getting lost in the woods.
So, Out of the woods means to be safe from danger.